Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

walterw

Walters Aproach

Recommended Posts

I completely agree, as will everyone else here, in your R/R. I, however, have a different question :)

 

You mentioned in a post in the Forex Room about using investor r/t and the VB indicator. This is how I trade as well, working mainly off of market profile levels and pivot points. Would you mind sharing how you're using IRT and the VB indicator? I'd love to see some charts too!!

 

THanks Walter,

 

Chris

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well Chris I must admit that I am experimenting with delta... I am very new to it and must say that from an intrinsic concept it does make sense... I do trade delta divergence setups, you can see them at charthub... with names er_110t also er_22T and some other experiments (green background) I was very inspired by the charts of "5pillars" (elitetrader) also lots of charts from him on charthub as es_317_VB he trades es ... My hardtime on this is that I am more a "Trend Trader" and delta divergence trades are countertrade... so it makes it hard to detect when market shifts from trending to cycling and viceversa... actually Delta Divergence Trades (DDT) realy work fine on cycling markets.... but will make you get run over on trending situations.... I am working in a method to "clearly" detect the change from trending to cycling... maybe we could aboard that topic on this thread.... I would like to interact on the issue, I believe that if you have a clear method to detect those shifts on the market stage would be very great... I did look your post here Chris and I find them very nice stuff... mp levels are so predictible.. combined with delta... you got a powerfull combination... hope we can keep interacting.... cheers Walter.

er_22T_5.thumb.png.4b8b355b89fc1937fe9029d749354a16.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Walter! 22T chart, huh? That's a fast moving chart, especially on ER2. :) Chris, 5P, was the one who got me hooked on it too! hehe, funny. He was a wealth of information and gave me some great tools to step up my game.

 

Let's definitely talk more about this...I'm about to leave to catch a flight home, though...so can't write more. I'll catch up maybe tomorrow with this.

 

Till then!

 

Chris

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I want to make some comentaries on this thread topic I did start some days ago on RRR (Risk Reward Ratio). On my personal experience, and I think most traders have the same tendency, we get to much enthusiastic about a technical aproach and become some how very "loyal" to it... the true fact after 11 years on trading I came to the sad conclusion that just about any trading aproach has 50/50 technical performance... there is no such 70 or 80 % performance as some "gurus" tell they have... when you trade with the real thing you come up with 50% success and 50% non-success trades... if you are having less than 50% success, then you are on "School mode" yet... you need the 50/50 to consider yourself a good trader... now, dont be mean on yourself trying to get that fantasy 70 or 80 % success... you will loose precious time... the key is RRR applied to the 50/50 performance, thats my story, and I can say now that I am happy with my 50/50 performace...

So... what REALLY is this RRR thing ?... well in my experience its not just a ratio, its more than that... its a STRATEGY that has to be embeded on your technical aproach.... where in simple words you have tight stops vs long runs.... so we are talking about "closing positions" more than opening.... HA¡¡¡ dont you spend hours thinking and studing how to "open positions" ? well thats fine but after you got a plan you say in lets say 10 minutes : I will close my position such and such... or I will see as it happens... well there you go... thats where any "analist" work goes to the toilet... well, this trader NEEDS a change of mind, when you study so many hours where you are going to "open" your position you MUST include in this study "simultaneosly" where are you going to place your stop and where is your aproximate target... thats more than chart reading or a simple RRR math... it is formulating a Strategy on your trade that will keep you alive during this very dangerous journey of being a trader.... where your fellow traders are big dinosaurs with thousands time more money than you, with greater technology and the worst.... they DO have a technical aproach with real RRR on action.... so RRR should be the center of your ecuation... doesnt care what technique you use, if its trendwise or countertrend, if its based or not on indicators, if it uses old fashion stochastics or new fantastic deltas.... doesnt matter, ALL of them eventually have a 50/50 performance... RRR inside your technique will make the diference to make you profitable...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

tin, it's proven at least from testing trading systems that if you have more winning trades than losing trades, the avg win vs avg loss is smaller. If you have a larger avg win than the avg loss, the winning number of trades are higher. This is to assume your strategy is a winning strategy. It's rare, but not impossible, to find a strategy that has higher percentage of wins over losses AND a greater avg win over avg loss. If you have it, you got the holy grail!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  TinGull said:
Hi pismo...I'd love to know more about why you think the win % would drop if you expect to win more from your winning trades than you expect to lose on the losing trades?

