Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

GhostofLivermore

FX Training - Let's Share the Cost

Recommended Posts

Hello Everyone

 

I was recently referred to a man here in Toronto that has been a professional FX Trader for the last 3 years full time.

 

I actually went over to his home and met his family and saw his workstation and saw his monthly PnL Statements.

 

With a 20,000 FX account he has averaged $4000 per month for the last 3 years pretty consistently.

 

He was referred to me by a personal friend that took his training 3 months ago and was thrilled with the results.

 

I worked out a deal with him for training and I asked him if he would mind if I found a partner to share the cost with and he said he didn't mind at all, so long as I teach them separately from our time.

 

What I am looking for is for someone to share the cost $2000 of the $6000 Training fee and I will teach you everything that he teaches me.

 

His training is 2 nights a week for 2 hours for 4 weeks total.

 

So 16 hrs.

 

Once he teaches me I will get on the phone / computer and teach you everything that I learned during the session.

 

If anyone is interested please pm me and let me know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  GhostofLivermore said:
Hello EveryoneI was recently referred to a man here in Toronto that has been a professional FX Trader for the last 3 years full time.I actually went over to his home and met his family and saw his workstation and saw his monthly PnL Statements.With a 20,000 FX account he has averaged $4000 per month for the last 3 years pretty consistently.He was referred to me by a personal friend that took his training 3 months ago and was thrilled with the results.I worked out a deal with him for training and I asked him if he would mind if I found a partner to share the cost with and he said he didn't mind at all, so long as I teach them separately from our time.What I am looking for is for someone to share the cost $2000 of the $6000 Training fee and I will teach you everything that he teaches me.His training is 2 nights a week for 2 hours for 4 weeks total.So 16 hrs.Once he teaches me I will get on the phone / computer and teach you everything that I learned during the session.If anyone is interested please pm me and let me know.

 

So he has made 250% per year for 3 years and hasn't figured out how to leverage that to more than $48k per year. Sure. And you are going to teach anybody anything in 16 hours? Sure.

 

ANYBODY with those kind of results could EASILY leverage that to 7 figures a year.

 

Here fishy, fishy. No wonder 95% go broke and go broke very fast.

 

Ghost of Livermore? LOL.

Edited by UrmaBlume

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  brownsfan019 said:
:confused:Not even sure where to begin with this... Good luck to you and anyone that learns from the guy that just got taught.

 

Those who can trade, those who can't create new magical indicators. LOL

 

Not to belabor punctuation but wouldn't that be better said:

 

"Those who can, trade and those who can't create new magical indicators. LOL." Plus in your case I might add "and those who can do neither, knock those who can do both."

 

Browns, you have made over four thousand posts, over eleven hundred per year and not once have you ever posted any original technical material - and yet, you knock those that do? LOL.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  UrmaBlume said:
...not once have you ever posted any original technical material...

 

Who says one has to be an original trader to be a great trader? (I'm not saying brownsfan is original or great...I have no way of knowing...I'm just responding to the quote).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  TMBTC said:
Who says one has to be an original trader to be a great trader? (I'm not saying brownsfan is original or great...I have no way of knowing...I'm just responding to the quote).

 

Or perhaps more importantly, who says that someone who creates new and effective indicators, "can't" trade? Study, preparation and originality are not a sign of weakness, that's what it takes to be out in front of the crowd.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  clmacdougall said:
Or perhaps more importantly, who says that someone who creates new and effective indicators, "can't" trade?

 

Your point is valid and I agree with you, although I would propose that your question is perhaps of equal importance.

 

Different strokes for different folks...there's no "truth" in the markets...the truth is what works. No one has THE way, etc...

 

However, I would only propose that creating "new and effective indicators" is generally unnecessary/often isn't really anything "new" at all. I want to refer to thalestrader's great post here (post #29) on the subject, as he has articulated the point better than I ever could.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  UrmaBlume said:
Not to belabor punctuation but wouldn't that be better said:

 

"Those who can, trade and those who can't create new magical indicators. LOL." Plus in your case I might add "and those who can do neither, knock those who can do both."

