Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

TheNegotiator

Harmonic Trading

Recommended Posts

Do any of you guys use 'harmonic' type trading setups? The Gartley 222 is one I believe and there are others. This website seems to have some good information (although it is about the author selling products).

 

http://harmonictrader.com

 

Nonetheless, there is plenty of free info provided.

 

I was wondering which markets this is effective in if any and whether traders find the setups easy to spot or if they need to comb multiple markets looking for these setups.

 

Would be interested to hear any thoughts on this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Harmonic setups and the site you reference use price only inputs and are not true harmonics. The actual harmonic of real-time buying and selling can be much more useful.

 

Below are shots of two different algorithms that produce true harmonics of buying and selling volumes that, as the graphs show, often lead price.

 

tpt107.jpg

 

 

harmonic1a.jpg

 

cheers

 

UrmaBlume

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In what way are these displaying 'real' harmonics and the site I posted doesn't? Would they be more realistic if they based the candles on volume/ticks rather than time?

 

When one component of the harmonic does the exact opposite of the other component and does it in the same amount then you have a balanced harmonic. In this case it is a balanced harmonic of order flow or the balance of trade.

 

You will note that when selling is increasing, the red line moving up, that buying is decreasing, blue line moving down, by the same amount = a balanced true harmonic - one component is a harmonic of the other.

 

In the work you showed there was only one component, price, and we operate under the belief that one of the lest effective predictors of price is price itself.

 

 

cheers

 

UrmaBlume

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Either I have misunderstood what it is you are saying or you have a different definition of harmonic oscillation. Or perhaps you have just not revealed the nature of your oscillator. As I understand it, harmonics are based on geometric patterns which tend to repeat over time. Are your indicators geometric but based on volume and/or other variables? From what you have said so far, I am far from understanding you clearly. Also, why couldn't these patterns be good predictors on a volume based chart for example? That would factor in volume geometrically. Or even delta could be used...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My small group endeavors to explore what we call the physics of market information. The harmonic of trade flow we have shown is designed as a leading indicator of price without any inputs from price. The net of order flow as shown in the graphic is the force and price is the particle or object.

 

As buying and selling displace each other in harmony (the graphic) so is price displaced.

 

The definition of simple harmonic motion is simply that the acceleration causing the motion a of the particle or object is proportional and in opposition to its displacement x from its equilibrium position.

 

The geometric representations of price you referenced measure result and not cause. Our work attempts to measure the motivator/force and thus predict result. That's the difference.

 

cheers

 

UrmaBlume

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i use HamFon's HamRadar01-1 to pick them up in tradestation as i'm not that good at picking them up visually. Metatrader 4 has some good indicators to identify bats and butterflies etc WRR_ZUP_INFO_V02.mq4 and ZUP_V92.mq4. You need to check different timeframes on each market. Hope this helps.

cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, those are indeed very impressive charts UrmaBlume. Kudos to your talented team!

I agree that there is a cause effect relation in market dynamics and last trade price

is part of the composite result but not the dominant cause of the market physics you

describe. It's really just an extension of supply and demand theory. There is just one

small clarification I am seeking in reference to your comment about "net order flow".

Strictly speaking the volume size of a last trade at a given price is technically past

tense history, even though it may have occurred just microseconds ago. Likewise quotes,

whether level 1, level 2, or montage orderbook depth all refer to a future event. The

reality is we can take action in the future but not in the past. Therefore it would be

interesting to know how much of a purist approach your research has taken. Do the charts

showing bipolar balanced harmonics use last trade price/size info, or are they derived

from quote price/size info?

 

 

All the Best,

JDevron

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wow, those are indeed very impressive charts UrmaBlume. Kudos to your talented team!...........................................Do the charts showing bipolar balanced harmonics use last trade price/size info, or are they derived from quote price/size info?

All the Best,

JDevron

 

Thanks for the kind words. So much work to develop such a simple expression of a prime market force.

 

Almost all of our work is about order flow as at its very base - money is the fuel that drives the motivation of price. This is part of what we learned from spending time with Peter Steidlmayer almost thirty years ago. In this post we discuss our concept of "The Technical Evolution of Market Profile Theory" and demonstrate several indicators that are part of our technical expression of that concept.

 

Thanks again for the kind words.

 

Cheers

 

UB

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh I see UrmaBlume, thanks for the link. Yes I have done some work in the market profile

area, and also in the cash flow area. My understanding is that a market volume profile

reports volumes at various prices levels, while cash flow inspects the price that a last

trade executed at and catagorizes it as either a bullish or bearish volume. It is easy to

extract bipolar volume data from the cash flow formula ...

