Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

AW69

Losing Clients Money

Recommended Posts

Here is the story- My friend (knob) in India meets a trader in the U.K and after many days of chit-chat builds a informal trust about his capabilities in trading forex and agrees to transfer £40k to the trader in U.K. in a hope that he will get a decent return every month.

 

It all went fine for few months untill my friend recieves a call from the trader in U.K, explaining how he lost all his money in last few days.

 

Well, as the situation sounds very stupid and naive because there was no legal documents signed neither the U.K based trader is technically managing his money, so is there any way around for him to sue the trader from India?

 

I know this is something my friend should be taking to lawyers in India. But as he has asked me for help, so has anyone ever come across any thing similar?

 

I will appreciate your time in replying.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly - while I dont know much about it.

whats he going to sue him for? He gave the guy money to trade, the guy lost it.

 

Unless the guy has caused fraud, or misrepresnted himself, how did he know he lost it in Fx.

 

Also did the UK trader say he was licensed. the FSA might have some sort of recourse.

Otherwise your friend in India should have done some due diligence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If it was just greed leading to an agreement without sufficient verification then there is likely to be no remedy.

 

If the guy is now defrauding him then he has a chance. He needs to request proof of the losses - the complete set of account statements for the period where the loss occurred. Be aware though that a sophisticated scammer could produce legitimate statements showing the losses if he traded two accounts and took a win on the second one whenever he took a loss on the first - hard to do though.

 

If the losses were not there then its time to visit the law.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you guys for the reply.

 

Well, we managed get a hard look into his account details and unfortunately he is not leing but my friend insists on saying that trader never mentioned about the overall risk and the risk- management was explained in a different procedure.

 

However, he accepts that he should have never sent the money through remittence but instead let the trader trade his account with POA. Then he might have some control on losses.

But because the money was transffered through remittence, can it not be classed as loan with a verbal aggreement? If yes, cant he make a claim providing necessary proof of ownership of the money.

If yes, how difficult will be to make a legal claim from abroad.

 

Cheers!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. This is an all too common story all over the world now, not just in the UK. It may have been illegal for the person concerned to solicit these funds, and a call to the United Kingdom Financial Services Authority Financial Services Authority helpline may be in order. Serious cases of multiple ripoff schemes have been referred to the SFO (UK Serious Fraud Office). It is important to follow up, as you may be preventing other users suffering the same fate.

 

For example

 

Mallorca expats hit by £20m ‘fraudster’ - Times Online

 

Most serious of all is people not being warned about overgearing accounts, and ridiculous gearing like 500:1. Trading on this kind of margin is the financial equivalent of driving a car with dicky stearing along a curved and variable cliff edge at high speed. The reduction of maximum gearing in US forex accounts down to 50:1 is a very sensible move. Unless you really know what you are doing, high gearing is crazy. Just suicidal.

 

Of course in this case the so called trader may just have pocketed the money.

 

Larry Levy

TraderSpeak.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This message will sound offensive, but I really don't care. Your friend is terribly careless and dumb.

1. You never give someone money without doing serious due diligence.

2. It also makes absolutely no sense to hire a financial professional in a different country to manage his money.

3. He obviously has no idea the risk level about trading. When you give money for someone to trade, you need to mentally prepare to lose it all.

 

It's even funnier for you to try to help him and treat him as a victim. This is his tuition fee to learn not to be stupid in life. With all your efforts to help and your sympathy, he must feel that it's that bad trader's fault. To me, the enabler is the one should be blamed and face his own responsibility. Suing?! You give the guy license to kill...he didn't kill it in the market...but he killed your client's money. That's that. If the trader did make 100% a year, can the trader sue your client to take over the winning? Of course not. It's a fair game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This message will sound offensive, but I really don't care. Your friend is terribly careless and dumb.

1. You never give someone money without doing serious due diligence.

2. It also makes absolutely no sense to hire a financial professional in a different country to manage his money.

3. He obviously has no idea the risk level about trading. When you give money for someone to trade, you need to mentally prepare to lose it all.

 

It's even funnier for you to try to help him and treat him as a victim. This is his tuition fee to learn not to be stupid in life. With all your efforts to help and your sympathy, he must feel that it's that bad trader's fault. To me, the enabler is the one should be blamed and face his own responsibility. Suing?! You give the guy license to kill...he didn't kill it in the market...but he killed your client's money. That's that. If the trader did make 100% a year, can the trader sue your client to take over the winning? Of course not. It's a fair game.

 

Agreed Jumbo123!!

