Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

UrmaBlume

Ask Me About Poker

Recommended Posts

  ch_dupre said:
Here is a question from a newbie - how do you recommend one learns poker?Thanks,Christophe

 

By all means, yes - I do.

 

How can learning to make decisions on line and the ability to judge risk and reward not help you develop as a trader.

 

Plus poker is a great and, for some, a profitable hobby with million dollar competitions around the world that are open to all.

 

Notice the bottom paragraph in the back cover. It's a note about a trading operation that only hires poker players (click image to expand).

 

 

CoversSpine.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  UrmaBlume said:
By all means, yes - I do.

 

How can learning to make decisions on line and the ability to judge risk and reward not help you develop as a trader.

 

Plus poker is a great and, for some, a profitable hobby with million dollar competitions around the world that are open to all.

 

Notice the bottom paragraph in the back cover. It's a note about a trading operation that only hires poker players (click image to expand).

 

 

CoversSpine.jpg

 

with the recent shutdown of the major sites where are you playing?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I live in Vegas so there are plenty of brick and mortar alternatives. I am running a bit behind on a couple of deadlines for my next book so I am taking a bit of a break from poker.

 

There are still sites that take US players but they don't have the action and it will be some time until they do.

 

However, when the withdrawal symptoms get too strong I will probably play some of the small dollar events at The Orleans. They are very friendly, small tournaments that are well run and they offer 2 events a day - one at noon and one at 7pm.

 

Below is a shot of my desk where I work and trade during the day and play multiple poker events after the market. Below that is my office window with some of the 1st place plaques I won at the Orleans events mentioned above before online poker got too good to ignore.

 

Some of the hardcore online players use a setup like this to play in as many as 24 tables/events at the same time. As in HFT trading there is something called rake back in poker where high volume players could, before recent govt action, play just break-even poker and still get low six figures a year from action rebates.

 

mini580.jpg

 

mini581.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi UrmaBlume,

 

Thanks for the reply. I just realised that my question wasn't clear.

 

I want to learn poker - how do you recommend I ( and any newbie) learn it?

 

Thanks,

 

Christophe

 

  UrmaBlume said:
By all means, yes - I do.

 

How can learning to make decisions on line and the ability to judge risk and reward not help you develop as a trader.

 

Plus poker is a great and, for some, a profitable hobby with million dollar competitions around the world that are open to all.

 

Notice the bottom paragraph in the back cover. It's a note about a trading operation that only hires poker players (click image to expand).

Edited by ch_dupre
spelling mistake

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  ch_dupre said:
Hi UrmaBlume,Thanks for the reply. I just realised that my question wasn't clear.I want to learn poker - how do you recommend I ( and any newbie) learn it?Thanks, Christophe

 

The availability of online poker plus the availability of dozens of good books on the subject make it easier than ever for anybody to learn poker.

 

Books I would recommend:

 

Super System 2 - Doyle Brunson

Theory Of Poker - Sklansky

Practical Poker Math - me

Small Stakes Holdem - Sklansky/Miller/Malmuth

Hold'em Poker for Advanced Players - Sklansky/Malmuth

No-Limit Hold'em - Sklansky/Miller

Tournament Poker - Sklansky

All of Dan Harrington's Books

Pot Limit Omaha - Jeff Hawang

Sit N Go Strategy - Collin Moshman

 

If you live outside the US you have all the online sites in the world available to you and I recommend you start with online play. US players still have several sites available to them.

 

Most of these sites offer both free play and very low/micro stakes play. I recommend that you DO NOT play the free sites as the play there bears no resemblance to real world play. I suggest you start at what to you are very low and affordable stakes.

 

I like poker and I like the markets and if I can be of any help I am usually up on Skype as UrmaBlume.

 

Good Luck

 

cheers

 

UB

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  UrmaBlume said:
The availability of online poker plus the availability of dozens of good books on the subject make it easier than ever for anybody to learn poker.

