Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Mysticforex

Traders Laboratory Forex Trading Contest!

Recommended Posts

Thank you for your kind words. As for the methodology, I am following the idea from Optiontimer's thread http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/trading-psychology/10158-optiontimers-project.html to trade in the direction of the main move when it is ready. I set up the simple chart in oanda, then in the evening scroll through the pairs searching for the ones that are ready for a trade.

 

'Tis truly the key to untold wealth. That method is the easiest way I know to make a lot of money in a little bit of time, and it doesn't cost you anything except a few hours of studying that thread. A little time and then the discipline/work ethic to employ it and you wil be on your way.

 

I experimented by entering trades in EU, EJ, CJ, UJ (actually GU also looked ready, but it was hard for me to enter EU and GU in the opposite direction - something to be worked on).

 

Yes. Do not assume that yesterday's correlations will hold tomorrow.

 

The next time the signals were ready, I entered heavily on the ones that perform the best. In this case it was EJ. I entered EJ heavily and pressed it by entering more positions when it went my direction (I call it my snowball trade). Strange that EJ was outperforming GJ. I tried entering some exotic pairs and those pairs with XAU and XAG also, but I find that the instruments that do not show a definite sustained direction were not performing as well. Ofcourse this was just a very small sample and need further study.QUOTE]

 

It is not strange and yet if you found it to be strange that was telling you something important.

The Euro is by far the strongest currency at the moment, and Yen is by far the weakest. The best play is to be long Eur and short YEN, and the fact that the market allows you to be long the strongest while simulataneously short the weakest is a gift of untold proportion!

 

The GBP is the weakest of the majors right now, so the weakest major will necessarily underpeform against the weakest when compared to the stronger majors. So it makes sense that if all the majors are rising against the Yen, the GBP wil rise the least, and in time, it may actually fall. Again, do not assume that since the GBP was the strongest against th Yen in the last bull market that it will remain so in toay's bull.

 

The next time the signals were ready, I entered heavily on the ones that perform the best. In this case it was EJ. I entered EJ heavily and pressed it by entering more positions when it went my direction (I call it my snowball trade)...I was very lucky to catch a wave when the position was so large.

 

You ought to enlarge that, print it out, and paste it everywhere so that you will never, ever, forget those words. While so many are out chasing for the holy grail hoping to figure out a way to get "one or two es points a day," you go and post the actual grail right there in your humble post.

 

1) Look for the strongest trend

 

2) Wait for the pullback

 

3) Jump in big (but not recklessly) when price signals the pullback may be over and the trend is likely resuming.

 

4) Use open trade equity as additional margin to pyramid, i.e. "snowball" your position.

 

As for your stop, trail behind recent reactions. Assume the trend will continue until it reverses and stops you out. I would recomend studying Victor Sperandeo's books, and perhaps incorporate his 1-2-3's and break of properly drawn trendlines to help you.

 

Finally, not all of your campaigns will not all be homeruns. In my own accounts, I am up over 170% for January. December I was up over 40%. But November was not a full of opportunity, and I managed only 15%. I do not have many negative months, but I did finish down about 2.5% in June of 2012. There will mostly be singles and doubles, a few triples, even fewer homeruns, and then the occassional grandslam. You will also sometimes strikeout.

 

But the way you managed that 89% is exactly how I trade, whether I am day trading or position trading. I know most here won't believe my numbers, and I don't care. If nothing else, my performance month after month in these contests ought to be enough to make some people think "Hey, maybe there is something to this system. Maybe I should go look at the OT project thread."

 

Think about this: I finished the contest +40%. But if you recall, I actually dropped to -50% because I inadvertently failed to place a stop loss on one trade. From that -50%, left me a balance of 45K, I hit the same pair you did, and traded it the same way you did, and I managed to take that 45K back to 140K in a month. Had it not been for that one mistake, my two month return for the contest would have likely exceeded 200%.

 

And one last thing - you mentioned "luck." Absolutely! Most traders overestimate the amount of control they have and underestimate the role of luck. You cannot control when and where the market will go on a tear, or tread sideways for a seeming eternity, or when a perfectly good signal to hop aboard a trend is suddenly reversed by price action, with an unhealthy dose of negative slippage to boot.

 

We only control whether or not we are ready to be the beneficiaries of these trends. We cannot control when luck will strike, only that we are ready to get lucky when it does.

 

You seem to have had a breakthrough in your understanding of what I have been trying to communicate here. Kuokam likewise sems to be on the cusp of a breakthrough. I wish the both of you the determination and perseverence and discipline to benefit fully from your burgeoning insights.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bravo Onemove, for the the fast learning and discipline in application.

 

OT, thanks a lot for another great contribution. I am so happy I came to know you and project here.

