Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Soultrader

Discretionary Trading vs Automated Trading

Recommended Posts

With the advancement in technology and improvements in trading softwares, many intraday traders are now automating their trading. There are advantages to this... emotions can be eliminated (not completely but more than discretionary) and traders can use mechanical exit points. Example: scaling out at +10pts on every trade.

 

As a pure discretionary trader, I still believe there is an edge in discretionary trading. Intuition comes into play as well as better entries. Why better entries? If one is a good tape reader he can pinpoint his entries and take minimal heat. This can save a trader a ton of points in the long run.

 

I have a couple questions regarding this topic and could use your guys opinion. Do you think discretionary traders enter before automated traders? What are your thoughts on discretionary vs automation? What type of trader are you and which one do you prefer?

 

Thanks,

 

Soultrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Do you think discretionary traders enter before automated traders?

 

I think this depends on how aggressive a trader is. For example, if a trader is looking to fade a key support/resistance level, does the trader enter while the market is moving towards support/resistance or after the market turns? Take another example, let's say a trader is looking to play a reversal from a downtrend, does the trader wait for the higher high and higher low to be in or does the trader anticipate that the higher high/low is coming based on somthing else? I don't think one can make a blanket statement here. I believe it comes down to experience and intuition as opposed to a mechanical or discretionary style.

 

What are your thoughts on discretionary vs automation? What type of trader are you and which one do you prefer?

 

I'm a discretionary trader for two main reasons. First, there are too many variables that I look at to capture in a mechanical system. Secondly, a mechanical system tends to be too rigid. For example, let's say that the market is a tick away from an entry/exit and then turns around, the entry/exit would not trigger on a mechanical system. I don't think that trying to "program" a discretionary style into a mechanical system makes too much sense. Think of the complexity.

 

Of course, one of the advantages of a mechanical system is that it is consistent in the way it executes. Discretionary traders need to make sure that their trade decisions are made in consistent and systematic way so that they can continue to replicate in the future and determine what has been working over the longer term. Discretionary traders should not let too much subjectivity into their trading, otherwise they don't have a system. Maintaining a trading log and journal are critical to success for a discretionary trader, IMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree. This is why many successful system traders advise to keep their system open and flexible, the less variables the better. This is also why higher timeframes work so well vs. intraday trading. I have 3 working systems and they do a nice job of capturing the essence of the market direction with only 1 indicator and price is the other indicator over time.

 

I discretionary trade because my mission is to understand the markets as much as possible before getting more into system trading. I want to know how the market works for myself before building more. Took me 2 yrs to come up with 3 systems so I figure my learning curve in building them would increase as my discretionary gets better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I agree. This is why many successful system traders advise to keep their system open and flexible, the less variables the better. This is also why higher timeframes work so well vs. intraday trading. I have 3 working systems and they do a nice job of capturing the essence of the market direction with only 1 indicator and price is the other indicator over time.

 

I discretionary trade because my mission is to understand the markets as much as possible before getting more into system trading. I want to know how the market works for myself before building more. Took me 2 yrs to come up with 3 systems so I figure my learning curve in building them would increase as my discretionary gets better.

 

Hi torero,

 

I'm curious on average how many trades you get daily in your intraday trading system. From my understanding, it is difficulty to get more than 3 trades a day for an automated system. This is also one of the aspect I prefer discretionary trading over automated trading. A discretionary trader has the flexibility to trade by adjusting to different market conditions. He/she can be both a scalper and a swing trader. I'm not sure whether automated system have such a flexibility.

 

Another aspect I prefer discretionary trading over automated trading is lower drawdown. I read something about the drawdown of automated system. It usually ranges from 20% to 50% annually. It's just too high, IMO. A good discretionary trader can have much lower drawdown as long as he has a sound trading method and good money management.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest scalptrader
I'm curious on average how many trades you get daily in your intraday trading system. From my understanding, it is difficulty to get more than 3 trades a day for an automated system. This is also one of the aspect I prefer discretionary trading over automated trading. A discretionary trader has the flexibility to trade by adjusting to different market conditions. He/she can be both a scalper and a swing trader. I'm not sure whether automated system have such a flexibility.