 

Books I would recommend:

 

Super System 2 - Doyle Brunson

Theory Of Poker - Sklansky

Practical Poker Math - me

Small Stakes Holdem - Sklansky/Miller/Malmuth

Hold'em Poker for Advanced Players - Sklansky/Malmuth

No-Limit Hold'em - Sklansky/Miller

Tournament Poker - Sklansky

All of Dan Harrington's Books

Pot Limit Omaha - Jeff Hawang

Sit N Go Strategy - Collin Moshman

 

If you live outside the US you have all the online sites in the world available to you and I recommend you start with online play. US players still have several sites available to them.

 

Most of these sites offer both free play and very low/micro stakes play. I recommend that you DO NOT play the free sites as the play there bears no resemblance to real world play. I suggest you start at what to you are very low and affordable stakes.

 

I like poker and I like the markets and if I can be of any help I am usually up on Skype as UrmaBlume.

 

Good Luck

 

cheers

 

UB

 

UB,

 

US players have not had live play available to them legally for quite some time. Online gambling is and has been against the law and deciding to gamble online is deciding to break the law.

 

It is not being prosecuted at the moment, but if you get a scorned congressman, he will go after the sites, the banks, the players, etc to make a name for himself.

 

MM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  MightyMouse said:
UB,US players have not had live play available to them legally for quite some time. Online gambling is and has been against the law and deciding to gamble online is deciding to break the law. It is not being prosecuted at the moment, but if you get a scorned congressman, he will go after the sites, the banks, the players, etc to make a name for himself.MM

 

I think MightyMouse's cape has SuperNit on the back of it - I know most of his posts do.

 

MILLIONS of US players have been playing online for more than a decade with no prosecutions and now that this most recent drastic action has taken place, most of the people I know that are really in the know, believe a backlash will make the pendulum more likely to swing towards legalization than prosecution.

 

That's not to mention the recent World Trade Organization decisions against the US for just this kind of legislation and action.

 

UrmaBlume

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd like to stand shoulder-to-shoulder with my "Super-Nit" buddy. :cool:

 

Last time I played online it was a demo a/c ... and I picked up a computer virus!

I was cured of such sites for life! :doh:

 

In fact, not only is it illegal here in Australia to be playing casino games online, my suspicion is that the mug player can't win against the algorithms used by the house against the online player. This possibility, and the fact that the taxation people can't get a dime from it, and the fact that many people lose the rent, the groceries and the kids' piggy banks is a fair enough reason to control it.

 

I don't know for sure, but this could attract quite a sophisticated element of criminal interest.

If not ... why not?

Are the crooks so slack these days that they don't recognise a mark any more? :roll eyes:

 

What security is there, for example, for someone living in Australia, against a house that has a "dummy" hand sitting at the table? The stooge hand only has to win the big pots once every 6 or 10 times to substantially boost the house take.

I call this healthy paranoia.

Where are the checks-and-balances people in the online world?

 

There aren't any.

 

Maybe I am missing something here?

 

In any case, people like myself would get their guts handed back to them through the kitchen window for trying to mingle with algorithms, Rush Players, and those who consistently win first prizes.

 

Kind of keeps me playing desk-top "Free Cell' a little longer when I feel the need for speed! :missy:

 

It seems to me that what you are promoting here, is information.

 

But if I were to A-C-T on that information, and I live in Australia and/or the USA, then I would be breaking the law. Fortunately, we have not crossed that line here - we are only talking about it ... right?

 

I picked up a theme running through your posts, and I quote:

 

  Quote
Online poker is the nuts. You can learn in free games or for stakes as low as nickle/dime all the way up to nose-bleed stakes. While I have done some consulting for some of these sites in the past' date=' I have no affiliation with any of them and would be happy to help any TLers get started.Are you speaking to the uninitiated, or the seasoned players here? "Consulting" means you have inside information ... right? So you must be aware of the scams?

