Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

TheDude

Close V Opening Gaps

Recommended Posts

Has anyone got any stats for the probability of a market closing the gap between yesterdays close and todays open?

 

I did a backtest on ES M0. I used the Globex RTH close which occurs 15 mins after the cash close. I disregarded whether the open was inside or outside of yesterdays range. Out of 80 days of data:

 

Gap closed during Initial Balance (60min) 16 days

Gap closed after Initial Balance 26 days

Gap not closed 22 days

Gap too small (<3 points) 16 days

 

If we disregard the days where the gap is too small/not tradable, we get:

66% days will close the gap, 59% of these days will close it after IB periods

34% will not close the gap.

 

Has anyone looked into this in other markets, or have the facility to automate such a test on a wider sample of data? :missy:

 

I thought this could be an interesting topic, but in no way intended to conflict with JPearls valuable contributions around Market Stats.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have not looked at it on the ES, but it seems in Forex it always fills right away. So, this is a good Sunday night strategy. Also, I have seen where two pairs, say the EURUSD and the GBPUSD, which are highly correlated, one gaps and the other does not. You can bet that the other pair will move as if it gapped. This gives you 2 chances to make money on the same gap.

 

I welcome others thoughts on this. Wish I could program someting to give me backtest results on this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that Tams.

 

I'd imagine that the half gap would have a higher probability, but would it be that much better? If we consider a gap to be a sign of excess, or minus development, then 'in theory' if the gap gets halfway, it 'should' go the whole way as the buyer/seller who created the gap are no longer/less active at that price. There could be a counter auction or pull back at the half gap point, but this could simply be fib traders coming in.

 

Having said that, I think these findings I posted are just something to be mindful of when in a trade. e.g. yesterdays close could now be a useful level to monitor if in a trade as a target/scale point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  TheDude said:
Thanks for that Tams.

 

I'd imagine that the half gap would have a higher probability, but would it be that much better? If we consider a gap to be a sign of excess, or minus development, then 'in theory' if the gap gets halfway, it 'should' go the whole way as the buyer/seller who created the gap are no longer/less active at that price. There could be a counter auction or pull back at the half gap point, but this could simply be fib traders coming in.

 

Having said that, I think these findings I posted are just something to be mindful of when in a trade. e.g. yesterdays close could now be a useful level to monitor if in a trade as a target/scale point.

 

you are only describing some of the contexts which might create a gap...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

your prev post allude to probabilities,

 

then there is room for additional experiment to find out if...

 

1) if a half gap (of a percentage of gap) would produce a higher probability of profit?

albeit a smaller profit amount at each instance?

 

2) if it is possible to combine a higher frequency strategy with MM to produce a run when the market prevails?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good point Tams. After all, if there is a higher probability of half gap fills, its probably easier to make more money through position sizing - although risk would also increase accordingly if we assume we pick a stop where the market proves us wrong. To my thinking, that point of reversal confirmation will be the same for both full or half gaps - if we use technical levels which to my thinking would make sense as we are using technical levels (full or half gap) to potentially exit. If we have a R ratio for each trade of 1:2 as a criteria, then we will get less opportunities perhaps?

 

Sorry, I don't understand your 2nd point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems like it would be worth looking at the gap not closed days. If one could find some behaviour to filter some of these whilst not keeping you out of too many good trades you might be on to something. Things to look at (random ideas) are perhaps time (x% gaps close within y hours), internals (gaps don't close if directional move and high $tick or uvol/dvol), simple price action (gaps dont close after a NR day) there are loads to be honest.

 

You could look at other percentages (apart from 50%) but I guess you are getting into curve fitting.

 

One thing that occurs to me if price goes 10+ points against you before closing a 3 point gap it might be a rather uncomfortable to trade. You might want to take a look at MAE (maximum adverse excursion). linked to this is GAP and go days...when do you throw in the towel (stop out).

 

I would be inclined to look at the time factor beyond simply IB not IB.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  EliasWilliamrd said:
Would you like to make huge profits with Penny Stocks?

 

CLICK HERE -

 

Geez Thanks Elias you twatbrain. I'm gunna be rich!!!

Edited by TLAdmin
removed referenced spam link

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I see what you mean BlowFish.

 

At the moment, Im just interested in the stats, with no plan to turn it into a system as such, but rather gauge the probabilities if I am in a trade.

 

Take today as a fine example of what you said by days when the gap doesnt close. As the probability is for the gap to close, the days when it doesnt should provide some pretty big opportunities as they suggest that the market is out of balance. I guess Taleb would call these the tails when the market is out of kilter - MP just happens to help us ID these more easily IMO.

 

Today we opened well outside of yesterdays range, with an overnight/pre-open range. We know from MP theory that yesterdays value has been rejected. Will the open accept the new level by rotating, then perhaps falling further, or will it reject the open and close the gap? Watching the first minutes of trading, and seeing it stay below the pre-open range, it becomes apparent this ain't stop running ready for a rejection & gap close. There is only one way....

 

Oddly (this was chance, not skill), I had my target at 37.50 So far that is todays low. Did I get a fill? Of course not!!! :angry:

Ensign.png.27e762b58c877430b8a1b5667df94528.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.