Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

timsingapore

Confused Trader.

Recommended Posts

I am determined to be a stocks trader as my life-time career,but recently I am wondering should I go and become a stocks broker to know more about the business of trading.Some of my friends say I should,because they think there's no better way than getting to "ground zero" and understand the stuff which I agree as well. However, from what I know about the job of brokers is they are mainly executing the client's orders and not so much involving trading.I am confused and really don't know would it really help my career.

 

Please advise.

Thank you!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi timsingapore,

 

If you are a stock "broker" than you would have the ability to fill clients orders in hope to make a small percentage either with commissions, fees and or stock price movements. Nevertheless, you could also do personal trading on the side. Nowadays, its not an impossible dream to trade stock personally through online trading accounts (ameritrade, scott trade, etc). I am a firm believer that the best way to learn is through personal experience and as well as the lessons you learn from other's experiences. Whether you go at it alone or decide to take classes and study to be a stock broker; either way you must become a diligent student. It won't be easy and expect to take losses early until you have a well defined enter and exit trading strategy.

 

*Good Luck on your next trade*

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am determined to be a stocks trader as my life-time career,but recently I am wondering should I go and become a stocks broker to know more about the business of trading.Some of my friends say I should,because they think there's no better way than getting to "ground zero" and understand the stuff which I agree as well. However, from what I know about the job of brokers is they are mainly executing the client's orders and not so much involving trading.I am confused and really don't know would it really help my career.

 

Please advise.

Thank you!

 

If you become a stock broker, you are 100% in sales. Your manager will likely take your chair away from you if he sees you doing anything other than making phone calls. When you start you have no clients to make trades for so it is call, call call. Maybe in 2-5 years when you have built a book of business and specialized in one area of the other you can think about being allowed to trade your own account, but at that point you will be making far more money as a broker than you likely ever will traing your account.

 

If they do let you trade your account, it's a poorly run office and neither you nor they will survive for long as brokers. If you do not want to sell, do not bother.

 

I have been a broker since 1988.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My ex-wife became a broker with Edward Jones. The office failed after 2 years. I agree with Mighty Mouse, that it is all about sales. Being a broker is not necessarily going to make you a good investor or a good trader. Sure, you will have resources available to you, and you will learn a lot about the industry. But you won't learn anything about trading. As a broker, you will need to be able to execute trades, but that won't make you a trader.

To be successful either way you go, you need time and money. 90% to 94% of all traders fail. My opinion is, that you need about 3 years and enough money to get you through those 3 years. It's not that people are not capable of being brokers or traders, but most of them run out of time and money before they reach success.

If you can get a broker to sponsor you, and you pass your licensing test, it might not be a bad experience no matter what happens. If you do become a broker, location is everything. You must be able to integrate with the community and relate to them very closely.

There is a failure rate and a certain amount of risk in anything we do. Do what fits you and what you like doing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm glad I was able to give you some insight. Remember to spread the knowledge. An inexperience person will never remove the "i-n" without applying what the basic fundamentals of the experience.

 

*Good luck on your next trade"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am determined to be a stocks trader as my life-time career,but recently I am wondering should I go and become a stocks broker to know more about the business of trading.Some of my friends say I should,because they think there's no better way than getting to "ground zero" and understand the stuff which I agree as well. However, from what I know about the job of brokers is they are mainly executing the client's orders and not so much involving trading.I am confused and really don't know would it really help my career.

 

Please advise.

Thank you!

 

I think every trader has this thought at some stage Tim, I know I put the same question to my mentor many years back (he's a former broker, stupid idea he said), but finding a less stressful source of income that lets you be free to trade when you want, and how you want, while paying the bills so your account can compound without you drawing it down, is the best solution.

 

Just stick at it, gaining experience in different market conditions is one of the keys, and only time can open that door for you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you're going to trade stocks then I'd suggest you get real good at trading vsa set ups. Volume spread analysis, theres also good info on this from e-mini trading, you'll have to search as its a pay product (well some stuff is free) and I can't advertise it here.

 

Anyway the point is get good at volume and candle analysis.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If you're going to trade stocks then I'd suggest you get real good at trading vsa set ups. Volume spread analysis, theres also good info on this from e-mini trading, you'll have to search as its a pay product (well some stuff is free) and I can't advertise it here.

 

Anyway the point is get good at volume and candle analysis.

 

VSA, like most other indicators, is more useful as a marketing gimmick by those who can't turn a $ with their own account to rope in unsuspecting wanna be traders than anything else. But nice try...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
VSA, like most other indicators, is more useful as a marketing gimmick by those who can't turn a $ with their own account to rope in unsuspecting wanna be traders than anything else. But nice try...

 

Couldn't disagree with you more strongly. I'm not suggesting pay for a thing.

 

Go and search Malcolmb (unfortunately at another website) to see how you can get great vsa info for free. Go argue with him whether VSA is any good or not I won't waste my time.

 

In stocks as the markets are centralised vsa gives great info and will help you analyse candles much better.

 

Bottom line to the person asking the original question, volume gives you hints to what the pros are doing and theres loads of info for free.

 

Nice try ??????????? Not trying a thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Couldn't disagree with you more strongly. I'm not suggesting pay for a thing.