Lesson is definitely learnt but if there is any legal way to sue someone then why not.. ?After all its all fair... Giving up is obviously the last resort anyways.

Cheers and happy trading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

here's a reality check:

your friend must consider his lost money as 'tuition' at a very expensive school...the university of "hard knocks". hopefully he learned a very valuable lesson and will eventually benefit from his new 'degree'. if he continues to fault someone else for the loss, no lesson is learned.

 

years ago 'stockbrokers' charged $200 - $500 fees to place stock orders. i assumed they knew more about picking the right stocks than i knew. i got involved with a broker and slowly watched my $165K account churn down to nothing. i still have the check from cowen & company dated jan. 8, 1997. it is drawn on the chemical bank of new york..."pay to the order of peter... One Dollar. it is a constant reminder to me that the only person that 'really' cares about my money is me. i began learning everything i could about stock trading. i'm 70 now and for the last 6 years i've been able to make a good living trading equities...averaging around 60%.

good fortune to you and your friend.

peter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
here's a reality check:

your friend must consider his lost money as 'tuition' at a very expensive school...the university of "hard knocks". hopefully he learned a very valuable lesson and will eventually benefit from his new 'degree'. if he continues to fault someone else for the loss, no lesson is learned.

years ago 'stockbrokers' charged $200 - $500 fees to place stock orders. i assumed they knew more about picking the right stocks than i knew. i got involved with a broker and slowly watched my $165K account churn down to nothing. i still have the check from cowen & company dated jan. 8, 1997. it is drawn on the chemical bank of new york..."pay to the order of peter... One Dollar. it is a constant reminder to me that the only person that 'really' cares about my money is me. i began learning everything i could about stock trading. i'm 70 now and for the last 6 years i've been able to make a good living trading equities...averaging around 60%.

good fortune to you and your friend.

peter.

 

Thank you guys.

I think he can only sue him based on the verbal agreement which is also legally binding.. Although proving it to the court would be a different ball game. Hope the e-mail & telephone communications which was recorded may help his case.

 

Anyway how many here thinks he shouldn't be thinking of suing him and why?

 

Happy Trading to all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What was the name of this ...so called trader? It sounds very similar to another episode i heard about just over 12 months ago. Name or alias and rough location would be helpful. If it ties up in any way...I may have some valuable information.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This scam is popping up more and more now. I've been solicited a few times by "FX Guns" showing off their trading results hoping to impress you and get your money either to teach you their magic, or invest in them. Some of those solicitations came from this forum, they take any lead or detail they can get and forums are easy pickings.

 

The ploy is simple - open two accounts, take the other side of your trade. If you wipe out all you did was transfer wealth. Avoid tax while doing this of course.

 

Next you build a winning streak from a clean account (if it blows up you start again). When you have the streak, you hit your database you skimmed from online forums looking for the big fish.

 

Next you simply use 2 accounts to transfer the wealth. Run 2 sets of books, one set of investors loses 100%, another makes 100%, they take their cut (or keep it all).

 

It's a no lose game for them, and why retail FX is the wild west of trading and getting banned/restricted in some countries because of this.

 

Your friend is in good company though. Rob Booker tells in an interview how one of his early FX mentors he looked too was actually a big Ponzi scheme, and an "FX Superstar" that Kathy & Boris interviewed in one of their books (might have been the same I forget) also turned out to be a scam. If they can't pick them, what hope do the uneducated public have?

 

