Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

JLJ

Real Time Quotes on Yahoo Finance

Recommended Posts

Maybe there's a better way.

I use Fidelity's Active Trader Pro for actual trades, but all day I look at the MACD and price trends on Yahoo Finance. Today Yahoo Finance froze repeatedly, on both my machines - one is Vista and I use Firefox, my other computer is brand new, super-fast, with Windows 8 and I use Internet Explorer on that machine.

I tried everything - closed and re-opened Yahoo Finance, re-booted both computers, etc. This went on for a couple hours which was scary and frustrating. I set stop-loss orders to protect myself but I would have traded differently had I been able to see the MACD. This occured between 11 am and 1 pm today

Maybe it was a problem with Yahoo's servers, but I'm wondering if there's a more reliable way to get this info?:confused::angry:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just playin!

 

If you want reliable, real-time data then you need to find a broker or charting/data solution that offers this. Relying on the free yahoo stuff is fine when it works but not so great when it does not. And since you aren't paying for it, there's not much you can say.

 

Find a better solution. It may or may not cost you money.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yahoo Finance is not free, it's $14.95 a month. I'd pay more than that for info that's updated fast enough. Yahoo is updated once a minute, except when it hangs/freezes, which is too often.

I looked at freestockcharts and it was so different from what I'm used to that I was intimidated. In Yahoo Finance I can easily see the MACD and the price and the volume, and being a newbie, if I see much more on the screen than that, I get overwhelmed. Please don't laugh. ...OK, if the veterans here laugh I don't blame them. :-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  JLJ said:
Yahoo Finance is not free, it's $14.95 a month. I'd pay more than that for info that's updated fast enough. Yahoo is updated once a minute, except when it hangs/freezes, which is too often.

I looked at freestockcharts and it was so different from what I'm used to that I was intimidated. In Yahoo Finance I can easily see the MACD and the price and the volume, and being a newbie, if I see much more on the screen than that, I get overwhelmed. Please don't laugh. ...OK, if the veterans here laugh I don't blame them. :-)

 

Ok, maybe not free but not exactly a top tier service either. I had no idea yahoo even had a service they charged for. If you want to treat this as a hobby, then most days the yahoo thing will be just fine. If you want something more reliable and serious, then you have to look elsewhere.

 

Other option is to find a broker that supplies this to you for free or discounted. Open ECry provides charts/data to customers for free or you can get a monthly demo for a fee.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  JLJ said:
Yahoo Finance is not free, it's $14.95 a month. I'd pay more than that for info that's updated fast enough. Yahoo is updated once a minute, except when it hangs/freezes, which is too often.

I looked at freestockcharts and it was so different from what I'm used to that I was intimidated. In Yahoo Finance I can easily see the MACD and the price and the volume, and being a newbie, if I see much more on the screen than that, I get overwhelmed. Please don't laugh. ...OK, if the veterans here laugh I don't blame them. :-)

 

They do have a free option which is delayed (I believe). I guess they have a paid option too :) Maybe Quote.com or Esignals live charts might suit you? (I think esignal bought quote)

 

Did you need stocks ? Lots of brokers giving out free real time futures stuff.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, stocks. I'm very new to this so I'm not comfortable doing futures.

BTW, It's occured to me that my internet security software (McAfee) may be causing the problem, because when I open Yahooo Finance, I always get a message basically asking if I want to run a program that may not be safe. Regardless of whether I click "yes" or "no," I get into YahooFinance - then before long, it freezes. I'd thought during market hours that maybe their servers weren't keeping up with the number of users - but I went in on Saturday night and had the same problem.They couldn't be that busy then!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  JLJ said:
Maybe there's a better way.

I use Fidelity's Active Trader Pro for actual trades, but all day I look at the MACD and price trends on Yahoo Finance. Today Yahoo Finance froze repeatedly, on both my machines - one is Vista and I use Firefox, my other computer is brand new, super-fast, with Windows 8 and I use Internet Explorer on that machine.

I tried everything - closed and re-opened Yahoo Finance, re-booted both computers, etc. This went on for a couple hours which was scary and frustrating. I set stop-loss orders to protect myself but I would have traded differently had I been able to see the MACD. This occured between 11 am and 1 pm today

Maybe it was a problem with Yahoo's servers, but I'm wondering if there's a more reliable way to get this info?:confused::angry:

 

If you're serious about charting and have the need to use indicators, then I would use a better platform. I haven't traded stocks in a year, but I know that Interactive Brokers has TraderWorkstation included and also TradeStation is a good platform for just about every instrument, but a bit expensive (you have to trade 5000 shares/mo. or pay $99/mo. to use the platform... but only 10 round futures trades!). Anyway, I would certainly avoid using free (EDIT: cheap) tools for such an important task.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would agree the Interactive Brokers option can be a good one -- if you trade there you will get the data for free. Their charting is decent, but you could also get the Ninja Trader platform for free and connect it to Interactive Brokers data. As long as you weren't requiring streaming tick data it is a good solution in the low/no cost. Of course, it means trading with IB, but that can be a good thing considering their breadth of products in a universal account including stock, futures, options and forex (though only full size, no mini) plus many international exchanges.

 

I like Tradestation a lot as well but as the prior poster mentioned you do have some minimum trading volumes or you pay a monthly platform fee which I think is $200+.