 

  Quote
Successful Rush Poker players have developed algorithms/systems for successful play to the point where they play rush very selectively and very aggressively. They base their actions on their cards and the actions of their opponents.Whoa! Me competing against an algorithm ... don't think so!

 

... and (I) have learned that about the same percentage of players succeed in poker as succeed in futures trading and that the characteristics of methods and understanding are much the same for both groups.Would that "same percentage" be "around 90% lose ... 8% break even ... 2% win?"

 

  Quote
There is really not more than procedure that can be learned from play money games. The good news is that most of the major online sites offer stakes as low as nickel/dime and lower for beginners with baby bankrolls.

 

One young lady from Scandinavia named Annette started with these uber low stakes games and over the last few years has won millions in the big buy-in tournament circuit.Sounds like an advert for the latest Million-Dollar trading system - "Get in now before we sell the last copy' date=' and it is removed from the market forever."[/b']

 

  Quote
What you miss here is that expert practitioners can often posses technical information that equals inside information or a nut poker holding.How can any beginner hope to compete on a level playing field if this is the case?

 

The issue with many traders is the inability to calculate hand ranking' date=' pot odds and/or implied odds as relates to their entry price, trade location, time frame, method, expectation and risk metrics. Good enough reason to steer wide of the activity.

 

Look, obviously this is an unregulated industry, and there are players who manage to find ways to turn a profit. But how many newbies are there who do their @r$e at this? There are a couple of good reasons the industry is clandestine ... money!

 

Oh - the second reason ... that one is 'money' too.

 

I feel bad enough running a blog, that hopes to help wannabe traders learn some ropes. I am trying to keep it real.

I don't picture myself as an urger for the trading industry!

 

Comes down to which is the worst of two gambling evils?

 

For mine, I will stick to the regulated industry to do my investing.

 

And so far I have never lost the rent by playing "Free Cell"! :rofl:

 

Pat - hats-off to you for doing so well in your chosen field.

A sign of a well-spent youth?

 

Have you ever played on an illegal on-line poker site?

5aa7107198bd7_Howitsdone.JPG.78c366f0a0c08094be1756d8c5be8cf2.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  UrmaBlume said:
I think MightyMouse's cape has SuperNit on the back of it - I know most of his posts do.

 

MILLIONS of US players have been playing online for more than a decade with no prosecutions and now that this most recent drastic action has taken place, most of the people I know that are really in the know, believe a backlash will make the pendulum more likely to swing towards legalization than prosecution.

 

That's not to mention the recent World Trade Organization decisions against the US for just this kind of legislation and action.

 

UrmaBlume

 

I played online before they shut it down in the US. I never played very high stakes online because I just didn't trust it. With the decision to formally make it illegal, I withdrew my money and play only live games. I need to be securities licensed and the potential of a gambling charge, though small, is just not a risk that I feel like introducing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

None of the poker rooms in Las Vegas cheat or scam as a matter of policy. At the same time, every now and then, an employee or a player or a combination of the two will initiate a scam to cheat either the house or other players. They are always discovered and most of the time they are publicly arrested and hauled out in handcuffs to discourage others.

 

Having knowledge of the operations of some of the biggest online sites I know for sure that the same is true for all credible online sites. These sites collect hundreds of millions dollars in rake and some are even publicly traded companies on exchanges as respected as the London Stock Exchange (LSE).

 

Any sign of cheating at any publicly traded site would instantly kill its stock price and its revenues. So while there have been a couple of instances of cheating in a couple of the hundreds of online sites, like Vegas, it was never a matter of policy.

 

I personally know dozens of players making 6 figures and more from online play. I even know one hedge fund analyst who quit his 6 figure job to play online. There was a recent article by an accountant (good w/numbers) who had been making low six figures for the last 6 years (twice what he made as an accountant) playing online poker and now he is out of work.

 

I resent the govt telling me what I can and cannot do with my money and my time and I am sorry for all of the people and businesses that are part of the US economy that have been hurt by this recent action.

