Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Tradewinds

Do NOT Try to Make Money Trading!!

Recommended Posts

The worst thing you can do is to try to make money trading. You will loose. Try to follow your trading plan. If your trading plan is profitable, and you follow it, you will make money. Here are 4 possibilities:

 

  • Trading Plan Profitable, You Don't Follow It
  • Trading Plan Profitable, You Do Follow It
  • Trading Plan Not Profitable, You Don't Follow It
  • Trading Plan Not Profitable, You Do Follow It

 

 

If your trading plan is profitable, and you don't follow it, you will probably loose money. If your trading plan is not profitable, and you don't follow it, you won't know whether it's your trading plan, or it was your fault. If your trading plan is not profitable, and you do follow it, then you will know for certain, that your trading plan is at fault.

 

The only usable results come from the two options when you do follow your trading plan. The best result is that your plan is profitable, you follow it, and you make money. The second best result is when your trading plan is not profitable, and you follow it. Then you know for sure, that it's the plan, and not you. If you don't follow the plan, then you know nothing except that you can't follow a plan.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

haha...when I first read the title, I thought this was going to be one of those ET-style threads where the OP proclaimed that making money trading was in fact impossible (because he or she couldn't do it, of course). Glad to see that's not the case! :cool:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Cory2679 said:
haha...when I first read the title, I thought this was going to be one of those ET-style threads where the OP proclaimed that making money trading was in fact impossible (because he or she couldn't do it, of course). Glad to see that's not the case! :cool:

 

Just trying to generate some controversy and traffic for Traders Laboratory. :rofl:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great topic TW

Even though the whole idea is to increase the equity in our trading accounts, I find myself walking a fine line between, trading to make money and trading my plan/system well.

 

If I stay focused on trading my system and adhering to my rules, profits always accumulate and my account equity is higher on Friday than it was on Monday. Your statements (bullets) IMO, are dead on. When I first started using a trading platform with a simulation option I was in heaven, but soon I learned the lesson you're describing. All my trades were being recorded under the same pre-programed strategy, and I was unable to decipher any meaningful data as to the profitability of my system. I had to separate my system strategy from my "seat of the pants" trades, only then could I tell if the (two) systems really worked. This may sound like common sense, but give a child a new toy and they'll run the batteries dead in one day, that's me. :doh:

 

If I'm trading my system and I hook in to my anticipated string of losing trades, I'm tempted to step over to "the dark side" and do a little revenge trading. At this point, I'm "Trying to Make Money" and find myself doing undisciplined and reckless things. This almost always has a negative effect on my equity curve. I say, "almost always" because sometimes "I get lucky" and pull my account back up. This, "getting lucky" creates a positive outcome to a negative, reckless behavior and (IMO) does much more harm than good.

 

Now, not all of my trades are system trades. If I ready myself for a day's trading and my "system's" signals just don't come, I often sharpen my knife and take a few scalps. But nowadays these scalp trades are recorded as another strategy and the data can be reviewed and utilized to assess my methods profitability, separate from my main trading system(s).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  $5DAW said:
This, "getting lucky" creates a positive outcome to a negative, reckless behavior and (IMO) does much more harm than good.

 

It's possible to make money, then after we made money, really have no conscious understanding of why it worked. The market may have been choppy, and we were in a contrary mood to do the opposite of whatever the market was doing. You can make money that way. But that would have been a combination of the traders mood matching market conditions.

 

So, as you state, there would have been a positive outcome for uncontrolled, moody and contrarian trading that day. The negative behavior gets rewarded. You feel good, the brain gets wired to do it some more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  bobcollett said:
Tradewind

I find your posts well thought out and knowledgeable

"Your trading plan is not profitable, you do follow it"

WHAT NOW??

bobc

 

Refine it or ditch it perhaps? Or did I miss your point? I think for me there is an added level here if you are self execution your system and not just running an algorithm. If you understand the system implicitly and why it makes money, there is fair reason to veto the entries and stand back. Of course there will be times that when you judge that risk has significantly elevated and in spite of an entry signal you don't trade, the market then proceeds to show you a big fat theoretical winner. But hey, who cares. Because honestly, the next time that situation comes around you'll take the trade and you'll have your arse handed to you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is one of the threads that I have printed out! I really liked it a lot. Forex has many sides but trades have only 2: green or red. Most of the times I try to explain what has gone wrong and my position or my Zulutrade's Signal Provider turned against me. Green trades are kept intuitive on my memory in order to repeat them when the market "calls". This is the easy part of forex :missy::missy:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  bobcollett said:

"Your trading plan is not profitable, you do follow it"

WHAT NOW??

bobc

 

What is going to give any of us the Edge?

