Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

aaa

TD Waldo 02

Recommended Posts

Hi Michael

 

Sorry if U're desappointed

 

Have U tweaked the

Move.Bars( xx ),

Previous.Bars( xx ),

according 2 your chart ?

 

But U're right = people must B aware that my video is not a good example.

Such a perfect precision arrives very rarely.

I should have posted a more realistics pic like that one below

 

rgds

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=21605&stc=1&d=1277918903

Snap1.jpg.ee9e5fa7e1cad855cddd8456f1634cc9.jpg

Edited by aaa

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yes aaa, your second pic is more realistics.

My parameters are the same as you give:Move.Bars( 10), Previous.Bars( 4 ).

I am not disappointed. Your code is precise enough for me because I have other indicator combination such as RSI etc, that's why i am very appreciated. I used to research candlestick pattern, and now find your code (or TD Waldo 02) better than candlestick pattern.Thanks also Tom Demark.

 

I notice you change to MoveBars(12) and Previous.Bars(3) in the second chart of 1 minute. can you explain why?

 

Can you pls continue coding TD Waldo 03 to Waldo 08? Appreciated!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For those of us that don't have the book yet, does anyone have a brief description of the theory behind the Waldo2 pattern/indicator.

 

Coincidentally, is Jason Perl the same JPERL that posts in the market statistics thread. Love those VWAP videos!... I'd buy the book today!

 

snowbird

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
For those of us that don't have the book yet, does anyone have a brief description of the theory behind the Waldo2 pattern/indicator.

 

http://books.google.com/books?id=GZtlA991lNYC&pg=PT199&lpg=PT199&dq=demark+waldo&source=bl&ots=GsiDAoHonR&sig=nKmYjAteHAV1_DxVu20rxx3uuqU&hl=en&ei=yLIFS7vCBoH_nAfd5PjJCw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5&ved=0CBAQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=demark%20waldo&f=false

 

Pattern Two:

 

The market records a fresh high or low for a move, but closes higher than the four previous closes (for a potential base)

 

OR

 

The market closes lower than the four previous closes (for a potential top)

 

OR

 

The close of the trend high is greater than the previous price bar, or the close of the trend low is less than or equal to the previous price bar

 

AND

 

A down close occurs after a high or an up close occurs after a low, and the close following the high is greater than the close prior to the high, or the close following the low is less than the close prior to the low.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I notice you change to MoveBars(12) and Previous.Bars(3) in the second chart of 1 minute. can you explain why?

 

Hi Michael

 

Here is a 2 cents suggestion

 

Put multiple copys of an indicator with different input on your preferate graph ( Move.Bars( xx ), Previous.Bars( xx ) )

 

Change colors 2 identfy them

 

Now choose the values which gives you best result according 2 your trading style

 

rgds

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Michael

 

Here is a 2 cents suggestion

 

Put multiple copys of an indicator with different input on your preferate graph ( Move.Bars( xx ), Previous.Bars( xx ) )

 

Change colors 2 identfy them

 

Now choose the values which gives you best result according 2 your trading style

 

rgds

 

yes aaa, I am asking my question because I found the most effective pattern was TD Waldo 2, according to the book. for those TD waldo 3-8, I got very bad results as I tried coding them. and thanks for your suggestions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

-

Question from a PM

 

2. Dots look like scalper dots (do they also appear delayed by 2-3 bars?)

 

I answer on the forum 4 the benefit of the community

 

- Dots appears with " only " 1 bar delay

 

plot1[1](h[1] + Offset, "Waldo02 High");

plot2[1](l[1] - Offset, "Waldo02 Low");

 

See also

 

http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/f46/repainting-8251.

 

How 2 delay a signal with EasyLanguage

 

When applying the analysis technique to a chart, you can displace the plot to the right or left.

 

For example:

 

Plot1[3](Value1);

 

The above example calculates the plot value using the current bar but draws it on the chart 3 bars ago.

Use a negative number to draw the value 3 bars ahead of the current bar.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Question from a Visitor Message

 

1. Do you have links other than the book that explain the Waldo indicator ?

 

I answer on the forum 4 the benefit of the community

 

*************************************************

 

Short-Term Capital Management Site

 

 

Each link will contain a description and explanation of what the indicator attempts to measure and what values it uses to determine the output of the indicator

 

Most of the NinjaScripts code on this site is intended for strategies, not indicators.

 

It is in the process of updating all the code examples

 

*************************************************

 

 

DeMark Indicators

Edited by aaa

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

-

Question from a PM

 

3. Does the indicator work on historical data (or must it be in real time) ?

 

I answer on the forum 4 the benefit of the community

 

************************* ************************

 

If pp can deal with 1 bar delay it should work in all Data feed

 

B aware that noplot function erase only the intrabar false signal

 

So in this code below it could not erase the false signal 1 bar back

 

plot1[1](h[1] + Offset, "Waldo02 High");

 

This limitation in the code should generate many false signals

 

And I dono how 2 avoid that, except reload the chart at each bar :=(

 

***********************

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.