 

Some people are so weak of character and understanding that they want and need a "nanny state" to direct and regulate all business, social and even recreational interactions. I do not.

 

Poker is a game of skill and the vast majority of all games whether online or brick and mortar are honestly run and I resent anyone telling me I can't play.

 

I find it interesting and must question the motives of the two posters above who post so big but obviously know so little about the subject at hand.

 

UrmaBlume

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  UrmaBlume said:
None of the poker rooms in Las Vegas cheat or scam as a matter of policy.

 

Urma ... I trust you. How long will it take me to learn whether a flush beats a full?

And how long will it take me to crack the 6 figure income mark?

 

  UrmaBlume said:
Having knowledge of the operations of some of the biggest online sites I know for sure that the same is true for all credible online sites.

 

Urma I believe you. Which of the biggest online sites is credible?

 

  UrmaBlume said:
These sites collect hundreds of millions dollars in rake and some are even publicly traded companies on exchanges as respected as the London Stock Exchange (LSE).
Where does the "hundreds of millions of dollars" come from? I am not in this to lose - I would be only playing to WIN. This is beginning to sound a little competitive ... I don't like the way this is heading.

 

  UrmaBlume said:
So while there have been a couple of instances of cheating in a couple of the hundreds of online sites, like Vegas, it was never a matter of policy.
No, it was just a nasty rumour started by some sad loser.

 

  UrmaBlume said:
I personally know dozens of players making 6 figures and more from online play.
"Dozens" = plural = at least 24 people "making 6 figures and more." So how many people do you know that lose? And how many losers are there for these people to be making 6 figures (and more)?

 

  UrmaBlume said:
I resent the govt telling me what I can and cannot do with my money and my time and I am sorry for all of the people and businesses that are part of the US economy that have been hurt by this recent action.

 

I am actually pleased, Urma. Because if a handful of layabouts can fleece the unskilled and unwary, then of course something has to be done to level-out the playing field.

 

You might have noticed that the regulators have recently tightened the screws on Forex trading sites, advertisers, brokers, and the amount of leverage allowed and so on. I wonder why? And I wonder if you also resent that?

 

  UrmaBlume said:
Some people are so weak of character and understanding that they want and need a "nanny state" to direct and regulate all business, social and even recreational interactions. I do not.

 

Regulation of financial industries, or activities can only be a good thing, since we have witnessed what happens when regulation is absent.

 

Tell me, what is your REAL problem with regulation?

 

  UrmaBlume said:
Poker is a game of skill and the vast majority of all games whether online or brick and mortar are honestly run and I resent anyone telling me I can't play.

 

You keep asserting that the game is honest, the sites are to be trusted, but then you quote mates who are gleaning "6 figures and more". Sounds a little unbalanced somewhere.

 

In fact, it sounds like there is an edge amongst the online elite that the rubes don't know about.

 

Right?

 

  UrmaBlume said:
I find it interesting and must question the motives of the two posters above who post so big but obviously know so little about the subject at hand.

 

You want motives, Urma?

 

Then why don't you begin by telling us why the online sites have been banned?

 

I asked in my previous post, whether you had ever played in an illegal online poker site.

 

I made an error.

 

I should have asked if you had ever played in a legal one.

 

To which I add, do you still play in legal/illegal rooms?

 

Now if someone plays in an illegal online room, I have to question whether they would have the same scruples in dealing with other illegal activities. I can't say, because I don't know. But we already have your word for it that you know at least 24 people who make 6 figures and more, in some of these online rooms.

 

Now to my way of thinking, all of this money had to be made in illegal online gaming rooms.

If not, then you would surely have no hesitation in naming the rooms you play in that are NOT illegal ... right?

 

This goes to the very heart of why the industry is regulated to begin with. Have you ever tried to get your winnings, or at the least, the balance of your account, back from an unregulated site?

 

You see, it is hard enough to get money back when they ARE regulated.

 

Your story is really pie-in-the-sky rubbish, but that's just as far as I am concerned - others can believe what they wish about this.

