Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Dinerotrader

Increasing Your Position Size Over Time

Recommended Posts

so far all this discussion has centered on trade to account risk.

 

what about the dynamics of the trade based on the system once the "trade to account ratio" method is adopted, whatever it may be.

 

if a trader uses 2 lots and does well by scaling out (helping to create a smoother equity curve), does that trader then go to 3 lots at a certain level; or wait until the level that would allow 4 lots. the 4 lots would obviously keep the multiple the same. with a different multiple the system changes and there are now several ways to scale out rather than 1: 2/3 then 1/3, 1/3 then 2/3, or 1/3, 1/3, 1/3

 

this isn't an argument about the merits of scaling out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  bootstrap said:
i do not advocate the numbers directly, but the scale. or maybe the process is a better term. it is something that i found early on and is given to me by a bond futures trader. its % of capital based on a risk

 

$5k to $7500 = 10% or $500

$7500 to $12500 = 7.5% or $600

$12500 to $20k = 5% or $625

$20k to $32500 = 3% or $600

$32500 to $50k = 2% or $650

$50K + = 1% or

 

Are these per trade?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is always a great question to discuss. While there are many ways to increase your position size over time I like to take a very basic approach. I'm willing to risk no more than 3% of my account per trade. I will add size to my trading as I continue to build my account size.

 

It's important to know you market as well. As you continue to build size, you need to make sure you are trading a liquid market. Trading 5 contracts on CL is no problem but trading 25 contracts could lead to some issues. So obviously you will need to put in a cap at some point.

 

Bottom line is I have to keep things simple for myself. Sure you can use other methods out there that can get pretty deep into the numbers but I have to constantly remind myself of the KISS method. If I don't keep it simple I start to lose focus of executing my trade plan. This also means for most of my trading I'm all in and all out. I don't scale in or out of a position. It just makes it too difficult for me on the execution side of things. Not saying this is the best method by any meand. Just what fits my style.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I keep to stats - growth is just a percentage of capital

 

if system says setup wins > 85% of the time it will risk 30%

> 70% < 85% risk 20%

> 50% < 70% risk 10%

 

of course profit is all about exits

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

An experience I had early on as a trader comes to mind on this topic. A trader who had been very successful while being backed by an arcade was now trading at the same firm where I worked but was now a client. I was quite privileged in this sense as I knew and socialised with some really good traders. Having done very well as a client, he had reached a plateau seemingly and actually I was trading bigger size than him(I was actually made to - it wasn't my choice!!). He asked me how I dealt with it. I can't remember exactly what I said as a young cocky(not too cocky!) trader, but it was something along the lines of I try not to look at size in any way other than mechanically whether it affects my ability to enter and exit the market. I trade the same way as I traded a 1 lot. This wasn't strictly true as it got to a point where I was pushed to do too much size and a couple of 'bad beat' trades affected me for a while. The client actually upped his size and carried on doing pretty well just with bigger size.

 

So my idea is to correctly size your trades is to have a thorough money management plan but also understand how you deal with the fluctuations psychologically. For me, they are symbiotic.

 

Sorry for the ramble!

 

TheNegotiator.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The correct formula for position sizing is as follow:

Units = 1% of account/Dollar market volatility

Dollar market volatility = ATR(20) x Dollar value per point

 

So lets say you have a 50k account:

 

Dollar market volatility = 10 (rounded for SPX) x $50 (ES point) = $500

Units = $500 (1% of 50k) / $500 (DMV) = 1 UNIT you should be trading on ES

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I start each day trading small size in CL and if I get a few winners, I will risk a great deal more on the next trade. To borrow a gambling term. I try to "parlay" my win to a bigger win. If I lose, I am still ahead for the day ( and pissed as all hell that I gave some back. I am human). To stay at the higher amounts, you are going to need to win at the higher amounts. In short, you need a lucky break. You really need to fight to get to higher levels and fight to stay there. We are trading traders who want your money as badly as we want theirs. One day you have to step up to the plate with more risk. And there is a good possibility that you are going to start losing a losing streak when you decide to step up.