(where last price * last size is < or > the midpoint of inside quotes).

But I'm wondering how to get bipolar volume data from the market profile. If I had to

guess it would be that the volume above the point of control (POC) volume price is

bullish and the volume below the POC is bearish. Is this assumption correct?

Purhaps you can tell me where I am going wrong in my thinking?

 

Thanks,

JDevron

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On second thought, the graphs you show indicate bipolar volume data that is symetrical or "balanced".

However, the data above and below the POC is usually not symetrical. Therefore, it seems unlikely that the bipolar volume data was derived from simply being above/below the POC. Now I'm wondering what basic concept I am missing. Any insights would be appreciated...

 

 

JDevron

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On second thought, the graphs you show indicate bipolar volume data that is symetrical or "balanced".However, the data above and below the POC is usually not symetrical. Therefore, it seems unlikely that the bipolar volume data was derived from simply being above/below the POC. Now I'm wondering what basic concept I am missing. Any insights would be appreciated...JDevron

 

JD,

 

Here is a hint - you are talking about counting contracts and I am talking about measuring force.

 

cheers

 

UB

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Do any of you guys use 'harmonic' type trading setups? The Gartley 222 is one I believe and there are others. This website seems to have some good information (although it is about the author selling products).

 

Welcome to Harmonic Trader

 

Nonetheless, there is plenty of free info provided.

 

I was wondering which markets this is effective in if any and whether traders find the setups easy to spot or if they need to comb multiple markets looking for these setups

 

Would be interested to hear any thoughts on this.

 

You never heard of the "30 Pips a Day Keeps your Money at bay" thread at Babypips? It has to be one of the best threads about Harmonic Trading. It is what got me started. Patterns on 1min or 5 min are not that reliable. 15min, 30hr, 1hr, 4hr are better.

 

Supposely it works in any market, but my experience is only in FX. At first it takes longer to find setups, but then its easy.

 

Also the guy that has the harmonictrader.com website also wrote some books which are the best on the subject. He is like Peter Steidlmayer and Market Profile.

 

I really enjoyed finding Harmonic patterns. But I gave up on them because I didnt have access to order flow to confirm entry. I would love to start looking at it again with Tape reading for confirmation...:)

 

If you cant find the thread at babypips Pm me for link.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Traditionally the discussion about harmonics and trading has been about geometric drawings of price with no reference to volume or the balance of trade.

 

The Harmonic we use has price as NO part of its calculation and is a representation of the force that drives price - the cause instead of the result as per:

 

"One definition of simple harmonic motion is simply that the acceleration causing the motion a of the particle or object is proportional and in opposition to its displacement x from its equilibrium position. As buying and selling displace each other in harmony (the graphic) so is price displaced."

 

tpt374.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

pbylina, thanks for the info. I will take a look. Urma, I definitely see your point about using balance of trade in regards to harmonics. However, many people do still trade by price and price patterns. Maybe this isn't optimal but there are some who suggest that actually, entry isn't even the most critical part to making money trading. So does it even matter being that precise anyway? All you need is some sort of edge and strong money/trade management and you should come out on top right? As a discretionary trader anyway. I am interested with the idea presented though. However, I am not sure I understand the explanation in principle at all. Are you talking about acceleration of price movement or buying/selling displacement(or delta) or something else? Is this indicator based purely off executed market orders or is there an additional variable guiding the outcome?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
pbylina, thanks for the info. I will take a look. Urma, I definitely see your point about using balance of trade in regards to harmonics. However, many people do still trade by price and price patterns. Maybe this isn't optimal but there are some who suggest that actually, entry isn't even the most critical part to making money trading. So does it even matter being that precise anyway? All you need is some sort of edge and strong money/trade management and you should come out on top right? As a discretionary trader anyway. I am interested with the idea presented though. However, I am not sure I understand the explanation in principle at all. Are you talking about acceleration of price movement or buying/selling displacement(or delta) or something else? Is this indicator based purely off executed market orders or is there an additional variable guiding the outcome?

 

Of course there are additional variables, but none of them have anything to do with price.

 

From time in the pits and time studying under Peter Steidlmayer almost 30 years ago, I learned and believe to this day that order flow and the balance of trade are key to anticipating change in the market.

 

Now while the pits are no more and there are no outstretched hands to define order flow, there are certain sets of indicators that can provide the same information.

