Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Mysticforex

Traders Laboratory Forex Trading Contest!

Recommended Posts

To all. Please feel free t post any reasons, descriptions of the trades you have taken. It's not mandatory but I am sure a lot of people would find it interesting.
Hi Chris and all.

 

The style of trading I do is Multi-Time-Frame using just one indicator.

 

The strategy has been around since before the Dead Sea was even sick.

 

The only variation I apply is, I use different Parameters for the indicator, for particular TF.

 

For Monthly/Weekly/Daily/4H I use the same parameters.

For 1H I use another parameter.

For 15M I use another parameter.

 

None of the parameters are standard Welles Wilder settings, but anyone could get good results if they did use those. My settings just get me in at slightly improved levels, with a slightly higher risk for that benefit.

 

The idea is to look for contrary moves to the main trend as indicated by the higher TF. When the contrarian move ends, you "should" have a higher probability of being in a trade that is trending well.

 

There are the usual problems - whipsaws, and then getting caught in a true trend reversal, as we have seen this week. My contest numbers will look shocking this week, because I have been focused on my own trading with the time I have available.

 

However, I took the same trades live, and closed them in profit. I do not use % of bank for staking calculations - each trade bears no relationship to another. My position sizing is done according to my psychological risk profile, which I have determined is around $500. Further, I don't bother too much with reward:risk calcs - I work out where I can see support and resistance, and whether these are "round figures" and likely to be more solid/stubborn than a mid-range sup/res level.

 

In effect, the style is tailor-made for me, by me, but is far from original. The discretionary part is simply judgement based on experience and a tad of intuition, mixed up with a sprinkling of economic data releases, and baked for 2 to three days, in a moderately trending market.

 

Hopefully we get a product that is sweet to the senses at the end of the trade!

 

I don't think further disclosure is going to assist anyone, but I traded the AUDJPY and NZDUSD. Anyone interested can see the trends earlier in the week where I made profit in my live a/c.

 

They can also see where those trends reversed and ran hard against me. One position has been stopped out, but the other two are still open, and under pressure. The AUDJPY is looking better as I write, but is still knee-deep in trouble!

 

I usually execute the trades on the 1H or 15M ... but manage them on the 4H to daily level.

 

I do not really think sharing the indicator or settings is going to be helpful to anyone, but you could choose from any list of lagging indicators, and apply one to all TF and get your trade.

 

From a list of 9 currency pairs (plus Gold, Silver and Oil which I rarely trade) I get 2 or 3 decent trades a week. It is normal (and a bit frustrating) to get spells of 2 weeks + without a good trade appearing.

 

Below is a screen shot of the Daily section of the AUDJPY I traded.

I did not show the other TF - but the same principle can be applied to all TF until they are seen to be aligning, with one of the lower TF reversing ( contrary to trend) before resuming movement with the higher TF trend.

 

It is a beautiful and fun way to trade. The trade is either there or it isn't, and the probability of getting direction right, is pretty good.

 

Of course no money is made until the trade is closed, and this is another story, and one where I usually have to put away the sharp objects after the trade closes!

 

Hope that helps.

 

Ivan

AUDJPY_DAILY.PNG.236080e026a54d37e4f7ae84c59d8359.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
me:crap:

 

ill b back for the next one with a better survival rate of less than 2 days.:rofl:

Hey Nicoacademia - rather than waste a month standing aside - why don't you start again - same account - but take no official part in the contest?

 

Your figures might not be displayed here, since you have officially tripped out. But at Mystic's discretion, he might agree to publish your numbers just for the exercise.

 

No harm asking the question, and the experience with the platform would be very useful for you mate.

 

Cheers

 

Ivan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
me:crap:

 

ill b back for the next one with a better survival rate of less than 2 days.:rofl:

 

Well nic,

Do not give up or start again.

You can still get out of jail..

I guess you must be scalping.

Tomorrow , change your chart to Daily.

Its a buy day for the euro.

Buy at 10 points below todays close and hold all day .

6 contracts. Profit 176 pips.

If this does not work,, open the right hand drawer of your bedside table in your hotel room and read Gideon.

