Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Khaosphere

From Poker to Daytrading

Recommended Posts

This discussion on ES vs. YM and other markets is really interesting and I never thought of it from this point of view. I tried YM one day and I put my stop a few ticks below a swing low and it got taken out 3 times that day. I looked at ES and every time the swing L was not taken out. there was equal L but not LL. So I thought YM was a bit looser and my stops were safer with ES and I've been trading ES since.

 

I'll take another look at YM outside market hours with a new point of view.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll take another look at YM outside market hours with a new point of view.

 

You can take this a step further and simply look at SPY/DIA on a margin account.

To me the problem with futures is to put on any kind of sophisticated position sizing/risk management strategy you need an extremely well funded account otherwise you quickly run into having to put on .3 contracts and then have to fudge up or down so why bother with the sophisticated strategy. The limits on leverage also act as a hard risk manager..not being able to "go for the jugular" when "you know you are right" with 10X leverage is a good thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And on poker side in 2005 I won a World Series Of Poker Series Golden Ring which was depicted in this blog:

 

PokerPages.com Poker News - Harrah's Showboat, Atlantic City WSOP Circuit Event 1

!

 

That is really cool. I think one analogy to think about is to narrow down the instruments you are trading and trade the same instruments every day. Figure if you are trying to learn to play poker it doesn't make a lot of sense to try to get good at raz, stud, omaha, and holdem while studying euchre for fun in your spare time, all at the same time. You will probably just end up not being very good at any of them.

I actually think a good live player probably has a better skillset than a hardcore internet multitabler. Did you learn to play live or online starting out?

I would think a good live player skills as far as patience would overcome anything learned as far as quick decisions by multitablers just because of how bored a 16 tabler would be with trading since they aren't "doing" anything most the time.

I also think you have to come at trading the same way you would come at learning 2/5 no limit live as a newb, as if online poker didn't exist. Guys on 2+2 that try to learn to trade IMO don't get that they can't take 10,000 samples at "low stakes" like they did with online poker in order to figure out the game without going busto.

Most important though, if you are a winning poker player, don't forget that tactically poker and the markets have <b>absolutely</b> nothing to do with each other. The best skill you learn from poker is losing money when everything in your decision process said you should have won is what drives newb traders with no poker skill off the cliff IMO.

I've heard of some high stakes NYC game that Jim Simons plays in for fun...I would bet on you to beat Simon's heads up all the way. If someone made a double auction market heads up tick data game though, Rentech would be orders of magnitude harder to beat than Dwan or Ivey heads up. why? Don't confuse the rules of the game, they practically have nothing to do with each other.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey guys, I would love to join the discussion as well if it is ok. I was an equity Specialist on NYSE and AMEX for 16 years, recently went out on my own to day trade mainly as the first poster here stated, small - mid cap equity, large volume, very liquid.

 

I am trading in mostly 30-50K lots. I am using Schwab Street Smart Pro, and I feel after a few months that the system just isn't up to par with what I need. I am making 300-500 trades a month, and at 8.95 a pop it is definitely eating up some P. Although I don't believe I will do much better on the commission side, I am definitely looking for some feedback as far as what systems, brokerage, clearing, and front ends you are all using for equities.

 

I thank you in advance and will keep you a breast of my progress as well. Thanks for your time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hey guys, I would love to join the discussion as well if it is ok. I was an equity Specialist on NYSE and AMEX for 16 years, recently went out on my own to day trade mainly as the first poster here stated, small - mid cap equity, large volume, very liquid.

 

I am trading in mostly 30-50K lots. I am using Schwab Street Smart Pro, and I feel after a few months that the system just isn't up to par with what I need. I am making 300-500 trades a month, and at 8.95 a pop it is definitely eating up some P. Although I don't believe I will do much better on the commission side, I am definitely looking for some feedback as far as what systems, brokerage, clearing, and front ends you are all using for equities.