 

 

 

I agree with that comment as well. It just make sense to me. If I'm going for 4 pts on the es, the chances of price traveling 4pts w/o my stop being hit ( where ever that may be, thats an entirely different topic:) ) is a lot less likely to deliver when comparing it to a smaller 2pt profit target.

 

So its a trade off in my view. A bigger profit objective and lower win % or smaller profit objective with a higher win %. You could have the best RR ratio, but if the reward is hardly hit then what you have a just a theoretical RR ratio since your targets aren't generally hit. So what might start of as a 2 or 3 RR ratio, might just turn out to be a 1 or below by the time the trade is said and done.

 

Therefore, a trader would need to compare the initial RR ratio with what actually happened. I found that my targets were ambitious. When I put the trade on I was happy since I had a 2 or even 3 RR ratio. But watching price move in my favor and then retracing back so I get 1 or 2 ticks, reality sets in that my actual RR ratio isn't the same as my theoretical or initial RR ratio.

 

So I brought in my targets, my initial RR ratio is lower, but the targets are being hit more often. In turn, my actual RR ratio is congruent with the initial or theoretical RR ratio.

 

I thought about RR ratios from a lot of angles. I hope this helps, and not confuses anyone:cool:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it makes sense to me now. I was thinking pismo was saying that if you expect to win more points on winning trades than lose on losing trades, your win % would drop. It was just a little confusing for my tiny brain, but I'm all straight now.

 

Thanks guys

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the bane of the day trader.

 

If you position or swing trade, you do not have to win more than you lose.

 

Suppose you have a system that wins only 4 out of 10 times, or 40%. On those winning trades you win 2000 each. Now on the other 6 times you lose 500 per.:

 

4 wins @ 2000=8000

6 losses@ 500=3000

net amount=+5000

 

You can be wrong more than you are right and still make money. Most of the "market wizards" fall into this camp. Long term position traders who don't have high winning percentages, but know how to keep losses small in comparison to winners. One thing that separates them from the newbies, and those that fail, they are willing to take that 5th signal even after the last four failed. By this time, the newbie is already looking for a new secret indicator or method to beat the market.

 

For the day trader things are inherently more difficult. The percentage of winners needs to be higher than the percentage of losers. This is basically because the wins will tend to be smaller and the amount of trades taken will increase. Which of course really means more opportunity to put capital at risk. Successful day traders have to have a better than 50% win ratio. If you position trade, yes you could basically throw darts at a board. As long as you had the ability to cut the losses and let the profits ride (sometimes a cliché is a cliché because it's true). As a day trader that number has to be around 65-70% winners. For scalpers it is even higher. Which is why so few people make it as scalpers.

 

While I would agree that most technical analysis does not work, I find it hard to believe that nobody can do better than 50/50. That is no better than flipping a coin. If you are a long term position trader that would be okay. Short term traders need more. That short term traders do exist and can achieve success would imply that it is possible to reach a higher percentage. 80-90%, well that's for the system vendors and holy grail hucksters..........

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pivotprofiler : My personal experience actually its a 50/50 performance on my technical aproach.... every 10 trades I normally get stopped 5 off them and the other 5 are succesfull, what keeps me alive and growing its that I am having quite tight stops "in the argument" and long lived trails that give me a very nice positive difference... I could still even have more stops and still be positive... the key is taking trades that will risk 1/4 off your normal positive trail average... if you dont have that RRR in view... I prefer not to take the trade... To establish this "potencials" I use S&R type studies... The truth is that very few good trades make me succesfull... the rest are just part off the promediating game... the most hard part for newbies its the psicological toll this takes... cheers Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.