 

  • Cause and Effect
  • Statistical Analysis

 

Cause and Affect - Can you determine a cause for what the price did?

Statistical Analysis - Under certain situations, does price behave a certain way more often than not?

 

Then there needs to be a test. You can run the test by practice trading. There are endless theories about why the market does what it does. Some of it is tested, much of it isn't.

 

If 95% percent of traders loose money in the market, then you need a grade on the test of A or A+ in order to make money. Or you could think of it as a 3.8 to 4.0 GPA score. Unless any of us are performing at that level, you will loose money, guaranteed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Tradewinds said:
What is going to give any of us the Edge?

 

  • Cause and Effect
  • Statistical Analysis

 

Cause and Affect - Can you determine a cause for what the price did?

Statistical Analysis - Under certain situations, does price behave a certain way more often than not?

 

Then there needs to be a test. You can run the test by practice trading. There are endless theories about why the market does what it does. Some of it is tested, much of it isn't.

 

If 95% percent of traders loose money in the market, then you need a grade on the test of A or A+ in order to make money. Or you could think of it as a 3.8 to 4.0 GPA score. Unless any of us are performing at that level, you will loose money, guaranteed.

 

Alright then, I'm interested...what is the "test"....what are the test parameters....how many samples do you need in your test protocol...I am always glad to learn new things....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  steve46 said:
what are the test parameters?

 

 

  • Total Net Profit
  • Gross Profit
  • Gross Loss
  • Commissions
  • Profit Factor
  • Cumulative Profit
  • Max Drawdown
  • Sharpe Ratio
  • Total Number of Trades
  • Percent Profitable
  • No. of Winning Trades
  • No. of Losing Trades
  • Average Trade
  • Average Winning Trade Loss Percent
  • Average Losing Trade Loss Percent
  • Ratio avg. Win/avg Loss
  • Max. consecutive Winners
  • Max. Consecutive Losers
  • Largest Winning Trade
  • Largest Losing Trade
  • # of Trades per Day
  • Avg. Time in Market
  • Avg. Bars in Trade
  • Profit per Month
  • Max. Time to Recover
  • Average MAE
  • Average MFE
  • Average ETD

 

There, hopefully you learned something Steve. ;) Come on Steve, you already know all this stuff, and probably a lot more than I may ever know. You are far superior to 99.9% of all the people in Traders Laboratory, . . . and humble to. :rofl: I'm just stumbling along here. Hopefully I'll get some scraps thrown to me for effort.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  steve46 said:
how many samples do you need in your test protocol...I am always glad to learn new things....

 

I don't know what the sample size needs to be. It needs to be large enough to insure the results are reliable. The sample size depends upon how confident you want to be in the data, and what is an acceptable margin of error. Trader's speak of being better than 50% right and letting those right trades attain more profit. A good trader might have an 80% win rate. Then there is the amount of trades that your system produces. The more trades your system produces, the faster you can reach a conclusion about how good the rules are.

 

A sample size calculation would need to be made with those inputs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I do have some acquaintance with those data points....but, I think they are of limited use primarily because most folks do not know how to evaluate the data.

 

I think for retail traders, simple is best, provided you have just a little bit of guidance..

 

For example..what you need is a concept...and that means you need an organizing principle that has a common sense advantage...I like to use a simple principle like "time based pivots" and then you zero in a little bit more....and from those pivots I like to see if there is a tendency for the market to "respect" the weekly open...For me this means, between Monday and Friday...what happens when price comes near to, or "tests" the weekly open...Simple idea right...?

 

In a trending market like we have now, one assumes that when price tests the weekly open, that other participants will come in to defend that price point...and try to lift the market higher...

