Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

ajhunter

I Don't Understand the Code for the Hull Moving Average

Recommended Posts

I would like to generate an indicator telling me when at what closing price would be required to change the direction of a Hull moving average. I am currently do not understand the Hull moving average function and am therefore unable to do the math/coding.

 

Value1 = 2 * WAverage(price, halvedLength);

Value2 = WAverage(price, length);

Value3 = WAverage((Value1 - Value2), sqrRootLength);

 

jtHMA = Value3;

 

I understand and can calculate value1 and value2 but I have no idea what a weighted average of the difference between the two actually is. I read value3 as being a weighted average of an integer over the squareroot of a period. But a weighted average of an integer makes no sense :confused:.

 

Some elucidation would be greatly appreciated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Indicator:

 

Inputs: Length(20), Offset(0); 


vars: avg1(0), color1(black); 


avg1 = jthma(Close, Length); 

Plot1 (avg1, "JT Hull"); 

color1 = green; 
if avg1 < avg1[1] then color1 = red; 

SetPlotColor[Offset](1, color1); 

 

 

 

 

Function

 

{jtHMA - Hull Moving Average Function}  
{Author: Atavachron}  
{May 2005}		  

Inputs: price(NumericSeries), length(NumericSimple);  
Vars: halvedLength(0), sqLength(0), sqrRootLength(0);  

{  
Original equation is:  
---------------------  
waverage(2*waverage(close,period/2)-waverage(close ,period), SquareRoot(Period)  
Implementation below is more efficient with lengthy Weighted Moving Averages.  
In addition, the length needs to be converted to an integer value after it is halved and  
its square root is obtained in order for this to work with Weighted Moving Averaging  
}  

if ((ceiling(length / 2) - (length / 2))  <= 0.5) then  
halvedLength = ceiling(length / 2)  
else  
halvedLength = floor(length / 2);  

sqLength = SquareRoot(length); 

if ((ceiling(sqLength) - sqLength)  <= 0.5) then  
sqrRootLength = ceiling(sqLength)  
else  
sqrRootLength = floor(sqLength);  

Value1 = 2 * WAverage(price, halvedLength);  
Value2 = WAverage(price, length);  
Value3 = WAverage((Value1 - Value2), sqrRootLength);  

jtHMA = Value3;  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I would like to generate an indicator telling me when at what closing price would be required to change the direction of a Hull moving average. I am currently do not understand the Hull moving average function and am therefore unable to do the math/coding.

 

Value1 = 2 * WAverage(price, halvedLength);

Value2 = WAverage(price, length);

Value3 = WAverage((Value1 - Value2), sqrRootLength);

 

jtHMA = Value3;

 

I understand and can calculate value1 and value2 but I have no idea what a weighted average of the difference between the two actually is. I read value3 as being a weighted average of an integer over the squareroot of a period.

1. value3 is not necessary an integer.

 

But a weighted average of an integer makes no sense :confused:.

 

Some elucidation would be greatly appreciated.

2. what/why does it makes no sense?

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The weighted average formula divides wtd sum by cumulative weight, where the weighted sum is generated by adding up different prices over the course of the relevant time period and multiplying them by the length (day in the period) associated with them.

 

JTHMA appears to be essentially a weighted average of other weighted averages -- specifically two weighted averages that have two different periods (length and halvedlength).

 

Here's where I'm confused. Weighted average for (price, length) requires a different price for each period included in the length -- So if I have a length of 5, I need a price for each of those five values of length. However the JTHMA formula just gives me one price (the real number, representing Value1-Value2), despite the fact that it has a length greater than 1.

 

Many thanks for any light you can shed on this!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

a possible solution to being able to tell what price it will need in order to change direction

is to stick it in a loop and let it find out itself.

i am not sure what you are trying to achieve, if for example your indikator, which in this case is the hull ma is pointing up and you would want to know how much price should move down in order to make your indikator go down or cross below some fix point whithout knowing or needing to know the exact calculations it shouldnt be to hard to find out.

stick the calculation in a loop and let it loop trough untill your disired outcome is calculated, this will then be the price you will need to achieve the theoretical change in the indikator you would like to see.

but then again, imho it is not very helpfull to use an indikator from which one does not know on which formula's it is based.

if you need help let me know this should not be very hard to realize, im not sure if it is what you are trying to achieve here

