Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

feng2088

Looking for Advice

Recommended Posts

Hello all,

 

I was here three weeks ago asking for help on some coding issues. A lot of you advised me to learn and read more about EasyLangage. I really appreciated your suggestions. Now I am able to program some simple strategies with EasyLanguge. I came up with a strategy that has a 91% winning rate. However the profit factor is only 1.15 and the total net profit is less than the total commission. I tested this strategy with one emini contract on a two year 1-mini data feed. Can you please review the attached performance reports and advise if this strategy is applicable? Should I find a new broker that offers lower rates? Thanks.

report.thumb.JPG.fcf8eaeb93513b390a741bf0fb39709f.JPG

report2.thumb.JPG.744f402342ef890db5cb61808794a49e.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hello all,

 

I was here three weeks ago asking for help on some coding issues. A lot of you advised me to learn and read more about EasyLangage. I really appreciated your suggestions. Now I am able to program some simple strategies with EasyLanguge. I came up with a strategy that has a 91% winning rate. However the profit factor is only 1.15 and the total net profit is less than the total commission. I tested this strategy with one emini contract on a two year 1-mini data feed. Can you please review the attached performance reports and advise if this strategy is applicable? Should I find a new broker that offers lower rates? Thanks.

 

Are you using limit orders to enter and exit?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you're giving a HUGE portion of your profits to pay commissions.

the current strategy doesn't seem viable to me....just an opinion.

couple of questions

1- did you 'optimize' you efs strategy for the e-mini?

2- have you looked at fewer trades with higher targets?

3- are you using an auto-trader?

peter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking at your report, one must also consider the slippage for a strategy which will generally be higher than the commissions. It is probably a good idea on any tested strategy to use a minimum of 1 tick slippage for each entry and each exit. I have seen many systems that were returning 200% annual return take a nose dive and blow the account within the first week of trading when factoring in slippage and commissions. We generally add four ticks slippage a round turn trade and $5 commission, even though most of our strategies are very short term styled trading. Most software programs allow you to set these costs in your parameters where they are automatically calculated into your summary reports.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks all. You are right I didn't think about slippage. I think I should use limit orders to enter and exit. Are there any reserved words I can make Tradestation to buy at bid and sell at ask? And if the buy order didn't get fill in 5 second, the trade would be cancelled? Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

" Buy next bar at open next bar -0.25 limit " ----- would this line of codes help me get the position filled at the bid price? how long would TS wait until it cancels the excecution if the order doesn't get filled? I will be trading on a 1 min time frame. Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To help control slippage, I do use limit orders to enter positions in an attempt to achieve the best fill price possible at my anticipated price level. With that said, I do not use limit orders to exit a position when my profit objectives are reached. When it is time to exit the market, I want out and I am willing to give up a tick or two of slippage to exit my position to assure I get out. An exception to this rule is in non-liquid markets or during night sessions that are thinly traded. This slippage is calculated into my profit objectives which takes into account the number of total contracts in the position that must be liquidated. As mentioned in my earlier post, there should be a setting in system properties to add commission and slippage to your backtesting results (see image, Commission & Slippage).

 

When you ask about entering at the bid and ask prices, I assume you are referring to backtesting strategies. It has been a great while since I have worked with Tradestation but I do know Multicharts (which we utilize as well as RightEdge) can be configured to backtest using the ask and bid prices (see image, Backtesting Ask & Bid). In a live trading environment it is of smaller concern since limit orders are requesting to be filled at your stated price or better.

 

As for your 5 second cancelation of orders: That may limited to the time frequency (i.e., 1,2,3—minute bars) used to generate a condition which triggers an order. There are also various ways to code an exception when using tick data that can cancel outstanding orders after a certain period. For live or simulated (demo account) trading, it could be a function of the broker API. You may also have the option to convert limit orders into market orders after a certain length of time (see image, Convert Orders).

