Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

TroyMaster

Bad Things About Beeing a Daytrader

Recommended Posts

Hey Guys,

 

Im new to this topic and Im trying to figure out how and If it will work for me out, to be a daytrader.

 

I do have a background as professional Pokerplayer and I see a lot of similarities between the Poker-mindset and the Daygame-Mindset.

 

Im trying to figure out what might be the difference between playing Poker and trading.

Whenever I try to figure out how the lifestyle as a Daytrader is, more than often I get to hear this bullshit "how to be a succesfull trader"-advice webpages.

 

What Im really trying to figure out:

 

WHAT ARE THE DOWN SIDES OF BEEING A DAYTRADER?

 

Cheers

Troy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I came from a poker background as well. The only difference is... the market is always right. So you can't exactly bully or take advantage of weaker players. Which makes self psychology more important than anything.

 

But everything else in poker is similar... figuring out your own style, waiting for your "setups", money management, managing emotions/tilt...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hey Guys,........What Im really trying to figure out:

 

WHAT ARE THE DOWN SIDES OF BEEING A DAYTRADER?

 

Cheers

Troy

 

 

Almost exactly the same as they are in poker - especially if most of your play is online.

 

 

Cheers

 

UB

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I think you'll come into this way more prepared than most. The fact that you understand odds, game theory, money management, etc... and probably regular losing hands -- along with your pot growing, drawing down, growing, et.c... means you are far beyond most who try their "hand" at trading.

 

Wouldn't surprise me if it works the other way as well -- that there are successful traders who do quite well i poker....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hey Guys,

 

Im new to this topic and Im trying to figure out how and If it will work for me out, to be a daytrader.

 

I do have a background as professional Pokerplayer and I see a lot of similarities between the Poker-mindset and the Daygame-Mindset.

 

Im trying to figure out what might be the difference between playing Poker and trading.

Whenever I try to figure out how the lifestyle as a Daytrader is, more than often I get to hear this bullshit "how to be a succesfull trader"-advice webpages.

 

What Im really trying to figure out:

 

WHAT ARE THE DOWN SIDES OF BEEING A DAYTRADER?

 

Cheers

Troy

 

Day Trading is no difference than playing a poker. A professional poker players manage their emotion smooth and that is no different than day trading. When emotion kicks in, the mind goes blank. And when the mind goes blank, u lose

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Day Trading is no difference than playing a poker. A professional poker players manage their emotion smooth and that is no different than day trading. When emotion kicks in, the mind goes blank. And when the mind goes blank, u lose

 

As this guy said. If you come from a professional poker background than you have a very high chance of doing well with day trading, it's just a case of learning how to use the right tools that are specific to trading

 

As with poker, sometimes you're up, sometimes you're down, but it's just about winning more than what you loose. Most people say they understand that they take losses along the way, but not many people really do understand it or expect it, and as result they just can't handle that side of things. As a professional poker player, you understand what the craic is so i'm not gonna patronise you :)

 

For the new guys.... with any business or any adventure that involves risk, you gotta be able to take the good and the bad and the happy and the sad. As I said above, sometimes you're up, sometimes you're down and when you're up it's never enough, and when you're down you think you're never going to get back ontop, but control your emotions, play the game and understand that for every low there's a higher high and heaven will never seems far away.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OP, when I sit down to live poker, online poker, and a trader station my subjective experience is different for all three. Other posters are covering the similarities (EV, MM, modulating emotions, etc, etc.) quite well. But, again, the qualities are different for me – before,during, and after ‘play’.

>Some of it is from the subjective utilities of the differing thinking processes btwn the games. In poker, my focus turns to include more of how individuals and the table as a small group is acting. In trading the group is too large for that – it’s more evaluations of large, cyclic / temporary factions, etc – so my focus is more on the fluid dealing, the ‘cards’ if you will, and my (computerized, visual mostly) representations of the auction than on people. Maybe that’s some of what you were getting at in your ‘math’ topic.

>Some of this is from a personal viewpoint that emerged with continuing ascendancy when I was giving gaming vs trading a lot of thought many years ago. This viewpoint is that gaming is a substitute, a verisimilar, a proxy for trading. From this perspective, gaming is portable, pretend trading. Each different game has some replacement role for real trading…. with poker emphasizing cloaking positions and deceit more than most other gaming games.

Trading has many more ways and methods from which to come at it than poker, ie more options of how to process and evaluate the current situation and opportunities and risks at hand – basically bcse substitutes for trading will have structural and discrete limits as they are not continuous, etc., in gaming, the ‘data streams’ are principally generated randomly instead of by humans like in trading, etc.

> And, some of these differences are from past (both simple and complicated) associations…

 

Two extreme cases:

My neighbor and friend eats and breathes poker and maybe does 10 stock trades a year (with good skill transference btw)

I eat and breathe trading and play poker only a few times a year (also with good skill transfer)

So it really distills down to which one you are able to master and enjoy most. hth

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure I'd agree -- there's tremendous psychological warfare underway with poker - agree that for most of us it's not in the pit where you see your enemy. Different than poker that way for sure. However, trying to judge, measure, analyze and take moves based upon analyzing the mass of people trading a given market is just as challenging. Your mind will do all kinds of horrible tricks on you when trading and I'm 100% sure it's the major reason for most peoples downfall when trading.

 

Clearly it's different to be at a table facing off against your enemy and being able to somewhat look them in the eye but I think the challenge, stress and drain on the mind and psychology might even be potentially be greater with trading off the floor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.