Edited by flyingdutchmen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Weighted average of the difference of price averages with a length of the square root of length(input)

 

Value1 = 2 * WAverage(price, halvedLength); double weights (the 2 * part) the weighted average of price with a period of 1/2 (fast length) the period that you choose with the input length (Inputs: Length(20), Offset(0); ) more on that below

 

Value2 = WAverage(price, length); is the weighted average of price with a period you chose with the input length (slow length). (obviously, I know)

 

Your choice of period you make with the input length is supposed to be made with some kind of statistically significant decision process. You should have a reason why you choose this number. This length is the longest length (slow length) used in the Hull Moving Average so a good setting is the longest moving average period that you generally like using for a moving average you use on your chart (especially if it is a weighted moving average you use) but double the number if your moving average you like moves right up and down with the general price cycles (especially if it is a weighted moving average you consider to show most of the movement cycles).

 

Value3 = WAverage((Value1 - Value2), sqrRootLength); is the weighted average of the difference of the double weighted fast price average and the slow weighted average of price and so it is a rate of change indicator. Many indicators use some kind of fast and slow comparison like this. Using a period of 1/2 of the slow length for the fast length in the equation is based on the slow length being statistically valid for smoothing cycles, thus 1/2 length should move with the cycles. The period used sqrRootLength in this case for the weighted average of the difference is a very fast length so that your hull moving average is of very reduced lag. Some would say that since this period is the square root of the slow length (if really statistically valid) then it is statistically valid- but I haven't tested this.

Ceiling - Returns the lowest integer greater than the specified number.

Floor - Returns the highest integer less than the specified number.

 

The Hull average is most generally used to produce smooth indicators for short time frame charts. I have a simple example for showing 2 fast stochastics, 2 because I am way

too dumb to input a statistically significant length so I hope I choose one that then being halved again will keep somewhere in between and show a significant cycle - which seems to help.

 

 

Inputs: length(20), EOB(true); 


vars: FastStochastic(0), FastStochastic2(0),	price1(0), price2(0), price3(0),
halvedLength(0), sqrRootLength(0), sqLength(0),
Havg(0), Lavg(0), Cavg(0),
price4(0), price5(0), price6(0),
halvedLength2(0), sqrRootLength2(0), sqLength2(0),
halfHavg(0), halfLavg(0), halfCavg(0);

if length < 4 then RaiseRunTimeError("Input length(period) must be 8 or greater"); //////// not required 
/////////////- personal reminder

price1 = (4 * H[3] + 3 * H[2]+ 2 * H[1] + H) * 0.1;
price2 = (4 * L[3] + 3 * L[2]+ 2 * L[1] + L) * 0.1;
price3 = (4 * C[3] + 3 * C[2]+ 2 * C[1] + C)  * 0.1;


halvedLength = round(length * 0.5,0);  
sqLength = SquareRoot(length); 

if ((ceiling(sqLength) - sqLength)  <= 0.5) then  
	sqrRootLength = ceiling(sqLength)  
else  
	sqrRootLength = floor(sqLength); 

halvedLength2 = round(halvedLength * 0.5,0);  
sqLength2 = SquareRoot(halvedLength); 

if ((ceiling(sqLength2) - sqLength2)  <= 0.5) then  
	sqrRootLength2 = ceiling(sqLength2)  
else  
	sqrRootLength2 = floor(sqLength2); 

Value1 = 2 * WAverage(price1, halvedLength);
Value2 = WAverage(price1, length);
Havg = WAverage((Value1 - Value2), sqrRootLength);



Value3 = 2 * WAverage(price2, halvedLength);
Value4 = WAverage(price2, length);
Lavg = WAverage((Value3 - Value4), sqrRootLength);


Value5 = 2 * WAverage(price3, halvedLength);
Value6 = WAverage(price3, length);
Cavg = WAverage((Value5 - Value6), sqrRootLength);


Value7 = 2 * WAverage(price1, halvedLength2);
Value8 = WAverage(price1, halvedLength);
halfHavg = WAverage((Value7 - Value8), sqrRootLength2);



Value9 = 2 * WAverage(price2, halvedLength2);
Value10 = WAverage(price2, halvedLength);
halfLavg = WAverage((Value9 - Value10), sqrRootLength2);


Value11 = 2 * WAverage(price3, halvedLength2);
Value12 = WAverage(price3, halvedLength);
halfCavg = WAverage((Value11 - Value12), sqrRootLength2);


