Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

cowpip

Trading Cross Currencies

Recommended Posts

I have been meaning to ask this for some time, but it just hasn't come out. For almost the entire time I have learned forex (now almost a measily 2 years), I have fixated on the major dollar currencies. I've paid a little attention to the crosses (particularly eur/gbp), but not much. I wanted to learn one currency (cable) really really well, and fixating on one was probably a good move for me when I started learning this stuff. But...

 

I am a bit of a fraidy-cat when it comes to the crosses, because I fear that I have to learn their personalities before I can trade them. Is this true? I imagine they each have their own personalities and quirks, but do you really have to learn those personalities before you can trade them?

 

Texxas - you mentioned in one of your recent posts (here) that the same setups and signals apply. That is encouraging. I would like to start moving out into other crosses. I've been such a cable-nut for so long, the main question I have is whether what I have learned on cable can be directly applied elsewhere.

 

I know fibs apply everywhere, but do they apply with the same force on the crosses?

 

I think I remember you telling us not long ago that the 35/50 S/R levels you compute were researched and applied mostly on the dollar majors, so is it safe to assume that they don't apply on the crosses as well?

 

And I don't know very much about how the crosses respond during lower liquidity periods. I suppose it's the same deal there as it is on the majors - more spikey/noisy than when the volumes are higher.

 

When I look at that gbp/chf chart you posted (here), I scratch my head and wonder why I insist on keeping my head buried inside a hole. I think it's time to lift my head up and look around.

 

Thanks so much for pointing this out. If you (or others) have any important things I should keep in mind when looking at / trading the crosses, I would (as always) be in your debt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  cowpip said:
I am a bit of a fraidy-cat when it comes to the crosses, because I fear that I have to learn their personalities before I can trade them. Is this true?

 

Texxas - you mentioned in one of your recent posts that the same setups and signals apply. the main question I have is whether what I have learned on cable can be directly applied elsewhere.

 

I know fibs apply everywhere, but do they apply with the same force on the crosses?

 

I think I remember you telling us not long ago that the 35/50 S/R levels you compute were researched and applied mostly on the dollar majors, so is it safe to assume that they don't apply on the crosses as well?

 

 

I'll answer your direct questions first, then elaborate on the generics second.

 

Yes, each of the currency candidates possess distinct personalities, due mainly to the extremes of their specific range parameters, unique fundamental elements & volume attraction. However, if your strategies or basic tool-kit revolves around pure price action sprinkled with a good dose of Math based ingredients, you'll find similar opportunities across most of the instruments.

 

Those % (35/50) s&r guides apply ONLY to the main 2 european pairs, yes. Those are the only pairs we'll trade via a "range based" trigger, again due to their volume attraction & high degree of emotive reaction - "herd attraction" ;)

 

We were raised & instructed from a young age on the principles of mathematical sequences. Price instruments, over whichever set of candidates you choose to observe, display general parameters of tradeable sequences.

 

Fibonacci & pivot based s&r variables have been around for years. All we do is scan a candidate & eyeball a Weekly or Daily timeframe snapshot. If price is backing onto, or reacting against a defined Fib or % based zone, we’ll zoom in & inspect that candidate further, plotting the exact lines from the tools available on our charting platform.

 

We’ll then look for accompanying (hard price based) s&r lines which marry up that zone of interest. Our 3rd item on the tick list of confluence will be the price footprints. If price action is grouping & setting up according to our ideal parameters (ie: doji’s/spinning tops/engulfing bars etc), displaying exhaustive or neutral emotive behaviour at a defined key zone of interest – we then have a possible trade set-up.

 

A case of then waiting for the ideal opportunity to engage: using our size, stops & r/r tools. It’s the same overall template for whatever we trade. No difference, no complicated variables, nothing to confuse the psyche etc. Just plain & simple repetition.

 

We know it works because we’ve utilized these simple confluence tools for years. Why re-invent the wheel? You’ve witnessed & followed Buk’s work (much of it in live scenario’s) 1st hand over the past few years Cary, has it changed much at all? Myself, Tess, Shona & Lorie all follow similar routes. We hate making life hard for ourselves, & there’s no point. If an instrument isn’t playing ball, we simply look for one which is. If nothing’s occurring, we remain flat until one offers a possibility or a probable opportunity.

 

Obviously, these specifics suit our style, personality & trading objectives. They won’t suit all tastes, & if not – then an alternative set of tools will need to be utilized for your own working template(s).

 

But whichever tools you use, try keep them nice & basic….and simple.

 

Like I said in the prev thread, the GBP is attracting strong attention, due in part to it's positive fundamental play. Pair it against a candidate which offers a decent (& extreme mix of interest rate/economic variable) tradeable risk & you can then hone down your strat tools to spot opportunities?

 

Such is the case with GBP/YEN. Just scoot thru your Weekly-Dailies to see the reaction to the fundamental plays.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=353&stc=1&d=1166168532

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=354&stc=1&d=1166168514

cross26.gif.1ca44e34e720a33ab36248cfe65982a7.gif

cross27.gif.ba1cabd5304cb831461c46721c87720d.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.