Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Mysticforex

Traders Laboratory Forex Trading Contest!

Recommended Posts

Aright Mystic.... at risk of sounding like a completely fickle individual, after watching this thread and the way folks are trading, I am a bit sorry I didn't join in.

 

On a further note regarding real money, I know from experience in online poker tournaments that if there is any entry fee, or if people are playing for real money, as little as 1 cent or 2 cent bets, the game is RADICALLY different than if it is played purely for "points", or as a tourney (with prizes) but requires no entry fee.

 

In my very limited experience, offering a prize of any sort increases the amount of "cowboy play" in a tournament if it is a free tournament.

 

Requiring some actual money be put up to enter or participate dramatically reduces cowboy play.

 

Probably the "purest" competition would be to require a real money account to be traded for participation, but give no prizes. Although limiting drawdown as your original intention was whether it is real or paper account probably does something very similar to real money, no prizes.

 

Just thinking out loud here... I will say I am looking forward to the next one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mostly play money contestants. Not many real money contests out there, although the prize money is real, so there is a real incentive to make it to the finish line.

 

Varengold Bank has been one of the few contests that i've seen that actually weighs in the volatility of the % gains throughout the contest without restricting the trader's ability to trade. They call it "risk-adjusted rate of return", which takes a standard deviation of the difference of the daily account balance for each trading day. That's why someone with only 30% gross returns but has low risk trades can still have a high risk-adjusted rate of return and an equal chance to win the contest. Using a flat 'no more than x% drawdown' is a more artificial barrier and does not give certain traders the room to execute their strategies fully.

 

Turns out someone decided to use their brain when determining the yardstick by which to measure results. a risk adjusted ROR is actually a shit hot way of doing this. it keeps is 100% pure without any arbitrary restrictions and yet gives the answer to the REAL question which is: who can make the greatest return with the least amount of risk.

 

For example, the last 4 weeks I'm up about 9% in my account. but my drawdown from any given day end to the following day end is less than 2%.

 

Now, you could take another guy, and he could have a 99% ROI for the same 4 weeks, but if his drawdown day to day is 40%.... well, I would argue that I'm the better trader, even though I made far less than him in terms of ROI. OF course, if he did a 99% ROI with only an 8% drawdown, I'd say he probably is the better trader.

 

I like it a lot. And I think it would be the perfect solution to this situation. furthermore, myfxbook is already equipped to provide those numbers if i'm not mistaken.

 

this idea has got my vote anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Turns out someone decided to use their brain when determining the yardstick by which to measure results. a risk adjusted ROR is actually a shit hot way of doing this. it keeps is 100% pure without any arbitrary restrictions and yet gives the answer to the REAL question which is: who can make the greatest return with the least amount of risk.

 

For example, the last 4 weeks I'm up about 9% in my account. but my drawdown from any given day end to the following day end is less than 2%.

 

Now, you could take another guy, and he could have a 99% ROI for the same 4 weeks, but if his drawdown day to day is 40%.... well, I would argue that I'm the better trader, even though I made far less than him in terms of ROI. OF course, if he did a 99% ROI with only an 8% drawdown, I'd say he probably is the better trader.

The Varengold bank contest winners were actually part 1 of a larger follow-on challenge to trade real money accounts. They used to offer cash prizes, with the 1st place winner eligible for trading a managed account somewhere between 250k-$1m, and they get . The last contest there were no immediate cash winners, but the top 3 were eligible to be flown out to headquarters to trade a large account and they get a % of the profits.

 

The point is that VG want to make sure that the same method used to win the contest will be used to continue winning when the trader migrates to a live account. It was almost like an american idol for trading; the larger goal was searching for real talent.

 

I like it a lot. And I think it would be the perfect solution to this situation. furthermore, myfxbook is already equipped to provide those numbers if i'm not mistaken.

 

this idea has got my vote anyway.

Technically any of the contest hosts can create their own Risk Adjustment (or use the standard deviation model that varengold bank used), but they choose not to. i think the Risk Adjusted ROI of 352% isn't as aesthetically pleasing as gross 12,000% ROI.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Technically any of the contest hosts can create their own Risk Adjustment (or use the standard deviation model that varengold bank used), but they choose not to. i think the Risk Adjusted ROI of 352% isn't as aesthetically pleasing as gross 12,000% ROI.

 

I think this is an extremely profound statement that reflects many of the more "depressing" (for lack of a better word) realities of trading, traders, and the trading industry as a whole.

 

of all the many hundereds (thousands?) of trading contests out there... it's possible that only this one, by varengold bank, is actually interested in "discovering" a serious, professional trader", one who has the experience and skill to be able to trade in such a manner that is stable and consistent enough to actually have real investors trust them enough to invest their real money that they likely expect to grow for many years to come.

