Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

jaysmith124

Psychology Ready?

Recommended Posts

http://goarticles.com/article/Trade-Stock-Successfully-with-Emotional-Detachment/4674012/

 

Trading is very much emotion than what one chose to believe...

 

It is estimated that 80% of any decision made is based on implicit emotion rather than explicit emotion (like logic or reason). What makes trading so interesting is that the trader really has to develop an awareness of the emotions and meaning attached to the emotion pulled out of awareness that are present during decision making while trading.

 

Rande Howell

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It is estimated that 80% of any decision made is based on implicit emotion rather than explicit emotion (like logic or reason). What makes trading so interesting is that the trader really has to develop an awareness of the emotions and meaning attached to the emotion pulled out of awareness that are present during decision making while trading.

 

Rande Howell

 

 

Hi Rande,

 

Are you saying that a Trader should be aware of their emotional state when they make the decision to pull the trigger.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rande,

re "80% of any decision made is based on implicit emotion rather than explicit emotion "

If you have time, please expand or provide references for how you are using the words implicit and explicit. Is it just code for emotions un conscious of and emotions conscious of ? etc. Thx.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Rande,

 

Are you saying that a Trader should be aware of their emotional state when they make the decision to pull the trigger.

 

Yes. A typical way a trader really messes up is when he is actually experiencing worry (negative appraisal) as he is staring at entry points. Instead of dealing with the worry, it escalates to fear (running, hiding, freezing) and he becomes paralyzed. Others will attempt to ignore the fear and jump into an ill advised trade. There will be an implicit limbic memory that links risk, uncertainty, mistake, and fear that becomes embedded into the emotion. It is this that needs to be brought into awareness. This is where self limiting beliefs can be ferreted out and changed.

 

Rande Howell

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes. A typical way a trader really messes up is when he is actually experiencing worry (negative appraisal) as he is staring at entry points. Instead of dealing with the worry, it escalates to fear (running, hiding, freezing) and he becomes paralyzed. Others will attempt to ignore the fear and jump into an ill advised trade. There will be an implicit limbic memory that links risk, uncertainty, mistake, and fear that becomes embedded into the emotion. It is this that needs to be brought into awareness. This is where self limiting beliefs can be ferreted out and changed.

 

Rande Howell

 

Hi Rande,

 

For the most part you and I see the emotional component in a similar vein ...

I say "similar" because you are coming from the Professional Observers corner [ which offers you impartiality ] and I am in the deep end as a Player.

 

That we agree, offers a greater depth to the content imho.

 

However, I struggle with this statement from you, and perhaps I am not reading it as you intended.

 

"is that the trader really has to develop an awareness of the emotions and meaning attached to the emotion pulled out of awareness that are present during decision making while trading"

 

In my experience, there is a place of detachment that a Player can reach.

 

As corny as it may sound, the Player is in balance and aware of nothing other than what he/she is doing ... in this case it is placing and managing an intraday trade... there is no situational awareness of feelings, muscular aches and pains, temperatures etc .... there is only the task in hand and in this case the Player and the Price are seamless.

 

How does a Player reach this place.

It takes a serious commitment from the mind in order to begin the journey that reaches all the feelings.

But somewhere along the way the struggle of the commitment turns into a desire or an interest to see just how far the Player can take them self ... eventually the struggle evolves into habit as the conscious mind is melted into the same pot.

 

Does the Player give up anything along the way ... well obviously TV, the News, Religion, Politics

and "expert opinion" family and friends will never be the same again as their long lost third eye rebuilds itself from the battering it took in early life.

 

What the Player picks up along the way is to the power of ten compared to what is surrendered.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

johnw

 

It's probably a little of both. There was an excellent interview by Terry Gross with George Soros a few years back. In it Soros spoke of an Observer/Participant. He said most of his success had come from being able to develop this Observer, yet it was never fully independent of the Participant. He had never become completely detached from emotion, but he recognized that being in the game of investing he was never independent of emotion. (Now, from my perspective event impartiality is actually an emotion -- but that's another discussion).

 

By being aware that the Participant was never fully independent of the Observing Self, he had built in a check that worked as a feedback loop into his capacity to Observe. This makes a lot of sense to me. And it is something I practice in my life and teach.

 

The key here is in recognizing that meaning (belief) becomes fused into emotion and becomes an element of emotion. By becoming aware of the meaning that is embedded in the emotion, we can deconstruct the ontology that drives our thinking. Fear, for example, usually has a meaning ranging from inadequacy to powerlessness to worthiness attached to it. When fear triggers, the deeper self limiting belief can be seen in operation. This is when it can be worked with. With work, that meaning is reconstructed so that it is more effective in dealing with managing uncertainty than interpreting uncertainty as something to be fearful of. Gotta get the awareness going first.