 

Reading Market Wizards, you will see that most of those guys did have a lucky break. Chances are that had they not had that lucky break when they had it, they may never have made it into that book. One bond trader who is a scalper, his name slips my mind, tells his story of one day taking 100 contracts. Before that the most he had done was 50.According to the story he started 6 months earlier with 25k. Subsequently he traded as many as 2000 contacts in tbonds. The point is that he went from 50-100 and he won with 100 and never looked back. Had he lost, he might have become a clerk at the CBOT.

 

Personally I have gone from trading qm to trading cl, but have not been able to build enough yet to increase the starting size of my trades in CL.

 

I see this as the quickest way. I suppose you can do it more gradually, but that could take a very long time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  SunnyJHarris said:
No, this is the one I teach my students. It comes with the territory.

 

What territory is that? :D

 

I guess you are being deliberately obtuse? Let me spell it out for you, unless you are a sponsor it is frowned upon to use the forums to solicit business. Referencing people to your paid for product (whether you buy the product outright or it's part of some sort of 'education') is soliciting.

 

Vendors are made very welcome here if they contribute. 'Check out my site chock full of dubious products and services' is not contributing. Oh and before you take umbrage at 'dubious' I have always held a low regard for people that sell indicators and studies that are available in the public domain. Some of yours fall into that category.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  TheNegotiator said:

 

So my idea is to correctly size your trades is to have a thorough money management plan but also understand how you deal with the fluctuations psychologically. For me, they are symbiotic.

 

Sorry for the ramble!

 

TheNegotiator.

 

