Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

CType

Stops Yes or No?

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Ive been searching the forum for a difinitive answer, and the fact that I can't find one is probably all the answer I need.

 

It seems that sometimes a trade gets stopped out, and then the price goes back to where you where expecting it to go when you entered.

 

The question is: Are professional traders just taking your shares cheap, or Is that really just the way the market moved that day?

 

If the pros are just taking your shares cheap is that considered part of the risk of trading? You just set your stop and hope they don't bother with it that day. The lack of any concern from this forum tells me not to worry about it. I would like to know what your opinion is of this practice, if it actually exist, and what can be done about it,.

 

Thanks

Bill

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My trade strategy always brackets an order, with a target and a stop. I will trade a 2nd position with a trailing strategy as well. Typically, as per my trade system, I enter a trade where my entire trade profile is predetermined; where my entry is, my fixed target, my initial stop.. also, how I manage the trade as it progresses. Where price has to go to trigger some trade mgt rules; reducing risk, locking in a little bit of profit, exiting a position at my predetermined fixed target, and then letting the remainder run with a trailing stop strategy.

 

My entire trade is a component to a greater tradeplan that acts as my roadmap each and every session. I know when I start my session, how long I trade for, and even have a dynamic, self adjusting daily goal setting strategy that guides me regarding my trigger to stop trading. My tradeplan allows me to quit positive on most sessions while also allowing me to take what the market wants to give me, vs what I want out of the market.

 

In the end, I have done my research to establish an edge in the market and that's what I trade and how I trade. The stops are a key part to the overall plan.

 

Hope that helps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Tams, I'm guessing by your answer you would just make sure the stop is reasonable, and not worry about stop hunters.

 

Yes I do, if you mean do I try and stay outside the potential price movement. I use 1.5 to 2 time ATR to place initial stops.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  CType said:
Thanks Tams, I'm guessing by your answer you would just make sure the stop is reasonable, and not worry about stop hunters.

 

Yes I do, if you mean do I try and stay outside the potential price movement. I use 1.5 to 2 time ATR to place initial stops.

 

2x ATR is often within 2 standard deviation,

ie. there is a 95.4499736% chance the market will go there without any special MM effort to hunt you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Tams said:
2x ATR is often within 2 standard deviation,

ie. there is a 95.4499736% chance the market will go there without any special MM effort to hunt you.

 

Im not sure you can conclude that (though may be wrong :)). Within any sample 95% of the data will be within 2 standard deviations so assuming a normal distribution (market data is not normal but lets not split hairs), there is a 95% probability that any data will not be outside 2SD.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Tiobingo. I'm getting the impression that I should be more concerned about where to place the stop then I am about getting stopped out by some market manager. That's what I really wanted to know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  BlowFish said:
Im not sure you can conclude that (though may be wrong :)). Within any sample 95% of the data will be within 2 standard deviations so assuming a normal distribution (market data is not normal but lets not split hairs), there is a 95% probability that any data will not be outside 2SD.

 

trend bias will skew the distribution to the naked eye.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

CType, some trades will win and others will lose and you can't be too worried about trying to avoid the losses that fit within the winning results of a system that gives you a winning edge over time. If you try to avoid the losses, you'll wind up ironically, missing the winners and getting the losses anyway. To make matters worse, most people will find some 'thing' to blame rather than their own lack of a well researched tradeplan and their own failings as a trader. You ask an excellent question but I think that the more important questions you need to find answers to are questions like: What should I trade? How should I trade it? The answers to those questions will come from some good old fashion hard work that would result in a good winning tradeplan. Read a lot of the posts on this forum and you'll soon learn that many traders have not bothered to do that kind of preliminary work. You could tell from their questions (and responses). Some have, of course, and you can also tell from what they say. Try to find a good mentor or trade coach.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ctype,

 

You must never forget to pay attention to volume averages. If the averages are low then its likely that you will find it nearly impossible selling your holdings, even with stop orders. Find a volume range that you're comfortable with and only trade those stocks meeting that range.

 

*Good luck on your next trade*

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  CType said:

It seems that sometimes a trade gets stopped out, and then the price goes back to where you where expecting it to go when you entered.

 

I find that some of the best entry opportunities often occur right after a thrust/shakeout. I don't know what sort of strategy you use, but you may look at entering a trade only after a test/rejection of the opposite direction.