 

yet so few "retail traders" even question risk adjusted ROI's, or drawdown, etc.

 

It seems that nearly all people who want to become a successful retail forex trader are essentially only interested in maximum returns, and the fact that so few even question why drawdown would be "capped", or would likely be dumbfounded as to why any competition would be judged based on anything other than absolute return!

 

the most obvious conclusion to me would be simply that contest organizers and the various entities who affiliate or sponser them have actually no interest at all in rewarding or even finding legitimate, consistent traders who are likely to be successful for years. It's really just to excite the cheerleading squad for "team trading!"

 

and whats more.... the overwhelming vast majority of people who attempt to trade at the retail level don't have even the most basic understanding of the skills necessary to even have a chance to make a living at this as a career.

 

And finally, it seems that both the retail trading vendor, and the aspiring retail trader, are perfectly happy with this reality.

 

I guess there is a lot more money selling a pipe dream than being a plumber.

 

and I guess most would rather be excited by a bullshit story, than be excited by the reality of learning how to make a great living from home.

 

oh well. more free money for some of us I guess.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
same oanda, or different broker? different platform (metatrader)?

 

 

The only one I know well enough to administer is Oanda. If you or anyone else knows a platform well enough to host a contest that's fine as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
same oanda, or different broker? different platform (metatrader)?

 

oanda supports mt4 and you can join the contest with that mt4 subaccount

(click on "add account" and then "advanced options")

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
oanda supports mt4 and you can join the contest with that mt4 subaccount

(click on "add account" and then "advanced options")

 

Good to know....although Oanda did a bad job integrating mt4 (compared with most other brokers). Maybe they improved their; i'll have to see.

 

Does oanda still shut down during news announcements?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Good to know....although Oanda did a bad job integrating mt4 (compared with most other brokers). Maybe they improved their; i'll have to see.

 

Does oanda still shut down during news announcements?

 

their mt4 is running smooth...cant remember when was the last time I had any connecting issues during news-events...

 

meanwhile, earlier today opened 2 trades, shorted gbp/usd but was too busy to post here..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Dang Mystic, now I really should have signed up for this. I'd be in the lead since starting the myfxbook thing... and actually caught 2ish% for the first two trading days of the month (days not pictured in myfxbook) so I'd be close to 6% up

 

although, I did have a seizure and drawdown 6ish% at one numbskulled moment, so that may have DQ'd me anyway.

 

oh well, next time I will do it, and win. unless that one guy signs up who had 50ish% ROI's and 2% drawdowns in a single month. thats just sick.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dang Mystic, now I really should have signed up for this. I'd be in the lead since starting the myfxbook thing... and actually caught 2ish% for the first two trading days of the month (days not pictured in myfxbook) so I'd be close to 6% up

 

although, I did have a seizure and drawdown 6ish% at one numbskulled moment, so that may have DQ'd me anyway.

 

oh well, next time I will do it, and win. unless that one guy signs up who had 50ish% ROI's and 2% drawdowns in a single month. thats just sick.

 

Yes, hindsight is always 20/20. :cool:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Looks like the cream has risen to the top

bobc

Gosh, Bob ... should I be depressed? :embarassed::embarassed:

 

I got in on a swing, and ended up in a position trade - pretty happy with it, and will

end the contest in the black .... or some time next month maybeeee :cool:

 

Are you entering next month?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Gosh, Bob ... should I be depressed? :embarassed::embarassed:

 

I got in on a swing, and ended up in a position trade - pretty happy with it, and will

end the contest in the black .... or some time next month maybeeee :cool:

 

Are you entering next month?

 

Hi Ingot

I knew my post would get you out of bed.

The only way you are going to get back in the black is to double your bet.

No . I am not entering your context next month

I dont trade forex. I do follow the $ closely because it affects my fundamentals

Especially Gold.

I also believe that contests can change your live trading, not necessarily for the better.

 

But if there is another contest, I will put up a small PRIZE $100 to the winner.

Kind regards

bobc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Ingot

I knew my post would get you out of bed.

The only way you are going to get back in the black is to double your bet.

No . I am not entering your context next month

I dont trade forex. I do follow the $ closely because it affects my fundamentals

Especially Gold.

I also believe that contests can change your live trading, not necessarily for the better.

 

But if there is another contest, I will put up a small PRIZE $100 to the winner.

Kind regards

bobc

Send the cheque now, mate - I've been playing possum to give the others a chance.

 

$100? Small? That's generous mate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Inlight of a prize being offered I shall of recluse myself from next months competition.
I wouldn't like to see you miss the contest, Mystic. I am certain others would not object to your continuing participation - particularly since you have no chance

of winning.

 

After all we have ForexTraderX and Obsidian to beat ... and of course myself!

 

Everyone can see that I am a late finisher ... :embarassed: Apparently Bob has already mailed the $100 to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.