 

See the attachment. 100% automated, even the execution.

 

I trade a portfolio of systems, no discretionary trader can come close to duplicating these results. From a conceptual view, the human mind could never find such systems, (I don't use AI). And from an execution view, any trader would burn out after a couple months trading something like this manually!

 

I'm a discretionary trader for two main reasons. First, there are too many variables that I look at to capture in a mechanical system.

 

Yes there are so many variable, but dont forget the simple stuff always works better, especially for discretionary trader. You should be using no more than 3 non correlating technical reason reasons to enter a position. Anything more and confusion starts to creep in...

 

The main problem most trader face is they lack the technical skills required to implement automated systems. Start learning programming if you are serious!

M_331.thumb.gif.a140541570d3e4edb7324d2da9f13921.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
See the attachment. 100% automated, even the execution.

 

I trade a portfolio of systems, no discretionary trader can come close to duplicating these results. From a conceptual view, the human mind could never find such systems, (I don't use AI). And from an execution view, any trader would burn out after a couple months trading something like this manually!

 

 

 

Yes there are so many variable, but dont forget the simple stuff always works better, especially for discretionary trader. You should be using no more than 3 non correlating technical reason reasons to enter a position. Anything more and confusion starts to creep in...

 

The main problem most trader face is they lack the technical skills required to implement automated systems. Start learning programming if you are serious!

 

scalptrader:

 

The chart from your system looks very interesting. It seems to me you are using some simple cross average at short time frame in your automated trading system. I'm wondering how the system performs at choppy market conditions.

 

Do you leave your system operate overnight or you just have it operated during regular trading hours? I guess sometimes the overnight spike may bring big trouble for an automated system if the system is not designed very well in this aspect.

 

Since you said that ''...no discretionary trader can come close to duplicating these results...'', I'm curious to know what's the return/drawdown of your totally automated system during its life span. Frankly speaking, I really doubt it can beat a good discretionary trader.

 

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest scalptrader

From a conceptual view, the human mind could never find such systems, (I don't use AI). So there is no point trying to guess. The rules will not make sense to you any way either!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
From a conceptual view, the human mind could never find such systems, (I don't use AI). So there is no point trying to guess. The rules will not make sense to you any way either!!

 

Scalptrader,

 

I don't want to know the rules. I just want to know the results (return, profit/loss ratio, drawdown, etc.) if you are willing to share. No matter what approach/method/system adopted, ultimately only the results can be the final judge.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi torero,

 

I'm curious on average how many trades you get daily in your intraday trading system. From my understanding, it is difficulty to get more than 3 trades a day for an automated system. This is also one of the aspect I prefer discretionary trading over automated trading. A discretionary trader has the flexibility to trade by adjusting to different market conditions. He/she can be both a scalper and a swing trader. I'm not sure whether automated system have such a flexibility.

 

Another aspect I prefer discretionary trading over automated trading is lower drawdown. I read something about the drawdown of automated system. It usually ranges from 20% to 50% annually. It's just too high, IMO. A good discretionary trader can have much lower drawdown as long as he has a sound trading method and good money management.

 

It's true that my systems don't trade everyday despite using intraday charts. The conditions to trade only when the direction is already confirmed. I use the same money management in these systems as my discretionary trading, so any DDs would be the same. I aim to create systems that can emulate my style and risk tolerance else I'd never trade them. This is the reason why there are many systems out there that seem profitable but the DDs are so large, I don't have the guts to withstand the DDs. I have to pass them up.