 

-bbc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks bbc,

Right now I'm trying to get familiar with my charting software, and how to code the scans to find what I'm looking for. Also being pretty new at this I thought I'd find what someone else is doing, or has done and just work on that until I get it. There are a lot of books on short term tradeing, almost all of them panned by someone for one reason or the other. I researched the authors and now I have a book by Oliver Velez "Tools and Tactics for the day trader", but it covers swing trades as well. Its a bit old though.

 

I'm going to start trading using only one of his techniques, and just stay with that one until I'm comfortable with it. There is a lot of information on this site that I'll need to digest sometime, but for now I don't want to get back into that information overload condition I was in a few days ago. I 'unsubscribed' to dozens of sites this week only keeping this one, one from Worden for software support, and my account. I had so many ideas floating around my head I didn't know where to start. :confused:

 

Well thanks for the information everybody, I'm going in.:)

 

Bill

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Tams said:
trend bias will skew the distribution to the naked eye.

 

Indeed it will. However that is an argument against your original point :). And as I mentioned the 95% rule is for normal distributions (and financial data series clearly are not with there 'fat tails').

 

Anyway on a more constructive note one can look at MAE (Maximum Adverse Excursions) to fine tune stops. It's a bit of a a balancing act really, wider stops more winners but the losses will be larger, narrower stops less winners but smaller losers.

 

Personally I prefer market structure for stops (swing highs/lows) but the world and his brother knows there will be orders accumulated there making them more vulnerable perhaps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  CType said:
I'm getting the impression that I should be more concerned about where to place the stop then I am about getting stopped out by some market manager. That's what I really wanted to know.

 

correct.

The market does not care who you are, where your entry is, where your stop is.

wait for the risk reward entries that suit you.

Though there may be traders hunting obvious stops, there is not a global conspiracy of traders out there hunting your stops. (you will always have times your stops get hit then reverse right to the tick, just as you will always have days when you fail to take an umbrella even when you know you should and it then it rains.....another global conspiracy :))

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Getting stopped out is half the fun. I have found that most of my trades retrace after the entry. So, one strategy I have is to have my normal entry and then wait for the retracment. Then place my stop when I do the order. This way my stop is further away than the original stop would have been and I make more when I hit the original target.

Test this out with your strategy and see if it does not imporove your results. Of course the retracment might be a reversal and you stop out anyway..so stop and reverse:)

BW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  CType said:
Hi,

 

Ive been searching the forum for a difinitive answer, and the fact that I can't find one is probably all the answer I need.

 

It seems that sometimes a trade gets stopped out, and then the price goes back to where you where expecting it to go when you entered.

 

The question is: Are professional traders just taking your shares cheap, or Is that really just the way the market moved that day?

 

If the pros are just taking your shares cheap is that considered part of the risk of trading? You just set your stop and hope they don't bother with it that day. The lack of any concern from this forum tells me not to worry about it. I would like to know what your opinion is of this practice, if it actually exist, and what can be done about it,.

 

Thanks

Bill

 

Here is a strategy on how to make money day trading ES:

 

1) you need a minimum $100K

2) u begin trading 2 contracts. for every $100K increase in your account, add 2 more contracts. dont really need chart. just dom

3) your profit target will be 2pts and no stop but add when the market is not going in your favor. the reason to add because u have that STAYING POWER. the market will always reverse or retraced

4) once u profit, enter again asap. must do this continously nonstop.

5) if the market still cant hit your profit target at the close, swing it

 

That is how you trade. Placing stop means u are asking to get stopped out. In fact, when placing stop really mean u are doing the big funds a favor by getting filled fast.

 

Hope this help

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  blueberrycake said:
I find that some of the best entry opportunities often occur right after a thrust/shakeout. I don't know what sort of strategy you use, but you may look at entering a trade only after a test/rejection of the opposite direction.

 

-bbc

 

Yep. If price approaches a level without any kind of test or violation, it's tough to know if the level (top or bottom) is in and if your stop will live. It's better to see a 'peek' through the doorway and let PA show a rejection. Tim Morge (of MedianLine fame) spent some time documenting what needs to be seen and coined the term "Good Separation." He wrote a pretty good doc imo, which can be found here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

CType,

In my opinion, risk control is a must to survive. There are many ways to control risk - price stops, time stops, far out of money options etc.

