Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

OsbourneCox

Is Day Trading Dead?

Recommended Posts

Its another religious argument. My belief is true and you are going to hell.

 

The funniest thing is that at this moment in history he concludes: you should all buy and hold.

 

He points out some inefficiencies that have died and one approach that hasn't. Then, despite that he says its all dead. It's like the low end "News;" how do you sell newspapers and tv to the peasants: blood, fear, controversy.

 

 

 

Edit: LMAO; I googled him. He started real trading in October 2009. He's a 20+ year old lawyer who writes a good fable. No more need be said.

Edited by Kiwi

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

from his article...

"In today’s market, traders now have to be both right about direction and have conviction in the direction at the same time."

 

so whats new?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Is it true that day trading used to be easier?

 

Back in 2000, the intraday swings in the Nasdaq were tremendous...sometimes 200 points. More importantly, these swings were "smooth"....thus making it very easy to hold without worry. Traders could make 2-3k in one trade.

 

Today, it's much choppier thanks to HFT. It's very easy to get "rattled out" of your position only to see it go back to your original direction.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There will always be day traders - and some will be successful. Is day trading difficult? You bet. Will some firms exit the space? Of course. Has the author of the article ever day traded? I doubt it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

When I read statement #4 I instant came to the conclusion that his was a bs. article. The movement of the market due to upward or downward pressure is natural and quite common. We see it every day weather stocks go up or down they do it in a zig zag pattern. He said "Yet once again, computers replaced humans in exploiting this edge, thus rendering the strategy ineffective." That is how most traders make their money.....:crap:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Day Trading is far from dead. The day trading dies, is the day we've got bigger things to worry about, like and end of the world as we know it.

 

The article is mainly about trading equities where volumes are spread a lot more thinly over various individual stocks within an index, unlike futures where you're trading the underlying index or commoditiy.

 

Trading did use to be a lot easier, but at the same time, I wouldn't say its got harder providing that you're day trading properly. What has happened is that basically it's come to a point where if you're going to day trade, you have no choice but to learn the mechanics of trading now, and to do it properly. As I mentioned in a another thread, the majoirty of the market is always looking for trends, even tho the market spends 80% of the time in a range. So essentially you have lots people who have taught themselves how to be chart analysts inadvertly thinking that they're trading. Over the past couple of years, they were able to get away with it because of the monster moves and trends, which gave a lot of people a false sense of security. Most of them people are gone now, and you can tell that from even from how quite the forums have got. In the prop letter, he stated that the days of someone being able to grind out a $50k USD a year living are over and that they're going to cut these 50k a year traders. Fair enough in my opinion, everything is relative, and if you're only earning 50k USD a year from trading, then you're not exactly an amazing trader.

 

If you're 'trading' and not analysing, then it's just a case of adapting to the conditions.

 

What is happening is the same as what happened on Eurex around 2006. Lots of people made good money when it was easy and were not talented enough to adapt to new conditions. The only differences is that back then they were blaming the flipper. Same stuff just another cycle, people blaming everyone/everything except for themselves.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Day Trading is far from dead. The day trading dies, is the day we've got bigger things to worry about, like and end of the world as we know it.

 

The article is mainly about trading equities where volumes are spread a lot more thinly over various individual stocks within an index, unlike futures where you're trading the underlying index or commoditiy.

 

Trading did use to be a lot easier, but at the same time, I wouldn't say its got harder providing that you're day trading properly. What has happened is that basically it's come to a point where if you're going to day trade, you have no choice but to learn the mechanics of trading now, and to do it properly. As I mentioned in a another thread, the majoirty of the market is always looking for trends, even tho the market spends 80% of the time in a range. So essentially you have lots people who have taught themselves how to be chart analysts inadvertly thinking that they're trading. Over the past couple of years, they were able to get away with it because of the monster moves and trends, which gave a lot of people a false sense of security. Most of them people are gone now, and you can tell that from even from how quite the forums have got. In the prop letter, he stated that the days of someone being able to grind out a $50k USD a year living are over and that they're going to cut these 50k a year traders. Fair enough in my opinion, everything is relative, and if you're only earning 50k USD a year from trading, then you're not exactly an amazing trader.

 

If you're 'trading' and not analysing, then it's just a case of adapting to the conditions.

 

What is happening is the same as what happened on Eurex around 2006. Lots of people made good money when it was easy and were not talented enough to adapt to new conditions. The only differences is that back then they were blaming the flipper. Same stuff just another cycle, people blaming everyone/everything except for themselves.

 

Killer post I couldn't agree more. If it was easy my Mom would be doing it, Markets change all the time, they changed this summer. What worked yesterday may not work today. Its our job to adapt and give thanks everyday we get to do this job! It doesn't get much better then this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

day trading is how you perceive it, if you can not day trade, go to a bigger chart it really is that simple if you know price action and how it reacts and you have the discipline you will make it, fail in any of these areas and you will fail no matter the time frame

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trading is not dead and it was never easier. Read ‘Reminiscences of a Stock Operator’ by Jesse Livermore...it was written about 100 years ago and yet is as relevant today as it was when it was first published...

 

It can be summarised neatly and succinctly with his very wise quote:

"There is nothing new in Wall Street. There can't be because speculation is as old as the hills. Whatever happens in the stock market today has happened before and will happen again."

 

Anyone here who thinks they have to learn something new because the market has changed is fooling themselves. There is nothing new, at all. Learn to trade and the skill will last a lifetime.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Someone should tell the hedge funds, investment, and commercial banks that day trading is not dead, so that they stop wasting their time on insider trading, front running, etc.

 

They probably don't day trade because they don't know which is the best time frame to use and which indicators give the best signals. Or, possibly, they are too overwhelmed by fear and greed to trade properly during the day time frame.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the article would have been "Is Buy and Hold Dead" the argument probably could be supported. It's not called the Lost Decade for nothing (actually more than a decade by now -- how soon until we return to Nasdaq 5000 :)

 

Anyway, I'd say it's more like Is Day Trading Hard? Heck yes. But dead? Not a chance.

 

The real sweet spot these day may actually be swing trading over a 1-5 day period.

 

MMS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Someone should tell the hedge funds, investment, and commercial banks that day trading is not dead, so that they stop wasting their time on insider trading, front running, etc.

 

They probably don't day trade because they don't know which is the best time frame to use and which indicators give the best signals. Or, possibly, they are too overwhelmed by fear and greed to trade properly during the day time frame.

 

Wow this post above was made in 2008. A full two years before these guys got caught with their hands in the cookie jar.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I saw "Inside Job" last night. Great expose on the financial meltdown. Sad part is that none of the culprits are going to jail, in fact a lot of them work as financial advisors to our government. Goldman Sachs is the new Catholic Church. They own us. Watch the movie, very well done and compelling, if not depressing ;>)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Google - buy and read, and then realise nothing really changes.

""where are all the customers yachts""

Any student of the markets, conspiracy theorists and anyone wanting to work on Wall street in all its guises, should do some economic history study - and not in the traditional sense.

Then accept that that is how the system works.

This is not a judgement on the rights of wrongs - but if its an eye opener for those who say - how can they let this happen. Then read history and learn - it always happens, and it does not take a genius to understand it will happen again in some form.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think there is any question that what we are seeing now will be repeated in different formats.

 

To assume we'll never see a real estate mania again, or a stock market bull like the late 90's, etc... is naive. It will happen again -- all the human instincts and greed of course will come into play. It may be dressed differently but it will be back - if it isn't already in a different form.

 

It's probably why if someone asked me who was young where they should go work I'd probably tell them somehow someway get a job at Goldman or Morgan -- you'll be set.

 

MMS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.