 

Datafeeds are definitely an area not to cut corners on since it's your primary link between you and everything you need to make your trades.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wish I could blame my learning curve (i.e., losses) on the platform I'm using. I thought it was me. :- (

What's different in a better platform? I just use the MACD, bid/ask, volume, etc. Pretty simplistic, I've just started day trading. It's painfully clear that I don't know what I'm doing. In my 3 weeks of really serious practice trading, I did very well. But since I started using actual money, I'm mostly losing and don't know what to do about it. It's discouraging. I've got a high tolerance for frustration, and I know I have a lot to learn so that's OK - I just wish I knew what/how to learn. I don't want to keep losing money unless I'm learning from my mistakes.

Maybe I'm not cut out for day trading? I might do better at swing trading.

BTW, if you no longer trade stocks, what are you trading now?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(Forgive me if this posts twice, I replied earlier today, but I don't see it.)

As Yahoo Finance continues to freeze, I'm now mostly using Fidelity's Active Trader Pro. Seems robust to me, but I don't have much a basis for comparison.

If you're day trading stocks and ETFs (as I am), what are the differences between different platforms? I wish I could blame my lack of success on my choice of platform, but unfortunately I think it's because I don't know what I'm doing. I listen to the business news, I pick a few stocks (or ETFs) to watch, then I watch the MACD for buy and sell signals - very simple compared to most of you guys here.

When paper trading I did very well, but since I began trading with real money (about 2-3 weeks ago), I pretty much stink at this. Fortunately I have a high tolerance for frustration and I'm willing to work, but I have so much to learn I don't know where to begin. Most days, I'm losing money, which wouldn't be so bad if I could figure out what to do differently. Every time i think I figure something out, tomorrow's trading seems to contradict it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

JLJ -- the short answer from me is after 3 weeks of trading you are just starting the journey. I have never met anyone who was consistently profitable after 3 weeks trading. Especially daytrading -- there's a steep learning curve and a bit of "school of hard knocks" that is involved. The fact that you've jumped in I think is a great sign - your challenge would be having the staying power to stay with it.

 

If you're using just a basic MACD for buy/sell you might want to realize that over time that is likely going to change as your experience grows. Maybe post more specifics about your approach and others here will be able to give you some feedback.

 

I haven't found just using an indicator out of the box to be very effective for me personally but others might feel differently. Things like RSI, stochastic, MACD, etc...on their own can provide some insight to the hundreds of bars you look at but usually cannot be traded as straight signals (like oversold you just buy, etc...)

 

You'll probably have to focus a lot on developing your trade plan, do a lot more testing, and go back to simulated testing - see if you were just lucky for a few weeks or maybe with real money you are just not following your plan due to that added pressure.

 

As for your Fidelity platform I'm sure that is fine for what you're discussing -- not the Yahoo one but you're good on the other.

 

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your encouragement. I know what I'm doing is pretty simplistic and I expect to add other indicators as I learn about them. I've heard about RSI & stochastic but don't have any idea of how to use them. I know I have a great deal to learn, but I don't know what to read next. (Posts on this forum, for one thing:)

 

This is what I do (stocks or ETF's I'm watching based on the news or what I infer from the news): I buy when the MACD starts to go up fairly sharply, well before it crosses the line. Sometimes I sell when it levels off but because I've observed that it'll often come back up, some times I don't sell until it's definitely dropping - which I can regret it if continues to drop and drop.

I think a lot about where to set my stop loss, I'm reluctant to lose too much on one trade, but if I set my stop loss at a 'safe' level then too often I get kicked out prematurely when the price drops - "prematurely" meaning the price often comes right back up, then I wished my stop loss hadn't kicked me out so soon. But after learning from that, I tried setting a much lower stop loss to avoid getting kicked out, and then the price often drops and drops and I lose money. I feel like I'm chasing a moving target.

I rarely buy more than 300 shares of anything because I don't know what I"m doing yet.

Maybe I ponder too long when deciding whether to buy, The window of opportunity is pretty fleeting, I'm realizing. When I'm watching a stock and I see the MACD and the price going up, I may wait too long. One _could_ get a nice gain on a price increase of only a few cents (assuming you buy enough shares) but only if you act fast. But often I'm sitting there thinking, trying to decide whether to buy, while a few seconds pass. Then I finally buy but I've just missed most of the upswing.This can be profitable only if the price continues to go up, but often it'll drop as soon as I buy, so I lose. Getting in this late will only work if there's a big sustained price increase which I don't often see.

Granted buying 300 shares won't get me far on a price increase of a few cents. But I want to know what I'm doing before I buy more.

thanks folks for your suggestions!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

JLJ - maybe someone can weigh in on some suggestions for places to put your stop. I realize on entry you seem to have a reasonably good idea of when you are entering -- other than sometimes being a bit unsure of whether it's totally ideal (then missing the move) -- it does sound like your stop in particular is very subjective.

 

There may be better suggestions but you could consider something like an ATR stop (Average True Range) -- so some multiplier of the ATR of the period of the charts you're watching.

 

Others on here might be much more adept using Fibonacci retracements -- there might very well be a way you could use one of these to identify stops of some safety but that would allow you to move to more of a rule-based exit which I think would help you.

 

Perhaps others can weigh in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your input. I really appreciate it.

I'll look into Average True Range - don't know what that is but I'll find out. I should probably spend more time reading about technical analysis. And I'll read around this forum about how people decide where to set their stops - there are probably threads devoted just to that!

thanks again...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.