Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

ValueTrader

Peak Volume Price

Recommended Posts

I tried to add the PVP code (OEC EL) that POPSTOCKS kindly posted on TL, however it failed to compile.

 

I tinkered with the 'Counters' as this was where the error message was pointing to.

 

I can now get it to run, but it appears to be giving me the PVP of each bar.

 

When i compare it to my Volume @ price histogram it returns a differnet value.

 

Is this because it is giving me the Peak volume Price from when the indicator is added / enabled, and is only of use in real-time?

 

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

 

Vars: Counter(0),
Op(0), 
Ct(0), 
hh(0), 
f(0),
mintick(0);

Array: v[800](0), p[800](0);

mintick=minmove/pricescale;

If 1 = 1 then Ct =1+Ct;
If Date > Date[1] or Ct = 1 then begin
Op = Open-100;

For Counter = 1 to 800
begin
p[counter] = 0;
v[counter] = 0;
End;

End;

For Counter = 1 to 800
begin
p[counter] = (counter*mintick)+Op;

If Close = p[counter] then v[counter]= volume+v[counter];

End;

hh = highestarray(v,800);

if hh> hh[1] then f = close;

Plot1(f);

Edited by ValueTrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
...

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

 

please wrap the code with code tag. That's the # key at the top of the message window.

Unwrapped codes are difficult to read (and debug).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the expediant reply Tams.

 

I see what you mean, I've checked back and all POPSTOCKS PVP codes, and other TL users veriants use it, but what it does i have no idea.

 

I'm learning EL as i go, and my only programing knowledge is BASIC from when i was a kid (20 years ago). I looks like a loop of some kind.

 

I've removed the line you hightlighted,

 

the PVP line follows the current price bar, and is not giving the correct signal.

 

I have a volume histogram on OEC, but this is set to the day volume and is not user adjustable (from OEC tech support)

 

So the VOL@price histogram give a rough PVP, but isnt session accurate a volume traded befor the cash open is also diplayed. Besides i find it distracting having to keep update a PVP line manually on my chart.

 

Thanks VT

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I tried to add the PVP code (OEC EL) that POPSTOCKS kindly posted on TL, however it failed to compile.

...

 

can you supply a link to this reference?

there is no use re-inventing the wheel,

any discussion there will help.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Further to my PVP Problems, I tried out the another code from the TL site..

vars:         MyVolume(0),
	PriceDiff(0),
	StartPrice(0),
	PVPPrice(0),
	PVPVolume(0),
	V2VolLevel(0);	

Array:
	PVPVolArray[10000] (0);

MyVolume = Volume;

if date > date[1] then begin
	StartPrice = AvgPrice;
	For Value1 = 0 to 10000 Begin
		PVPVolArray[Value1] = 0;
	End;
	PVPVolArray[5000] = MyVolume;
	PVPPrice = AvgPrice;
	PVPVolume = MyVolume;
end;

If date = date[1] And StartPrice > 0 Then Begin
	Value2 = AvgPrice - StartPrice;
	V2VolLevel = 5000+(Value2*(1/(minmove/pricescale)));
	PVPVolArray[V2VolLevel] = PVPVolArray[V2VolLevel] + MyVolume;

	If PVPVolArray[V2VolLevel] > PVPVolume Then Begin
		PVPVolume = PVPVolArray[V2VolLevel];
		PriceDiff = 5000-V2VolLevel;
		PVPPrice = StartPrice - (PriceDiff*(minmove/pricescale));
	End;

End;

Plot1(PVPPrice, "PVP");
Plot2(PVPVolume, "PVPVolume"); 

 

I've turned off the tick-by tick update option, else the pvp line seems to follow the last price.

 

My question is, is this reliable? The reason i question it is that my volume histogram shows the price with the most volume traded at different level. Am i missing somthing here? i've Demo traded using it before running it live, and some signals using the code seem to be correct, then at other times it appears my histogram peak volume is the correct one!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Further to my PVP Problems, I tried out the another code from the TL site.....

 

you should always provide a link to your source...

1. give the original author credit

2. so that ppl can understand the background... instead of starting from nowhere.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That looked mightily familiar for some reason. Mind you I wrote a big chunk of the PvP indicator for DBtina... actually I took a big chunk and made a small perfectly formed chunk :)

 

This works for me without ADE. It averages the data across the bar so you do not update it every bar (like Ensign and Jerry's original stuff) it does a couple of other funky things too like variable number of days, old pvp. It has some comments but was kind of 'lazy' code maybe that will help you get a handle

//
//	PvP Averaged across bar. Set update at end of bar true.
//	See PvP Tick Precise version also
//

Input:
	PlotOldPvP (false),
	NumberofDays (1);

vars:
	n(0),m(0),
	StartPrice(0),						// Price corresponding to first element of  array
	PVPPrice(0),
	PVPPrice1(0),
	PVPPeakVolume(0),
	PVPIndex(0),							//Index of the peak (highest) volume array element
	PVPArraySize(3000),						//Set to Array Size
	PVPArrayMid(1500);						//Set to Array Mid Point
Array:
	PVPVolArray[3000] (0);					//Make sure this matches Array Size


if BarNumber = 1 then n = NumberofDays - 1;			//Make sure to reset on first bar
if (date > date[1]) or BarNumber =	1  then begin			//initialise
	n = n + 1;
	if n = NumberofDays then		
	begin	