 

Your example of a buy order depends on your objective. Are you wanting to get filled at a certain price, or are you wanting to simulate the cost of trading into your strategy (which may be accomplished as described above). Also, depending on trading objectives (and your setting, environment, data frequency) you may wish to enter an order before the completion of the one minute bar once a signal is triggered. This may be accomplished by enabling Intra-Bar Order Generation (see image, Intra-Bar Order Generation) which may also be coded directly into the script (i.e., [intrabarOrderGeneration = True]).

 

If you are actually needing to enter the order one tick below the next bar’s opening price of say, ES for instance: Buy 1 contract Next Bar (Open - .25) Limit ; However, the problem with this type of order (as is characteristic in limit orders) is you can be right about anticipated price direction and not profit from being right simply because prices never retrace to your limit price. I use limit orders when I am expecting a retracement of prices to a certain level prior to heading in my desired direction.

 

There are always trade-offs and what works for me may not work for you or anyone else. Reminds me of the saying that we don’t trade the markets, we trade our beliefs. Hope this helps.

5aa7105d774b6_CommissionSlippage.png.2debb6ecbb124fd38fc42ee253544314.png

5aa7105d7c5a7_BacktestingAskBid.png.029dd67475d4154cb0c287d7f0b22998.png

5aa7105d80ba8_ConvertOrders.png.379a92595a8d66313e7f2b92debfdae0.png

5aa7105d83aea_Intra-BarOrderGeneration.png.3c48b9c9203b1cd8d76d47e67c8ec937.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you much for your post, Billy! I modified my codes and now for both buy and sell I use limit orders (see below). I want $0 slippage always. You mentioned that if I used -0.25 limit, my order may not be filled, That is ok since I will be trading on the 25 ticks time frame. I don't mind missing those opportunities. I am not ready to go live yet as I am not sure if i miss anything here. I attached couple screenshots of my strategy performance and settings . The return seems good when I backtest it, but would I see a big discrepancy if I go life? Thanks

 


Buy next bar at open next bar -0.25 limit ; 

If Positionprofit > x amount then 

Sell next bar at Positionprofit limit;

5aa7105d8fa27_Performance1.JPG.26d61f603b3f571309b9d7bad44a0df9.JPG

5aa7105d94b52_Performance2.JPG.15131a15b12e3d39aa5bca49e6d93d9d.JPG

5aa7105d989ff_strategysetting1.JPG.4900430425af1814e886d13aa25a3f9c.JPG

5aa7105d9c37e_strategysetting2.JPG.ae52f2d89d5cbd84a7c8c89d49f65a19.JPG

5aa7105da0853_strategysetting3.JPG.3b23147142a56b1163df68a70e82c688.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

feng2088,

 

I would recommend you shoot for less trades, and more dollars per trade. Also, limit orders will eliminate slippage, but you will miss out on your best trades, so there is still an expense that should be considered. You should check the "Fill entire order when trade price exceeds limit price" which will give you a more realistic report. Also, you must test this on a time frame NOT within the time frame you optimized on. This will be your out-of-sample test, and will tell you if your strategy has any chance of success.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The performance report shows that your average losing trade is ten times larger than your average winning trade, so a 90% win rate is basically keeping you even. Of course once you figure in the commissions and slippage on all of those trades you're just digging a hole for yourself. You may want to revisit the strategy or look for a new one. As others have said I'd suggest a strategy that has fewer trades each day and also one that has winning and losing trades more similar in size. That way if you can come up with a 60% - 70% win rate you'll do a whole lot better than with the strategy you showed us. I'd steer away from a system that gives the performance you showed us.

Good luck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

at 25 tick time frame, you may not be able to get your order to the TS server in time. when you modify an order, I think TS will cancel the original order, wait to confirm it's cancelled, and then send a new order.

 

also make sure you are not on magic fills and on realistic fills.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Basically, your Profit Factor Should be more than 1.5, even if only half of your trades are profitable. Use slower time frame, and do a back testing for at lease few years, and forward tests if you optimize the strategy in any way.