 

Most of your posts mention the wonderful sums of money made by 24 mates, or some chick from somewhere who made a mil or two playing in some respected joint in an unregulated fairyland.

 

  Quote
One young lady from Scandinavia named Annette started with these uber low stakes games and over the last few years has won millions in the big buy-in tournament circuit.

 

How about you begin to show a bit of conscience, and balance the picture a little.

 

What about the rubes who lose?

What about the hundreds and thousands who are so green that they don't have a ghost of a chance?

Some of these rubes don't know a spade from a heart - all they see is $$$.

Yet following the wonderful stories posted on sites like TL, I wonder how many members from here have rushed out and joined some hitherto unknown site?

How many have bought your book of "Poker 101 for the Unwary" because in just 5 short lessons they too will be making 6 figure sums?

 

You see, Urma, or Pat, there is something amiss in all of this, and I think that as in war, one of the first casualties is ... er ... the truth.

 

You didn't answer my question about algorithms.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jeez - Get a Life and don't forget to keep up with the meds.

 

An amazing amount of verbiage from one with virtually no experience or understanding of the game or the business of running the game. Probably the same about what you write about the markets.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  UrmaBlume said:
Jeez - Get a Life and don't forget to keep up with the meds.

 

An amazing amount of verbiage from one with virtually no experience or understanding of the game or the business of running the game. Probably the same about what you write about the markets.

 

Hurting a tad are we?

 

And the wonderful thing is ... I don't get to get ripped off by urgers touting for more dupes to attend illegal gambling sites, to make others wealthy.

 

I understand why you don't wish this side of things to become well known!

 

Terse statement Pat ... but you didn't answer any questions - nicely deflected.

Insults towards a poster are not actually counted as legit answers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  UrmaBlume said:
None of the poker rooms in Las Vegas cheat or scam as a matter of policy. At the same time, every now and then, an employee or a player or a combination of the two will initiate a scam to cheat either the house or other players. They are always discovered and most of the time they are publicly arrested and hauled out in handcuffs to discourage others.

 

Having knowledge of the operations of some of the biggest online sites I know for sure that the same is true for all credible online sites. These sites collect hundreds of millions dollars in rake and some are even publicly traded companies on exchanges as respected as the London Stock Exchange (LSE).

 

Any sign of cheating at any publicly traded site would instantly kill its stock price and its revenues. So while there have been a couple of instances of cheating in a couple of the hundreds of online sites, like Vegas, it was never a matter of policy.

 

I personally know dozens of players making 6 figures and more from online play. I even know one hedge fund analyst who quit his 6 figure job to play online. There was a recent article by an accountant (good w/numbers) who had been making low six figures for the last 6 years (twice what he made as an accountant) playing online poker and now he is out of work.

 

I resent the govt telling me what I can and cannot do with my money and my time and I am sorry for all of the people and businesses that are part of the US economy that have been hurt by this recent action.

 

Some people are so weak of character and understanding that they want and need a "nanny state" to direct and regulate all business, social and even recreational interactions. I do not.

 

Poker is a game of skill and the vast majority of all games whether online or brick and mortar are honestly run and I resent anyone telling me I can't play.

 

I find it interesting and must question the motives of the two posters above who post so big but obviously know so little about the subject at hand.

 

UrmaBlume

 

I too resent that they took poker away from me. I enjoy playing the game.

 

I never thought that an online site would cheat me. Since they were raking games with 250k players playing at any one time, I thought it was in their best interest to keep it fair. However, it seemed too easy to be sitting at a table that had 2 players communicating with each other via cellphone, etc without me knowing.

 

Poker players are exactly like traders. They all make money playing poker.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  MightyMouse said:
I too resent that they took poker away from me. I enjoy playing the game.

 

Yes I'm not happy about the poker laws either. Why don't they just legalize it and rake in the billions in taxes? I love playing poker but playing in a casino is so slow and too much of a grind for me most days. Too many wanna-be pros waiting for AK. Although sometimes I find a loose game Omaha game where I can pick up a quick hundred or so.

