Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Dinerotrader

How Do You Begin to Manage Other's Money?

Recommended Posts

Here is a scenario:

You consistently make money trading commodities. You have a friend who wants to give you $100k to trade and only wants 15% return on his money per year. Nice possibility there to make some money. How does that trader legally manage his friend's money in the easiest(least amount of red tape) way possible? My general understanding is that you can get a series 3 license and become a Commodity Pool Operator. That is the gist of my current understanding.

 

I'd be interested to hear from those that have walked this path or can provide a lot more detail on this process and what it takes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here is a scenario:

You consistently make money trading commodities. You have a friend who wants to give you $100k to trade and only wants 15% return on his money per year. Nice possibility there to make some money. How does that trader legally manage his friend's money in the easiest(least amount of red tape) way possible? My general understanding is that you can get a series 3 license and become a Commodity Pool Operator. That is the gist of my current understanding.

 

I'd be interested to hear from those that have walked this path or can provide a lot more detail on this process and what it takes.

 

You can form a pool which is really just a trading account and if you don't advertise yourself as a money manager and if there are less that 14 members and less than $400,000 dollars under management you can go on line with the CFTC and file an exemption and you will be legal. Filing the exemption is quick and easy and free.

 

The last one of these that we did we formed an LLC registered in Nevada and registered the exemption with the CFTC.

 

Whether you form the LLC or not you will want to create an operating agreement that makes a statement of the risk involved, provides for liquidation, lays out your share of the profits and how and when they will be paid and has the invester sign that he understands the risks and authorizes you to make the trades.

 

Legal, easy and inexpensive and you are on your way.

 

Good Luck

 

cheers

 

UrmaBlume

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You could also "publish signals" with Collective2.com or StrategyRunner.com.

The trades are placed in the client accounts, you get paid, and you never take

possession of the client's funds. Hence, you don't need to be registered, and no

one can ever say that you "Madoff with their money". :2c:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor

Just my two cents:

 

I contcted both NFA and CFTC for this matter some time ago. I am a non-US resident and my clients are also non-US residents. The answers I got from both institutions was:

 

''Dear ....,

 

As a foreign money manager with only foreign customers, you would not be

required to register as a CTA. In other words, the regulations outlined

in the Commodity Exchange Act would not apply to you and,

therefore, there is no limitation imposed upon you with regard to number

of customers or amount of funds.''

 

So it seems that US-based money managers are discriminated against non-US money managers in US ;)

 

Pure nonsens and communism: the government decides who can be a money manager instead of the market.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tresor - what does the regulator in davey jones locker say

 

I would be more worried if the US regulator thought they could regulate people outside the US. There are two issues...... where your management company (or you are based) and where the clients are based.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor
Tresor - what does the regulator in davey jones locker say

 

The regulator in Davy Jones' locker say nothing about this. There is the act of securities market but this act covers brokers' activities. Brokers in Davy Jones' locker however demand a power of attorney signed by my clients in which the clients authorise me to trade their accounts.

 

I would be more worried if the US regulator thought they could regulate people outside the US. There are two issues...... where your management company (or you are based) and where the clients are based.

 

You know I just wanted the US authorities' interpretation of the law because the compliance dept. of my US broker had some doubts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor

Both clients and I are based in Europe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tresor - then you are really in problem - the Europeans cant even agree amongst themselves about regulations and they will probably over regulate the wrong people.;)

 

Given your comment "Pure nonsens and communism: the government decides who can be a money manager instead of the market."

 

they also decide who can drive, drink, vote, practice medicine. etc; etc;

When you consider the amount of poor money managers out there, imagine if there was no regulation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor
Tresor - then you are really in problem - the Europeans cant even agree amongst themselves about regulations and they will probably over regulate the wrong people.;)

 

Yes, EU is slowly becoming the biggest socialist country in the world... unfortunately. So many stupid regulations, including even the safe shape of bananas that shops are allowed to sell. No kidding!

 

Given your comment "Pure nonsens and communism: the government decides who can be a money manager instead of the market."

 

they also decide who can drive, drink, vote, practice medicine. etc; etc;

When you consider the amount of poor money managers out there, imagine if there was no regulation.

 

A few months ago I met some Russians guys during snowboarding and they presented me with some basic facts (that I later confirmed from Internet sources) about Russia that made me wonder:

 

(i) flat personal income tax for all Russian residents of 13% has been implemented 10 years ago - imagine I pay twice as much! (any Western country has a budget deficit - Russia on the other hand has a budget surplus);

 

(ii) you can trade forex at the leverage that suits you best, even at 1:1000 - no ignorant politician would even think of telling the Russian traders what is a ''safe leverage'' for them - I read there are plans in the US to reduce the leverage to 1:10 - Is this economic liberty?

 

(iii) many more...

 

We will soon be visiting Russia to see what a capitalist economy looks like and Russians will be having sight-seeing tours in the Western countries to see what a socialist (regulated) economy looks like. Ironic :rofl:

 

It is true that there are many poor money managers. Someone gave them their licenses ;) I personally think that the free market would verify poor manoey managers better than the state.

 

I agree that certain jobs should be regulated, e.g. medical stuff, security stuff, etc. Money managers should not be regulated. Did regulation prevented the people from Bernie Madoff?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor
Regulations allowed you to throw bad Bernie in jail.

 

Let us hope these specific regulations will not be used against Dinerotrader and let us wish him all success in his new career.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Let us hope these specific regulations will not be used against Dinerotrader and let us wish him all success in his new career.

 

Not quite there with the new career but just wanted to know what kind of red tape I need to be aware of if a wealthy friend wants to loan me $20k-40k to trade with. Not a lot of money but I'd rather be aware of what goes into doing it the right/legal way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor
Not quite there with the new career but just wanted to know what kind of red tape I need to be aware of

 

I didn't help much with the red tape question. I just noticed the thread title and it reminded me of the nightmare I once had with a US broker when I tried to convince its compliance dept. that did not need to be a CTA to trade for non-US clients via a US broker. After a few months of trading US futures I switched completely to forex.

 

Forex brokers do not have any legal dilemas. If you have clients they do not ask questions. Instead they are happy to have clients

 

if a wealthy friend wants to loan me $20k-40k to trade with.

 

I do not know what your trading performance is. If I were you I would double think the loan, unless you are 99% sure of your trading strategy.

 

My history was a simple one: I presented my equity curve to three friends and they took the risk of losing their money instead of proposing a loan to me. Had it been a loan type of investing I would have probably not agreed to such structured deal.

 

We agreed on a 10% performance fee. Happily I did not blow their accounts :cool: and even managed to bring the profits they were satisfied with. At the moment I charge 30% performance fee for non-friend clients. I have 9 clients in total after almost 1 year.

 

On the operational side, the clients are sent daily reports by the broker and monthly performance report with a calculation of my remuneration. The broker is responsible for transfering my remuneration from the clients' account into mine.

 

All of my clients understand English so I do not get many questions from them regarding reports. I do not run bookkeping. I did not set up a company or any legal structure for this undertaking.

 

Once a year I am obligated to fill in tax papers and report the income from this activity and pay personal tax.

 

But my understanding is that US red tape may be more complex than red tape in Davy Jones' Locker.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I do not know what your trading performance is. If I were you I would double think the loan, unless you are 99% sure of your trading strategy.

 

I agree, a loan for trading without strong past trading performance is pretty risky and 99% of the time, a bad idea.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.