Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

emg

Why Do More Than 90% of Traders Lose?

how about an informal poll of all those who make their living trading? all forms, day  

64 members have voted

  1. 1. how about an informal poll of all those who make their living trading? all forms, day

    • Yes
      40
    • No
      32
    • I don't make my living entirely from Trading, but it supplements my income.
      41


Recommended Posts

Well said Loustrar1...Those are great points. Those of us who have made it aren't heard by those who want the quick fix....I teach and coach trading and have to say that I lose a lot of clients when I tell them it will take time and effort and there is NOT a quick fix. The truth is not what most want to hear. Sadly. I have much better success with those that have not already be programmed by the courses that tout "work from home in your underwear for 30 minutes a day and live the life of your dreams"...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Loustar1 said:
...Hello and thanks for starting this topic.

 

Not wanting to work hard in order to have their financial dreams leaves them in a mindset that makes them easy prey for the hucksters that promise riches beyond their wildest dreams with a few clicks of the mouse.

....

My question is this -- >> What EXACTLY are the 10% that win consistantly doing? -- And why aren't we talking about that?

 

amen Loustar. all great points.

 

i'd like to put your "riches beyond dreams" into a real perspective.

years back, in my search for the holy grail, i attended a presentation on a well know software system. over 100 "traders" attended.

 

the product developer showed how to turn $1,000 into over $10,000,000 using his product. the strategy was simple...buy and sell on signals and re-invested 100% of gains. (compounding the ROI). as the gains piled up, so did the number of shares purchased. at the end of the demonstration i asked him two questions... #1"how can you buy over 2x the average volume and not move the market? ...#2 what was the max open drawdown?

answer #1..."this is just an example..yada, yada, yada."

answer #2...40% drawdown.

 

i sat down, turned to the guy sitting next to me and asked "could you sleep at night with those DDs?" he said..."IF i'm GOING to make 10 million, i'm not going to worry about the DD.

 

thanks for sharing,

peter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  peterjerome said:
amen Loustar. all great points.

 

i'd like to put your "riches beyond dreams" into a real perspective.

years back, in my search for the holy grail, i attended a presentation on a well know software system. over 100 "traders" attended.

 

the product developer showed how to turn $1,000 into over $10,000,000 using his product. the strategy was simple...buy and sell on signals and re-invested 100% of gains. (compounding the ROI). as the gains piled up, so did the number of shares purchased. at the end of the demonstration i asked him two questions... #1"how can you buy over 2x the average volume and not move the market? ...#2 what was the max open drawdown?

answer #1..."this is just an example..yada, yada, yada."

answer #2...40% drawdown.

 

i sat down, turned to the guy sitting next to me and asked "could you sleep at night with those DDs?" he said..."IF i'm GOING to make 10 million, i'm not going to worry about the DD.

 

thanks for sharing,

peter.

 

turn $1000 to $10mil? Is that larry william?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They say that 95% of traders lose.

I think that there are several reasons:

  1. No knowledge and no experience
  2. Desire to earn a million after the first trade with a 100 USD deposit
  3. Lack of ability to close a losing trade

 

Loustar1 offered to discuss those traders who win and how they manage to do it, why not discuss it?

Why do we always discuss the experience of unlucky traders instead of trying to get a bit of knowledge and luck of those who do know how to trade?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Pattrol said:
They say that 95% of traders lose.

I think that there are several reasons:

  1. No knowledge and no experience
  2. Desire to earn a million after the first trade with a 100 USD deposit
  3. Lack of ability to close a losing trade

 

Loustar1 offered to discuss those traders who win and how they manage to do it, why not discuss it?

Why do we always discuss the experience of unlucky traders instead of trying to get a bit of knowledge and luck of those who do know how to trade?

 

Well, by design, wouldn't you expect 95% of the responses to be about why they lose?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Pattrol said:
They say that 95% of traders lose.

 

Loustar1 offered to discuss those traders who win and how they manage to do it, why not discuss it?

 

Why do we always discuss the experience of unlucky traders instead of trying to get a bit of knowledge and luck of those who do know how to trade?

 

EXACTLY...

we generate the results we believe we deserve.

peter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  cipthiree said:
Hello, I'm new to the forum turned up here to aspire help and your moral hearts.

 

From the looks of your picture, I would run and hide if I were you. In a few days your friend is going to betray you to the authorities and you will be put to death by Friday. In a couple of thousand years people will doubt you ever existed. It's not worth it. RUN!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  TimRacette said:
Really, any career path that has scalable has a very low success rate. 1% of all the traders make 99% of all the money, the rest are simply perpetual losers.