 

MMS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The proprietor of this site was a professional poker player before he made the switch to becoming a trader.

 

Anyway. I play poker weekly to help subsidize our expenses. I win consistently. I know there's an element of luck, but I also win consistently. You have to learn the odds, and what people would do during certain situation (knowing when and how to bluff is a good example) It's all about odds and psychology, in my opinion.

 

Do I pay for every hand? Yes, it's called an ante. Do I win every hand? No, I don't even half. But when I'm on a roll, I play it for as much as I can, and when I'm losing I get out quick. So yeah, they have a lot in common.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes poker and trading are so similar its uncanny. Patience, wait for the right setup, and bet aggressively when the opportunity arises. Smalls losses and big winners. That's why I prefer Omaha to Hold'em, bigger pots, less patient people playing hands they shouldn't, and BIGGER pots. But if I had a dollar for every time I busted out with rockets or cowboys ...

 

MMS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  MadMarketScientist said:
Yes poker and trading are so similar its uncanny. Patience, wait for the right setup, and bet aggressively when the opportunity arises. Smalls losses and big winners. That's why I prefer Omaha to Hold'em, bigger pots, less patient people playing hands they shouldn't, and BIGGER pots. But if I had a dollar for every time I busted out with rockets or cowboys ...MMS

 

Amen - nothing better for an Omaha-8 game than a bunch of holdem players.

 

Or course in Omaha rockets or cowboys are worth so much LESS than they are in Holdem because they come around much more often in Omaha. Aces once every 220 hands in Holdem and once every 39 hands in Omaha. I can only imagine very few hands that I would even play kkxx in omaha,except hands like KKA2s. So many unseasoned Omaha plyers over push AA and some even play AAAx (only game in poker where you look down and see three aces or even 4 aces and its an automatic toss).

 

CoversSpine.jpg

Please Click to enlarge image

 

MMS - I didn't know you played - ever get to Vegas?

 

cheers

 

UB

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Pony said:
The proprietor of this site was a professional poker player before he made the switch to becoming a trader.

 

Anyway. I play poker weekly to help subsidize our expenses. I win consistently. I know there's an element of luck, but I also win consistently. You have to learn the odds, and what people would do during certain situation (knowing when and how to bluff is a good example) It's all about odds and psychology, in my opinion.

 

Do I pay for every hand? Yes, it's called an ante. Do I win every hand? No, I don't even half. But when I'm on a roll, I play it for as much as I can, and when I'm losing I get out quick. So yeah, they have a lot in common.

 

Yes, and you have to learn how to put someone on a hand and understand the odds that your opponent is facing. If you can't read the player it is difficult to play. You end up grinding out the odds. It's a lot more lucrative when you play with the same players each time. This is possible in either garage/basement/backroom games or higher stakes games in casinos where there are fewer transient players.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  UrmaBlume said:

Or course in Omaha rockets or cowboys are worth so much LESS than they are in Holdem because they come around much more often in Omaha. Aces once every 220 hands in Holdem and once every 39 hands in Omaha. I can only imagine very few hands that I would even play kkxx in omaha,except hands like KKA2s. So many unseasoned Omaha plyers over push AA and some even play AAAx (only game in poker where you look down and see three aces or even 4 aces and its an automatic toss).

 

MMS - I didn't know you played - ever get to Vegas?

 

cheers

 

UB

 

Yup I love the omaha games, too bad they are getting harder and harder to find, at least where I'm from. Because of TV its all guys playing 1-2 or 2-4 no limit with $200 in front of them ... such a boring game for me. I was actually referring to being run over with KK or AA in hold-em. Can't fall in love with you hand, I have to remind myself that when I look down at a big pair.

 

Yes I get down to vegas once a year or so, love the Bellagio room. The action and atmosphere is amazing ... red bulls and 15-30 all day!

