Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

mcerio

VPCI As PaintBar

Recommended Posts

What I have below is what I had hoped to be the firs step in making VPCI into a PaintBar Study....it will verify, but just paints every bar.

 

The end result was supposed to be GREEN colored vbars for when VPCI is greater than Ave VPCI (or VPCI Smooth) AND greater than Zero.

 

RED when VPCI is less than VPCI Smooth AND less than zero.

 

WHITE or not painted when VPCI and its relation to zero are not in sync.

 

I am new as can be at this and am hoping someone can point me in the right direction.

 

Thank You.

 

 

 

inputs:

Price( Close ),

Length1( 5 ),

Length2( 20 ),

VPCIAvgLen( 20 ) ;

 

variables:

VolValue( 0 ),

VolumeSum1( 0 ),

VolumeSum2( 0 ),

VWMA1( 0 ),

VWMA2( 0 ),

VP( 0 ),

VPR( 0 ),

VM( 0 ),

VPCI( 0 ),

AvgVPCI( 0 ) ;

 

if BarType >= 2 then { not tick/minute data }

VolValue = Volume

else

VolValue = Ticks ;

 

VolumeSum1 = Summation( VolValue, Length1 ) ;

if VolumeSum1 > 0 then

VWMA1 = Summation( Price * VolValue , Length1 ) /

VolumeSum1 ;

 

VolumeSum2 = Summation( VolValue, Length2 ) ;

if VolumeSum2 > 0 then

VWMA2 = Summation( Price * VolValue , Length2 ) /

VolumeSum2 ;

 

VP = VWMA2 - Average( Price, Length2 ) ;

if Average( Low, Length1) > 0 then

VPR = VWMA1 / Average( Low, Length1 ) ;

if Average( VolValue, Length2 )> 0 then

VM = Average( VolValue, Length1 ) / Average( VolValue, Length2 ) ;

VPCI = VP * VPR * VM ;

AvgVPCI = Average( VPCI, VPCIAvgLen ) ;

 

 

 

If (VPCI > AvgVPCI) and (VPCI > 0)

Then PlotPaintBar (High, Low);

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, so now the end looks like this:

 

If (VPCI > AvgVPCI) and (VPCI > 0)

Then PlotPaintBar (High, Low)

Else;

 

NoPlot( 1 ) ; { unpaint the bar }

 

 

It verifies but still nothing...I seem to get all of my attempts at a paintbar to either not paint at all OR paint everything all the time.

 

Thank you in advance for any wisdom you can lend me.

 

MC

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OK, so now the end looks like this:

 

If (VPCI > AvgVPCI) and (VPCI > 0)

Then PlotPaintBar (High, Low)

Else;

 

NoPlot( 1 ) ; { unpaint the bar }

 

 

It verifies but still nothing...I seem to get all of my attempts at a paintbar to either not paint at all OR paint everything all the time.

 

Thank you in advance for any wisdom you can lend me.

 

MC

 

 

I would suggest you to start from STEP ONE:

 

go download this book:

 

"Getting Started with EasyLanguage"

this is the book you need if you're thinking about using EasyLanguage but don't know where to start.

 

Documentation

 

lots of useful examples for you to copy-and-paste.

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK. I took a look at what you wanted me to and have managed to get some paintbars working...now i am on to show me for vpci...it plots points (would really like an arrow at the cross above and below when above or below 0), but it is not doing the simple calculation at all. It cant seem to figure out when a pre-defined value is pos or neg and plot it.

 

I don't get it.

 

Here is where I'm at...seems simple enough but not working:

 

inputs:

Price( Close ),

Length1( 1 ),

Length2( 1 ),

VPCIAvgLen( 1 ) ;

 

variables:

VolValue( 0 ),

VolumeSum1( 0 ),

VolumeSum2( 0 ),

VWMA1( 0 ),

VWMA2( 0 ),

VP( 0 ),

VPR( 0 ),

VM( 0 ),

VPCI( 0 ),

AvgVPCI( 0 ) ;

 

if BarType >= 2 then { not tick/minute data }

VolValue = Volume

else

VolValue = Ticks ;

 

VolumeSum1 = Summation( VolValue, Length1 ) ;

if VolumeSum1 > 0 then

VWMA1 = Summation( Price * VolValue , Length1 ) /

VolumeSum1 ;

 

VolumeSum2 = Summation( VolValue, Length2 ) ;

if VolumeSum2 > 0 then

VWMA2 = Summation( Price * VolValue , Length2 ) /

VolumeSum2 ;

 