 

One way to find out if that concept is viable for trading is to go back through your charts and see what happened each time that time-based pivot (the weekly open) was tested...

 

In the popular literature, you hear that 30 data points is all you need to trade...I guess you could start there...although I prefer to have about 100 data points as a minimum sample size for evaluation. Once you have that data, you have some idea of what your odds of success are if you decide to take the trade...

 

By the way, there's another nice benefit for people willing to put in the time to do the testing manually, and that is that you learn about how price acts when it tests a particular price point....like the weekly open...for instance, one might learn that when price tests the weekly open, it is likely to retrace and then "re-test" before continuing upward...If in the course of your research you found this to happen a lot, then you have discovered a nice setup, that increases your confidence in that trade....just a thought.

 

Rinse and repeat for the next concept...

Edited by steve46

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Related to the previous post, today in the ES market we happened to see an example where

the daily time based pivot was hit....(previous daily low)

 

Rather than post the chart here (again) I will simply direct folks to the thread "Trading Adverse Events"...and you can see towards the end of the RTH session that price tested 1325.25

and then bounced (as it often does)...the first time at 10:25am PST, where a long entry would have made a couple points, and then later in the day at about 11:30am PST, where long entry would have resulted in a nice 4+ pts profit..

 

To put this in perspective, for me at least....I have already done my homework so I know what my odds are when this "test" comes along...also I know that I can read the tape...and so I the advantage of being able to tell if the setup is going to work or not, early in the process ( I don't have to risk much to take the trade)....one thing I can tell you folks is that a big reason this stuff works, is that there are a lot of other professionals watching the same thing, and moving size when they see it setup....THAT is why the move happens..because others (with capital to move) are getting on board...

 

Good luck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Tradewinds said:
The worst thing you can do is to try to make money trading.

 

profit vs. strategy?....not a case of chicken or egg.

 

profit is the objective. strategy is your plan to secure objective.

execute the strategy with precision & commitment, but keep your eye on the objective.

or so it seems to me.

 

peter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

re "execute the strategy with precision & commitment, but keep your eye on the objective" ??

 

The underlying thread of this thread seems to be more like

let the objective take care of itself, keep your eye on and execute the strategy with precision & commitment,

... one of the better ways to play most 'games'

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  zdo said:
re "execute the strategy with precision & commitment, but keep your eye on the objective" ??

 

The underlying thread of this thread seems to be more like

let the objective take care of itself, keep your eye on and execute the strategy with precision & commitment,

... one of the better ways to play most 'games'

 

i NEVER take my eye off the prize. i'l leave that to the autotraders.

peter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed. I find that when I try to make money for money's sake, or try to make "X" pips per day, I inevitably lose because I force trades. As if I "have to" make "X".

 

If I just watch and wait for a setup, and if I see it, take it - and don't think about the pips or a certain amount - I consistently do better. Not just a little bit better. Far better.

 

It's totally psychological about forcing trades or not for me.

 

Thanks for this topic - an incredibly well timed reminder!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  peterjerome said:
profit vs. strategy?....not a case of chicken or egg.

 

profit is the objective. strategy is your plan to secure objective.

execute the strategy with precision & commitment, but keep your eye on the objective.

or so it seems to me.

 

peter.

 

We all learn and get ideas as we are trading. So strategy development and trading can happen almost simultaneously. I would not see them as mutually exclusive. It's quite easy to intuitively know how well we are doing as we are trading, without actually looking at the P/L report.

 

I think part of the issue here is the level of alertness that a trader has while trading. If keeping your eye on the P/L column motivates you to stay alert, and make the right decisions, that's a good thing. I would rather just know that I dealt well with my loosers, and made good decisions with the winners, and trade my system, having confidence in it.

 

I'm more concerned with profit as I'm developing my strategy than when I'm implementing my strategy. I don't see much sense in live trading a strategy that I'm really not sure about.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Tradewinds said:
I'm more concerned with profit as I'm developing my strategy than when I'm implementing my strategy. I don't see much sense in live trading a strategy that I'm really not sure about.

 

interesting that many speak of their strategy as if it was the holy grail that needs no supervision. we have auto-pilot systems that are in contol of the takeoff, the flight itself, and the landing...all without aid of a pilot. what real purpose does the pilot serve? would anyone actually board a plane that was pilot-less?

