Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Ynos

Trading for a Friend

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I day trade mostly stocks and recently one of my closest friends asked me to trade his money along with my own (he has 5k to give me).

 

I would either be trading longer term with his money or add it to mine (if legal to do so) because of the pattern day trading rule.

 

Has anyone here done this? What legal entities if any need to be formed? Someone recommended a partnership but I don't know. Would a joint account work?

 

I am not an investment advisor or anything like that if it matters for this.

 

I would rather just do the legal part on my own rather than go to a lawyer.

 

Any help would be great.

 

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ynos, I think it is wise of you to ask these questions. I'm not an attorney either but I would offer you the following things to think about.

 

1. Tax implications

2. A 'passive investment' LLC might be the way to go for you. Much depends on where you live.

3. Better to be penny wise than pound foolish. Tradersaccounting.com might be a good place to begin looking. I don't endorse them but I did attend one of their webinars and they know there stuff. You might be able to get a free consultation.

4. Have you thought of futures or forex? They both offer compelling opportunities for day trading and are treated much differently than stocks.

 

Good luck. I'm sure you'll find the answers you need to make the best decision.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One way around the whole legal setup would be start a system on Collective2 and have him open a brokerage account that can accept signals from C2. So you send the trade to C2, C2 sends it to his broker. Creates an additional step or two for you, but that is a quick way to get it going w/o a lawyer in between.

 

Of course the $5k in stocks is going to create a pdt problem. I'm so used to trading futures now that I don't think about the pdt anymore. Can you send your signals on an index - like the S&P, Dow, or Nasdaq? If so, then the ES, YM or NQ contract could work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm curious now about this C2 arrangement Brownsfan. Can you direct me to where I can get more info about this? I was unaware of this arrangement. I have used an Interactive brokers master account to manage sub accounts in different names. With that you can apportion what percentage of each trade you would like to come out of each account and vice versa with p and l's. But it sounds like this is something different altogether.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi,

I day trade mostly stocks and recently one of my closest friends asked me to trade his money along with my own (he has 5k to give me).

 

I would either be trading longer term with his money or add it to mine (if legal to do so) because of the pattern day trading rule.

 

Has anyone here done this? What legal entities if any need to be formed? Someone recommended a partnership but I don't know. Would a joint account work?

 

I am not an investment advisor or anything like that if it matters for this.

 

I would rather just do the legal part on my own rather than go to a lawyer.

 

Any help would be great.

 

Thanks

 

that's the fastest way to lose a friend, your own trading account, and his money...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm... Words of wisdom from Tam. Lol.. He does make an excellent point. I don't even talk to one of my cousins anymore after winding down what proved to become a terrible partnership in a business we were involved with. I didn't think about that but come to think of it, it's a very important consideration.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

... you will lose your own trading account too,

because you are basically changing your own set up,

and divide your focus in something that's not your normal trading operation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm curious now about this C2 arrangement Brownsfan. Can you direct me to where I can get more info about this? I was unaware of this arrangement. I have used an Interactive brokers master account to manage sub accounts in different names. With that you can apportion what percentage of each trade you would like to come out of each account and vice versa with p and l's. But it sounds like this is something different altogether.

 

More info here.

 

:roll eyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I echo the same feelings. Say very nicely, that you can't and don't want to trade his money. Tam's gave you some great reasons. You will be mentally worried on every trade, more so than usual. If it is a loss your friend will be mad. You will pull profits too quick and let your losses run...there goes the account.

Just not worth it. Have him look for a good managed fund with good results.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have mixed feelings on this one. I do manage some funds for family members and it has gone just fine. You need to make sure your relationship could make it through a tough stretch of trading/losing money.

 

I understand some of the above comments on it being a bad idea. I guess it would all depend on who it's for. It it's someone that is going to hound you for daily results and freak out at a losing session then no it's not a good idea. If it's for someone that understands up front they need to be in for the long haul then I don't have a problem with it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I highly recommend against trading family and friend's money. You will stress your relationship, and you don't want that extra risk. Additionally, your trading will likely suffer. If you're that good, just give them some of your extra money :).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have tried to talk him out of it for 3 months telling him horror stories but he is insistent and I get the sense that he thinks I am being selfish by not doing it already.

 

He originally wanted me to trade his 5k in my futures account which I refused, due to obvious reasons.

 

We are both 31, we have been friends since we were 18 and have been very close since college.

 

His former investment advisor lost him about 8k of his 10k which he had saved, he then moved on to investing for himself and lost a little more.

 

If I do it he will not bug me daily about it, this is something we talked about.

 

I was hoping there was some kind of account that could be set up where I place trades on his behalf but it is his account.

 

I would be swing trading stocks 2-6 week holding time usually.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ynos,

 

It sounds like he is aware of the risks in the market with the experience he has had. It's obviously your call so I wouldn't let us influence you too much. You know your relationship with him better than anyone. I made the decision to trade money for certain family members but have also turned other ones down because I have a different relationship with them.

 

If you are going to be swing trading stocks then you could just have him open the account and you advise him on what trades to take. This way you are seperate from the account just in case things go bad or something happens between the two of you.

 

This would not be difficult to do. You are not making trades that are as time sensitive as day trading would be. That would be my choice to start things off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.