In a market with no exchanges paper trails are hard to follow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • Date: 8th April 2025.   Markets Rebound Cautiously as US-China Tariff Tensions Deepen     Global markets staged a tentative recovery on Tuesday following a wave of volatility sparked by escalating trade tensions between the United States and China. The Asia-Pacific region showed signs of stability after a chaotic start to the week—though some pockets remained under pressure. Taiwan’s Taiex dropped 4.4%, dragged lower by losses in tech heavyweight TSMC. The world’s largest chipmaker fell another 4% on Tuesday and has now slumped 13.5% since April 2, when US President Donald Trump first unveiled what he called ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs.   However, broader sentiment across the region turned more positive, with several markets rebounding sharply after Monday’s dramatic sell-offs. Japan’s Nikkei 225 surged over 6% in early trading, rebounding from an 18-month low. South Korea’s Kospi rose marginally, and Australia’s ASX 200 gained 1.9%, driven by strength in mining stocks. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng rose 1.6%, though still far from recovering from Monday’s 13.2% crash—its worst day since the 1997 Asian financial crisis. China’s Shanghai Composite added 0.9%.   In Europe, DAX and FTSE 100 are up more than 1% in opening trade. EU Commission President von der Leyen repeated yesterday that the EU had offered reciprocal zero tariffs on manufactured goods previously and continues to stand by that offer. Others are also trying again to talk to Trump to get some sort of agreement that limits the impact.   Much of the rally appeared to be driven by dip-buying, as well as hopes that the intensifying trade war could still be defused through negotiations.   China Strikes Back: ‘We Will Fight to the End’   Tensions reached a boiling point after Trump threatened to impose an additional 50% tariff on all Chinese imports unless Beijing rolled back its retaliatory measures by April 8. ‘If China does not withdraw its 34% increase above their already long-term trading abuses by tomorrow... the United States will impose additional tariffs on China of 50%,’ Trump declared on social media.   If implemented, the new tariffs would bring total US duties on Chinese goods to a staggering 124%, factoring in the existing 20%, the 34% recently announced, and the proposed 50%.   In response, China’s Ministry of Commerce issued a stern warning, stating: ‘The US threat to escalate tariffs is a mistake on top of a mistake... If the US insists on its own way, China will fight to the end.’ The ministry also called for equal and respectful dialogue, though signs of compromise on either side remain scarce.   Beijing acted quickly to contain a market fallout. State funds intervened to support equities, and the People’s Bank of China set the yuan fixing at its weakest level since September 2023 to boost export competitiveness. Additionally, five-year interest rate swaps in China fell to their lowest levels since 2020, indicating potential for further monetary easing.   Trump Talks Tough on EU Too   Trump’s hardline approach extended beyond China. Speaking at a press conference, he rejected the European Union’s offer to eliminate tariffs on cars and industrial goods, accusing the bloc of ‘being very bad to us.’ He insisted that Europe would need to source its energy from the US, claiming the US could ‘knock off $350 billion in one week.’   The EU, meanwhile, backed away from a proposed 50% retaliatory tariff on American whiskey, opting instead for 25% duties on selected US goods in response to Trump’s steel and aluminium tariffs.     Volatile Wall Street Adds to the Drama   Wall Street experienced wild swings on Monday as investors processed the rapidly evolving trade conflict. The S&P 500 briefly fell 4.7% before rebounding 3.4%, nearly erasing its losses in what could have been its biggest one-day jump in years—if it had held. The Dow Jones Industrial Average sank by as much as 1,700 points early in the day but later climbed nearly 900 points before closing 349 points lower, down 0.9%. The Nasdaq ended up 0.1%.   The brief rally was fueled by a false rumour that Trump was considering a 90-day pause on tariffs—rumours that the White House quickly labelled ‘fake news.’ The market's sharp reaction underscored how desperate investors are for any sign that tensions might ease.   Oil Markets in Focus: Goldman Sachs Revises Forecasts   Crude prices also reflected the uncertainty, with US crude briefly dipping below $60 per barrel for the first time since 2021. As of early Tuesday, Brent crude was trading at $64.72, while WTI hovered around $61.26.   Goldman Sachs, in a note dated April 7, lowered its average price forecasts for Brent and WTI through 2025 and 2026, citing mounting recession risks and the potential for higher-than-expected supply from OPEC+.       Under a base-case scenario where the US avoids a recession and tariffs are reduced significantly before the April 9 implementation date, Goldman sees Brent at $62 per barrel and WTI at $58 by December 2025. These figures fall further to $55 and $51, respectively, by the end of 2026. This outlook also assumes moderate output increases from eight OPEC+ countries, with incremental boosts of 130,000–140,000 barrels per day in June and July.   However, should the US slip into a typical recession and OPEC production aligns with the bank’s baseline assumptions, Brent could retreat to $58 by the end of this year and to $50 by December 2026.   In a more bearish scenario involving a global GDP slowdown and no change to OPEC+ output levels, Brent prices might fall to $54 by year-end and $45 by late 2026. The most extreme projection—based on a simultaneous economic downturn and a full reversal of OPEC+ production cuts—would see Brent plunge to below $40 per barrel by the end of 2026.   Goldman noted that oil prices could outperform forecasts significantly if there was a dramatic shift in tariff policy and a surprise in global demand recovery.   Cautious Optimism, But Warnings Persist   With both Washington and Beijing showing no signs of backing down, markets are likely to remain volatile in the days ahead. Investors now turn their attention to upcoming trade meetings and policy decisions, hoping for clarity in what has become one of the most unpredictable trading environments in recent years.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.