 

This is the difficult part in system trading is that no system can trade more than 5 trades a day and stay profitable. Slippage and commissions will eat it alive. The feedback from traders in TS forums have confirmed this. Higher timeframes have better chances of lasting longer and be profitable. So less trades greater profitability.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think this depends on how aggressive a trader is. For example, if a trader is looking to fade a key support/resistance level, does the trader enter while the market is moving towards support/resistance or after the market turns? Take another example, let's say a trader is looking to play a reversal from a downtrend, does the trader wait for the higher high and higher low to be in or does the trader anticipate that the higher high/low is coming based on somthing else? I don't think one can make a blanket statement here. I believe it comes down to experience and intuition as opposed to a mechanical or discretionary style.

 

 

 

I'm a discretionary trader for two main reasons. First, there are too many variables that I look at to capture in a mechanical system. Secondly, a mechanical system tends to be too rigid. For example, let's say that the market is a tick away from an entry/exit and then turns around, the entry/exit would not trigger on a mechanical system. I don't think that trying to "program" a discretionary style into a mechanical system makes too much sense. Think of the complexity.

 

Of course, one of the advantages of a mechanical system is that it is consistent in the way it executes. Discretionary traders need to make sure that their trade decisions are made in consistent and systematic way so that they can continue to replicate in the future and determine what has been working over the longer term. Discretionary traders should not let too much subjectivity into their trading, otherwise they don't have a system. Maintaining a trading log and journal are critical to success for a discretionary trader, IMO.

 

 

Thank you Ant. I have yet to go on a mission to designing a pure mechanical system. The methods I have learned and apply in trading are far too complicated to program. How would one go about programming tape reading? Pretty impossible I'de say. At the same time discretionary traders need to approach the markets in a very systematic way: Trading off setups, controlling losses, target points, etc...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Believe or not, soul, I've seen some code in the TS forum and has been shown by other traders using internals to signal and time their trades. Nothing is impossible that cannot be done in code. Just a matter of how skillful or skilless the coder is. Check around the forum and you can find some nice nuggets to get your ideas going.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very interesting. I do not come from a comp, engineering background and I have absolutely zero knowledge when it comes to coding. I find Easy Language extremely hard.

 

How would one go about learning coding? Is this something that will take years to become skilled at? Is learning Easy Language enough? Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well... systems is like Formula 1 races... if its raining you need certain types of tires if not other types... thats also true with systems... you design a system for a market climate... if you are good analist you even design an alternative system for a diferent climate.... the big problem comes in discerning wich climate are we having and wich sistem should be implemented... thats where discretionary traders have an edge... they do know and feel the climate in order to adapt to it... systems dont discern market conditions.... some naive traders put conditions to their systems to filter market climate ,believe me there is no rule , no specific hours, no nothing to market conditions... market can go wild on lunch hour as it can get sleepy on the first 30 minutes before a news... or be wild without news , there is no parameters as to market climate, only a seasoned trader in front of his screen can tell you the market conditions an wich of his alternative techniches can be applied in that conditions...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very pertinent points Walter. I agree, unless the trader or fund can bankroll their automated system with deep pockets, the drawdowns will freak most folks out.

 

As you say, the ever changing climate dilutes the vast majority of these programmed systems, well certainly in the FX environment anyway.

 

Obviously, there are well capitalized firms (excl the large corporates) & individuals out there who can & do run successful forays into the automated streams - but they're few & far between. For the average market participant, total automation is a tricky prospect.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I got a bachelors in international marketing. Just nights studying to become a webmaster when webmasters belonged in the marketing department. From there it went on. It took a few months of reading, doing tutorials etc. Matter of time, just like how one would start on trading I guess. I got to know EL with a tutorial and manual in no time.

