Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

CType

Stops Yes or No?

Recommended Posts

Fibtrade resistance retrace is a good tactic for low risk trade. Building on that, one way I would play that example is

(a) Make an anticipation entry on retrace

(b) Automatic tight fixed hard stop like ~6 ticks on ES/6E (typically 1 bar length)

© Aggressively tighten stop to break even in next couple of bars or get out if it stalls.

 

Many people wait for confirmation bar and enter above it. My preference is to be part of confirmation bar. Similarly many people 1st identify entry and then determine stop. My preference is to 1st identify a stop point and enter only if price comes within hard stop range. Basic idea is to have many break even trades, few losses of 1-2 ticks/contract and few runners of 3+ points. Obviously the numbers need to be adjusted based on the timeframe, instrument and volatility.

 

Anyway the example is more to describe the way I understand and typically apply the age old rule "cut losses short and let profits run". There is no one correct way. I am curious to see how other traders apply this rule in their trading.

 

Good Luck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone for you input, and suggestions.

 

I'm paper trading now with two similar pullback systems. One, from the book I mentioned in this thread, is to wait for 3 to 5 consecutive down days and enter went the price moves above the lowest high. The other is from an article in 'Stocks and Commodities' magazine. Also a pullback, but waiting until the market opens above the lowest high. They called this 'Getting Clear'. I plan on being out of the trade no later than the fifth day. I read somewhere that if your trade immediately goes against you to get out, and not wait for the stop. So I could be out on the first or second day. I probably won't do that with the simulations, but will watch how those work out.

 

As for the stops, it seems to me now that it wouldn't matter if you placed the stop with your broker, or used a manual stop. Assuming unwavering discipline (ya right) you will be out of the trade either way. It's not likely you will be the only one with at stop at that level no matter where you put it. May as well place the initial stop when I enter the trade. I'll probably widen it from 1.5 to 2 X ATR and take a smaller position.

 

Thanks again everyone, you have all been very helpful.

 

B

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It all depends on your trading style. As you mentioned in your op, most of the time, if you just buy support or sell resistence then the market will just smash through you and stop you out. If you're a swing trader using a large stop and trying to capture the bigger move then this isn't so much of an issue. However, if you're a day trader, then you need to understand how day trading works and where the key trading opportunities are. The majoirty of the market is always looking for a trend and is looking to jump on the back of anything that moves hoping for a break out, which is why you see the trading activity that you do around s/r levels as you mentioned.

 

I've posted this video before on these forums, but it's a great example of how the market just smashes a resistance level at 1181 in ES on the 18th of October. Anyone selling resistance there as a day trader, most likely got stopped out or took a heck of a lot of heat before the sell off. If you're day trading, then you need to learn these concepts to profit consistently.

 

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AAc1vJREAlQ]YouTube - Day Trading ES 18th October.avi[/ame]

 

Something that I think has highlighed this recently is all this stuff on the internet saying that day trading is dead. The reason why people are writing all of this is because the market isn't trending, and as a one trick pony, they don't know what to do. The days of massive volatility made it easier for less talented traders to make a living. The reason being is that they could have 3 losers in a row for 2 points each, then have a big 10-20pt trade that knocks them into profit, thus not requiring massive skill in my opinion. However, now that the markets have settled down, now more than ever, you need to put the time in the learn the right skills. It's not all about hollywood trades and big trends. An example would be when many people look at European markets, they think they're dead as they don't have monster moves or trends like the emini's for example. However, people obviosuly make money trading them by understanding the flow of orders coming into the market.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

86834 - you make some good points, while intraday trend trading via breakouts may be having a tough time at the moment, longer term trend traders just recently are having a pretty good time of it. One fund I have invested in was up 7.82% for October.

So clearly there are trends.

I think the point that there are different types of traders, styles and methods should not be lost in the discussion. While everything will have its own good times and bad times.

With regards this thread......you need to match stops with the system or style to be adopted, and then IMHO stops dont necessarily need to be as systemised as many might think.

 

I for one will always prefer to adopt a system that makes me easy money over hard money, even if it supposedly takes no real skill.;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

CType,

Sounds good. Some times when I read, even if I already knew the concept it triggers some small idea I can use. In that spirit, I hope you will find following observations useful.

 

(a) Assume it will take at least several months and may be 1000-2000 trades (if day trading) just to break even consistently. Realizing this will help you not undermine the progress you make and save you from lot of frustration or giving up. Many times especially in the early stages it may happen you are actually making progress but just PnL results not reflecting them.

 

(b) I feel what majority don't do or believe often works in trading. IMO most aspiring traders are smart, committed, hardworking and try to give their best. But on downside, try to master multiple setups at once or impatient and not stick long enough with a setup to truly make it theirs.

 

© Markets are there to make money, not to pay tuition fee. Don't hurry to trade live or undermine power of learning on simulator. Trade on simulator exactly as you would do in live trading. Not only it will teach for free but also help to ingrain discipline & consistency enough that you won't even think about it when you trade live.

 

(d) Sometimes it helps to identify and make progress in stages instead of in PnL especially for struggling traders. Stages could be : Struggling -> Trader with plan -> Trader with plan & discipline & consistency -> Trader profitable before costs -> Trader profitable after costs -> Live trader -> ...

 

(e) It is difficult to believe especially when trader is still working their way but IMO fitness, balance and quality of life outside trading will have as much (if not more) impact on trading results as technique in long term.

 

I wish you good luck in your trading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe the OP already has the ‘answers’ he was after, but I’ll post this for other noobs

 

re: topic question “Stops Yes or No” A very few systems are amenable to no stops at all. All the rest need loss management.

 

re “Ive been searching the forum for a difinitive answer, and the fact that I can't find one is probably all the answer I need” Stops are highly system dependent. Any ‘personal preference’ answers given without any references to the systems or even the type of system the posters are using with that stop style will not help you at all in the long run.

 

For example: The range/volatility type stops (deviations, LeBeau, etc, etc) – nothing ‘wrong’ with them at all, but there are a whole host of system types for which they are sub optimal. Generalizations simply have no place in stop placement.

 

Another point: OP seems to have concluded not to be concerned with ‘professionals’ and ‘stop running’ , etc. But, situationally, stop running does occur, and some systems absolutely must include those situations in their stop schema and placements.

 

Basically, discussing stops in absence of the context of an individual system is a non productive mind game… ie, the fact that you can't find one is definitely not all the answer you need…

 

In my experience less than 10% actually understand what I just said. Even fewer will be willing to persist in the work and multiple tests required to find the best stop style and levels for their system(s). Most continue using the style that ‘seems to work’ for them – never realizing how far off they are until it’s too late…hth

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll just pass along my experience.

 

I have run into and talked to a lot more busted traders who did not use stops, who could not describe their stop/risk strategy, who had no idea when to exit -- even some who were masters of the entry.

 

I have never run into a highly successful trader without a stop strategy.

 

MMS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.