Absolutely agreed. Rules of MM are rules and changing or ignoring them can lead to high consequences.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 7th April 2025.   Asian Markets Plunge as US-China Trade War Escalates; Wall Street Futures Signal Further Turmoil.   Global financial markets extended last week’s massive sell-off as tensions between the US and its major trading partners deepened, rattling investors and prompting sharp declines across equities, commodities, and currencies. The fallout from President Trump’s sweeping new tariff measures continued to spread, raising fears of a full-blown trade war and economic recession.   Asian stock markets plunged on Monday, extending a global market rout fueled by rising tensions between the US and China. The latest wave of aggressive tariffs and retaliatory measures has unnerved investors worldwide, triggering sharp sell-offs across the Asia-Pacific region.   Asian equities led the global rout on Monday, with dramatic losses seen across the region. Japan’s Nikkei 225 index tumbled more than 8% shortly after the open, while the broader Topix fell over 6.5%, recovering only slightly from steeper losses. In mainland China, the Shanghai Composite sank 6.7%, and the blue-chip CSI300 dropped 7.5% as markets reopened following a public holiday. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index opened more than 9% lower, reflecting deep concerns about escalating trade tensions.           South Korea’s Kospi dropped 4.8%, triggering a circuit breaker designed to curb panic selling. Taiwan’s Taiex index collapsed by nearly 10%, with major tech exporters like TSMC and Foxconn hitting circuit breaker limits after each fell close to 10%. Meanwhile, Australia’s ASX 200 shed as much as 6.3%, and New Zealand’s NZX 50 lost over 3.5%.   Despite the escalation, Beijing has adopted a measured tone. Chinese officials urged investors not to panic and assured markets that the country has the tools to mitigate economic shocks. At the same time, they left the door open for renewed trade talks, though no specific timeline has been set.   US Stock Futures Plunge Ahead of Monday Open   US stock futures pointed to another brutal day on Wall Street. Futures tied to the S&P 500 dropped over 3%, Nasdaq futures sank 4%, and Dow Jones futures lost 2.5%—equivalent to nearly 1,000 points. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, down more than 20% from its recent highs, while the S&P 500 is nearing bear territory. The Dow closed last week in correction. Oil prices followed suit, with WTI crude dropping over 4% to $59.49 per barrel—its lowest since April 2021.   Wall Street closed last week in disarray, erasing more than $5 trillion in value amid fears of an all-out trade war. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, sinking more than 20% from its recent peak. The S&P 500 is approaching bear territory, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average has slipped firmly into correction territory.   German Banks Hit Hard Amid Escalating Trade Tensions   German banking stocks were among the worst hit in Europe. Shares of Commerzbank and Deutsche Bank plunged between 9.5% and 10.3% during early Frankfurt trading, compounding Friday’s steep losses. Fears over a global trade war and looming recession are severely impacting the financial sector, particularly export-driven economies like Germany.   Eurozone Growth at Risk   Eurozone officials are bracing for economic fallout, with Greek central bank governor Yannis Stournaras warning that Trump’s tariff policy could reduce eurozone GDP by up to 1%. The EU is preparing retaliatory tariffs on $28 billion worth of American goods—ranging from steel and aluminium to consumer products like dental floss and luxury jewellery.   Starting Wednesday, the US is expected to impose 25% tariffs on key EU exports, with Brussels ready to respond with its own 20% levies on nearly all remaining American imports.   UK Faces £22 Billion Economic Blow   In the UK, fresh research from KPMG revealed that the British economy could shrink by £21.6 billion by 2027 due to US-imposed tariffs. The analysis points to a 0.8% dip in economic output over the next two years, undermining Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ growth agenda. The report also warned of additional fiscal pressure that may lead to future tax increases and public spending cuts.   Wall Street Braces for Recession   Goldman Sachs revised its US recession probability to 45% within the next year, citing tighter financial conditions and rising policy uncertainty. This marks a sharp jump from the 35% risk estimated just last month—and more than double January’s 20% projection. J.P. Morgan issued a bleaker outlook, now forecasting a 60% chance of recession both in the US and globally.   Global Leaders Respond as Trade Tensions Deepen   The dramatic market sell-off was triggered by China’s sweeping retaliation to a new round of US tariffs, which included a 34% levy on all American imports. Beijing’s state-run People’s Daily released a defiant statement, asserting that China has the tools and resilience to withstand economic pressure from Washington. ‘We’ve built up experience after years of trade conflict and are prepared with a full arsenal of countermeasures,’ it stated.   Around the world, policymakers are responding to the growing threat of a trade-led economic slowdown. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba announced plans to appeal directly to Washington and push for tariff relief, following the US administration’s decision to impose a blanket 24% tariff on Japanese imports. He aims to visit the US soon to present Japan’s case as a fair trade partner.   In Taiwan, President Lai Ching-te said his administration would work closely with Washington to remove trade barriers and increase purchases of American goods in an effort to reduce the bilateral trade deficit. The island's defence ministry has also submitted a new list of US military procurements to highlight its strategic partnership.   Economists and strategists are warning of deeper economic consequences. Ronald Temple, chief market strategist at Lazard, said the scale and speed of these tariffs could result in far more severe damage than previously anticipated. ‘This isn’t just a bilateral conflict anymore — more countries are likely to respond in the coming weeks,’ he noted.   Analysts at Barclays cautioned that smaller Asian economies, such as Singapore and South Korea, may face challenges in negotiating with Washington and are already adjusting their economic growth forecasts downward in response to the unfolding trade crisis.           Oil Prices Sink on Demand Concerns   Crude oil continued its sharp slide on Monday, driven by recession fears and weakened global demand. Brent fell 3.9% to $63.04 a barrel, while WTI plunged over 4% to $59.49—both benchmarks marking weekly losses exceeding 10%. Analysts say inflationary pressures and slowing economic activity may drag demand down, even though energy imports were excluded from the latest round of tariffs.   Vandana Hari of Vanda Insights noted, ‘The market is struggling to find a bottom. Until there’s a clear signal from Trump that calms recession fears, crude prices will remain under pressure.’   OPEC+ Adds Further Pressure with Output Hike   Bearish sentiment intensified after OPEC+ announced it would boost production by 411,000 barrels per day in May, far surpassing the expected 135,000 bpd. The alliance called on overproducing nations to submit compensation plans by April 15. Analysts fear this surprise move could undo years of supply discipline and weigh further on already fragile oil markets.   Global political risks also flared over the weekend. Iran rejected US proposals for direct nuclear negotiations and warned of potential military action. Meanwhile, Russia claimed fresh territorial gains in Ukraine’s Sumy region and ramped up attacks on surrounding areas—further darkening the outlook for markets.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • AMZN Amazon stock watch, good buying (+313%) toi hold onto the 173.32 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?AMZN
    • META stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 507.48, 557.84 at https://stockconsultant.com/?META
    • TMUS T-Mobile stock, watch for a top of range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?TMUS
    • KULR KULR Technology stock watch, pullback to 1.25 triple support area with bullish indicators at https://stockconsultant.com/?KULR
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.