VP = VWMA2 - Average( Price, Length2 ) ;

if Average( Low, Length1) > 0 then

VPR = VWMA1 / Average( Low, Length1 ) ;

if Average( VolValue, Length2 )> 0 then

VM = Average( VolValue, Length1 ) / Average( VolValue, Length2 ) ;

VPCI = VP * VPR * VM ;

AvgVPCI = Average( VPCI, VPCIAvgLen ) ;

 

 

Condition1 = (VPCI is > avgVPCI) ;

 

{ OPTIONAL STEP: Replace CLOSE with your own formula for the price at which the marker

will be placed. Note that Value1 is a numeric variable, a temporary holding place

for the result of the numeric formula. }

 

Value1 = (low - .5);

 

{ Leave the following as is. The plot is not named because there is only one plot, and

the default name Plot1 will be adequate. The alert does not include a description

because the alerting criteria and the plotting criteria are the same, and the

description will be redundant. }

 

if Condition1 then

begin

Plot1 (value1) ;

Alert ;

end ;

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you should wrap your code with the code tag.

it is the [b][size="4"]#[/size][/b] key at the top right of the message window

tagged code looks like this:

[code]
Input:
length(20);

Variables:
avg(0);

avg = average( close, length);

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you are jumping ahead,

you haven't done these parts yet...

 

What I have below is what I had hoped to be the firs step in making VPCI into a PaintBar Study....it will verify, but just paints every bar.

 

The end result was supposed to be GREEN colored vbars for when VPCI is greater than Ave VPCI (or VPCI Smooth) AND greater than Zero.

 

RED when VPCI is less than VPCI Smooth AND less than zero.

 

WHITE or not painted when VPCI and its relation to zero are not in sync.

...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I’m actually not going to paint the bars based on VPCI….but I do want to eliminate the VPCI indicator from below my chart and simply replace it with a show me that gives me one arrow up or down based on the following info:

 

If VPCI > AvgVPCI (this is VPCI Smooth) and VPCI > 0 (the “zero” I am referring to is the one represented in the VPCI indicator, NOT on the chart of course) then plot the show me under the bar as an arrow pointing up…ONLY at the initial time that these are true not on every single bar that fits this criteria.

 

Same thing but pointing DOWN when VPCI < AvgVPCI and VPCI < 0.

 

This doesn’t seem like it should be so difficult to get to work….but I sure can’t do it.

 

:crap:

 

Any help is SO needed and appreciated fully.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
...

This doesn’t seem like it should be so difficult to get to work….but I sure can’t do it.

 

:crap:

 

Any help is SO needed and appreciated fully.

 

 

what program are you using?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TradeStation

 

I am now working with cross over...still not working correctly with my VPCI calculations.

 

See below:

 

Condition1 = (VPCI > avgVPCI) ;

Condition2 = (VPCI crosses over 0) ;

 

 

{ OPTIONAL STEP: Replace CLOSE with your own formula for the price at which the marker

will be placed. Note that Value1 is a numeric variable, a temporary holding place

for the result of the numeric formula. }

 

Value1 = (low - .5);

 

{ Leave the following as is. The plot is not named because there is only one plot, and

the default name Plot1 will be adequate. The alert does not include a description

because the alerting criteria and the plotting criteria are the same, and the

description will be redundant. }

 

if Condition1 and Condition2 then

begin

Plot1 (value1) ;

Alert ;

end;

 

This is in with the code above for VPCI

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is actually where I was stumped ignore last post:

 

Condition1 = (VPCI > 0) ;

Condition2 = (VPCI crosses over AvgVPCI) ;

Condition3 = (VPCI crosses over 0);

Condition4 = (VPCI > AvgVPCI);

 

{ OPTIONAL STEP: Replace CLOSE with your own formula for the price at which the marker

will be placed. Note that Value1 is a numeric variable, a temporary holding place

for the result of the numeric formula. }

 

Value1 = (low - .5);

 

{ Leave the following as is. The plot is not named because there is only one plot, and

the default name Plot1 will be adequate. The alert does not include a description

because the alerting criteria and the plotting criteria are the same, and the

description will be redundant. }

 

if Condition1 and Condition2 or Condition3 and Condition4 then

begin

Plot1 (value1) ;

Alert ;

end;

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm, thx. I've been trying to find out more about the text_new function....but no good tutorials on how to add it correctly to your code. Do you know of any good references?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hmmm, thx. I've been trying to find out more about the text_new function....but no good tutorials on how to add it correctly to your code. Do you know of any good references?

 

1. READ THE MANUAL and the REFERENCE

 

lots of sample code in there

 

 

2. Press [F1] in TS for HELP

 

 

 

3. You have NOT tried the search function of this site !!!!! (ask me how I knew.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.