FastStochastic = FastKCustom(Havg, Lavg, Cavg, halvedLength);
FastStochastic2 = FastKCustom(halfHavg, halfLavg, halfCavg, halvedLength2);


	plot1(FastStochastic,"Slow");
	plot2(FastStochastic2,"Fast");
	plot3(20);
	plot4(80);

	if EOB and CheckAlert Then Begin   //// set EOB to false for intrabar alerts
		If plot1 Crosses Over Plot4 Then
		Alert("FastStochastic _Slow_ crossed over 80"); 
		If plot1 Crosses Under Plot3 Then
		Alert("FastStochastic _Slow_  crossed under 20"); 
		If plot1 Crosses Over Plot3 Then
		Alert("FastStochastic _Slow_  crossed over 20"); 
		If plot1 Crosses Under Plot4 Then
		Alert("FastStochastic _Slow_  crossed under 80"); 
		If plot2 Crosses Over Plot4 Then
		Alert("FastStochastic _Fast_ crossed over 80"); 
		If plot2 Crosses Under Plot3 Then
		Alert("FastStochastic _Fast_  crossed under 20"); 
		If plot2 Crosses Over Plot3 Then
		Alert("FastStochastic _Fast_  crossed over 20"); 
		If plot2 Crosses Under Plot4 Then
		Alert("FastStochastic _Fast_  crossed under 80"); 
	End ;

 

and attached image:

