Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

wwalker126

My 1st Stock Trade!

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

 

I've decide to become an active trader. For the past months, I have been aggressively been studying stock charts. After feeling good about producing profits in my virtual account, I now feel comfortable to jump right into the real thing. So my question is: What's going on with the housing industry? I've been following the industry for the last 3 or so months. For the past couple weeks I have watch many housing companies post their earnings. Almost every company has reported quarterly losses. However according to their charts for the past 90 days, it seems many of those company have been uptrending. Is this a possible bounce? I bought BZH a few days ago because I think these companies are bouncing and headed upward.

For those who are experienced, please tell me if I'm on the right track and if have the mindset/criteria/research method of becoming an experienced trader such as yourself?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When you say you are now an active trader I really hope you haven't quit your job to trade full time.

 

The score is this - to become 'reasonable' at day trading will take you 3-5 years(at a minimum) full time trading with real money to find your style that you are psychologically suited to of course this takes resources in and of itself not to mention lost earnings if you quit your job.

 

The best advice I can give you is:

 

  1. To trade technically off price action.
  2. To read books but NEVER follow what they say just incorporate bits into YOUR style.
  3. To trade using EOD signals, stop-limit orders and continue working your day job(once profitable here consider day trading).
  4. Remember that lots of pro traders risk 2 to make 1 the opposite of what newbies do and still make lots of money.

 

The total cost to me to learn day trading was £200,000 which included lost earnings as I dedicated night and day to trading which was a huge mistake, I really should have swing traded to start as I would have learnt how to trade just as quick and been much richer for it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

there is no question that I am serious about trading stocks. And of course, I'm definitely excited. I'm not surprised if I get positive or negative feedback. But I was hoping that the negative feedback would support itself with reason(s) as to why I shouldn't be trading right now or why I shouldn't apply the research methods I've come up with?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I also think that it is an extreme waste of time using the trading forums for reading about other peoples strategies as I can guarantee you they will be of no use to you and will just tire your brain reading all the posts which are written for the most part by unsuccessful traders. This will clog your brain with useless garbage, trust me.

 

You have to stop listening to the guru's (most of which who can't trade anyway) and you have to find your own simple techniques to use. You have to find your own way!

 

Find something you like and backtest it by hand using a spreadsheet, you will soon see if something has merit.

 

To me the forums like this one have been a tremendous waste of time over the years but do have value in answering basic questions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  wwalker126 said:
Hi everyone,

 

I've decide to become an active trader. For the past months, I have been aggressively been studying stock charts. After feeling good about producing profits in my virtual account, I now feel comfortable to jump right into the real thing. So my question is: What's going on with the housing industry? I've been following the industry for the last 3 or so months. For the past couple weeks I have watch many housing companies post their earnings. Almost every company has reported quarterly losses. However according to their charts for the past 90 days, it seems many of those company have been uptrending. Is this a possible bounce? I bought BZH a few days ago because I think these companies are bouncing and headed upward.

For those who are experienced, please tell me if I'm on the right track and if have the mindset/criteria/research method of becoming an experienced trader such as yourself?

 

I wish you well in your venture. Personally, I wouldn't touch day trading with a 20 foot pole, although there are day traders who make money. I actually met one the other day; he also trades options.

 

But to your question: I am not trading anything to do with the housing industry, but from another perspective, here goes: listening carefully to a number of people (in mortgages, real estate sales, banking) I keep hearing that the banks are sitting on an unknown, but presumed large number of homes which they could foreclose but have chosen not to, for the simple reason that the market is already up to its gills in foreclosures. Add to that fact that the next round of forclosable properties is either here or just around the corner (balloons coming due), the state of unemployment and under-employment, and I keep hearing that it may take until 2013 - 2014 to clear all of it out of the system.

 

It is not that no new homes are being built, or that none are being sold, but rather that builders were sitting on inventory - built homes, partially developed property, and bare land - that was priced when the market was overheated, and the reductions in value still have not been absorbed completely. Can any of the big ones make money? What I have seen locally is tremendous reductions in staff, bankruptcies, and buyouts (e.g. Centex, now part of Pulte). How do you make money when the debt yo are carrying is greater than the sales to service the debt? that, in turn, flows out to all the suppliers, and etc. and etc.

 

And the home builders are not just competing against one another; they are also competing against any homeowner, for reasons other than foreclosure, who wants to sell their home. I am not the least surprised that there were losses; how to explain the increase before? Not everything happens on the news, and not all the news is entirely accurate or complete. And not all professional investors/traders make the right decisions. The market will do what it will do, and we have a plethora of people who have opinions about why it did it or what it will do next. Their collective advice and something under $3.00 will generally get you a ride on the local transit.

