Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

silverpuma

Is Spot and Futures FX Prices the Same

Recommended Posts

Hi all, I need some help. I bit of a basic question but one I've been pondering for a day or two.

 

Realising that the spread fluctuates constantly I have the following question.

 

I have a small account with MB Trading and since they are a ECN broker I get the market spread and pay $5.90 comms on each full std lot round trip. For example today the eur/usd was around 0.8 - 1.2 pips of a spread. But say I had a Interactive Broker account and was trading the FX futures from CME again on the eur/usd (I think its called 6E but that not important for now) would the spread be exactly the same on the 6E fluctuating in step with MB Tradings spread.

 

Maybe an easier way to say what I mean, does all spot forex ECN broker always give the same spread as a FX Futures broker are they standardised? Or to say it another way, will all good ECN brokers that work with commissions have the same fluctuating spread and all Futures FX brokers going through CME give the same fluctuating spread. o if had a IB FX futures account and a MB Trading account running simultaneously they would show the same fluctuating spread virtually all the time/

 

Better stop now as I'm starting to confuse myself;)

 

I think I made this sound more comlicated than it probably is......!!!!! :crap: Thanks in advance for any help........

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

silverpuma,

 

The 6E (EC on TradeStation) or any CME futures contract has the exact same spread regardless of the broker. With the FX cash (which MB Trading also has), ECN spreads are determined by the participants and with a FX cash account with a non-ECN broker, are set by the broker.

 

Even with brokers that offer commission based accounts, there are two kinds. In a true ECN, one account holder can trade with another account holder whereas in some accounts you can only trade with the banks involved (I believe Currenex is this way).

 

That means although you can rest orders, only the banks can hit you which they never will unless your bid has become the ask.

 

Your best bet is to always ask the broker directly and not depend on your interpretation of their marketing material.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ScottB said:

  Quote

That means although you can rest orders, only the banks can hit you which they never will unless your bid has become the ask.

 

Can you expand on that a little please?

 

Thanks, Max

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Max,

 

Say the EUR/USD spot FX is 1.3188 bid by 1.3189 ask and you put a limit order at 1.3188 on an interbank platform like Currenex. No other customer can hit your limit order, only banks.

 

The banks will only hit your order if your 1.3188 order is now the ask because prices are now 1.3187 bid by 1.3188 ask. Your limit order is still at the same price but now, instead of being at the bid, it is at the ask.

 

In an interbank market, you only have the illusion of getting in at the bid, although, you do get the price you want.

 

With an ECN, another customer can hit your limit order at the bid and therefore you can get filled while 1.3188 is still the bid. I know this sounds confusing but it only applies to the spot market.

 

If you stay with the futures market, you won't have to deal with this as there is no broker created spread. I only mentioned it so you can see the differences among the various brokers (account types) and to encourage you to ask your broker any question at all.

 

There is an old saying in poker: if you sit down at the table to play and can't spot the sucker, you are the sucker. The reason 80-95% of all traders lose their money pretty quickly is they are sitting at a table with professionals and are the suckers.

 

It takes a lot of questions, hard work and unfortunately a lot of money lost to become the one sitting at the table who can spot the sucker (i.e. be the professional).

 

Don't be discouraged by what you don't know, just keep asking questions regardless of how basic they may seem.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  ScottB said:
silverpuma,

 

The 6E (EC on TradeStation) or any CME futures contract has the exact same spread regardless of the broker. With the FX cash (which MB Trading also has), ECN spreads are determined by the participants and with a FX cash account with a non-ECN broker, are set by the broker.

 

 

Thanks ScottB for this help. So in the CME FX Futures my only decision is choosing the broker with the mix of financial stability, tight commission charges, fast and reliable execution and a good trading platform.

 

Any suugesstions?

 

My initial thoughts are an IB account using Ninjatrader as my charting package, but I'm a complete newbie to the Futures side of things . Looking forward to hearing your and others suggestions..................its all appreciated......:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I like Velocity Futures the best - low margins (don't overleverage though), decent commissions, great infrastructure, been around forever and great support/customer service.

 

Advantage Futures is also very good at all of the above. IB is a good choice if you are going to be trading a wide variety of instruments that include equities, stocks, options or FX (cash). Their margins are higher (which is not a bad thing), their commissions are in the ballpark (I don't know exactly but they are neither great nor awful) but they can be challenging at times to work with.

 

Also, IB does not stream prices but rather takes a snapshot every 100-200 milliseconds so if you are doing anything algorithmically, you should be aware of the implications.

 

Dorman Futures is pretty good as well.

 

There are a zillion others but I have or have had accounts at all of the above and therefore am speaking from direct experience.

 

I hope this helps and as I said, never hesitate to ask questions. There are also an incredible number of online resources that you can find.

 

Remember, if it sounds too good to be true, it is. This is a tough business, it takes an enormous amount of work to become even marginally proficient. If you see a claim or offer of service that uses any of the following, run, run very, very fast

 

Hurry, dirty secret, revealed for the first time, can't lose, all you have to do is... limited time, limited number, in only a few hours per day, etc.

 

In fact, we should start a new thread of all the catch phrases vendors/trainers use to make it sound like they are going to make all this easy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ScottB, Thanks for all the broker info. I have been trading for a few years but using FX spot and spread betting. I'm just beginning to emerge after a long learning phase to being consistently profitable, albeit with a small fraction of my available trading capital. I see no point in adding funds until I can justify this by my results. Thankfully this is beginning to happen, but I'm a conservative trader and will manage my risk closely (i.e Max 1% of capital per trade).

 

I use price action with no indicators and look for S&R and supply demand imbalances. But a major part is trying to find other traders in areas of stress or greed (i. e. trapped traders) and gain by their stops being triggered and joining that order flow. All of this has been developed from the ingredients of James16 (paid for forum) + Sam Seiden's Supply / Demand imbalance teachings and most of all (by far) Lance Beggs at Your Trading Coach Lance has been very very helpful and his new ebook is the best I've read.

 

Anyhow, I've been reading Tom Williams "Master of the Markets" ( 3 times) and feel the addition of volume could be a help, but I'll add it slowly as I get familiar to the different nuances. The Wyckoff forum has been a great help as well. This is where the Futures FX come into play with its volume.

 

I had a quick glance at Velocity Futures and it looks good. Do you or did you use their X_Trader V 7 platform? I wonder how it compares to Ninjatrader? I had heard positive feedback from OpenCry as well. More to ponder:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Max,

 

I think you are doing the right thing using small leverage; being over leveraged causes a lot of anxiety and often gives rise to poor trading decisions.

 

I currently use NinjaTrader or the TT FIX gateway currently but with the last prop firm I was with, I used X_Trader API. X_Trader is the gold standard of front ends in my opinion although I like NinjaTrader almost as much.

 

I trade enough to test out my algorithms but other than that, I don't take many manual trades. The algorithms are based on basically what you trade - price action, S&R and a few proprietary calculations I have developed over the years.

 

Always more to ponder.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.