 

If you optimize the strategy, the easiest forward test for any strategy is to apply the strategy to all the data possible without recent X months. Then do the the rest of coding, optimization, and add the data you were missing. This way you will see if the strategy will even work for the X months.

 

All the best,

 

Lukas

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • Hello citizens of the U.S. The hundred year trade war has leaked over into a trading war. Your equity holdings are under attack by huge sovereign funds shorting relentlessly... running basically the opposite of  PPT operations.  As an American you are blessed to be totally responsible for your own assets - the govt won’t and can’t take care of you, your lame ass whuss ‘retail’ fund managers go catatonic  and can't / won’t help you, etc etc.... If you’re going to hold your positions, it’s on you to hedge your holdings.   Don’t blame Trump, don’t blame the system, don’t even blame the ‘enemies’ - ie don’t blame period.  Just occupy the freedom and responsibility you have and act.  The only mistake ‘Trump’ made so far was not to warn you more explicitly and remind you of your options to hedge weeks ago.   FWIW when Trump got elected... I also failed to explicitly remind you... just sayin’
    • Date: 7th April 2025.   Asian Markets Plunge as US-China Trade War Escalates; Wall Street Futures Signal Further Turmoil.   Global financial markets extended last week’s massive sell-off as tensions between the US and its major trading partners deepened, rattling investors and prompting sharp declines across equities, commodities, and currencies. The fallout from President Trump’s sweeping new tariff measures continued to spread, raising fears of a full-blown trade war and economic recession.   Asian stock markets plunged on Monday, extending a global market rout fueled by rising tensions between the US and China. The latest wave of aggressive tariffs and retaliatory measures has unnerved investors worldwide, triggering sharp sell-offs across the Asia-Pacific region.   Asian equities led the global rout on Monday, with dramatic losses seen across the region. Japan’s Nikkei 225 index tumbled more than 8% shortly after the open, while the broader Topix fell over 6.5%, recovering only slightly from steeper losses. In mainland China, the Shanghai Composite sank 6.7%, and the blue-chip CSI300 dropped 7.5% as markets reopened following a public holiday. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index opened more than 9% lower, reflecting deep concerns about escalating trade tensions.           South Korea’s Kospi dropped 4.8%, triggering a circuit breaker designed to curb panic selling. Taiwan’s Taiex index collapsed by nearly 10%, with major tech exporters like TSMC and Foxconn hitting circuit breaker limits after each fell close to 10%. Meanwhile, Australia’s ASX 200 shed as much as 6.3%, and New Zealand’s NZX 50 lost over 3.5%.   Despite the escalation, Beijing has adopted a measured tone. Chinese officials urged investors not to panic and assured markets that the country has the tools to mitigate economic shocks. At the same time, they left the door open for renewed trade talks, though no specific timeline has been set.   US Stock Futures Plunge Ahead of Monday Open   US stock futures pointed to another brutal day on Wall Street. Futures tied to the S&P 500 dropped over 3%, Nasdaq futures sank 4%, and Dow Jones futures lost 2.5%—equivalent to nearly 1,000 points. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, down more than 20% from its recent highs, while the S&P 500 is nearing bear territory. The Dow closed last week in correction. Oil prices followed suit, with WTI crude dropping over 4% to $59.49 per barrel—its lowest since April 2021.   Wall Street closed last week in disarray, erasing more than $5 trillion in value amid fears of an all-out trade war. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, sinking more than 20% from its recent peak. The S&P 500 is approaching bear territory, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average has slipped firmly into correction territory.   German Banks Hit Hard Amid Escalating Trade Tensions   German banking stocks were among the worst hit in Europe. Shares of Commerzbank and Deutsche Bank plunged between 9.5% and 10.3% during early Frankfurt trading, compounding Friday’s steep losses. Fears over a global trade war and looming recession are severely impacting the financial sector, particularly export-driven economies like Germany.   