Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

TheNegotiator

Time Profile

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I have a question for any coders out there. How difficult might it be to code an indicator to display a profile of time at price? That is to say the amount of time a price is either the bid or the offer. For clarification I am currently on ninja but if any other platform is more suitable I am interested in any suggestions.

 

Thanks,

 

TheNegotiator.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  TheNegotiator said:
Hi,

 

I have a question for any coders out there. How difficult might it be to code an indicator to display a profile of time at price? That is to say the amount of time a price is either the bid or the offer. For clarification I am currently on ninja but if any other platform is more suitable I am interested in any suggestions.

 

Thanks,

 

TheNegotiator.

 

When we talk about TP anaylsis, most people's expectation is at the sub-seconds level. ie. in microseconds terms.

 

TradeStation (EasyLanguage) were designed to do analysis down to the minutes level. It can do analysis at the tick level, but without the time component.

 

MultiCharts, with its extended-EasyLanguage keywords, can do sub-minute analysis. (ie at the seconds level). But it is still far from the microsecond level.

 

 

So, if your expectation is at or above the seconds level... it can easily be done.

At the sub-second level, it can be done, but will require a bit more work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  TheNegotiator said:
If you have all the LAST data, surely it could be calculated from this. Then it depends on how accurate your timestamp is no?

 

I know that this is then an approximation for some markets.

 

yes, if your expectation is at or above the seconds level,

pretty well any advanced level programmable charting software can do the trick.

The timestamp is of minor consequence, as long as the difference is static.

 

 

do you have a mock up on how the analysis would look like?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  TheNegotiator said:
That is to say the amount of time a price is either the bid or the offer.

 

Please specify what the task should be:

 

 

Assume you have a hypothetical sequence of trades:

 

Columns contain:

- Time

- Price

- B for Bid, A for Ask

- Volume

 

1000 12230 B 1

1500 12230 B 2

2700 12230 B 2

4300 12231 A 1

5400 12231 A 2

5600 12230 B 1

 

Time arbitrarily set as milliseconds from e.g. 9:30 am.

 

So here the program should return 3300 which means: 3300 milliseconds trading at bid until a trade at ask happens.

Then return 2300 (millisec trades at ask).

 

Or are you looking for something else?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay. The idea is for a day/composite profile of time spent at each price. It could end up looking very much like a volume profile (which could I'm guessing also be easily incorporated). So whenever a price is a market price bid or offer, it accumulates time by this price on the profile.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  TheNegotiator said:
The idea is for a day/composite profile of time spent at each price. It could end up looking very much like a volume profile (which could I'm guessing also be easily incorporated). So whenever a price is a market price bid or offer, it accumulates time by this price on the profile.

 

Time between trades is quite often during the day ranging in very small sizes (few milliseconds).

 

AFAIK the usual trading platforms / their built-in languages are not capable of accurately following such fast transitions.

 

Many projects in Ninja got into trouble trying to use small time spans in computations.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  uexkuell said:
Time between trades is quite often during the day ranging in very small sizes (few milliseconds).

 

AFAIK the usual trading platforms / their built-in languages are not capable of accurately following such fast transitions.

 

Many projects in Ninja got into trouble trying to use small time spans in computations.

 

If you were using it out of hours as an analysis tool, would it still be a problem or is it an intrinsic language issue?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  TheNegotiator said:
If you were using it out of hours as an analysis tool, would it still be a problem or is it an intrinsic language issue?

 

Aside from the main trading hours still regularily trade bursts can be observed which would probably have the potential to confuse anything that is written in an interpreted language.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  TheNegotiator said:
If you were using it out of hours as an analysis tool, would it still be a problem or is it an intrinsic language issue?

 

Aside from the main trading hours still regularily trade bursts can be observed which would probably have the potential to confuse anything that is written in an interpreted (=relatively slow) language.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You are probably limited by the time stamp of the data provided. Anything that goes sub second can only be determined on the live data feed, and must assume constant quote dissemination and local thread scheduling latency on your PC).

 

However I would guess that using second data you could get a very reasonable approximation, that would unlikely differ much if at all visually from a milli or microsecond resolution, by distributing the second evenly over all prices touched during that second.

 

I would also venture a guess that it wouldn't differ much visually from a volume profile.

 

