Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

evroom1

Trading Without a Chart

Recommended Posts

Therefore, would you say treasuries are the best day trading objects on the dom?

 

Here is my take on it.

 

It is possible to scalp off the DOM, no question about it.

 

It is possible to take position day trades off the DOM. I do it on the Treasuries and although a chart isn't used a volume profile is. XTrader has a volume profile on the DOM as fo a lot of other products. From this you can see highs/lows and areas that it cut through like butter as opposed to areas where there was a lot of consolidation. Long term charts are also used but not necessarily referenced intra-day. Look at a longer term chart, remember the most relevant price points. Job done.

 

You also do need to have a decent short term memory as it helps to know where price got stuck throughout the day.

 

The more intra-day swings an instrument puts in the LESS you are able to rely solely on the DOM. Or rather, the less I am. The treasuries put in very few intra-day swings but CL puts in 30 or more. It is these swing points that are also pain points to a lot of other traders.

 

On an instrument like the ES, I cannot trade purely off the DOM. I need to be able to see the intraday swings. In an up move, you might see an iceberg on the offer and 3-4000 contracts hit it. Still, it'll just carry on up, cutting through like a knife through butter. On the other hand if it's pulling back down in an up move and you see the same thing on the bid, it's a good opportunity for a long.

 

Everyone uses it in a different way. For me, I need context and in the treasuries the volume profile is sufficient. On the ES, the volume profile is not sufficient, so I use an intraday chart too.

 

For CL/YM - not my cup of tea. Very different from reading DOM on a thick market, although I keep promising myself to have a serious look one day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Therefore, would you say treasuries are the best day trading objects on the dom?

 

 

US Treasuries are certainly the slowest/thickest. For various reasons, that gives you more time to make a decision. You also have spreading activity occurring which can tip your hand. I will hold up my hands and say that I can't personally see the spreading no matter how hard I look - it's way above my head.

 

I think FESX is just as good though and I would argue that it's a better trade, certainly for people in Asia like me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

After reading the pages in the beginning and the end of this thread I felt a need to comment on the topic.

 

ALL trading requires the use of historical data. ALL of our indicators are based on something that has happened in the past. ALL of our indicators are ultimately based on price.

 

There was some talk about only using the 'x' axis of the chart. I get a curvy line if I do that where the dots that make up the line are unrelated. Maybe someone can comment on the cone that professionals utilize.

 

To say someone trades without a chart is a misnomer to me in that if your application interrogates the history data for high and low points, averages, frequencies, etc., then you are basically reading a chart using mathematics rather than your eyes.

 

Taking the concept of trading without a chart literally, the only way this can be done is with an automatic system. I've spent the last several years writing such a system. It is completely on its own and does quite well. However, I do have to rely on charts when choosing symbols to trade and to review how well a stock is performing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
After reading the pages in the beginning and the end of this thread I felt a need to comment on the topic.

 

ALL trading requires the use of historical data. ALL of our indicators are based on something that has happened in the past. ALL of our indicators are ultimately based on price.

 

There was some talk about only using the 'x' axis of the chart. I get a curvy line if I do that where the dots that make up the line are unrelated. Maybe someone can comment on the cone that professionals utilize.

 

To say someone trades without a chart is a misnomer to me in that if your application interrogates the history data for high and low points, averages, frequencies, etc., then you are basically reading a chart using mathematics rather than your eyes.

 

Taking the concept of trading without a chart literally, the only way this can be done is with an automatic system. I've spent the last several years writing such a system. It is completely on its own and does quite well. However, I do have to rely on charts when choosing symbols to trade and to review how well a stock is performing.

 

Lot's of people trade without charts but that doesn't mean they don't have a means to pick a good trade location.

 

This is enough information to pick a spot:

 

07-05-201310-03-11_zps798be8e8.png

 

In fact - this information isn't available on the price chart and a price chart would be misleading as it doesn't show you where the majority of trading occurred.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the profile beside the dom, which is for all the day session. Is it enough to take decisions, as compared to the Profile fragmented in 30 minutes ? How do you combine it with the dom to come to a decision?

 

 

 

Lot's of people trade without charts but that doesn't mean they don't have a means to pick a good trade location.