 

Almost all of our software development is about what we call the "Technical Evolution of Market Profile Theory." In the graph above you can see that regime change came to the harmonic BEFORE it came to price and without non-linear processing and intelligent agents that is virtually impossible with only price as inputs.

 

"As buying and selling displace each other in harmony (the graphic) so is price displaced.

 

The definition of simple harmonic motion is simply that the acceleration causing the motion a of the particle or object is proportional and in opposition to its displacement x from its equilibrium position.

 

The geometric representations of price you referenced measure result and not cause. Our work attempts to measure the motivator/force and thus predict result. That's the difference."

 

If trade was always in balance then price would never change. The movement of price is almost always a response to an imbalance in trade.

 

 

cheers

 

UrmaBlume

Edited by UrmaBlume

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Urma, please explain your indicator in more depth. This is not a thread for marketing and I am sure if people are interested they can read exactly the same material on your indicator website.

 

lol that's exactly the same output as an excel momentum model I built once. You make it sound like it's quantum physics. Post the math not the argument, everyone else can test it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
lol that's exactly the same output as an excel momentum model I built once. You make it sound like it's quantum physics. Post the math not the argument, everyone else can test it.

 

Very interesting silentDUD,

 

If, as you say, it is "exactly the same output" as your work, then you have no need to see mine and you can just post yours for us all to test- lol.

 

UrmaBlume

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The market changes velocity during different times of the day.

For illustration of this concept let's say during the first hour a 10 minute

moving average may work best, while a 30 minute moving average may be

the best around lunch time, and a 20 minute moving average may work best

during the last hour.

 

I'm interested in the mechanism used to switch between the most appropriate

period. Obviously I can simply hard code in some periodic interval assigned to

a certain time of day based on historical averages of movements during those

times of day. What I'm really interested in is using an algorythm that is flexible

enough to assign the appropriate interval based on current conditions. I have

tried comparing current envelope heights to the historical averages of envelope

heights, but so far the results have been less than amaizing.

 

Any suggestions to improve the interval selection mechanism would be

greatly appreciated.

 

