Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

JLJ

Considering a Stock for Swing Trading

Recommended Posts

I've had my eye on a particular stock that's tripled in price in the past year or so. It had no P/E for quite a while and now I look back and the P/E is 184 - the average for its industry is 17. Not a good P/E but at least they're finally making money. I'm considering buying some because their price has gone up consistently for the past year or two - it's actually tripled. Should I just forget about buying this (for swing trading) because of this P/E?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My thought would be this.

 

You didn't share the stock symbol that I saw - that would help to get more opinions.

 

But, if the only reason you're buying is because it has gone up a lot for the past year, than I would say you don't have nearly enough reason to be buying. You sound like you are looking at this like a fundamental play, not one based on technical analysis.

 

If that's the case, I would think you'd want to have a lot more analysis on WHY you think it will continue to go up for a swing trade, besides the fact that it has been rising. Granted, momentum does count for a lot, and there could be many very valid reasons it has climbed, and could continue to do so, but I think your analysis should be much deeper than it is so far.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've had my eye on a particular stock that's tripled in price in the past year or so. It had no P/E for quite a while and now I look back and the P/E is 184 - the average for its industry is 17. Not a good P/E but at least they're finally making money. I'm considering buying some because their price has gone up consistently for the past year or two - it's actually tripled. Should I just forget about buying this (for swing trading) because of this P/E?

 

What do the rules in your trading plan say? Do they allow you to buy it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the stock is ANN.

I wasn't even attempting to look at technical analysis for this, more fundamental. And you're right that I've only taken a superficial look. My next step, I suppose, is to learn more about the company and the industry to discern why the stock has gone up and whether that's likely to continue.

No one has said, yet, that I should rule it out simply because the P/E is 184 and the average for its industry is 17. To my newbie mind, that does not sound good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
the stock is ANN.

I wasn't even attempting to look at technical analysis for this, more fundamental. And you're right that I've only taken a superficial look. My next step, I suppose, is to learn more about the company and the industry to discern why the stock has gone up and whether that's likely to continue.

No one has said, yet, that I should rule it out simply because the P/E is 184 and the average for its industry is 17. To my newbie mind, that does not sound good.

 

I Think most here are technical traders, that is, they trade from chart patterns, support/resistance that sort of thing. I would guess not to many here would even give PE a thought.

 

If the stock is in an uptrend, then you would think long; downtrend think short. PE doesn't matter.

 

Now if your looking for a stock with good fundamentals that you might want to buy and hold for the long run... that's another story. That, in my opinion, is not trading. That is investing, and I guess I quit thinking of the stock market as a place to invest money a long time ago, but that's just me...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone for your feedback. Part of my confusion is that I was thinking simplistically that day traders look at technical analysis and investors look at fundamentals. I don't yet know how to assess a stock for swing trading.

It had not occurred to me that technical analysis was the way to go when contemplating buying a stock I might hold for a matter of months. I thought TA was more for day traders.

I see there's a section on TL for Swing Trading, so I'll start reading that to bone up. Thanks, folks, for your patience with my painfully basic newbie questions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Arguably, using technical analysis on longer term charts is even more powerful because you don't get some of the day to day or hour by hour noise you get with day trading. So you can definitely take a swing or position trade off of technicals.

 

It's simply a matter of bumping up the timeframes you're looking at -- it's like someone looking at a chart on a 1 minute, 5 minute, 89 tick chart, etc... vs. looking at it on a 4 Hour, daily or weekly chart. By doing that, many times the same technical approach works, it's just the time horizon has changed considerably.

 

As for the way I look at things, my specific approach which may not fit your criteria, the last time I had a buy signal on ANN was the break of $16+ and it had a nice run, right now I would only be looking for a new buy once it pulled back to the 18.50 - 19.00 range and bounced off that level before entering -- otherwise for me on a swing basis it hasn't met my criteria yet for a new buy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I annotated the chart with the places I see as S/R (support/resistance) levels and some more obvious trendlines. I normally trade close to the S/R levels trying for a reversal or breakout so I wouldn't be taking any positions right now on this. I could imagine price making its way back down towards the lower resistance level and trendline and then making another run up and I would look to play that if it occured. Many ways to play this and make money if you are willing to be patient for a low risk high reward trade setup. Base your analysis on support and resistance first and build off that. Also keep an eye on what the ES (S&P futures) are doing because if it is continuing to make lower lows you'll have a hard time making long positions work on any stock no matter the technical or fundamentals. My :2c:

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=21355&stc=1&d=1275976831

5aa7101077b01_6-7-201000.thumb.png.b366f3db39803e97bca7fbb228839216.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

JLJ,

 

Another thing you can do is find yourself a good swing trading 'system.' There are some good ones out there. Don't spend a fortune on one though. The idea is to come up with a simple set of trade rules and then apply your rules to good swinging markets. You could take a look at your stock in question and look for setups in that stock that fit the rules of your swing trade system. Maybe you do have something but you might be surprised to learn that the best trade is a short not a buy. Or not. Swingtraders should be flexible enough to go both ways, no pun intended.