 

Browns, you have made over four thousand posts, over eleven hundred per year and not once have you ever posted any original technical material - and yet, you knock those that do? LOL.

 

So we going to start this again Pat?

 

Maybe you and tresor should start a 'we love to hate on Browns thread' and you guys can just hang out there.

 

And I've posted plenty on this site for free with plenty of valuable information.

 

For example, you can check here and here to see what a blotter looks like. Something you've NEVER produced once. Funny how a guy that has all these tools and wonderful after-the-fact charts cannot produce a blotter or two to show that he actually does this in real-time.

 

And there's the Candlestick Corner, as well as chatting with some off site including doing a lot of work with a particular trader from this very forum.

 

All for free BTW.

 

 

For kicks, here is today's oil blotter for a 1 ct account. How have you done today? LOL. Let me guess, there's a million reasons why you can't produce that (again)...

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=21855&stc=1&d=1280412333

5aa710215f26c_ThisiswhatablotterlookslikePat.png.b82f9418b987258766583ae53bc1158d.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  brownsfan019 said:
...here is today's oil blotter...

 

While I don't doubt your success and have nothing against you, brownsfan, let's be honest...blotter snapshots like that are fairly easy to manipulate...

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=21856&d=1280413182

5aa71021622c1_This20is20what20a20blotter20looks20like20Pat.png.0c876cfe207861f165ff81ff01d782f1.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Candle Stick corner - now that's a real contribution and some real state of the art stuff, LOL.

 

Like I said - not one piece of original work anywhere. Just a lot of noise about other peoples work.

 

Sure you have made a lot of posts, over 4,000 of them and you made them for free. How could you charge and who would pay you for other people's work?

 

I have hundreds of requests to buy my indicators and one of them is from you. You have none becasue you have nothing to show that is your own = pretender without portfolio.

 

The more you post the more you lower the intellectual common denominator on this board.

 

Candlestick corner, LOL, I am surprised Golldman is not all over you for your ground breaking work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  mktwzrd said:
While I don't doubt your success and have nothing against you, brownsfan, let's be honest...blotter snapshots like that are fairly easy to manipulate...

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=21856&d=1280413182

 

Right on Wizard. Most everybody has excel and can create the same buschwa. You are kinder than me, I call his "blotter" BS.

 

I have talked to this guy on the phone and regardless of his many years and thousands of content free posts I found his market and technical understanding to be very dated, based on no original method, concept or technology and generally at or below novice level. Hence he brags about "CandleStick Corner."

 

Candlesticks - now that's some heavy stuff. And all of this in a thread on retail FX trading, LOL.

 

cheers

 

UB

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

GhostOfLivemore, why don't you just solicit 99 traders at $60 each and cover almost all your costs? :2c:

 

 

PS...

Noobie trader quiz

Your time is limited. If you had to choose one - Would you be better off reverse engineering the character of BF or reverse engineering the indicators of UB ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  zdo said:
GhostOfLivemore, why don't you just solicit 99 traders at $60 each and cover almost all your costs? :2c:

 

 

PS...

Noobie trader quiz

Your time is limited. If you had to choose one - Would you be better off reverse engineering the character of BF or reverse engineering the indicators of UB ?

 

 

1) What about non disclosure and on selling clauses???

2) I would have to see their PL and risk reward profiles to make an informed decision and no one is playing that game.....:haha: Can I get the best of both of them?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Aint the Net great. Here is a dog who is famous in his own mind. Woof Woof Pat.

 

 

Funniest thing is that he's a paranoid dog. Accuses Brownsfan of attacking him (but wait, he was the attacker). Paranoid. Delusions of Grandeur. Hmmm ... I guess you can post from the hospital now.

 

 

  UrmaBlume said:
Candle Stick corner - now that's a real contribution and some real state of the art stuff, LOL.

 

Like I said - not one piece of original work anywhere. Just a lot of noise about other peoples work.

 

Sure you have made a lot of posts, over 4,000 of them and you made them for free. How could you charge and who would pay you for other people's work?

 

I have hundreds of requests to buy my indicators and one of them is from you. You have none becasue you have nothing to show that is your own = pretender without portfolio.