 

My performance lately has not been optimal for two reasons:

1- I tried to pick tops and got punished, because I followed a COT reader telling me for weeks that the yen was way oversold and ready to reverse. There I learned what it is to follow too many indicators at the same time:

2- I lacked the courage to take two trades that went in my projected direction in leaps. So, as of late, I've been only applying the "cut your losses short" and "manage your risk" rules.

 

For my bottom line for the 4 months contest, I started out with 100700. Now I have 150800 in the account. Very satisfied with a result I never achieved and managed to keep in my 6+ years trading live or sim.

But I know the learning never ends, as a saying here goes "who is not advancing is retreating".

 

Now, for a couple of weeks I am taking a break from the contest.

My project at hand is that of learning the to read and trade over the DOM. I have been told the pros' trade but that way and wanted to check out what I am missing. Any opinion on the subject is welcomed, be it by pm .

 

See you next time. Thanks again to Mystic, OT, Ingot and all the contributors.

 

 

 

'Tis truly the key to untold wealth. That method is the easiest way I know to make a lot of money in a little bit of time, and it doesn't cost you anything except a few hours of studying that thread. A little time and then the discipline/work ethic to employ it and you wil be on your way.

 

 

 

Yes. Do not assume that yesterday's correlations will hold tomorrow.

 

The next time the signals were ready, I entered heavily on the ones that perform the best. In this case it was EJ. I entered EJ heavily and pressed it by entering more positions when it went my direction (I call it my snowball trade). Strange that EJ was outperforming GJ. I tried entering some exotic pairs and those pairs with XAU and XAG also, but I find that the instruments that do not show a definite sustained direction were not performing as well. Ofcourse this was just a very small sample and need further study.QUOTE]

 

It is not strange and yet if you found it to be strange that was telling you something important.

The Euro is by far the strongest currency at the moment, and Yen is by far the weakest. The best play is to be long Eur and short YEN, and the fact that the market allows you to be long the strongest while simulataneously short the weakest is a gift of untold proportion!

 

The GBP is the weakest of the majors right now, so the weakest major will necessarily underpeform against the weakest when compared to the stronger majors. So it makes sense that if all the majors are rising against the Yen, the GBP wil rise the least, and in time, it may actually fall. Again, do not assume that since the GBP was the strongest against th Yen in the last bull market that it will remain so in toay's bull.

 

 

 

You ought to enlarge that, print it out, and paste it everywhere so that you will never, ever, forget those words. While so many are out chasing for the holy grail hoping to figure out a way to get "one or two es points a day," you go and post the actual grail right there in your humble post.

 

1) Look for the strongest trend

 

2) Wait for the pullback

 

3) Jump in big (but not recklessly) when price signals the pullback may be over and the trend is likely resuming.

 

4) Use open trade equity as additional margin to pyramid, i.e. "snowball" your position.

 

As for your stop, trail behind recent reactions. Assume the trend will continue until it reverses and stops you out. I would recomend studying Victor Sperandeo's books, and perhaps incorporate his 1-2-3's and break of properly drawn trendlines to help you.

 

Finally, not all of your campaigns will not all be homeruns. In my own accounts, I am up over 170% for January. December I was up over 40%. But November was not a full of opportunity, and I managed only 15%. I do not have many negative months, but I did finish down about 2.5% in June of 2012. There will mostly be singles and doubles, a few triples, even fewer homeruns, and then the occassional grandslam. You will also sometimes strikeout.

 

But the way you managed that 89% is exactly how I trade, whether I am day trading or position trading. I know most here won't believe my numbers, and I don't care. If nothing else, my performance month after month in these contests ought to be enough to make some people think "Hey, maybe there is something to this system. Maybe I should go look at the OT project thread."

 

Think about this: I finished the contest +40%. But if you recall, I actually dropped to -50% because I inadvertently failed to place a stop loss on one trade. From that -50%, left me a balance of 45K, I hit the same pair you did, and traded it the same way you did, and I managed to take that 45K back to 140K in a month. Had it not been for that one mistake, my two month return for the contest would have likely exceeded 200%.

 

And one last thing - you mentioned "luck." Absolutely! Most traders overestimate the amount of control they have and underestimate the role of luck. You cannot control when and where the market will go on a tear, or tread sideways for a seeming eternity, or when a perfectly good signal to hop aboard a trend is suddenly reversed by price action, with an unhealthy dose of negative slippage to boot.

 

We only control whether or not we are ready to be the beneficiaries of these trends. We cannot control when luck will strike, only that we are ready to get lucky when it does.

 

You seem to have had a breakthrough in your understanding of what I have been trying to communicate here. Kuokam likewise sems to be on the cusp of a breakthrough. I wish the both of you the determination and perseverence and discipline to benefit fully from your burgeoning insights.