 

Again the less variables and rules the system is the more robust it is. That means with different conditions, it manages to survive and thrive in it because there are little rules to thrive in one and die in another. So, in truth, the good strategy doesn't have to be so sophisticated or difficult to code. Know the market and code should come pretty well placed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Most system traders (successful ones) admit no system will last forever. Hence there is always continuing search for the new systems. Even robust ones need tweaking, revisions, etc from time to time. Same as discretionary traders, they need tweaking (bullish to bearish mindset etc) as new conditions arise. This also explains why these systems for sale out there don't make money. Either too many people trading it making the market absorbing the strategy into failed ones or just don't last long enough when changing conditions become evident.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the comments Walter, Texxas, and Torero. Some very interesting points. Im very new to this system world... which is why I am still very skeptical with trading systems. I have been taught by discretionary traders only and seeing how successful they are, I always believed discretionary traders make the best traders.

 

Very good point on the funding part Texxas. Deep pockets is definitely a consideration especially with some of the drawdowns I keep hearing with system based traders. One of the biggest concern I have as a discretionary trader is that more and more traders are creating systems and being automated. Will the edge of a pure discretionary trader ever fade away? The market needs to be full of emotion for traders like myself to survive.... without emotions, I wouldnt know what to exploit. (of course I dont believe this will ever happen but could affect price movement?)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On the subject of "mechanical trading systems" & the pro's-con's etc:

 

One of the guys in our office zapped this missive across to me late last night.

 

I won't reveal the blog/trader, it's immaterial - however, it raises the complexities of this type of trading when the template/mechanics are not built & managed within a solid psychological and/or physical framework.

 

I think the (abridged) commentary say's it all:-

 

 

Firstly to report, results which are rather shitty, and second to suspend / close the blog, possibly forever. Reasons to follow.

 

First of all lets talk turkey about the results.

 

The month was terrible - in fact the worst that we have experienced in the 14 months trading it, however not the worst on record from our tests.

 

We suffered this month a 48% drawdown. We suffered this drawdown at a point when i was supposed to be enjoying a holiday in New York - it was 30% when I left the UK and 45% when i got back. Needless to say due to things beyond my control, much of my holiday was totally spoilt.

 

The month of December ended up at -45% on the account - from £100,502 down to £55,000 The system still works and is within parameters but the money management, which at the end of the day is the bit that creates the severity of drawdown, was at fault and has since been rectified.

 

We were running the account at 100% efficiency - which meant that at a max drawdown there would just be enough in the account to sustain it. what i didnt take into account was the psychological pressure of actually getting close to reaching this level and seeing the account decimated.

 

Even after five years of trading, the market can still humble you, and this drawdown certainly has. So if you are reading this and you're a trader - dont ever think you have this thing licked.

 

To this point, i hope that you've enjoyed the journey and it's with sadness that I am to close this blog.

 

There are a few reasons for my decision, some of which I cannot talk about at the moment, however the main one is that because of the blog I am getting emotionally involved when the system has a losing month. The fact that it's in a drawdown at the end of a month shouldnt matter because it peaks and troughs no matter what the date is - the fact it's at the end of the month is immaterial.

 

Getting emotionally involved in the trading of a mechanical system is not good - you start to analyse every facet of the trades and it can drive you nuts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I totally agree. Trading mechanical doesn't really take away the fact that you still can pull the plug or manipulate it during the trades, etc. This intervention is what makes the system worst and not stay with the performance as expected.

 

As I said before, my system were built on money management first. They must fit my trading style and tolerance level. All the systems I've put it on trading has then 20% maximum drawdown. So I know I'll pull the plug on it when it reaches there. It's a benchmark point where the system will have stopped working.

 

Most people don't understand that systems can handle drawdowns on its own, it's the owners or traders who trade them that can't handle them. This is the other reason why renting them can be an emotional panic when you don't know in full details what the system is capable of doing and not doing. I always judge the systems' soundness by seeing if any money management is in place, then see if it's within my emotional tolerance.

 

I learned this very quickly after deciding to go mechanical with the original belief that no more emotions will be involved. Nothing can be further from the truth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The biggest issue in mechanical systems for me is EXECUTION. Slippage is an enormous problem as is the system getting out of sync with the actual fills.