 

i don't monitor the P&L column, but i do keep an eye on the price action...just in case unforseen turbulance develops. after many years of unsuccessful trading strategies, i am finally consistently in the black. that works for me...

good trading,

peter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  peterjerome said:
interesting that many speak of their strategy as if it was the holy grail that needs no supervision. we have auto-pilot systems that are in contol of the takeoff, the flight itself, and the landing...all without aid of a pilot. what real purpose does the pilot serve? would anyone actually board a plane that was pilot-less?

 

i don't monitor the P&L column, but i do keep an eye on the price action...just in case unforseen turbulance develops. after many years of unsuccessful trading strategies, i am finally consistently in the black. that works for me...

good trading,

peter.

 

I think the analogy of a pilot is good. Turbulence is often predicted ahead of time. The pilot can divert. But that is part of their strategy. The pilot is often told what to do by the tower. The pilots have a flight plan. They are operating the controls, but for the most part they are following the plan very, very closely. Being prepared to deal with the turbulence is part of your strategy. Your strategy may be mostly, "in your head", rather than programmed. But you still have a strategy, and you execute it. That's the way it sounds to me. What I'm saying is, you may be executing your strategy a lot more mechanically than your realize. Your strategy just may be more complex and have subtleties that would be difficult to document and program.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 7th April 2025.   Asian Markets Plunge as US-China Trade War Escalates; Wall Street Futures Signal Further Turmoil.   Global financial markets extended last week’s massive sell-off as tensions between the US and its major trading partners deepened, rattling investors and prompting sharp declines across equities, commodities, and currencies. The fallout from President Trump’s sweeping new tariff measures continued to spread, raising fears of a full-blown trade war and economic recession.   Asian stock markets plunged on Monday, extending a global market rout fueled by rising tensions between the US and China. The latest wave of aggressive tariffs and retaliatory measures has unnerved investors worldwide, triggering sharp sell-offs across the Asia-Pacific region.   Asian equities led the global rout on Monday, with dramatic losses seen across the region. Japan’s Nikkei 225 index tumbled more than 8% shortly after the open, while the broader Topix fell over 6.5%, recovering only slightly from steeper losses. In mainland China, the Shanghai Composite sank 6.7%, and the blue-chip CSI300 dropped 7.5% as markets reopened following a public holiday. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index opened more than 9% lower, reflecting deep concerns about escalating trade tensions.           South Korea’s Kospi dropped 4.8%, triggering a circuit breaker designed to curb panic selling. Taiwan’s Taiex index collapsed by nearly 10%, with major tech exporters like TSMC and Foxconn hitting circuit breaker limits after each fell close to 10%. Meanwhile, Australia’s ASX 200 shed as much as 6.3%, and New Zealand’s NZX 50 lost over 3.5%.   Despite the escalation, Beijing has adopted a measured tone. Chinese officials urged investors not to panic and assured markets that the country has the tools to mitigate economic shocks. At the same time, they left the door open for renewed trade talks, though no specific timeline has been set.   US Stock Futures Plunge Ahead of Monday Open   US stock futures pointed to another brutal day on Wall Street. Futures tied to the S&P 500 dropped over 3%, Nasdaq futures sank 4%, and Dow Jones futures lost 2.5%—equivalent to nearly 1,000 points. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, down more than 20% from its recent highs, while the S&P 500 is nearing bear territory. The Dow closed last week in correction. Oil prices followed suit, with WTI crude dropping over 4% to $59.49 per barrel—its lowest since April 2021.   Wall Street closed last week in disarray, erasing more than $5 trillion in value amid fears of an all-out trade war. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, sinking more than 20% from its recent peak. The S&P 500 is approaching bear territory, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average has slipped firmly into correction territory.   German Banks Hit Hard Amid Escalating Trade Tensions   German banking stocks were among the worst hit in Europe. Shares of Commerzbank and Deutsche Bank plunged between 9.5% and 10.3% during early Frankfurt trading, compounding Friday’s steep losses. Fears over a global trade war and looming recession are severely impacting the financial sector, particularly export-driven economies like Germany.   