Edited by kuokam

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
'Tis truly the key to untold wealth. That method is the easiest way I know to make a lot of money in a little bit of time, and it doesn't cost you anything except a few hours of studying that thread. A little time and then the discipline/work ethic to employ it and you wil be on your way.

 

Optiontimer, Thank you so very very much! I am so grateful for your thread http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/trading-psychology/10158-optiontimers-project.html and for your generosity in sharing what works.

 

There is still a lot of work to do on my part. For example, I exited EJ at the hook back of daily stochrsi, yet it has continued to move strongly with no reliable fresh signal for re-entry. Therefore I am sidelined unable to participate in the 4+% move since. What is your strategy for re-entry?

 

You ought to enlarge that, print it out, and paste it everywhere so that you will never, ever, forget those words. While so many are out chasing for the holy grail hoping to figure out a way to get "one or two es points a day," you go and post the actual grail right there in your humble post.

 

1) Look for the strongest trend

 

2) Wait for the pullback

 

3) Jump in big (but not recklessly) when price signals the pullback may be over and the trend is likely resuming.

 

4) Use open trade equity as additional margin to pyramid, i.e. "snowball" your position.

 

As for your stop, trail behind recent reactions. Assume the trend will continue until it reverses and stops you out. I would recomend studying Victor Sperandeo's books, and perhaps incorporate his 1-2-3's and break of properly drawn trendlines to help you.

 

Thank you very much for pointing the way.

 

Finally, not all of your campaigns will not all be homeruns. In my own accounts, I am up over 170% for January. December I was up over 40%. But November was not a full of opportunity, and I managed only 15%. I do not have many negative months, but I did finish down about 2.5% in June of 2012. There will mostly be singles and doubles, a few triples, even fewer homeruns, and then the occassional grandslam. You will also sometimes strikeout.

 

But the way you managed that 89% is exactly how I trade, whether I am day trading or position trading. I know most here won't believe my numbers, and I don't care. If nothing else, my performance month after month in these contests ought to be enough to make some people think "Hey, maybe there is something to this system. Maybe I should go look at the OT project thread."

 

Think about this: I finished the contest +40%. But if you recall, I actually dropped to -50% because I inadvertently failed to place a stop loss on one trade. From that -50%, left me a balance of 45K, I hit the same pair you did, and traded it the same way you did, and I managed to take that 45K back to 140K in a month. Had it not been for that one mistake, my two month return for the contest would have likely exceeded 200%.

 

Optiontimer, yes, I still maintain from my earlier post

 

Optiontimer is such an amazing trader!! Any trader knows that it is much harder to go into a deep draw down and then having to pull oneself out of one with a much smaller balance to start with. So in my mind Optiontimer has surpassed all of us thus far.

 

That is an amazing performance in your own accounts! To have such a consistent positive performance over time is what I strive to learn to do.

 

Do you have a max drawdown level where you decide that no additional signals will be taken in the week? in the month? A sit-out period so to say. And what might that max drawdown level be?

 

And one last thing - you mentioned "luck." Absolutely! Most traders overestimate the amount of control they have and underestimate the role of luck. You cannot control when and where the market will go on a tear, or tread sideways for a seeming eternity, or when a perfectly good signal to hop aboard a trend is suddenly reversed by price action, with an unhealthy dose of negative slippage to boot.

 

We only control whether or not we are ready to be the beneficiaries of these trends. We cannot control when luck will strike, only that we are ready to get lucky when it does.

 

You seem to have had a breakthrough in your understanding of what I have been trying to communicate here. Kuokam likewise sems to be on the cusp of a breakthrough. I wish the both of you the determination and perseverence and discipline to benefit fully from your burgeoning insights.

 

Thank you for your encouragement.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
...There is still a lot of work to do on my part. For example, I exited EJ at the hook back of daily stochrsi, yet it has continued to move strongly with no reliable fresh signal for re-entry. Therefore I am sidelined unable to participate in the 4+% move since. What is your strategy for re-entry?

 

Do you have a max drawdown level where you decide that no additional signals will be taken in the week? in the month? A sit-out period so to say. And what might that max drawdown level be?

 

 

 

Thank you for your encouragement.

 

The stoch is for OB/OS against the trend only. The hook, as you call it, is only to be used as a sort of "training wheels" to tip you off that the main trend is getting ready to resume. I never recommended that you use it to exit a with-trend position. Once you are in a position, get rid of the stoch until price pulls back to the MA's. Then you can put it back on your chart to help you determine whether and where a good spot to add-on to your with-trend position would be. It is not an entry and exit indicator. Its only use, as I've described it, is to identify an oversold pullback in an uptrend or an overbought rally in a downtrend. That is it!