If you are interesting in attempting sub second analysis in NT search for the Gom indicators. There is a version of his GomRecorder that records millisecond timestamps so that'd probably ease your workload considerably, and allow you to retain the data after refreshing your charts. Assuming dissemination and scheduling latency are constant-ish it's probably an improvement over the second approximation, but may be a distinction without a difference.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 8th April 2025.   Markets Rebound Cautiously as US-China Tariff Tensions Deepen     Global markets staged a tentative recovery on Tuesday following a wave of volatility sparked by escalating trade tensions between the United States and China. The Asia-Pacific region showed signs of stability after a chaotic start to the week—though some pockets remained under pressure. Taiwan’s Taiex dropped 4.4%, dragged lower by losses in tech heavyweight TSMC. The world’s largest chipmaker fell another 4% on Tuesday and has now slumped 13.5% since April 2, when US President Donald Trump first unveiled what he called ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs.   However, broader sentiment across the region turned more positive, with several markets rebounding sharply after Monday’s dramatic sell-offs. Japan’s Nikkei 225 surged over 6% in early trading, rebounding from an 18-month low. South Korea’s Kospi rose marginally, and Australia’s ASX 200 gained 1.9%, driven by strength in mining stocks. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng rose 1.6%, though still far from recovering from Monday’s 13.2% crash—its worst day since the 1997 Asian financial crisis. China’s Shanghai Composite added 0.9%.   In Europe, DAX and FTSE 100 are up more than 1% in opening trade. EU Commission President von der Leyen repeated yesterday that the EU had offered reciprocal zero tariffs on manufactured goods previously and continues to stand by that offer. Others are also trying again to talk to Trump to get some sort of agreement that limits the impact.   Much of the rally appeared to be driven by dip-buying, as well as hopes that the intensifying trade war could still be defused through negotiations.   China Strikes Back: ‘We Will Fight to the End’   Tensions reached a boiling point after Trump threatened to impose an additional 50% tariff on all Chinese imports unless Beijing rolled back its retaliatory measures by April 8. ‘If China does not withdraw its 34% increase above their already long-term trading abuses by tomorrow... the United States will impose additional tariffs on China of 50%,’ Trump declared on social media.   If implemented, the new tariffs would bring total US duties on Chinese goods to a staggering 124%, factoring in the existing 20%, the 34% recently announced, and the proposed 50%.   In response, China’s Ministry of Commerce issued a stern warning, stating: ‘The US threat to escalate tariffs is a mistake on top of a mistake... If the US insists on its own way, China will fight to the end.’ The ministry also called for equal and respectful dialogue, though signs of compromise on either side remain scarce.   Beijing acted quickly to contain a market fallout. State funds intervened to support equities, and the People’s Bank of China set the yuan fixing at its weakest level since September 2023 to boost export competitiveness. Additionally, five-year interest rate swaps in China fell to their lowest levels since 2020, indicating potential for further monetary easing.   Trump Talks Tough on EU Too   Trump’s hardline approach extended beyond China. Speaking at a press conference, he rejected the European Union’s offer to eliminate tariffs on cars and industrial goods, accusing the bloc of ‘being very bad to us.’ He insisted that Europe would need to source its energy from the US, claiming the US could ‘knock off $350 billion in one week.’   The EU, meanwhile, backed away from a proposed 50% retaliatory tariff on American whiskey, opting instead for 25% duties on selected US goods in response to Trump’s steel and aluminium tariffs.     Volatile Wall Street Adds to the Drama   Wall Street experienced wild swings on Monday as investors processed the rapidly evolving trade conflict. The S&P 500 briefly fell 4.7% before rebounding 3.4%, nearly erasing its losses in what could have been its biggest one-day jump in years—if it had held. The Dow Jones Industrial Average sank by as much as 1,700 points early in the day but later climbed nearly 900 points before closing 349 points lower, down 0.9%. The Nasdaq ended up 0.1%.   The brief rally was fueled by a false rumour that Trump was considering a 90-day pause on tariffs—rumours that the White House quickly labelled ‘fake news.’ The market's sharp reaction underscored how desperate investors are for any sign that tensions might ease.   Oil Markets in Focus: Goldman Sachs Revises Forecasts   Crude prices also reflected the uncertainty, with US crude briefly dipping below $60 per barrel for the first time since 2021. As of early Tuesday, Brent crude was trading at $64.72, while WTI hovered around $61.26.   Goldman Sachs, in a note dated April 7, lowered its average price forecasts for Brent and WTI through 2025 and 2026, citing mounting recession risks and the potential for higher-than-expected supply from OPEC+.       Under a base-case scenario where the US avoids a recession and tariffs are reduced significantly before the April 9 implementation date, Goldman sees Brent at $62 per barrel and WTI at $58 by December 2025. These figures fall further to $55 and $51, respectively, by the end of 2026. This outlook also assumes moderate output increases from eight OPEC+ countries, with incremental boosts of 130,000–140,000 barrels per day in June and July.   However, should the US slip into a typical recession and OPEC production aligns with the bank’s baseline assumptions, Brent could retreat to $58 by the end of this year and to $50 by December 2026.   In a more bearish scenario involving a global GDP slowdown and no change to OPEC+ output levels, Brent prices might fall to $54 by year-end and $45 by late 2026. The most extreme projection—based on a simultaneous economic downturn and a full reversal of OPEC+ production cuts—would see Brent plunge to below $40 per barrel by the end of 2026.   Goldman noted that oil prices could outperform forecasts significantly if there was a dramatic shift in tariff policy and a surprise in global demand recovery.   Cautious Optimism, But Warnings Persist   With both Washington and Beijing showing no signs of backing down, markets are likely to remain volatile in the days ahead. Investors now turn their attention to upcoming trade meetings and policy decisions, hoping for clarity in what has become one of the most unpredictable trading environments in recent years.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.