Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

TEAMTRADER

Signal Service?

Recommended Posts

SIGNALS SERVICE

Does anyone PERSONALLY know of a ‘tradable’ day trader’s signals service that is ‘reasonably successful’?

By ‘reasonably successful’ I mean at least 70% of the trade signals create a profit.

By ‘tradable’ I mean that the signals are restricted to up to three or four FX instrument charts and are in the recognised European or US trading times.

It can be signals via a live trading room or via premium software.

My objective is that I’d like to trial with them my ‘filtration system’ set of indicators.

The target would be to improve their signal entry successes to 95% or better.

Thanks for any replies.

Regards,

TEAMTRADER

“Trade what you see and not what you hear or Hope.”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

The indicators I have are MT4 based so FX is the prime market.

The indicators for futures would need to be programmed into whatever platform was in use but I could not help there except to offer the basis of the MT4 set up.

Regards

TEAMTRADER

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Team,

I know of a good one and they just had a webinar yesterday on price action. Here is one of their videos on you tube. They have forex rooms for all sessions. Might be interesting with your filtration system.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PFn823P09uI&feature=youtube_gdata]YouTube - PriceactionPart1[/ame]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Teamtrader, do you consider a 70% win rate 'reasonably successful?' I personally believe that a win rate over 65% should be considered 'very successful." I think it is hard to maintain a win rate like that over time and anybody achieving that level of success is doing something extremely right. Are you suggesting that your indicator would have a 95% success rate? Please forgive me if I misunderstood your comment but you have piqued my interest and I must say, that I am respectfully skeptical but will keep an open mind.

 

Here's a question that I once was confronted with. It's the story of two trade systems. One made 9 winning trades at $222.22 each and had only one loser, but it was a $1000 loss. The system won 90% and made $1000 in profit. But what if you got two or three of those big $1000 losses in a row?

 

The other system had a big $2000 winner, but also 9 losing trades at $111.11 each. The system only won 10% of its trades but ended equally profitable with $1000. Isn't it wise to let your profits run and to cut your losses fast?

 

What system is better? What about a system in the middle, that won 5 $400 trades but lost 5 $200 trades? Same $1000 profit result with a 50% win rate. It would seem by your comment that if a 70% win rate is reasonably successful, then this 50% win rate must really suck, no?

 

Win rates are just one part of the puzzle. I remain respectfully skeptical. What good is a 95% win rate if 5% of the trades could wipe you out? Wins and losses come at a random clip, afterall and losses will cluster up. Guaranteed! I'm not suggesting your system does that, but I am merely trying to say that I have heard these claims many times and have yet to see one work. Please show me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I specifically mentioned 70% because it is less work for me to filter out the 30%.

If there is a management system in place then the losses are hypothetical - and everyone has a management system or should have.

Momentum is the key to all trades in my filtration system and as momentum creates divergence, then the addition key is to seek out convergence and this is how reversals are detected.

Also conflict between momentum oscillators is an important area.

I trust the grab is self explanatory.

I am fully retired and part of that word is 'tired' - and that just about sums me up at the moment!:)

Knowledge is a great thing but can only be passed on or learned.

Regards

TEAMTRADER

tio.thumb.gif.72dfdd42053a8f229ebccbe29c86a379.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Teamtrader, thank you for the response and the chart. Please don't take my comments to be negative or argumentative. That is not my intention. I enjoy a good trade conversation and my questions and comments are in the spirit of 'furthering our cause' and for learning. I'm not retired but I can sure identify with tired! I live on the West Coast so getting up early to trade day after day, while going to bed most nights too late, well.. Let's just say I can identify with being tired. lol..

 

I can see the divergence you speak of. What I have learned with this sort of approach though is that it is one thing to identify diverging indicators after the fact, when you can easily see how the price action reacted (past tense). It's entirely a different matter to live on the right edge of the chart, in real life market action and then try to identify divergence and make accurate trade decisions based on what is currently forming -- or seemingly so, but not really. It requires a lot of guessing and discretion. "Is this divergence finished? Is it just beginning? When do I decide that it is valid and how then do I base my entry?" I imagine you probably do have rules to follow.

 

I am content with my 67% ongoing win rate and I suspect it's better than most traders can achieve over hundreds if not thousands of trades. It's based on price action and not lagging indicators. I do use indicators but not to base my trade decisions on. I use them to confirm my decision and to help calculate the size of my trades. And while I would always want to find ways to improve my results, I would have to remain respectably skeptical, but with an open mind, as I said. If you find a signal service that would try your idea, I would be interested in kicking the tires and taking it for a test drive. I am certainly willing and wanting to learn something new. I apologize if I got off subject as you were seeking to find a signal service. But you sparked an interesting train of thought and I wanted to respond in kind. Cheers..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, if yours works, don't fix it. The worst thing traders do is to change strategies and therefore become one of the 90% who do not make a living from FX.

You will see that my indicators are chart specific but what you may not see is that they are linked together and with the addition of trap lines can forecast when a reversal is due and with this information it concentrates the mind for the direction of the next trade.

Multiple momentum is as rewarding as conflicting momentum so I trade what I fully understand and I urge others to trade what they fully understand.

I'm still looking for a service so perhaps there is a user somewhere that I can help.

Regards

TEAMTRADER

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.