 

I think the problem is most people trade with notion they are right till market proves wrong i.e., wait to get stopped out at their hard stop. Better way in my opinion is to aggressively manage position to break even. The goal should be to play the game for free (i.e., with stop at break even) as often as possible. Not many people do that or think that way. Myself and other professional traders I know do that.

 

I see you are looking for a system. My suggestion, pick a simple trend-pullback method, one market, one time frame and spend next few months just trading on simulator only one setup making around 1000-2000 trades. Then the method will become yours. Challenge is not finding a system but ability to do the above.

 

I don't think realistically an individual trader can compete with professional firms on mechanical or fundamental based systems. Better bet would be discretionary trading.

 

Good Luck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

CType,

In my opinion, risk control is a must to survive. There are many ways to control risk - price stops, time stops, far out of money options etc.

 

I think the problem is most people trade with notion they are right till market proves wrong i.e., wait to get stopped out at their hard stop. Better way in my opinion is to aggressively manage position to break even. The goal should be to play the game for free (i.e., with stop at break even) as often as possible. Not many people do that or think that way. Myself and other professional traders I know do that.

 

I see you are looking for a system. My suggestion, pick a simple trend-pullback method, one market, one time frame and spend next few months just trading on simulator only one setup making around 1000-2000 trades. Then the method will become yours. Challenge is not finding a system but ability to do the above.

 

I don't think realistically an individual trader can compete with professional firms on mechanical or fundamental based systems. Better bet would be discretionary trading.

 

Good Luck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

Here is the best way to take a trade:

 

Lets say we want to short corn at a resistance value of 594 2/8.

Once price hits 594 2/8, WAIT DON'T SHORT IT.

Let price go down and then wait for the retrace / test back to 594 3.8 or a little higher.

If it doesn't retrace and the trade runs away from you let it go, it's a missed trade.

 

BE PATIENT, trade with the sim until you get the hang of it.

 

Fibtrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  CType said:
Hi,

 

Ive been searching the forum for a difinitive answer, and the fact that I can't find one is probably all the answer I need.

 

It seems that sometimes a trade gets stopped out, and then the price goes back to where you where expecting it to go when you entered.

 

The question is: Are professional traders just taking your shares cheap, or Is that really just the way the market moved that day?

 

If the pros are just taking your shares cheap is that considered part of the risk of trading? You just set your stop and hope they don't bother with it that day. The lack of any concern from this forum tells me not to worry about it. I would like to know what your opinion is of this practice, if it actually exist, and what can be done about it,.

 

Thanks

Bill

I am assuming you are talking about stop losses. There seem to be all sorts of opinions as to where to place stop losses, and I have read numerous comments that too many traders place them a specific percentage away, or a specific amount away, and tend to get stopped out easily. whether it is specific action by certain individuals "hunting" stops, or jsut the normal action of the market due to various strategies, when you are out, you are just as out no matter the cause (hunter or otherwise).

 

I believe it is Charles LeBeau who recommends a 3x Exponential ATR stop as a chandelier stop. Those, too will get stopped out, but the original stop (placed at time of purchase) is used to protect capital and to provide the figuring point for how much to purchase, and the traveling stop, once you are in profit, is to protect profit, act as a selling stop if there is a reversal, and cover you if you do not have a specific sell target.

 

I saw one program (which escapes me now) where they used a 4 ATR stop consistently (which of course limits even more the size of purchase).

 

It may be that you are placing the stop too close; increasing the amount of ATR may reduce the number of times you are stopped out. However, it also limits the size of purchase. On the other hand, it may let you run longer without having to re-group and purchase back in. As they keep saying, there is no Holy Grail.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

In ly thoughts, there is no definite answer to that question, the reason is that you never will be able to avoid getting shaked out unless you just don't trade

 

I'm a pure discretionnary trader. The result is that I seldom set hard stops as i prefer to rely on price action to determine if I should hold or exit a trade. But i always define a maximum risk that i can accept.

 

By the way, I try to adapt to the profile of each period (day or time of day) modifiyng the way I manage my trades. As a result, most of time market doesn't seem to offer good R/R opportunities, I just avoid trading that period, and when despite these precautions price action doesn't go as expected, I get out, not waiting to get stopped out or that my max risk to be reached.

 

That 's for day trading. Of course in addition you must consider that different trading timeframes (Scalping, DT swing ....) require different exit or protection strategies.

 

Well. that's the way I do things, but I wouldn't pretend there is no other ways to manage risk.

 

Ps. Sorry for my approximate english, I'm not a native

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.