Thanks,

John

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 11th July 2025.   Demand For Gold Rises As Trump Announces Tariffs!   Gold prices rose significantly throughout the week as investors took advantage of the 2.50% lower entry level. Investors also return to the safe-haven asset as the US trade policy continues to escalate. As a result, investors are taking a more dovish tone. The ‘risk-off’ appetite is also something which can be seen within the stock market. The NASDAQ on Thursday took a 0.90% dive within only 30 minutes.   Trade Tensions Escalate President Trump has been teasing with new tariffs throughout the week. However, the tariffs were confirmed on Thursday. A 35% tariff on Canadian imports starting August 1st, along with 50% tariffs on copper and goods from Brazil. Some experts are advising that Brazil has been specifically targeted due to its association with the BRICS.   However, the President has not directly associated the tariffs with BRICS yet. According to President Trump, Brazil is targeting US technology companies and carrying out a ‘witch hunt’against former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, a close ally who is currently facing prosecution for allegedly attempting to overturn the 2022 Brazilian election.   Although Brazil is one of the largest and fastest-growing economies in the Americas, it is not the main concern for investors. Investors are more concerned about Tariffs on Canada. The White House said it will impose a 35% tariff on Canadian imports, effective August 1st, raised from the earlier 25% rate. This covers most goods, with exceptions under USMCA and exemptions for Canadian companies producing within the US.   It is also vital for investors to note that Canada is among the US;’s top 3 trading partners. The increase was justified by Trump citing issues like the trade deficit, Canada’s handling of fentanyl trafficking, and perceived unfair trade practices.   The President is also threatening new measures against the EU. These moves caused US and European stock futures to fall nearly 1%, while the Dollar rose and commodity prices saw small gains. However, the main benefactor was Silver and Gold, which are the two best-performing metals of the day.   How Will The Fed Impact Gold? The FOMC indicated that the number of members warming up to the idea of interest rate cuts is increasing. If the Fed takes a dovish tone, the price of Gold may further rise. In the meantime, the President pushing for a 3% rate cut sparked talk of a more dovish Fed nominee next year and raised worries about future inflation.   Meanwhile, jobless claims dropped for the fourth straight week, coming in better than expected and supporting the view that the labour market remains strong after last week’s solid payroll report. Markets still expect two rate cuts this year, but rate futures show most investors see no change at the next Fed meeting. Gold is expected to finish the week mostly flat.       Gold 15-Minute Chart     If the price of Gold increases above $3,337.50, buy signals are likely to materialise again. However, the price is currently retracing, meaning traders are likely to wait for regained momentum before entering further buy trades. According to HSBC, they expect an average price of $3,215 in 2025 (up from $3,015) and $3,125 in 2026, with projections showing a volatile range between $3,100 and $3,600   Key Takeaway Points: Gold Rises on Safe-Haven Demand. Gold gained as investors reacted to rising trade tensions and market volatility. Canada Tariffs Spark Concern. A 35% tariff on Canadian imports drew attention due to Canada’s key trade role. Fed Dovish Shift Supports Gold. Growing expectations of rate cuts and Trump’s push for a 3% cut boosted the gold outlook. Gold Eyes Breakout Above $3,337.5. Price is consolidating; a move above $3,337.50 could trigger new buy signals. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Michalis Efthymiou HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Back in the early 2000s, Netflix mailed DVDs to subscribers.   It wasn’t sexy—but it was smart. No late fees. No driving to Blockbuster.   People subscribed because they were lazy. Investors bought the stock because they realized everyone else is lazy too.   Those who saw the future in that red envelope? They could’ve caught a 10,000%+ move.   Another story…   Back in the mid-2000s, Amazon launched Prime.   It wasn’t flashy—but it was fast.   Free two-day shipping. No minimums. No hassle.   People subscribed because they were impatient. Investors bought the stock because they realized everyone hates waiting.   Those who saw the future in that speedy little yellow button? They could’ve caught another 10,000%+ move.   Finally…   Back in 2011, Bitcoin was trading under $10.   It wasn’t regulated—but it worked.   No bank. No middleman. Just wallet to wallet.   People used it to send money. Investors bought it because they saw the potential.   Those who saw something glimmering in that strange orange coin? They could’ve caught a 100,000%+ move.   The people who made those calls weren’t fortune tellers. They just noticed something simple before others did.   A better way. A quiet shift. A small edge. An asymmetric bet.   The red envelope fixed late fees. The yellow button fixed waiting. The orange coin gave billions a choice.   Of course, these types of gains are rare. And they happen only once in a blue moon. That’s exactly why it’s important to notice when the conditions start to look familiar.   Not after the move. Not once it's on CNBC. But in the quiet build-up— before the surface breaks.   Enter the Blue Button Please read more here: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/netflix-amazon-bitcoin-blue  Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • What These Attacks Look Like There are several ways you could get hacked. And the threats compound by the day.   Here’s a quick rundown:   Phishing: Fake emails from your “bank.” Click the link, give your password—game over.   Ransomware: Malware that locks your files and demands crypto. Pay up, or it’s gone.   DDoS: Overwhelm a website with traffic until it crashes. Like 10,000 bots blocking the door. Often used by nations.   Man-in-the-Middle: Hackers intercept your messages on public WiFi and read or change them.   Social Engineering: Hackers pose as IT or drop infected USB drives labeled “Payroll.”   You don’t need to be “important” to be a target.   You just need to be online.   What You Can Do (Without Buying a Bunker) You don’t have to be tech-savvy.   You just need to stop being low-hanging fruit.   Here’s how:   Use a YubiKey (physical passkey device) or Authenticator app – Ditch text message 2FA. SIM swaps are real. Hackers often have people on the inside at telecom companies.   Use a password manager (with Yubikey) – One unique password per account. Stop using your dog’s name.   Update your devices – Those annoying updates patch real security holes. Use them.   Back up your files – If ransomware hits, you don’t want your important documents held hostage.   Avoid public WiFi for sensitive stuff – Or use a VPN.   Think before you click – Emails that feel “urgent” are often fake. Go to the websites manually for confirmation.   Consider Starlink in case the internet goes down – I think it’s time for me to make the leap. Don’t Panic. Prepare. (Then Invest.)   I spent an hour in that basement bar reading about cyberattacks—and watching real-world systems fall apart like dominos.   The internet going down used to be an inconvenience. Now, it’s a warning.   Cyberwar isn’t coming. It’s here.   And the next time your internet goes out, it might not just be your router.   Don’t panic. Prepare.   And maybe keep a backup plan in your back pocket. Like a local basement bar with good bourbon—and working WiFi.   As usual, we’re on the lookout for more opportunities in cybersecurity. Stay tuned.   Author: Chris Campbell (AltucherConfidential) Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/   
    • DUMBSHELL:  re the automation of corruption ---  200,000 "Science Papers" in academic journal database PubMed may have been AI-generated with errors, hallucinations and false sourcing 
    • Does any crypto exchanges get banned in your country? How's about other as Bybit, Kraken, MEXC, OKX?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.