 

My systems trade about 20 times a day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest scalptrader

Who is your broker? You tried just using limit orders?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Problem with limit orders is that the market trades there but you don't get filled. This means one of two things:

Your system thinks you are filled and you are not, or,

You miss many profitable trades and get all the losers whick makes your back testing useless.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The biggest issue in mechanical systems for me is EXECUTION. Slippage is an enormous problem as is the system getting out of sync with the actual fills.

 

My systems trade about 20 times a day.

 

From testing out many systems on my own. Slippages and commissions must be set as realistic as possible. Limit orders will hide the fills in backtesting but in real trading, you'll get bad trades and good trades will be missed (everyone is out to get that fill too). 20 trades/day is alot of trades, comms and slippages will eventually eat up your profits long term.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hrrummpff! A very interesting thread, to be sure. I think Ant, Torero and Walter nailed it all down pretty well. I am probably older than most of you and I seem to recall LTCM (Long Term Capital Management) putting together billions of dollars, the best tacticians, the most powerful computers and coders who could probably program rockets to Mars and beyond.. in an attempt to use their edge in automated system trading and clean house.

 

Well, house was cleaned all right. Despite all the best resources available, not only were they unable to win more than they lost, they collapsed in spectacular style soon thereafter.

 

In other words, boys and girls, it ain't worth it, but I know that won't discourage most of you from attempting it nevertheless. Of course marketers like Modus and others will pronounce that the powers that be have taken a factual survey and 75% or more of the pros and big institutional players succeed only by using an automated system. Well, lest ye forget, they can afford some very significant drawdowns, which are precisely what kill most of the retail traders in their valiant attempts to play like the big boys. Additionally, they have a full cadre of analysts, computer whizzes, etc.. on hand at all times running up to date scenarios with informational access that you can still only dream about. Additionally, until they collapse, you never hear about their whopping losses or their real ROI, etc.. so best to stick to your own knitting and for most, that is going to still come down to being a discretionary trader. When the computers can do it all without effort on your part, the game will be over or they will change all the rules anyway.

 