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=22389&stc=1&d=1285095602

capture1.jpg.578cf932f3188572edaf59a8198c3347.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 11th July 2025.   Demand For Gold Rises As Trump Announces Tariffs!   Gold prices rose significantly throughout the week as investors took advantage of the 2.50% lower entry level. Investors also return to the safe-haven asset as the US trade policy continues to escalate. As a result, investors are taking a more dovish tone. The ‘risk-off’ appetite is also something which can be seen within the stock market. The NASDAQ on Thursday took a 0.90% dive within only 30 minutes.   Trade Tensions Escalate President Trump has been teasing with new tariffs throughout the week. However, the tariffs were confirmed on Thursday. A 35% tariff on Canadian imports starting August 1st, along with 50% tariffs on copper and goods from Brazil. Some experts are advising that Brazil has been specifically targeted due to its association with the BRICS.   However, the President has not directly associated the tariffs with BRICS yet. According to President Trump, Brazil is targeting US technology companies and carrying out a ‘witch hunt’against former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, a close ally who is currently facing prosecution for allegedly attempting to overturn the 2022 Brazilian election.   Although Brazil is one of the largest and fastest-growing economies in the Americas, it is not the main concern for investors. Investors are more concerned about Tariffs on Canada. The White House said it will impose a 35% tariff on Canadian imports, effective August 1st, raised from the earlier 25% rate. This covers most goods, with exceptions under USMCA and exemptions for Canadian companies producing within the US.   It is also vital for investors to note that Canada is among the US;’s top 3 trading partners. The increase was justified by Trump citing issues like the trade deficit, Canada’s handling of fentanyl trafficking, and perceived unfair trade practices.   The President is also threatening new measures against the EU. These moves caused US and European stock futures to fall nearly 1%, while the Dollar rose and commodity prices saw small gains. However, the main benefactor was Silver and Gold, which are the two best-performing metals of the day.   How Will The Fed Impact Gold? The FOMC indicated that the number of members warming up to the idea of interest rate cuts is increasing. If the Fed takes a dovish tone, the price of Gold may further rise. In the meantime, the President pushing for a 3% rate cut sparked talk of a more dovish Fed nominee next year and raised worries about future inflation.   Meanwhile, jobless claims dropped for the fourth straight week, coming in better than expected and supporting the view that the labour market remains strong after last week’s solid payroll report. Markets still expect two rate cuts this year, but rate futures show most investors see no change at the next Fed meeting. Gold is expected to finish the week mostly flat.       Gold 15-Minute Chart     If the price of Gold increases above $3,337.50, buy signals are likely to materialise again. However, the price is currently retracing, meaning traders are likely to wait for regained momentum before entering further buy trades. According to HSBC, they expect an average price of $3,215 in 2025 (up from $3,015) and $3,125 in 2026, with projections showing a volatile range between $3,100 and $3,600   Key Takeaway Points: Gold Rises on Safe-Haven Demand. Gold gained as investors reacted to rising trade tensions and market volatility. Canada Tariffs Spark Concern. A 35% tariff on Canadian imports drew attention due to Canada’s key trade role. Fed Dovish Shift Supports Gold. Growing expectations of rate cuts and Trump’s push for a 3% cut boosted the gold outlook. Gold Eyes Breakout Above $3,337.5. Price is consolidating; a move above $3,337.50 could trigger new buy signals. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Michalis Efthymiou HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Back in the early 2000s, Netflix mailed DVDs to subscribers.   It wasn’t sexy—but it was smart. No late fees. No driving to Blockbuster.   People subscribed because they were lazy. Investors bought the stock because they realized everyone else is lazy too.   Those who saw the future in that red envelope? They could’ve caught a 10,000%+ move.   Another story…   Back in the mid-2000s, Amazon launched Prime.   It wasn’t flashy—but it was fast.   Free two-day shipping. No minimums. No hassle.   People subscribed because they were impatient. Investors bought the stock because they realized everyone hates waiting.   Those who saw the future in that speedy little yellow button? They could’ve caught another 10,000%+ move.   Finally…   Back in 2011, Bitcoin was trading under $10.   It wasn’t regulated—but it worked.   No bank. No middleman. Just wallet to wallet.   People used it to send money. Investors bought it because they saw the potential.   Those who saw something glimmering in that strange orange coin? They could’ve caught a 100,000%+ move.   The people who made those calls weren’t fortune tellers. They just noticed something simple before others did.   A better way. A quiet shift. A small edge. An asymmetric bet.   The red envelope fixed late fees. The yellow button fixed waiting. The orange coin gave billions a choice.   Of course, these types of gains are rare. And they happen only once in a blue moon. That’s exactly why it’s important to notice when the conditions start to look familiar.   Not after the move. Not once it's on CNBC. But in the quiet build-up— before the surface breaks.   Enter the Blue Button Please read more here: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/netflix-amazon-bitcoin-blue  Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • What These Attacks Look Like There are several ways you could get hacked. And the threats compound by the day.   Here’s a quick rundown:   Phishing: Fake emails from your “bank.” Click the link, give your password—game over.   Ransomware: Malware that locks your files and demands crypto. Pay up, or it’s gone.   DDoS: Overwhelm a website with traffic until it crashes. Like 10,000 bots blocking the door. Often used by nations.   Man-in-the-Middle: Hackers intercept your messages on public WiFi and read or change them.   Social Engineering: Hackers pose as IT or drop infected USB drives labeled “Payroll.”   You don’t need to be “important” to be a target.   You just need to be online.   What You Can Do (Without Buying a Bunker) You don’t have to be tech-savvy.   You just need to stop being low-hanging fruit.   Here’s how:   Use a YubiKey (physical passkey device) or Authenticator app – Ditch text message 2FA. SIM swaps are real. Hackers often have people on the inside at telecom companies.   Use a password manager (with Yubikey) – One unique password per account. Stop using your dog’s name.   Update your devices – Those annoying updates patch real security holes. Use them.   Back up your files – If ransomware hits, you don’t want your important documents held hostage.   Avoid public WiFi for sensitive stuff – Or use a VPN.   Think before you click – Emails that feel “urgent” are often fake. Go to the websites manually for confirmation.   Consider Starlink in case the internet goes down – I think it’s time for me to make the leap. Don’t Panic. Prepare. (Then Invest.)   I spent an hour in that basement bar reading about cyberattacks—and watching real-world systems fall apart like dominos.   The internet going down used to be an inconvenience. Now, it’s a warning.   Cyberwar isn’t coming. It’s here.   And the next time your internet goes out, it might not just be your router.   Don’t panic. Prepare.   And maybe keep a backup plan in your back pocket. Like a local basement bar with good bourbon—and working WiFi.   As usual, we’re on the lookout for more opportunities in cybersecurity. Stay tuned.   Author: Chris Campbell (AltucherConfidential) Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/   
    • DUMBSHELL:  re the automation of corruption ---  200,000 "Science Papers" in academic journal database PubMed may have been AI-generated with errors, hallucinations and false sourcing 
    • Does any crypto exchanges get banned in your country? How's about other as Bybit, Kraken, MEXC, OKX?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.