 

Interesting background, I look forward to hearing about your progress. I'm curious how you're trading. Trading off the DOM, using indicators, scalping or swinging, etc. Would you mind sharing your approach?

 

I use IB but I don't trade that size. MB has a flat rate for $4.95.

 

I'm curious, trading that big of size, why don't you trade futures? Do you find the edge is greater in stocks?

 

Thanks for sharing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Interesting background, I look forward to hearing about your progress. I'm curious how you're trading. Trading off the DOM, using indicators, scalping or swinging, etc. Would you mind sharing your approach?

 

I use IB but I don't trade that size. MB has a flat rate for $4.95.

 

I'm curious, trading that big of size, why don't you trade futures? Do you find the edge is greater in stocks?

 

Thanks for sharing.

 

I looked at RealTick by MasterTrader, seems most reasonable for my volume needs. I am really more concerned with who they clear through and where my orders are going to be routed, because when you are using someone who is not "in-housing" (which is a bulls*&t practice which the SEC totally dropped the ball on) then you are traded around all day by institutional volume which is being paired off. I hate the fact that an institution has access to my liquidity anytime they want but I am not privy to the orderflow they possess. But it is a fact of life in the retail world.

 

The reason I don't trade futures is a simple matter of "stick to what you know". I am self-teaching as we speak, but there is no guarantee I will ever get comfortable enough to trade them. I have an equity trading background and that is where I am most comfortable. With the right product, the proper DD and research, your risk is mainly headline risk, which is fine with me. In the event that some jackass from thestreet.com makes a video with his grandmothers camcorder in her living room and screams sell ETRADE, then I wait for the sheep to exit, wait for the street to cover their short and I resume. The world we love in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am really more concerned with who they clear through and where my orders are going to be routed, because when you are using someone who is not "in-housing" (which is a bulls*&t practice which the SEC totally dropped the ball on).

 

By "in-housing" you mean brokers who legally, and with your consent (in the docs you signed when you opened an account with them), take the other side of your trade?

 

Nothing wrong with that, in so long as you are getting the best price possible for your retail trade. Otherwise, it is akin to the bucketshop wirehouses of Dow/Gann/Livermore days.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I read 4 interesting books about trading (reminiscences of a stock operator, the visual investor,trading for a living, secrets for profiting in a bull and a bear market), opened an account on a discount broker website, etc...

 

Everything I really have to say to your IMHO, hazardous attempt to make money in the markets is: that it is absolutely haphazard. This is exactly the reason why I and brokers like you. Just the foundation of a well growing business...

 

Please don't be met in person. This is the mildest way you can get an well-meant advise.

 

Markets are not all guns and roses and by far not fearing poker players!

 

"Ten thousand hours of practice is required to achieve the level of mastery associated with being a world-class expert — in anything. In study after study, of composers, basketball players, fiction writers, ice skaters, concert pianists, chess players, master criminals, and what have you, this number comes up again and again. Ten thousand hours is the equivalent to roughly three hours per day, or twenty hours per week, of practice over ten years. Of course, this doesn’t address why some people don’t seem to get anywhere when they practice, and why some people get more out of their practice sessions than others. But no one has yet found a case in which true world-class expertise was accomplished in less time. It seems that it takes the brain this long to assimilate all that it needs to know to achieve true mastery.”

[source: Daniel Levitin : “This is Your Brain on Music”]

 

PS: When you get hurt really bad by the markets, you can come back and read this thread again, and then be honest by asking yourself: "....mmhh, which of the post had the most potential to open my eyes?"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
By "in-housing" you mean brokers who legally, and with your consent (in the docs you signed when you opened an account with them), take the other side of your trade?

 

Nothing wrong with that, in so long as you are getting the best price possible for your retail trade. Otherwise, it is akin to the bucketshop wirehouses of Dow/Gann/Livermore days.

 

Actually no, that is not what I mean, so please don't assume what I do mean, because you know what that does. But thanks anyway

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.