 

The more you post the more you lower the intellectual common denominator on this board.

 

Candlestick corner, LOL, I am surprised Golldman is not all over you for your ground breaking work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't say I know much of what Brownsfan has taught or passed along, but I have certainly benefited from how UB has pushed the envelope in trying to understand the markets today.

In fact he's done the very thing which Kevin Koy only wished were possible in his day. Check out pg. 14 of his book "Markets 101". In it he wished he could have created a "spectrum of timeframes" by which to read the markets.

UB did just that in order to understand market bias, not bad if you ask me! And just in case you're wondering who Kevin Koy is he co-wrote Steidlmayers greatest work in my opinion "Markets and Market Logic" well worth a read.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  clmacdougall said:
I can't say I know much of what Brownsfan has taught or passed along, but I have certainly benefited from how UB has pushed the envelope in trying to understand the markets today. In fact he's done the very thing which Kevin Koy only wished were possible in his day. Check out pg. 14 of his book "Markets 101". In it he wished he could have created a "spectrum of timeframes" by which to read the markets.

UB did just that in order to understand market bias, not bad if you ask me! And just in case you're wondering who Kevin Koy is he co-wrote Steidlmayers greatest work in my opinion "Markets and Market Logic" well worth a read.

 

Thanks for the very kind words.

 

I remember our phone conversations and am very glad you found them to be of value.

 

Kevin was still working with Peter when I first started studying their work. Peter was always the brains of the partnership and I remember Kevin as a prissy little thing that rumor has blew out their trading account while Peter was out of town and that broke up their partnership.

 

Later when I spent those weeks at Peter's ranch in Butte Meadows, Kevin was nowhere around, the breakup was kind of nasty with Kevin, in my opinion, acting like a little girl scorned.

 

About that same time Jim Dalton started his writing and giving sminars on the profile and I thought then and still do that Dalton did a better job of explaining the profile and its use but that if you could get around Peter's unique way of expressing himself, that he was the man for the nuances in his theory.

 

That was over 25 years ago and at the time very exciting work and very much the state of the art. I believe it was about then that Peter was chairman of CBOT so when we made trips to Chicago to work with him it always included an inside look at the floor and some great drinking and war stories with some of the floor/pit traders.

 

Now almost all of the technical development work we do at the small, private, closed hedge fund that I founded and now manage is based on the theory I learned from those guys waaaay back then. The theory is great and has legs with regard to time but the profile itself cost me a lot of money until I started to develop certain technologies, some of which I have demonstrated here.

 

At the time I was working for Boyd Jefferies, the founder of Jefferies & Co, after Boyd made me an offer I couldn't refuse to leave a small retail NASD Broker/Dealer that I had founded in Hawaii Kai on Oahu. I got to Hawaii on the boat shown below which was paid for by trading the brand new, very high premiumed options on the then brand new CBOE - long before any index options or index futures.

 

Any way, thanks again for the kind words and the trip down memory lane. Give me a Skype sometime and catch me up with what you have been doing.

 

cheers

 

UB

 

1stboat.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Kiwi said:
The last post and the lick-spittle make the point.

 

 

 

.

 

I had to look up the word "lick-spittle" on line to figure out your post, I never knew such a phrase/word existed up til now. Kiwi, I'm not feigning my appreciation for UB's work, it simply helped me to see beyond the dated Market Profile works in print and carry forward my studies and understanding of the market.

The debate regarding UB usually hinges on the differences between invention and evolution. UB himself has never claimed the theory for his work started with him, he openly credits Steidlmayer for that, but the evolution of it's application was in desperate need.

It's simply the difference between the model T ford at it's invention and any new car on the road today. We all benefit from the evolution of someone else' work/invention.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

RESULTS and UPDATE:

OK it's been about 8 weeks since I started to demo trade the method and I am super happy with the results.

 

I started with a 5k account and it is now $6,350 (I can show all the trade details to anyone interested)

 

I've been around this business along time and this is one of the best approaches to trading I have ever used.

 

I am still trying to build my live money account so I am happy to share this with ONE person still if anyone is interested

Snap1.jpg.b80eb17a7c233b2a3ef7ada11570706a.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.