 

This is enough information to pick a spot:

 

07-05-201310-03-11_zps798be8e8.png

 

In fact - this information isn't available on the price chart and a price chart would be misleading as it doesn't show you where the majority of trading occurred.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is the profile beside the dom, which is for all the day session. Is it enough to take decisions, as compared to the Profile fragmented in 30 minutes ? How do you combine it with the dom to come to a decision?

 

Well - it depends on the market. I very much doubt you could get good trade locations of Crude using just the days volume profile, it's for thicker markets.

 

On ES & FESX I do set levels before the markets open. And those levels come from daily charts/value areas.

 

For FESX, there is no need for an intraday chart or any other chart for that matter.

 

For the ES - I do use the intraday chart because I play measured moves on more volatile days. On less volatile days, I ignore the charts and focus on the profile. I do use swing charts too. Even on volatile days, I will give more precedence to what I see on the volume profile if we build a lot of volume in the area.

 

Early on in the session, I tend to pay more attention to medium sized volume clusters as areas we will come back and test and that will get defended. Later on as the profile builds I don't use volume clusters at all, especially if we are retracing old ground for the day. I tend to focus on highs/lows, steps in the profile and distribution areas.

 

In terms of the depth, well there's nothing special about the using the depth for the volume profile but basically you are looking for absorption, vacuums, one side to give up or one side to start pushing it aggressively.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I understand you well, this is it: ideally you mark your levels beforehand, you follow them on profile for confirmation and only then look at the dom to tell you if price is being accepted or rejected, thus which way market is going to head. This brings me to think the two tools are complementary. But there are some people who trade exclusively by the dom, and those by the profile . Can one trade well with only one of the tools?

 

Well - it depends on the market. I very much doubt you could get good trade locations of Crude using just the days volume profile, it's for thicker markets.

 

On ES & FESX I do set levels before the markets open. And those levels come from daily charts/value areas.

 

For FESX, there is no need for an intraday chart or any other chart for that matter.

 

For the ES - I do use the intraday chart because I play measured moves on more volatile days. On less volatile days, I ignore the charts and focus on the profile. I do use swing charts too. Even on volatile days, I will give more precedence to what I see on the volume profile if we build a lot of volume in the area.

 

Early on in the session, I tend to pay more attention to medium sized volume clusters as areas we will come back and test and that will get defended. Later on as the profile builds I don't use volume clusters at all, especially if we are retracing old ground for the day. I tend to focus on highs/lows, steps in the profile and distribution areas.

 

In terms of the depth, well there's nothing special about the using the depth for the volume profile but basically you are looking for absorption, vacuums, one side to give up or one side to start pushing it aggressively.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If I understand you well, this is it: ideally you mark your levels beforehand, you follow them on profile for confirmation and only then look at the dom to tell you if price is being accepted or rejected, thus which way market is going to head. This brings me to think the two tools are complementary. But there are some people who trade exclusively by the dom, and those by the profile . Can one trade well with only one of the tools?

 

For FESX - here is what I do

- mark the levels beforehand - many of which are extremes away from the market but also prior value areas which we might be above/below/within

- as we approach a level for the first time, the profile is not that relevant, the depth is though

- as the profile builds for the day, it becomes more and more relevant for picking intraday levels and of course you try to pick up clues from the depth

 

Treasuries traders watch 3 DOMs side by side and don't bother with intraday charts. Charts aren't much help at all for scalping.

 

A lot of spread traders also wouldn't have much use for the price charts of the individual instruments that make up the spread.

 

There's some stuff on youtube if you search around for it

NoBSDayTrading - YouTube

Guy Bower - YouTube

Akira Kobayashi - YouTube

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks a lot.

I am also surfing your site right now. great job!

 

 

For FESX - here is what I do

- mark the levels beforehand - many of which are extremes away from the market but also prior value areas which we might be above/below/within

- as we approach a level for the first time, the profile is not that relevant, the depth is though

- as the profile builds for the day, it becomes more and more relevant for picking intraday levels and of course you try to pick up clues from the depth

 

Treasuries traders watch 3 DOMs side by side and don't bother with intraday charts. Charts aren't much help at all for scalping.

 

A lot of spread traders also wouldn't have much use for the price charts of the individual instruments that make up the spread.

 

There's some stuff on youtube if you search around for it

NoBSDayTrading - YouTube

Guy Bower - YouTube

Akira Kobayashi - YouTube

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.