Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

tucciotrader

Ctic Call Options at Price Strike 1$

Recommended Posts

I have a few difficulties understandig why the market maker is not going to quote the call option at price strike below the dollar...what I don't uderstand is that the security is trading at 0,38$ on the nasdaq and its call options is trading at price strike >1$ and the open interests for this call options is huge (yet, I don't know for how many stocks a single call contract accounts for...maybe 1k?)

 

Why is anybody buying call options instead of buying the security itself?

 

http://finance.yahoo.com/q/op?s=CTIC&m=2011-01

http://finance.yahoo.com/q/op?s=CTIC&m=2012-01

 

Strike: 1.00

Last: 0.02

Open Int: 47,331

Expire at close Friday, January 21, 2011

--

Strike: 1.00

Last: 0.08

Open Int: 73,660

Expire at close Friday, January 20, 2012

 

thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Q: "I have a few difficulties understandig why the market maker is not going to quote the call option at price strike below the dollar"

A: Most strikes, expiries etc are set by the exchange. Maybe they have rules or have decided not to list new option strikes in these months.....maybe there are other shorter dated options that are less than a $1 strike that are available.

 

Q"...what I don't uderstand is that the security is trading at 0,38$ on the nasdaq and its call options is trading at price strike >1$ and the open interests for this call options is huge "

A...These may have traded earlier in the year when the strikes were at the money.

 

(yet, I don't know for how many stocks a single call contract accounts for...maybe 1k?)

A.....check on the appropriate exchange for that instrument.

 

 

Q..."Why is anybody buying call options instead of buying the security itself?"

A....Risk v return. The stock has been a poor performer over the year.... risking 2c v 39 c seems worth it depending on the view. What if the stock rallies to 80c the options might go to 6-8 c. As in every trade there are trade offs - this is the fun part of option trading :)

Are they all buying options......or are they simply buying them back as they are short them?

 

Apart from the varieties of options available, the education requires to trade them, there is also the added element of being able to understand what has happened in the history of the option trading in an instrument. This in itself can provide a lot of information.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, thanks. Now, it makes more sense to me!

 

That could merely be a buy back as they are short them.

 

I wonder what "Open interest" means. Does that mean "traded" or just "bought" ?? I mean, if call options are being naked shorted, say, hitting the bid...someone must be buying them...right? that could be the Market Maker as well...will that increment the value of Open Int?

 

How can I tell when an call option is being bought or sold??

 

http://finance.yahoo.com/q/op?s=CTIC&m=2011-01

 

I'm sorry, I must admit I'm quite new to option trading...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1) How to tell if a call option is being bought or sold? it not really a matter of this, as for every buyer there is a seller. The question is How do you know if the option is being open or closed? Is it a new or initiating trade?

Watch the open interest, ideally if its decreasing its being closed out. Realistically you either need to watch to know if a client is closing out the option, or rolling it. There is a lot of information required to be tracked for this. The easiest is to watch for changes in the open interest of a series.

 

2) Open Interest - you had best check with the exchange how best they operate the measurement of this. But in a simplistic measure, check out Open Interest Definition

 

Now while you will only be interested in what the exchange numbers are reported as.......as food for thought, take it one step further and think about it terms of an individual traders open interest.

(assume all in the same strike, series, instrument etc)

Day 1.... buy 10 contracts,

Day 2.....sell 5 contracts

Day 3......buy 2 contracts

Day 4......sell 2 contracts

 

Whats the open interest? +10-5+2-2=5

 

(now if you dont want to get confused stop reading.....otherwise as an interesting often not known element of the option market)....

 

Or can a trader have +12 longs open and -7 shorts open?

 

Depending on the exchanges and the availability to do this..... both options are possible and you want to check how the exchange accounts for this. Usually they would still only show +5 open.

But it can get confusing when expiry comes around, as the volumes may not replicate what the open interest is.

This is because of choice to keep option positions open that are "back to back", and not closed out. (It involves extra accounting and costs but can be worth it.)

So on expiry day (assuming the options are ITM), the option trader chooses to exercise both the longs and the shorts, and the volume will be expiry day trades of +12, and selling 7.

 

All I would say is check exactly how the exchange calculates it if you are going to use it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  SIUYA said:
1) How to tell if a call option is being bought or sold? it not really a matter of this, as for every buyer there is a seller. The question is How do you know if the option is being open or closed? Is it a new or initiating trade?

 

well, if it's an active trade..the short seller might be hitting the bid whereas the market maker is forced to quote some contracts (both at bid & ask)...so, the trader could be short selling call contracts to the market maker. thus, increasing the open int

 

  SIUYA said:

Watch the open interest, ideally if its decreasing its being closed out. Realistically you either need to watch to know if a client is closing out the option, or rolling it. There is a lot of information required to be tracked for this. The easiest is to watch for changes in the open interest of a series.

 

that was my take too! Needless to say, changes in the open int. series are not provided. At any rate, I noticed that the open int. have increased a lot, lately. So..offhand, I'd say that call contracts are being bought (long) insteadof bought back (short close)

 

Yet, that could be new shorts beign opened by hitting the marker maker at bid as the last traded price is equal to the bid!!

 

  SIUYA said:

All I would say is check exactly how the exchange calculates it if you are going to use it.

 

Still, I wonder why the market maker is not quoting options with price strike below 1$ as well as why are call contracts being bought at price strike 1$ while the underline security is trading at 0,38$??

 

I have both good and bad fellings.

 

Good: the security might be trading over 1$ in the near future.

Bad: a Reverse/Split is around the corner...

 

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  tucciotrader said:

I have both good and bad fellings.

 

Good: the security might be trading over 1$ in the near future.

Bad: a Reverse/Split is around the corner...

 

Thanks

 

I did a little bit of rummaging around, and learnt something today....I got onto the NASDAQ legal and compliance area and realised there is a lot of minimum requirements to stay listed. Maintaining a share price above $1 is one of them..... thanks.

 

Also found this.....

The 5 Dumbest Things on Wall Street: Sept. 17 - TheStreet

 

they sound like they are lining their own pockets and it will not be getting back above $1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  tucciotrader said:
so, in a nutshell, those who are shorting the calls are making millions while the market maker is paying them that millions! unless the call option is in the money by the expire day...is tha correct?

 

thats a big assumption.....and you know what happens when you assume!

 

shorting options for 2cents is like picking up pennies in front of a steamroller. It seems easy until the day you trip and get flattened.

As I said the stock may only need to rally to 80c and those options may be worth a lot more.

Whilst the articles suggest the management are sub par. What if the company was worth something to another company without the current management. The stock might be worth $1 plus.....who knows.

Approach it on a risk reward basis.....sell at your own risk for those 99 times out of 100 you get it right.....just watch out for the 1 time you get it wrong.

 

Also are you sure the market makers are buying them? maybe market makers are trading with other market makers, or clients with other clients? Maybe they are part of a roll, another hedge....Dont assume anything

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.