 

Go and search Malcolmb (unfortunately at another website) to see how you can get great vsa info for free. Go argue with him whether VSA is any good or not I won't waste my time.

 

In stocks as the markets are centralised vsa gives great info and will help you analyse candles much better.

 

Bottom line to the person asking the original question, volume gives you hints to what the pros are doing and theres loads of info for free.

 

Nice try ??????????? Not trying a thing.

 

Volume has it's place, and I agree it is probably most useful in Equities trading, but it's well down the check list of what makes a system a winner.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Volume has it's place, and I agree it is probably most useful in Equities trading, but it's well down the check list of what makes a system a winner.

 

In your humble opinion.

 

In my humble opinion for stocks its high on the check list of what makes a winning system.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
My check list is pretty short.

 

I'll admit to having lost interest in our nice little chat but as a final contribution to the debate.

 

3 point checklist of vsa traders to trade stocks and yes fx:

 

VSA.

VSA.

VSA.

 

Obviously others disagree as is their right.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I never wanted to be a stock broker, but now enjoy trading full time. I trade some stocks with my indicators, but mostly the futures markets. If I had more time, I would look at stocks more, but I am making enough money with Futures. Then there is the whole, why trade the stocks when you can make a higher percentage return trading the options.

 

So, my next quest is to learn all about Weekly Options. My Son has a professor that is making a lot of money on APPL Weekly Options, from what he tells his students. Maybe I will start another thread.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Weekly is very cool. Minimal effort, absorbs most of the noise. Great returns if you ride the trend all the way. CFD's or LEAPS keep your capital free to trade your futures etc on the side.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm glad I was able to give you some insight. Remember to spread the knowledge. An inexperience person will never remove the "i-n" without applying what the basic fundamentals of the experience.

 

*Good luck on your next trade"

 

Absolutely agreed,hope i can be good enough and share some of my insight to other traders like you guys did some day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Go and search Malcolmb (unfortunately at another website) to see how you can get great vsa info for free.

 

 

 

No need to go that far. There are three VSA threads here running into many thousand posts on the topic. The threads are dormant now but amongst the mire there are some pearls.

 

Stear clear of tradeguider and all there over priced product and it costs nothing though investing the $50 odd bucks in the original book won't break the bank.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I also thought I wanted to be a stock broker at a certain point, but that was before I found out that a broker is basically a seller.

 

Watch Wall Street Warriors and you will quickly see the difference between traders and brokers.

 

Anyway, you will probably need a job while you learn the ropes, so working in the industry as a broker until you can make it as a trader (if you ever do, it`s hard) is not a bad idea if you like that type of work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No need to go that far. There are three VSA threads here running into many thousand posts on the topic. The threads are dormant now but amongst the mire there are some pearls.

 

Stear clear of tradeguider and all there over priced product and it costs nothing though investing the $50 odd bucks in the original book won't break the bank.

 

I've often wondered if some of those massively long threads on certain topics mean that whatever they are trying to do is far too complex, and so "open for interpretation", that by the time it works for them, they are actually doing something else anyway which is the real reason they are making money. "You know that indicator only ever works if you do X & Y first, then it's brilliant" :rofl:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A very valid point. Denise Schull (trading psychology woman) said somewhere early in her material that if you can't write down an outline of each of your strategies in 2 or 3 sentences they are probably too complex. I am not sure I would go quite that far but I am inclined to agree.

 

VSA is actually reasonably straightforward though there are maybe 8 or 9 'principles'. (Tradeguider has somehow simplified that into 450 or so 'indicators').

 

The original book was poorly written and had a number of errata, though they where kind of obvious if you spent a bit of time with it. Not only that, even way back when it was little known, it attracted charlatans (one is described in detail at the start of another trading psychology book by Mike Elvin).

 

Fast forward to now and you have the TG circus, you have to credit their marketing which has raises the profile of VSA enormously however to keep feeding the beast they need to keep selling software and education. To do that it is in their interest to maintain some mystique and complexity whilst offering to dispel that (if you pay).

 

Anyway going back to the threads, a lot of the posts where people looking for 'the secret', and of course being a forum there where plenty of 'experts' to oblige (though as often the case it was the blind leading the blind). A large part was simply people posting charts and analysis and discussion, again that's often the meat and potato of massive threads (and nothing wrong with that). As usual the real gems get buried amongst the general chatter and outright BS. Having said that those gems are there and an astute reader would learn who to pay attention to quite quickly. (There was also odd bits of drama that where quite entertaining!)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Having said that those gems are there and an astute reader would learn who to pay attention to quite quickly.

 

I have observed from my own journey that our astuteness at decoding trader talk increases exponentially according to our experience over time though :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi "Confused Trader".

 

I have been a stockbroker for twenty years and the advantage of being so, form a trading perspective, is that you are kind of paid to watch the market action and act on it. That's a good training provided that you pay attention to the action (I know many brokers that never did that and know nothing about trading). You can also learn something from interaction with the clients, if they are bright and successful in their trading. The bottom line is that anything that puts you in contact with the market on a continuous basis will be good for you if you are willing to learn.

 

Hope this helps

Best

F

 

PS: you are not a "confused trader", you are a "trader with a question". Never ever under-rate you. Never ever over-rate you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.