Joking aside, I would be interested in other members views to get nic out of jail.

regards

bobc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well nic,

Do not give up or start again.

You can still get out of jail..

I guess you must be scalping.

Tomorrow , change your chart to Daily.

Its a buy day for the euro.

Buy at 10 points below todays close and hold all day .

6 contracts. Profit 176 pips.

If this does not work,, open the right hand drawer of your bedside table in your hotel room and read Gideon.

Joking aside, I would be interested in other members views to get nic out of jail.

regards

bobc

 

 

Nic, are all your trades closed ? or do you have any open ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So Nico, who has the stones to play it in the open, is craps because of the lame-a$$ drawdown rule, while the phony coward "forextraderX", who demanded the flippin' rule in the first place doesn't even have the stones to register.

 

In real life, if you still have margin enough to trade, you're still in the game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Nic, are all your trades closed ? or do you have any open ?

 

hi mystic. umm. they open and close really quickly. actually i'm still trading the account. but just happy to trod along :) i dont' give up easily. haha. which is why i should have set a tighter stop before the a/c blew up. i was actually on the phone-line at work and when i looked back it blew right through.

 

it's ok to me i am still refining my strategy. and too hard too fast and too intense.

 

thanks for the kind words guys. :)

 

i'm fine just trodding along being the first eliminated(kinda like survivor!) haha.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Dear In the Mystic moonlight

Is your result chart correct?

Does nic have 320% return?

regards

bobc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dear In the Mystic moonlight

Is your result chart correct?

Does nic have 320% return?

regards

bobc

 

Yes it is correct. By not using some kind of DD rule the Contest has turned into exactly the kind of Rodeo I was hoping to avoid.

 

To me at least it doesn't make sense to expend anymore energy on it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Nic,

320% return . Pretty cool.:)

I dont trade forex but with these sort of returns, I am prepared to learn

What day do you give lessons?

I realise I am sitting in Johannesburg and you are in Thailand and there is a time difference

No problem. I will get up early, to sit at your feet and learn.:missy:

Perhaps Obsidian would like to join us:haha:

regards

bobc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes it is correct. By not using some kind of DD rule the Contest has turned into exactly the kind of Rodeo I was hoping to avoid.

 

To me at least it doesn't make sense to expend anymore energy on it.

 

Dear In the mystic moonlight,

Its the Rodeo riders that come first in life.

George Soros come to mind with his bet on the pound.

I read elsewhere today a post by Colonel B.

To be successful in trading you must buy the Red candle.

 

Anyway,I read between the lines at your disappointment. Nic has quite a lead.

So go and buy a red candle.

Sell the euro today after the German Court announcement.It will fall if the ECB buying is illegal and it fall because its already at the top.

regards

bobc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

it was no surprise that german court did not rule against esm...that would be like burying their dream with their own hands...guess we will see real fireworks if fed does not give hint about qe3...

shorted aud, eur and gbp...small positions with with tight stops...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Nic,

320% return . Pretty cool.:)

I dont trade forex but with these sort of returns, I am prepared to learn

What day do you give lessons?

I realise I am sitting in Johannesburg and you are in Thailand and there is a time difference

No problem. I will get up early, to sit at your feet and learn.:missy:

Perhaps Obsidian would like to join us:haha:

regards

bobc

 

to learn how to hit %100+ in a couple of weeks, I may pay six digit figures...in thai baht of course ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes it is correct. By not using some kind of DD rule the Contest has turned into exactly the kind of Rodeo I was hoping to avoid.

 

To me at least it doesn't make sense to expend anymore energy on it.

 

Ya know Mystic, the cool thing about the way you set it all up is that it is through oanda.

 

Oanda is great in that they are very flexible with deposit amounts... it seems it would be pretty easy to set up a competition with, say, a $50 real money account for each person.

 

You'd be amazed at how serious people take such a competition even if it is only a few dollars on the line (but, real dollars, not play money). And of course, those that blow out, well, so be it. Since the prize would be recognition only at this time, most people won't employ cowboy trading tactics because it can cost them their $50 (or whatever)

 

Just a thought.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes it is correct. By not using some kind of DD rule the Contest has turned into exactly the kind of Rodeo I was hoping to avoid.