 

I haven't read your book (thats pretty cool) but I'll check it out

 

MMS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  MadMarketScientist said:

Yes I get down to vegas once a year or so, love the Bellagio room. The action and atmosphere is amazing ... red bulls and 15-30 all day!,,,,I haven't read your book (thats pretty cool) but I'll check it out MMS

 

Let me know next time you come. There is a great tapas joint near me and I will buy you a drink and some of their amazing stuffed dates (stuffed with a walnut, blue cheese and wrapped in bacon w/great sauce) and a crispy duck roll.

 

cheers

 

pat

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  MadMarketScientist said:
The WSOP is on right now ... do you ever get out and play there? Looks like hedge fund guy David Einhorn is doing ok: David Einhorn Made It To Day 2 In The World Series Of PokerMMS

 

MMS,

 

I haven't played professionally or in the WSOP in some years. The last time I was at the WSOP was for a book signing.

 

Until recently I did play online PL Omaha tournaments almost every day. Even though I live in Vegas I haven't played in a Vegas room in years becasue online games are so much softer, you can play multiple games, you don't have to toke anyone, you can playing your bathrobe and switch games, stakes, tournaments or casinos with a click.

 

Somtimes this nanny state mentality really pisses me off. I really miss online poker. Not to mention the upwards of 50,000 online players who have lost thier livelehood/job and that doesn't include all the magazines, Ad sales & associated jobs and TV shows etc that have been or will be cancelled or at least downsized.

 

I know one player in California who is over 80 that has been making a modest supplement to his Social Security of around 5k per month but doesn't have the ability to do a 50 mile commute to play in a single game at a cardroom for much reduced potential who has lost his "extra/buffer" and now scratches on SS. Poker is the essence of the American spirit and now online poker is forbidden and in troubled times another 50-100k jobs are lost.

 

In the future and until Online is restored, whenever I am Jonesing for a poker fix I will play some of the small takes tournaments at the Orleans. Very friendly local room and I have won a bunch of their events.

 

mini581.jpg

 

 

Cheers

 

UB

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  UrmaBlume said:

Somtimes this nanny state mentality really pisses me off. I really miss online poker.

 

Yeah I hear you ... no way to fake an IP so it looks like an UK address? I hope this is just a temporary thing, a way to eliminate competition before the big boys (MGM, Wynn, LVS) come in and start their own sites up

 

Impressive wall!

 