 

The idea is, that if you have a hard and fast rule set, that gives you an edge in the market and puts the odds in your favor on every trade, then your biggest job will be to control your risk (take small position sizes as you build up your account because swing trades are larger and require more room to breath) and execute your tradeplan according to your system accurately. You'll lose some trades for sure, but that's ok. The edge of your system will take over and grow your account as you win more than you lose, so long as you keep your risk very small as it relates to your overall available trade capital. I hope that makes sense. Good luck!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hope this isn't a dumb question, but what is a trading 'system' and where would you find one? I understand that people devise their rules based on months - or years - of back testing and practice trades, but are you saying there's something pre-fab you can buy? Can you give an example?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Beware of the man who tries to sell you an ATM machine at a discount...They will of course always give you a "deal" on such machinery.....

To me on this chart you are making a rookie mistake that every stock chart is either a long or short...

Most stocks, if randomly picked from a basket are "wait and see" in reality and you have to sit in the weeds like a marine sniper for your target knowing what you are shooting at.

I wouldn't do anything here other than wait and see if the chart bull flags, especially if people getting scared risk wise at the index.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hope this isn't a dumb question, but what is a trading 'system' and where would you find one? I understand that people devise their rules based on months - or years - of back testing and practice trades, but are you saying there's something pre-fab you can buy? Can you give an example?

 

JLJ,

There are so many you can buy, the best bet is to see if you can find some good feedback on this site and others. A swing trade system should be easy but effective. Try to have a 2 to 1 win ratio. I saw a you tube video that I posted on another thread. Just go on You Tube and search swing trading forex.

Don't buy anthing right away, do some research and get some feedback. Make sure you have a solid money back guarantee or trial.

I know there are some swing trade rooms out there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

JLJ, a trade system is a package of indicators, sometimes custom, that help identify trade setups that have a winning edge in the market. They usually come with rules that tell you the entry, target, stop and perhaps even a trade mgt plan that has you moving your stop to reduce risk and/or lock in some profit as the trade progresses. The good ones print the actual trade setups right on the chart and are simple to learn and use. They should never be blindly trusted though. Even if they work most traders still need to do foundational work to learn the system and manually backtest it to gain confidence and see for themselves that it works (or not).

 

There are some real good ones but its hard to find them amongst a bunch that really are not that good (being diplomatic here). There is one in particular that I personally really like for stocks and forex called the Ultimate Swing Trader. I hope that the readers on TL don't think I am spamming or promoting here .. lol.. I'm not. You asked me a question so I'm merely trying to answer you straight forward with my personal opinion. Hope it helps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

By the way, I think WorldTrader gave good advice too. You really need to find one that gives you an edge that you can prove. If you can win 2 out of 3 on average, over a lot of trades, and, if you control your risk, never risking more than 2% of your trade capital on any one trade (and maybe 1% is even better), then you could prosper with that type of 'trade system.' One thing for sure, it helps remove the human element. The system acts as your objectivity and reduces your trades down to high probability setups.. if it's a good trade system, that is. The chart posted earlier of ANN looks to me like a good swinging stock, by the way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

JLJ...I will take AmCan and worldtraders comments a step further. Most systems out there are going to based off of technical indicators like MACD or Stochastics to name a couple. Before you go out and buy a system you will want to do some basic research to learn a little about the basics of technical analysis.

 

You will want to get a feel for what basic indicators like the ones I mentioned above are telling you. Also look to see what it is traders are looking at when they load up a chart. Using a system without an understanding of the basics will just lead to frustration.

 

If you are a reader and motivated to get a background on technical analysis take a look at Technical Analysis of the Financial Markets by John J. Murphy. It is a large book but does cover many of the basic principles of technical analysis.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great advice by Cuttshot. I have the John Murphy book. I think it belongs in every trader's library. And if I can now humbly add something to Cuttshot's advice, I would also encourage you to look for a trade system that is based on price action. Indicators always lag the market. They definitely have value and the more you know about them the better as there are many different kinds. I like a system that uses price action to base its trades from but uses a very select few indicators to confirm the price action and possibly even to calculate the size of the trade; its targets and stops. Still though, unless you follow Cuttshot's advice and learn as much as you can, it's probably all going to be a foreign language.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

AmCan,

 

Yes I agree price action is king. In fact I like my charts to be very clean. By that I mean very few indicators on them. However, it seems like most trading systems on the market today are a combination of mulitple indicators. You are almost forced to dive in and study some of these indicators to understand what works and what doesn't. As the markets go more and more electronic traders are turning to different technical approaches. It is very important to have a system that you understand and that fits your style.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.