 

Tim

Your contribution is worth exactly 1%

bobc

"another enemy"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  bobcollett said:
Com'on Mouse ,make a contribution , not a snide remark.

bobc

"another enemy"

 

I do not agree with the statistic. since there is no exit poll to get an accurate stat for overall winners and loses in the market.

 

Secondly, what makes a loser? if someone is trading futures, which are highly leveraged, and he loses 5k and never trades again. Is he a loser? Technically yes, but does it really say something about how hard trading is as the 90% BS stat would lead you to believe?

 

I think trading is considerably easier than most people think. I also think that it isn't as lucrative as people think. I also think it is foolish to assume that all the winnings end up in the accounts of a few.

 

Those are my contributions.

 

If you read closely, there is a positive message there.

 

 

MM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  MightyMouse said:
I do not agree with the statistic. since there is no exit poll to get an accurate stat for overall winners and loses in the market.

 

Secondly, what makes a loser? if someone is trading futures, which are highly leveraged, and he loses 5k and never trades again. Is he a loser? Technically yes, but does it really say something about how hard trading is as the 90% BS stat would lead you to believe?

 

I think trading is considerably easier than most people think. I also think that it isn't as lucrative as people think. I also think it is foolish to assume that all the winnings end up in the accounts of a few.

 

Those are my contributions.

 

If you read closely, there is a positive message there.

 

 

MM

Well done Mouse

A positive contribution, especially the assumption that all our money does not ends up at Goldman Sachs

.As you say , its not that hard, and not that lucritive.

But its better than bricklaying.

bobc

"new friend"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't read this entire thread but a lot of the good stuff early on.

 

I don't think there's any question that most traders will not succeed. But I would never let that stop me. When I went to school, most of the rest of the kids there got worse grades than me -- a few got better. Same goes for college, and then into my career. I've seen plenty of people do poorly in any endeavor - not just trading.

 

To me we MUST have losers for the rest of us to do well. If it was so easy everyone would be doing it right? Is it our fault that so many are just ultra lazy and expect money and profits to be handed to them? They blame the brokers, the services, the courses, whatever when in reality you'd get a lot further if you took responsibility and blame yourself for your losses.

 

I truly feel if some is willing to work harder than they ever expected, stay incredibly stubborn in their desire, and forget looking at this as get rich quick it really doesn't ultimately have to end in failure.

 

It just will for most.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

put a bunch of highly educated people into a room - lets guess they are all lawyers, doctors, bankers, academics etc; people who might have more idea than your average punter :)

Tell them that 50% of the people in the room are below average intelligence for the room.

watch the incredulous looks and denials that 1) this is true, and 2) each individual will believe they are above average.

There are always winners and losers depending on the measure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I consider myself a successful trader, but I am not full-time. I am a software engineer, but have an automated trading system that I busted my ass on for about 2 years. Been running since 2008 (started with $30K) and slowly added more and more money as I proved to myself (to the best of my ability--via backtests and forward tests) that what I'm doing actually works.

 

MightyMouse said the following: "I also think that it isn't as lucrative as people think". I think I'm starting to slowly agree with that statement as I've been doing this successfully now for more than 3 years. The jury is still out on this, so time will tell.

 

Now, just a little background. I tried to trade (as a hobby) for 10-15 years and pretty much just pissed money away year after year after year. I blew up badly once when I lost $27000 in about 1 hour. I had a 2nd blow-up, but it wasn't as bad.

 

After many years, I finally had a "trading breakdown" when I went through some serious emotional anguish over the fact that I was a "trading failure". I finally faced myself that I couldn't trade my ass for a hole in the ground and decided to buckle down and start to use my software development skills to mine data and look for some semblance of profitability in the markets.

 

I did this for many, many months and thought I had finally discovered something that may (just may) work. Once I started acting on this strategy with real money, I found out over the course of a couple months that I was wrong. It was through this (much more disciplined) approach that I stumbled onto what I'm doing now. But this next step took more than a year of concerted effort (on my part) where I sacrificed one hell of a lot of family time and busted my ass constantly until I finally "cracked the nut".

 

I still had a long way to go, but I finally had the underpinnings of something that seemed to work. I worked another solid 1 to 2 years honing and tweaking my strategy to what it's become today. Even with all of this blood, sweat and tears, I only have a winning strategy that has an EV of .10 and this is all I've got!!!!!! One automated strategy that supplements my income.

 

My desire (of course) is that this will eventually replace my income and I finally think I'll truly get there, but I'm not counting my chickens until my trading consistently brings in north of $200K per year (for at least two years).

 

Jason

 

Here are two charts of my actual profitability since the inception of my automated trading back in 2008. Not a ton of money, but I'm pretty damned proud of it!!!!!

 

Daily Results

http://postimage.org/image/2xst806mc/

 

Trade by Trade Stats

http://postimage.org/image/2xs2rempw/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.