Eurozone Growth at Risk   Eurozone officials are bracing for economic fallout, with Greek central bank governor Yannis Stournaras warning that Trump’s tariff policy could reduce eurozone GDP by up to 1%. The EU is preparing retaliatory tariffs on $28 billion worth of American goods—ranging from steel and aluminium to consumer products like dental floss and luxury jewellery.   Starting Wednesday, the US is expected to impose 25% tariffs on key EU exports, with Brussels ready to respond with its own 20% levies on nearly all remaining American imports.   UK Faces £22 Billion Economic Blow   In the UK, fresh research from KPMG revealed that the British economy could shrink by £21.6 billion by 2027 due to US-imposed tariffs. The analysis points to a 0.8% dip in economic output over the next two years, undermining Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ growth agenda. The report also warned of additional fiscal pressure that may lead to future tax increases and public spending cuts.   Wall Street Braces for Recession   Goldman Sachs revised its US recession probability to 45% within the next year, citing tighter financial conditions and rising policy uncertainty. This marks a sharp jump from the 35% risk estimated just last month—and more than double January’s 20% projection. J.P. Morgan issued a bleaker outlook, now forecasting a 60% chance of recession both in the US and globally.   Global Leaders Respond as Trade Tensions Deepen   The dramatic market sell-off was triggered by China’s sweeping retaliation to a new round of US tariffs, which included a 34% levy on all American imports. Beijing’s state-run People’s Daily released a defiant statement, asserting that China has the tools and resilience to withstand economic pressure from Washington. ‘We’ve built up experience after years of trade conflict and are prepared with a full arsenal of countermeasures,’ it stated.   Around the world, policymakers are responding to the growing threat of a trade-led economic slowdown. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba announced plans to appeal directly to Washington and push for tariff relief, following the US administration’s decision to impose a blanket 24% tariff on Japanese imports. He aims to visit the US soon to present Japan’s case as a fair trade partner.   In Taiwan, President Lai Ching-te said his administration would work closely with Washington to remove trade barriers and increase purchases of American goods in an effort to reduce the bilateral trade deficit. The island's defence ministry has also submitted a new list of US military procurements to highlight its strategic partnership.   Economists and strategists are warning of deeper economic consequences. Ronald Temple, chief market strategist at Lazard, said the scale and speed of these tariffs could result in far more severe damage than previously anticipated. ‘This isn’t just a bilateral conflict anymore — more countries are likely to respond in the coming weeks,’ he noted.   Analysts at Barclays cautioned that smaller Asian economies, such as Singapore and South Korea, may face challenges in negotiating with Washington and are already adjusting their economic growth forecasts downward in response to the unfolding trade crisis.           Oil Prices Sink on Demand Concerns   Crude oil continued its sharp slide on Monday, driven by recession fears and weakened global demand. Brent fell 3.9% to $63.04 a barrel, while WTI plunged over 4% to $59.49—both benchmarks marking weekly losses exceeding 10%. Analysts say inflationary pressures and slowing economic activity may drag demand down, even though energy imports were excluded from the latest round of tariffs.   Vandana Hari of Vanda Insights noted, ‘The market is struggling to find a bottom. Until there’s a clear signal from Trump that calms recession fears, crude prices will remain under pressure.’   OPEC+ Adds Further Pressure with Output Hike   Bearish sentiment intensified after OPEC+ announced it would boost production by 411,000 barrels per day in May, far surpassing the expected 135,000 bpd. The alliance called on overproducing nations to submit compensation plans by April 15. Analysts fear this surprise move could undo years of supply discipline and weigh further on already fragile oil markets.   Global political risks also flared over the weekend. Iran rejected US proposals for direct nuclear negotiations and warned of potential military action. Meanwhile, Russia claimed fresh territorial gains in Ukraine’s Sumy region and ramped up attacks on surrounding areas—further darkening the outlook for markets.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • AMZN Amazon stock watch, good buying (+313%) toi hold onto the 173.32 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?AMZN
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.