Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

forexrus

Zulutrade

Recommended Posts

Started to use Zulutrade as a signal provider, right now all seems OK, no delays or slippage it seems, but certain brokers don't allow orders to be placed "too close" to the market, which is an issue, cause I am used to trade this way, but will likely have to manually enter/exit trades on Zulutrade account to not cause troubles for the followers using such brokers as Ava and AAA...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Williamfx65 said:
really?:) nice that you share..

what's your signal name on zulu? :missy:

 

Just started recently, so not many trades and followers yet, but hope it changes soon. :)

 

CornixForex_II is the name of a system. Overall trading approach is discussed and described on my page (can be found in the profile here on TL).

 

Thanks for the interest. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you deffinitely got my attention - will keep an eye on you, though it is still too early for my taste to follow - i usually wait at least for 20 trading weeks (but this is me) - other followers are not so risk averse :) you keep them good and coming and we will stick to you like a gum ;) :haha:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, it's early to be sure about it, especially how it is executed for followers in reality over many trades. Not so concerned about the approach, because traded it for myself for quite some time before decided to scale up to OPM. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Williamfx65 said:
well you know manual trading quite different level than beeing an SP ;)

but lets wait and see how your trading will evolve :)

 

Yea, not sure yet which is harder emotionally: trading your own account or giving signals to people watching you.

 

Thanks for the support anyway, curious to see what it gets like too, quite an interesting new challenge for me. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

imo, and from what i see from other SPs and followers deffinitely the second one.

just be prepared for quite some 'ugly' comments if trades do not go well, and the opposite as well. I am a milder profile, i empathise with you guys (not of course if a trader is a reckless one - leaving trades open for months, high dd and still greedy for commission - then and only then i will raise my voice)

good luck trading :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. I noticed indeed that many followers seem to not realize what business it is (despite any business is a subject to similar matters), that losses are integral part of the process, that losing streaks do not mean everything is bad just like winning streaks don't mean everything is great (just look at those "traders" with 95% winning trades, until... kaboom... hilarious :) )...

 

Oh well, I'll just keep doing it and see how it goes, didn't mortgage the soul to run this project after all. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Classic situation occurred today. Last couple of days I had two small losses... Well, my subscriber quickly escaped today... lliterally in the next few minutes I took the best trade since system public release.

 

Just want to remind everyone who's about to follow me: I trade for real, not another "trader" with 99.999% winning trades. ;)

 

Please, if you follow me, expect losses to happen. That's perfectly normal.

 

I really want to provide quality service and can make you money, but cannot help if followers flee after 2 or 3 losses.

 

Had to write this, because it's critical moment of successful signal providing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for providing us with the posts, of course nobody expects 100% winning ratio - it is actually on the opposite, whenever looses occur, just keep them to the min do not wait for the dd to accumulate or the market to turn back with you. keep this policy and we all are going to be happy :2c:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Williamfx65 said:
Thank you for providing us with the posts, of course nobody expects 100% winning ratio - it is actually on the opposite, whenever looses occur, just keep them to the min do not wait for the dd to accumulate or the market to turn back with you. keep this policy and we all are going to be happy :2c:

 

Very true... Unfortunately far not all understand it. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

do not worry, in this cases when the SP reaches this level, i have seen there is the red sign popping up - meaning even if those who do not understand the concept behind will react to the color of the label - red=danger :haha:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Williamfx65 said:
do not worry, in this cases when the SP reaches this level, i have seen there is the red sign popping up - meaning even if those who do not understand the concept behind will react to the color of the label - red=danger :haha:

 

Haha... Guess you're right about it. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Williamfx65 said:
hey my friend how is trading going?

winning or loosing? :rofl:

 

Getting used to trade from the new platform while transmitting trades automatically into Zulutrade enabled MT4. :)

 

Also released a longer-term system on Zipsignals (not many trades there, so Zulutrade compensation plan doesn't make much sense), which is about 380 pips ITM so far. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Williamfx65 said:
ohhh, and the Zipsignals does?

what is the difference between the two?

 

Well, compensation structure for SP at Zipsignals is similar to Collective2, membership fee regardless of the # of transactions, which makes perfect sense for swing trading systems with not too frequent trades.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.