 

I have no max drawdown level. If you start sitting out signals, especially after a series of losses, you will undoubtedly sit out the trade that would have won back your all of your losses and then some. So long as you are taking the trades as your set up defines them, you must take them all. You will harm your long-term results if you place a restriction on your market activity that has nothing to do with the market.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
.........

 

I have no max drawdown level. If you start sitting out signals, especially after a series of losses, you will undoubtedly sit out the trade that would have won back your all of your losses and then some. So long as you are taking the trades as your set up defines them, you must take them all. You will harm your long-term results if you place a restriction on your market activity that has nothing to do with the market.

[emphasis added]

 

That's a fine quote here. It take a lot of confidence in your system to play it consistently no matter what. This is why systems are important, and the more you automate, the 'easier' it becomes as your focus is much less likely to drift. When you work out the expected drawdowns ahead of time, you can also use equity-based stop loss in case of a tsunami, which no one really has control over anyway.

 

One of the original turtles commented on the mechanical approach they used. There were times where there were lots of small losses that added up while going after the larger trend, and psychologically it can be difficult (even with a mechanical strategy, written by and under the guidance of a master trader) to exercise patience to wait for the turnaround to bigger profits.

 

Keeping all other variables constant, and depending on your aggression levels, your overall capital risk decreases as you increase the repetitions of your strategy. Your overall equity goes up, and risk of ruin or risk of loss is less and less as you now play with "the market's" money.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Mystic. I started in the contest for various reasons, and for continuing reasons will not be able to take part much.

 

I note that I have only made 3 trades ... but for counting purposes it appears that an entry is one trade, and an exit is another trade. So it prints that I have made 6 trades.

 

It seems that those contestants who are showing an odd number of trades, still have a trade open in the market at the time of your screen grab.

 

Just a little more trivia from me, which you have all come to look forward to!

 

:rofl:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

It seems that those contestants who are showing an odd number of trades, still have a trade open in the market at the time of your screen grab.

 

:rofl:

 

Hello Ingot,

 

I person using two trades to enter into a complete position but exiting with only one trade won't follow this even or odd trade logic. Same with entering with one trade and exiting with two. At the end of the above combination of three trades there won't be an open position.

 

Your input is valued and appreciated.

 

Thank you.

 

Gringo

Edited by Gringo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 person using two trades to enter into a complete position but exiting with only one trade won't follow this even or odd trade logic. Same with entering with one trade and exiting with two. At the end of the above combination of three trades there won't be an open position.

Gringo

D'oh! Of course ... thanks mate! There are always broader ways to see things.

 

btw - my post above should have read: " I started in the contest late for various reasons... " ... it didn't make a lot of sense otherwise.

 

Cheers - GL in the contest.

 

Ingot

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hello Ingot,

 

I person using two trades to enter into a complete position but exiting with only one trade won't follow this even or odd trade logic. Same with entering with one trade and exiting with two. At the end of the above combination of three trades there won't be an open position.

 

Your input is valued and appreciated.

 

Thank you.

 

Gringo

 

Hi Gringo,

 

 

FYI Let's say you opened two 50K long positions on a pair with the idea of TPing 1 position for 25 pips and the second position at 50 pips. It's not necessary.

You can open one position for 100k. when the trade goes 25 pips in to profit (hopefully)

you can sell 50K and this will take half your trade off the table. Either as Market or Entry since there is no hedging allowed ( oanda never allowed hedging even back in the pre, new CFTC rules.

 

Hope this helps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
... Ingot found the Holy Grail ;)
I am in possession of the HG ... yes I am.

 

But I did not find "it" ... "it" found me.

 

It is "my" Grail, and can not be shared. Each must attract their own Grail.

 

It will come to you, but you need to present the right kind of conditions that attract it ... just as I did.

 

Patience - with yourself and with the market

Persistence in your belief in yourself and your dream

Commitment to education

Focus on your goal

Ruthlessness in discarding the mythology of trading (ie the things that do not work)

Consistency in application of your plan

Methodically apply your rules

 

In fact I think I could do a far better job of showing you how to attract your own HG,

by directing you to this thread:

 

http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/trading-psychology/9278-your-mama-doesnt-trade-so-wise.html

 

There is a lot there ... so allow yourself a few days to absorb it.

 

Finally, in a few days I will be starting a new thread, which addresses more of the

things that you can apply practically, to make an immediate difference to your

trading results.

 

I hope I am not coming across in an arrogant fashion - the Internet can make

things appear thus. By sheer good luck more than anything, I found the trades

and got the entries that brought me to this place.

 

In the next 4 weeks, I hope to continue to attract that kind of trade to my notice.

 

To those who are not currently making startling profits ... help is at hand ...

do not give up.

 

Cheers

 

Ingot :cool:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.