 

To me at least it doesn't make sense to expend anymore energy on it.

 

hmm. i will verify that the chart is wrong. i will resign to avoid any confusion. :) don't mean to trouble anyone.

 

nor attract any 6 figure thai baht wires. might trip off STR.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ya know Mystic, the cool thing about the way you set it all up is that it is through oanda.

 

Oanda is great in that they are very flexible with deposit amounts... it seems it would be pretty easy to set up a competition with, say, a $50 real money account for each person.

 

You'd be amazed at how serious people take such a competition even if it is only a few dollars on the line (but, real dollars, not play money). And of course, those that blow out, well, so be it. Since the prize would be recognition only at this time, most people won't employ cowboy trading tactics because it can cost them their $50 (or whatever)

 

Just a thought.

I give it some thought. Most people have at least learned to use the platform. I will have to find out if Oanda WiLL allow contests with "Real" money:

 

Maybe I can talk one of my friends inti shelling up some prize money

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes it is correct. By not using some kind of DD rule the Contest has turned into exactly the kind of Rodeo I was hoping to avoid.

 

To me at least it doesn't make sense to expend anymore energy on it.

 

Oanda only allows 1:50 leverage anyway for its trading products. But they do also allow smaller lot size increments. Not bad percentages considering the trading is being done manually.

 

MyFxBook had a recent contest with Oanda. The winners' percentages were some of the lowest ever; only 500% winning percentages. Most contests allow metatrader 4 and allow 1:200 - 1:500 leverage. It is not uncommon to see 1000-5000% monthly gains.

 

I do think I know where Mystic is coming from. He wanted to avoid the "all-in-ers" I've done a study where I evaluated the trade history of those who won....essentially that's what it comes down to. Those who have contests that are solely based on absolute gain % the top earners bet it all in (as much as their margin allows) on what they consider to be high probability trades.

 

It's more of a luck approach and it is more likely when people are trading with play money (nothing to lose)....not to say that it cannot be done with real money either as noted by bobc

 

Dear In the mystic moonlight,

Its the Rodeo riders that come first in life.

George Soros come to mind with his bet on the pound.

I read elsewhere today a post by Colonel B.

To be successful in trading you must buy the Red candle.

...............

Edited by 4EverMaAT
clear up definition

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
hmm. i will verify that the chart is wrong. i will resign to avoid any confusion. :) don't mean to trouble anyone.

 

nor attract any 6 figure thai baht wires. might trip off STR.

 

Hi Nic

YIP. You have to do the honourable thing and resign.

 

And you have'nt confirmed the time for my first lesson?

regards

bobc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

" I've done a study where I evaluated the trade history of those who won....essentially that's what it comes down to. Those who have contests that are solely based on absolute gain % the top earners bet it all in (as much as their margin allows) on what they consider to be high probability trades.

 

It's more of a luck approach and it is more likely when people are trading with play money (nothing to lose)....not to say that it cannot be done with real money either as noted by bobc

 

Hi 4Ever in blue jeans,

Your post makes interesting reading.

Does your study include real money traders, or just play money contestants?

Because if its real money,then I should change my leverage to win big.

I believe there is more luck than the experts make out

regards

bobc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi 4Ever in blue jeans,

Your post makes interesting reading.

Does your study include real money traders, or just play money contestants?

Because if its real money,then I should change my leverage to win big.

I believe there is more luck than the experts make out

regards

bobc

 

Mostly play money contestants. Not many real money contests out there, although the prize money is real, so there is a real incentive to make it to the finish line.

 

Varengold Bank has been one of the few contests that i've seen that actually weighs in the volatility of the % gains throughout the contest without restricting the trader's ability to trade. They call it "risk-adjusted rate of return", which takes a standard deviation of the difference of the daily account balance for each trading day. That's why someone with only 30% gross returns but has low risk trades can still have a high risk-adjusted rate of return and an equal chance to win the contest. Using a flat 'no more than x% drawdown' is a more artificial barrier and does not give certain traders the room to execute their strategies fully.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.