Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

wje3

Trading with Market Statistics Using Excel and EOD

Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone;

This is my first post here. I have been reading Jerry's threads on Trading with Market Statistics with great interest. I have a few questions:

I am considering using market statistics yet using it for End of Day trading. I remember reading somewhere within the discussions that Jerry felt that this methodology would work on any time frame. I would be using a 20 day time period and closing prices. The 20 day period is somewhat arbitrary yet it is one month of trading days.

My questions pertain to using Excel to generate the relevant data points.I am no expert in Excel and usually rely on my children to walk me thru the formulae, but once done it's pretty straight froward.

Will Excel give me the correct data points, especially the SD of the VWAP ? The PVP, and VWAP calculations are straight forward. But after all the lengthy discussion about variance and calculating the standard deviation of the VWAP, I want to make sure that what Excel says is the SD is valid.I would use the 20 days of VWAP to calculate the SD.

I'm not a statistician/mathematician nor an Excel expert. I'm just trying to understand any limitations of the statistical tools that Excel uses.

Thanks in advance for your help.

Bill

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes if the formulas are correct. Does excel have a weighted SD? You might need to do a bit of dinkering to get that.

 

I would be as concerned about PVP (and lesser extent VWAP). If you are using the closing price of the daily bar you will be lumping all the volume for the day at that one price point (the close). If you can sample data every hour (or better still every minute) to get the volume distribution at price things will be more accurate. No reason not to do the calculations once per day but I would personally be happier with a sampling rate that is higher.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi BlowFish;

Thanks for your answers.

Regarding the once a day sampling rate,lumping all the volume in for the closing price-yes I am a little concerned about that as it isn't very "granular". Yet, the underlying theory is the same as with two minute bars,if I understand it correctly. With two minute bars, all the volume is attributed to the close of that interval. With daily bars, it's the same underlying concept. I could do an average price for the day which might be more reflective of the days volatility.

Actually, what I am more concerned with is the statistics of the standard deviation. Why do I need a weighted SD. If I am trying to determine the SD for the VWAP, that series of numbers(the VWAP) is already weighted. I'm just trying to determine the SD of a series of numbers. Why does the SD need to be weighted as well?

Thanks for your help.

Bill

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bill, sounds like you understand the sampling issues. If you are looking 20 days back thats only 20 samples. As you correctly observe Jerry samples every 2 minutes. He talks about what he considers enough data....from memory he likes to see at least the bands open up wider than the bars themselves. I dunno I would have thought things are only just going to be settling down after 20 bars, it's a fairly small sample.

 

I did some comparisons (a long while back) of Jerry's 2 minute sample and raw tick data (so completely accurate) usually the VWAP & SD's where negligibly different but occasionally there would be a 2 or 3 ticks difference. The PVP is a bigger issue. It is very sensitive to how you allocate the volume how you sample and accumulate the peak can completely alter the PVP. This is because it jumps around based on the highest peak. Incidentally the way Ensign (which Jerry uses) allocates volume to PVP is that it pro ratas it to every level/tick between the high and the low of the bar. Allocating all the volume to a single price will likely give quite some odd results.

 

Jerry talks about why the SD's should be weighted by volume in the threads.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi BlowFish;

Thanks for the information. I agree that the 20 day sampling is inadequate. There are large vacant areas on the volume histogram. I'm going to continue looking at the feasibility of using this on a larger time frame, e.g. daily

I'll also re-read the threads on the weighted SD.

Thanks again for your help.

Bill

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Bill,

 

Even if you want to look at the longer time frames if you can build what you need with more data (like hourly perhaps) you should be golden. You might want to look at Ninjatrader you can get it free and there are indicators for VWAP SD and PVP in the public domain. of course there may be other reasons that you are leaning towards excel in which case that might not make sense for you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi BlowFish;

Funny you should mention NinjaTrader. I just downloaded it last night and I'm going to start playing with the charts. 20 days of hourly data might work but I'll take a look at it over the next few days.

Thanks for the suggestion.

Bill

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks BlowFish;

I have a slightly related question regarding NinjaTrader. If I want to generate MP charts(TPOs and Volume Profiles) using NinjaTrader and the FinAlg add-on, do I only pay the one time FinAlg fee (plus data fees) if I'm running it on the free NinjaTrader downloaded program?

Are there any other fees from NinjaTrader to do this?

It's not clear to me from the NinjaTrader website.

Thanks for your help.

Bill

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bill,

 

Finalg is one of payment.

 

Ninja licensing is a bit odd. It's free if you have a live account with one of there brokers (Mirus & Amp being the most common futures one). Certain things (that your probably wont need) cost extra (one off) license fees. Multibroker support springs to mind. I am not sure if there is some sort of minimum required account activity, I do not believe so. Many people just sign up for a free demo account with the aforementioned brokers when they expire they re-sign. From that point of view it is completely 'free'. I think nowadays Mirus prevent you signing from the same email address within a month.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.