		For Value1 = 0 to PVPArraySize Begin
			PVPVolArray[Value1] = 0;
		End;
		StartPrice = l;
		PVPPrice1 = PVPPrice;
		PVPPrice = StartPrice;
		PVPPeakVolume = 0;
		PVPIndex = PVPArrayMid;
		//PVPVolArray[PVPIndex] = Volume;
		n = 0;
	end;
end; 

Value2 = l - StartPrice;				//price in relation to starting price
value2 = value2 * (1/(MinMove/PriceScale));		
Value2 = PVPArrayMid+Value2;
value3 = (h-l) * (1/(MinMove/PriceScale));       // number of ticks l -> h				
Value1 = Round(Value2,0);				//shouldnt be needed as not adding to average price 
for m = Value1 to value1 + value3
begin
	PVPVolArray[m] = PVPVolArray[m] + Volume / (value3+1);	// +1 as as zero ticks should be vol/1 one tick vol/2 etc.
	If PVPVolArray[m] > PVPPeakVolume Then begin		// new peak volume? save it
		PVPIndex = m;
		PVPPeakVolume = PVPVolArray[m];
		PVPPrice = StartPrice - ((PVPArrayMid - m)*minmove/PriceScale );
	end;
end;

Plot1(PVPPrice, "PVPavg");
if (PVPPrice1 > 0 and PlotOldPvP) then Plot2 (PVPPrice1, "PVP Yesterday");	


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That looked mightily familiar for some reason. Mind you I wrote a big chunk of the PvP indicator for DBtina... actually I took a big chunk and made a small perfectly formed chunk :)

 

This works for me without ADE. It averages the data across the bar so you do not update it every bar (like Ensign and Jerry's original stuff) it does a couple of other funky things too like variable number of days, old pvp. It has some comments but was kind of 'lazy' code maybe that will help you get a handle

//
//	PvP Averaged across bar. Set update at end of bar true.
//	See PvP Tick Precise version also
//

Input:
	PlotOldPvP (false),
	NumberofDays (1);

vars:
	n(0),m(0),
	StartPrice(0),						// Price corresponding to first element of  array
	PVPPrice(0),
	PVPPrice1(0),
	PVPPeakVolume(0),
	PVPIndex(0),							//Index of the peak (highest) volume array element
	PVPArraySize(3000),						//Set to Array Size
	PVPArrayMid(1500);						//Set to Array Mid Point
Array:
	PVPVolArray[3000] (0);					//Make sure this matches Array Size


if BarNumber = 1 then n = NumberofDays - 1;			//Make sure to reset on first bar
if (date > date[1]) or BarNumber =	1  then begin			//initialise
	n = n + 1;
	if n = NumberofDays then		
	begin	

		For Value1 = 0 to PVPArraySize Begin
			PVPVolArray[Value1] = 0;
		End;
		StartPrice = l;
		PVPPrice1 = PVPPrice;
		PVPPrice = StartPrice;
		PVPPeakVolume = 0;
		PVPIndex = PVPArrayMid;
		//PVPVolArray[PVPIndex] = Volume;
		n = 0;
	end;
end; 

Value2 = l - StartPrice;				//price in relation to starting price
value2 = value2 * (1/(MinMove/PriceScale));		
Value2 = PVPArrayMid+Value2;
value3 = (h-l) * (1/(MinMove/PriceScale));       // number of ticks l -> h				
Value1 = Round(Value2,0);				//shouldnt be needed as not adding to average price 
for m = Value1 to value1 + value3
begin
	PVPVolArray[m] = PVPVolArray[m] + Volume / (value3+1);	// +1 as as zero ticks should be vol/1 one tick vol/2 etc.
	If PVPVolArray[m] > PVPPeakVolume Then begin		// new peak volume? save it
		PVPIndex = m;
		PVPPeakVolume = PVPVolArray[m];
		PVPPrice = StartPrice - ((PVPArrayMid - m)*minmove/PriceScale );
	end;
end;

Plot1(PVPPrice, "PVPavg");
if (PVPPrice1 > 0 and PlotOldPvP) then Plot2 (PVPPrice1, "PVP Yesterday");	


 

Can somebody help me .....

 

This indicator was working just fine for weeks on my charts. All of the sudden it won't work when I use it on my AAPL chart. It still works fine on the SPY. Anyone got an idea how to fix this?

 

zHqiOBD.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Can somebody help me .....

 

This indicator was working just fine for weeks on my charts. All of the sudden it won't work when I use it on my AAPL chart. It still works fine on the SPY. Anyone got an idea how to fix this?

 

zHqiOBD.png

 

Above code works fine ; format window , chart properties 10 , 15

Check for a bad workspace problem

5aa7121534a37_AAPL-PVP3-25-14.thumb.jpg.13dd09e0bf51b86bf67c160a78141727.jpg

5aa712153983a_ESM14-PVP3-25-14.thumb.jpg.f3d1c2b872ad1df7bafd507336b42738.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.