 

Just as a point of curiosity, why day trading instead of swing or position trading? Patience?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Otjm,

Thanks for your personal advice especially since you know those who work direct within the housing market. As I continue to study and learn, I notice that many of my strategies require me to hold a stock longer than 1 day. So for me, I have day trading in 1 hand and swing trading in the other hand, if I could predict the future I say that I’ll probably will be leaning more towards swing trading within the weeks ahead.

Also, going back to my original post; since a bought BZH a few weeks ago, BZH has made a day high of 20+% since roughly 2 weeks ago. Has anyone else traded BZH? Any advice, suggestions, news releases etc would be greatly appreciated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  metatron said:
When you say you are now an active trader I really hope you haven't quit your job to trade full time.

 

The score is this - to become 'reasonable' at day trading will take you 3-5 years(at a minimum) full time trading with real money to find your style that you are psychologically suited to of course this takes resources in and of itself not to mention lost earnings if you quit your job.

 

The best advice I can give you is:

 

  1. To trade technically off price action.
  2. To read books but NEVER follow what they say just incorporate bits into YOUR style.
  3. To trade using EOD signals, stop-limit orders and continue working your day job(once profitable here consider day trading).
  4. Remember that lots of pro traders risk 2 to make 1 the opposite of what newbies do and still make lots of money.

 

The total cost to me to learn day trading was £200,000 which included lost earnings as I dedicated night and day to trading which was a huge mistake, I really should have swing traded to start as I would have learnt how to trade just as quick and been much richer for it.

 

Good post...

 

Although I don't think #4 is good advice, especially for someone new to trading.

 

.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fascinating thread - kinda of a duel discussion on the specific housing sector stocks which in itself is full of intrigue, and then how best to leap into trading successfully (or minimize the pain)

 

What I would say on the housing discussion is if I was thinking about fundamental trading -- and I'll preface this saying I'm a 100% technical trader since I just don't think I'm smart enough to really analyze the thousands of different datapoints in an industry. But, with that said if a housing stock company had a portfolio that included homes in the more solid areas of the country I would have an interest.

 

I can speak from some recent experience. Having sold a home recently in California, having purchased one in Texas. Also the same goes on a rental property in California.

 

If a homebuilder has a focus on the 250K - 500K part of the market in places, like Texas it is still quite strong. I know people getting multiple offers if you believe that - however when it advances above that price range it gets VERY slow. Yes, you are competing against foreclosures, etc... even in the lower range but those can at times be a real pain and people who price right, in a good market are moving. If I saw a builder who was representing this range and was not heavily invested in the areas that were part of the mania (California, Florida, Nevada, etc...) I think prospects are going to improve.

 

Like an above poster said the system is still in for its shocks but to me the bottom is already in in the stronger markets and actually probably 20% - 25% off those lows.

 

That being said, I wouldn't do anything personally unless the technicals that I would trust/follow led me to buy but even someone like me who is 100% technical likes to know the reasons behind the move as well. Or it gets boring.

 

MMS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mad,

I couldn’t agree with you more. If it’s not technical then I want to see first-hand the reasons behind a move. With that said, I am strictly interested in technical analysis trading. All, I mean all my trades derive from technical analysis. I bet many would agree with me when I say, It’s always great when a technical trade turns into reality news. In regards to the housing market, I have “read/heard” that the housing companies will start aggressively promoting the idea of BUILDING A NEW HOME to potential homebuyers. Let’s see how that play out in the months to come.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi W. Walker.

 

One thing I would recommend VERY strongly is to WRITE YOURSELF A TRADING PLAN!

 

Yes, I was shouting. :D

 

90+% of all traders lose money.

90+% of all traders do not have a trading plan.

You do the math. :)

 

IMHO your odds of being successful without a written trading plan are almost nil.

 

I wish you the best of luck. But it won't help without a trading plan! ;)

 

Pluto1618

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pluto,

Thanks for your advice. As you and many experienced trader have said to me, having a trading plan is crucial. However I have learned that some concepts you come up with may work for you and not work for other; or vice versa. Whatever your strategy is, technical or non-technical, long-term or short-term, whatever it is just make sure it works for you. You should be in control of your money whether it increases or decrease you should only be able to blame yourself for the outcome.

 

*Side note* my 1st trade has done well and continues to do well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.