MMS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • Date: 8th April 2025.   Markets Rebound Cautiously as US-China Tariff Tensions Deepen     Global markets staged a tentative recovery on Tuesday following a wave of volatility sparked by escalating trade tensions between the United States and China. The Asia-Pacific region showed signs of stability after a chaotic start to the week—though some pockets remained under pressure. Taiwan’s Taiex dropped 4.4%, dragged lower by losses in tech heavyweight TSMC. The world’s largest chipmaker fell another 4% on Tuesday and has now slumped 13.5% since April 2, when US President Donald Trump first unveiled what he called ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs.   However, broader sentiment across the region turned more positive, with several markets rebounding sharply after Monday’s dramatic sell-offs. Japan’s Nikkei 225 surged over 6% in early trading, rebounding from an 18-month low. South Korea’s Kospi rose marginally, and Australia’s ASX 200 gained 1.9%, driven by strength in mining stocks. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng rose 1.6%, though still far from recovering from Monday’s 13.2% crash—its worst day since the 1997 Asian financial crisis. China’s Shanghai Composite added 0.9%.   In Europe, DAX and FTSE 100 are up more than 1% in opening trade. EU Commission President von der Leyen repeated yesterday that the EU had offered reciprocal zero tariffs on manufactured goods previously and continues to stand by that offer. Others are also trying again to talk to Trump to get some sort of agreement that limits the impact.   Much of the rally appeared to be driven by dip-buying, as well as hopes that the intensifying trade war could still be defused through negotiations.   China Strikes Back: ‘We Will Fight to the End’   Tensions reached a boiling point after Trump threatened to impose an additional 50% tariff on all Chinese imports unless Beijing rolled back its retaliatory measures by April 8. ‘If China does not withdraw its 34% increase above their already long-term trading abuses by tomorrow... the United States will impose additional tariffs on China of 50%,’ Trump declared on social media.   If implemented, the new tariffs would bring total US duties on Chinese goods to a staggering 124%, factoring in the existing 20%, the 34% recently announced, and the proposed 50%.   In response, China’s Ministry of Commerce issued a stern warning, stating: ‘The US threat to escalate tariffs is a mistake on top of a mistake... If the US insists on its own way, China will fight to the end.’ The ministry also called for equal and respectful dialogue, though signs of compromise on either side remain scarce.   Beijing acted quickly to contain a market fallout. State funds intervened to support equities, and the People’s Bank of China set the yuan fixing at its weakest level since September 2023 to boost export competitiveness. Additionally, five-year interest rate swaps in China fell to their lowest levels since 2020, indicating potential for further monetary easing.   Trump Talks Tough on EU Too   Trump’s hardline approach extended beyond China. Speaking at a press conference, he rejected the European Union’s offer to eliminate tariffs on cars and industrial goods, accusing the bloc of ‘being very bad to us.’ He insisted that Europe would need to source its energy from the US, claiming the US could ‘knock off $350 billion in one week.’   The EU, meanwhile, backed away from a proposed 50% retaliatory tariff on American whiskey, opting instead for 25% duties on selected US goods in response to Trump’s steel and aluminium tariffs.     Volatile Wall Street Adds to the Drama   Wall Street experienced wild swings on Monday as investors processed the rapidly evolving trade conflict. The S&P 500 briefly fell 4.7% before rebounding 3.4%, nearly erasing its losses in what could have been its biggest one-day jump in years—if it had held. The Dow Jones Industrial Average sank by as much as 1,700 points early in the day but later climbed nearly 900 points before closing 349 points lower, down 0.9%. The Nasdaq ended up 0.1%.   The brief rally was fueled by a false rumour that Trump was considering a 90-day pause on tariffs—rumours that the White House quickly labelled ‘fake news.’ The market's sharp reaction underscored how desperate investors are for any sign that tensions might ease.   Oil Markets in Focus: Goldman Sachs Revises Forecasts   Crude prices also reflected the uncertainty, with US crude briefly dipping below $60 per barrel for the first time since 2021. As of early Tuesday, Brent crude was trading at $64.72, while WTI hovered around $61.26.   Goldman Sachs, in a note dated April 7, lowered its average price forecasts for Brent and WTI through 2025 and 2026, citing mounting recession risks and the potential for higher-than-expected supply from OPEC+.       Under a base-case scenario where the US avoids a recession and tariffs are reduced significantly before the April 9 implementation date, Goldman sees Brent at $62 per barrel and WTI at $58 by December 2025. These figures fall further to $55 and $51, respectively, by the end of 2026. This outlook also assumes moderate output increases from eight OPEC+ countries, with incremental boosts of 130,000–140,000 barrels per day in June and July.   However, should the US slip into a typical recession and OPEC production aligns with the bank’s baseline assumptions, Brent could retreat to $58 by the end of this year and to $50 by December 2026.   In a more bearish scenario involving a global GDP slowdown and no change to OPEC+ output levels, Brent prices might fall to $54 by year-end and $45 by late 2026. The most extreme projection—based on a simultaneous economic downturn and a full reversal of OPEC+ production cuts—would see Brent plunge to below $40 per barrel by the end of 2026.   Goldman noted that oil prices could outperform forecasts significantly if there was a dramatic shift in tariff policy and a surprise in global demand recovery.   Cautious Optimism, But Warnings Persist   With both Washington and Beijing showing no signs of backing down, markets are likely to remain volatile in the days ahead. Investors now turn their attention to upcoming trade meetings and policy decisions, hoping for clarity in what has become one of the most unpredictable trading environments in recent years.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.