Eurozone Growth at Risk   Eurozone officials are bracing for economic fallout, with Greek central bank governor Yannis Stournaras warning that Trump’s tariff policy could reduce eurozone GDP by up to 1%. The EU is preparing retaliatory tariffs on $28 billion worth of American goods—ranging from steel and aluminium to consumer products like dental floss and luxury jewellery.   Starting Wednesday, the US is expected to impose 25% tariffs on key EU exports, with Brussels ready to respond with its own 20% levies on nearly all remaining American imports.   UK Faces £22 Billion Economic Blow   In the UK, fresh research from KPMG revealed that the British economy could shrink by £21.6 billion by 2027 due to US-imposed tariffs. The analysis points to a 0.8% dip in economic output over the next two years, undermining Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ growth agenda. The report also warned of additional fiscal pressure that may lead to future tax increases and public spending cuts.   Wall Street Braces for Recession   Goldman Sachs revised its US recession probability to 45% within the next year, citing tighter financial conditions and rising policy uncertainty. This marks a sharp jump from the 35% risk estimated just last month—and more than double January’s 20% projection. J.P. Morgan issued a bleaker outlook, now forecasting a 60% chance of recession both in the US and globally.   Global Leaders Respond as Trade Tensions Deepen   The dramatic market sell-off was triggered by China’s sweeping retaliation to a new round of US tariffs, which included a 34% levy on all American imports. Beijing’s state-run People’s Daily released a defiant statement, asserting that China has the tools and resilience to withstand economic pressure from Washington. ‘We’ve built up experience after years of trade conflict and are prepared with a full arsenal of countermeasures,’ it stated.   Around the world, policymakers are responding to the growing threat of a trade-led economic slowdown. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba announced plans to appeal directly to Washington and push for tariff relief, following the US administration’s decision to impose a blanket 24% tariff on Japanese imports. He aims to visit the US soon to present Japan’s case as a fair trade partner.   In Taiwan, President Lai Ching-te said his administration would work closely with Washington to remove trade barriers and increase purchases of American goods in an effort to reduce the bilateral trade deficit. The island's defence ministry has also submitted a new list of US military procurements to highlight its strategic partnership.   Economists and strategists are warning of deeper economic consequences. Ronald Temple, chief market strategist at Lazard, said the scale and speed of these tariffs could result in far more severe damage than previously anticipated. ‘This isn’t just a bilateral conflict anymore — more countries are likely to respond in the coming weeks,’ he noted.   Analysts at Barclays cautioned that smaller Asian economies, such as Singapore and South Korea, may face challenges in negotiating with Washington and are already adjusting their economic growth forecasts downward in response to the unfolding trade crisis.           Oil Prices Sink on Demand Concerns   Crude oil continued its sharp slide on Monday, driven by recession fears and weakened global demand. Brent fell 3.9% to $63.04 a barrel, while WTI plunged over 4% to $59.49—both benchmarks marking weekly losses exceeding 10%. Analysts say inflationary pressures and slowing economic activity may drag demand down, even though energy imports were excluded from the latest round of tariffs.   Vandana Hari of Vanda Insights noted, ‘The market is struggling to find a bottom. Until there’s a clear signal from Trump that calms recession fears, crude prices will remain under pressure.’   OPEC+ Adds Further Pressure with Output Hike   Bearish sentiment intensified after OPEC+ announced it would boost production by 411,000 barrels per day in May, far surpassing the expected 135,000 bpd. The alliance called on overproducing nations to submit compensation plans by April 15. Analysts fear this surprise move could undo years of supply discipline and weigh further on already fragile oil markets.   Global political risks also flared over the weekend. Iran rejected US proposals for direct nuclear negotiations and warned of potential military action. Meanwhile, Russia claimed fresh territorial gains in Ukraine’s Sumy region and ramped up attacks on surrounding areas—further darkening the outlook for markets.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • AMZN Amazon stock watch, good buying (+313%) toi hold onto the 173.32 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?AMZN
    • META stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 507.48, 557.84 at https://stockconsultant.com/?META
    • TMUS T-Mobile stock, watch for a top of range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?TMUS
    • KULR KULR Technology stock watch, pullback to 1.25 triple support area with bullish indicators at https://stockconsultant.com/?KULR
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.