Happy Trading :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You have to design these backtest limit orders so they only get filled when the market moves one tick past your limit. You rarely sell at the ask or buy at the bid. Certainly nothing you can depend on. This has to be taken into account when programming. Tradestation/Easy Language does not take this into account, you need to program it yourself. Tradestations ProftTarget strategy will fill limit orders on a touch which is not realistic at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • Date: 8th April 2025.   Markets Rebound Cautiously as US-China Tariff Tensions Deepen     Global markets staged a tentative recovery on Tuesday following a wave of volatility sparked by escalating trade tensions between the United States and China. The Asia-Pacific region showed signs of stability after a chaotic start to the week—though some pockets remained under pressure. Taiwan’s Taiex dropped 4.4%, dragged lower by losses in tech heavyweight TSMC. The world’s largest chipmaker fell another 4% on Tuesday and has now slumped 13.5% since April 2, when US President Donald Trump first unveiled what he called ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs.   However, broader sentiment across the region turned more positive, with several markets rebounding sharply after Monday’s dramatic sell-offs. Japan’s Nikkei 225 surged over 6% in early trading, rebounding from an 18-month low. South Korea’s Kospi rose marginally, and Australia’s ASX 200 gained 1.9%, driven by strength in mining stocks. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng rose 1.6%, though still far from recovering from Monday’s 13.2% crash—its worst day since the 1997 Asian financial crisis. China’s Shanghai Composite added 0.9%.   In Europe, DAX and FTSE 100 are up more than 1% in opening trade. EU Commission President von der Leyen repeated yesterday that the EU had offered reciprocal zero tariffs on manufactured goods previously and continues to stand by that offer. Others are also trying again to talk to Trump to get some sort of agreement that limits the impact.   Much of the rally appeared to be driven by dip-buying, as well as hopes that the intensifying trade war could still be defused through negotiations.   China Strikes Back: ‘We Will Fight to the End’   Tensions reached a boiling point after Trump threatened to impose an additional 50% tariff on all Chinese imports unless Beijing rolled back its retaliatory measures by April 8. ‘If China does not withdraw its 34% increase above their already long-term trading abuses by tomorrow... the United States will impose additional tariffs on China of 50%,’ Trump declared on social media.   If implemented, the new tariffs would bring total US duties on Chinese goods to a staggering 124%, factoring in the existing 20%, the 34% recently announced, and the proposed 50%.   In response, China’s Ministry of Commerce issued a stern warning, stating: ‘The US threat to escalate tariffs is a mistake on top of a mistake... If the US insists on its own way, China will fight to the end.’ The ministry also called for equal and respectful dialogue, though signs of compromise on either side remain scarce.   Beijing acted quickly to contain a market fallout. State funds intervened to support equities, and the People’s Bank of China set the yuan fixing at its weakest level since September 2023 to boost export competitiveness. Additionally, five-year interest rate swaps in China fell to their lowest levels since 2020, indicating potential for further monetary easing.   Trump Talks Tough on EU Too   Trump’s hardline approach extended beyond China. Speaking at a press conference, he rejected the European Union’s offer to eliminate tariffs on cars and industrial goods, accusing the bloc of ‘being very bad to us.’ He insisted that Europe would need to source its energy from the US, claiming the US could ‘knock off $350 billion in one week.’   The EU, meanwhile, backed away from a proposed 50% retaliatory tariff on American whiskey, opting instead for 25% duties on selected US goods in response to Trump’s steel and aluminium tariffs.     Volatile Wall Street Adds to the Drama   Wall Street experienced wild swings on Monday as investors processed the rapidly evolving trade conflict. The S&P 500 briefly fell 4.7% before rebounding 3.4%, nearly erasing its losses in what could have been its biggest one-day jump in years—if it had held. The Dow Jones Industrial Average sank by as much as 1,700 points early in the day but later climbed nearly 900 points before closing 349 points lower, down 0.9%. The Nasdaq ended up 0.1%.   The brief rally was fueled by a false rumour that Trump was considering a 90-day pause on tariffs—rumours that the White House quickly labelled ‘fake news.’ The market's sharp reaction underscored how desperate investors are for any sign that tensions might ease.   Oil Markets in Focus: Goldman Sachs Revises Forecasts   Crude prices also reflected the uncertainty, with US crude briefly dipping below $60 per barrel for the first time since 2021. As of early Tuesday, Brent crude was trading at $64.72, while WTI hovered around $61.26.   Goldman Sachs, in a note dated April 7, lowered its average price forecasts for Brent and WTI through 2025 and 2026, citing mounting recession risks and the potential for higher-than-expected supply from OPEC+.       Under a base-case scenario where the US avoids a recession and tariffs are reduced significantly before the April 9 implementation date, Goldman sees Brent at $62 per barrel and WTI at $58 by December 2025. These figures fall further to $55 and $51, respectively, by the end of 2026. This outlook also assumes moderate output increases from eight OPEC+ countries, with incremental boosts of 130,000–140,000 barrels per day in June and July.   However, should the US slip into a typical recession and OPEC production aligns with the bank’s baseline assumptions, Brent could retreat to $58 by the end of this year and to $50 by December 2026.   In a more bearish scenario involving a global GDP slowdown and no change to OPEC+ output levels, Brent prices might fall to $54 by year-end and $45 by late 2026. The most extreme projection—based on a simultaneous economic downturn and a full reversal of OPEC+ production cuts—would see Brent plunge to below $40 per barrel by the end of 2026.   Goldman noted that oil prices could outperform forecasts significantly if there was a dramatic shift in tariff policy and a surprise in global demand recovery.   Cautious Optimism, But Warnings Persist   With both Washington and Beijing showing no signs of backing down, markets are likely to remain volatile in the days ahead. Investors now turn their attention to upcoming trade meetings and policy decisions, hoping for clarity in what has become one of the most unpredictable trading environments in recent years.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.