 

Rande Howell

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
johnw

 

It's probably a little of both. There was an excellent interview by Terry Gross with George Soros a few years back. In it Soros spoke of an Observer/Participant. He said most of his success had come from being able to develop this Observer, yet it was never fully independent of the Participant. He had never become completely detached from emotion, but he recognized that being in the game of investing he was never independent of emotion. (Now, from my perspective event impartiality is actually an emotion -- but that's another discussion).

 

By being aware that the Participant was never fully independent of the Observing Self, he had built in a check that worked as a feedback loop into his capacity to Observe. This makes a lot of sense to me. And it is something I practice in my life and teach.

 

The key here is in recognizing that meaning (belief) becomes fused into emotion and becomes an element of emotion. By becoming aware of the meaning that is embedded in the emotion, we can deconstruct the ontology that drives our thinking. Fear, for example, usually has a meaning ranging from inadequacy to powerlessness to worthiness attached to it. When fear triggers, the deeper self limiting belief can be seen in operation. This is when it can be worked with. With work, that meaning is reconstructed so that it is more effective in dealing with managing uncertainty than interpreting uncertainty as something to be fearful of. Gotta get the awareness going first.

 

Rande Howell

 

 

Thanks Rande,

 

Adding more depth and words to the conversation adds clarity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trade 7

 

100 shares .15 loss

 

I took a break not being able to focus. I will attempt to trade everyday.

This trade was counter to the trend. I noticed that my emotions are in check. The intensity of what I feel has mellowed out.

 

I am looking forward to tomorrow.

Trade7.jpg.fc887e0047f0ba8f997d7c43cee5298b.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Trade 7

 

100 shares .15 loss

 

I took a break not being able to focus. I will attempt to trade everyday.

This trade was counter to the trend. I noticed that my emotions are in check. The intensity of what I feel has mellowed out.

 

I am looking forward to tomorrow.

 

 

What do you mean by "my emotions are in check"? I'm certainly not sure. Here's the way I observe your comments:

 

I took a break not being able to focus.

I look a the the distraction inherent to not being able to focus. Suspect it is avoidance of discomfort. So my suspicion is that the distraction (motivation of the emotion) is an indicator of worry. Worry tells me that the limbic system is heated up by hypervigilence. This needs to be cooled down and the fearful part of self needs to be understood and encouraged.

 

I will attempt to trade everyday. Can't tell if this is a structural problem (job) or fear based (simply can't face the trading room)

 

The intensity of what I feel has mellowed out.

This is the arousal of the underlying emotion. Most likely fear. Fear is to be soothed, not ignored. If fear is present, you capacity to observe from a mindset of impartiality is truly compromised. What ever the fear is, it needs to be understood, de-constructed, and separated from managing uncertainty.

 

Our fears can teach us what we need to learn in emotional competency, but we have to approach the fear and push through it, rather than avoid it.

 

This may be more than you want to hear. If it is, just let me know.

 

Rande Howell

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What do you mean by "my emotions are in check"? I'm certainly not sure. Here's the way I observe your comments:

 

I took a break not being able to focus.

I look a the the distraction inherent to not being able to focus. Suspect it is avoidance of discomfort. So my suspicion is that the distraction (motivation of the emotion) is an indicator of worry. Worry tells me that the limbic system is heated up by hypervigilence. This needs to be cooled down and the fearful part of self needs to be understood and encouraged.

 

I will attempt to trade everyday. Can't tell if this is a structural problem (job) or fear based (simply can't face the trading room)

 

The intensity of what I feel has mellowed out.

This is the arousal of the underlying emotion. Most likely fear. Fear is to be soothed, not ignored. If fear is present, you capacity to observe from a mindset of impartiality is truly compromised. What ever the fear is, it needs to be understood, de-constructed, and separated from managing uncertainty.

 

Our fears can teach us what we need to learn in emotional competency, but we have to approach the fear and push through it, rather than avoid it.

 

This may be more than you want to hear. If it is, just let me know.

 

Rande Howell

 

I meant that my emotions have been mitigated. I still have to deal with what is there. I have started writing down current self talk, and replacing it with more accurate self talk that does not include fear, but reasoned optimism. I have only been through this once last weekend, and I will go through the exercise again this evening. I believe this has effectuated changing my state. (Mindset) But, it takes daily practice.

 

I will be trying to read and re read everyday. Accepting the current fear based emotions, and replacing them with confidence. Eventually, I should be ruminating a new mindset throughout the day without reading it first.

 

Today, I experienced frustration, as well, after I was letting trades go by.

 

I know my fear based emotions are from a culmination of past, and future, thoughts/beliefs. Understanding that mindfulness is about staying in the present, I believe, and is putting me on the right track to trading with impartiality.

Edited by jaysmith124

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.