Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

pandion

Robert Miner--Dynamic Trader

Recommended Posts

Hello all-

I'm new here... new to trading, but have worked in finance and the markets my whole career (fundamental analysis, value, long term investing). Has anyone here used Robert Miner's software, or just his approach to trading in general? It seems intuitive to me. His book I thought was well done, but trying to determine if I should shell out $2,000 for his software. It seems like TradeStation's market scanner could probably get me a lot of what Miner's scanning does with his software. Does Miner's software have anything else that is just not doable through TS? The one proprieatary thing only his software offers is his DTosc oscillator. Is that much better than regular stochastics... can anyone compare the two and if there is any practical differences?

 

Any other swing trading approaches I should look into? I dont' want to kill myself for looking for the elusive holy grail... but would like to be aware if there is anything blatant I am missing.

 

thank you

Drew

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You won't make it if you are always tailing. You need to implement your own ideas instead of buying and selling with everyone else. His system is complete garbage, put the 2k into a micro account and start learning on your own.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Totally agree with sicktrader. When I was first starting out I bought his software and his book and his daily reports. This was back in late 2003. His reports were extremely bearish and stayed that way for at least a year which is as long as I stayed subscribed. His software is nothing fancy, you can get the same tools in virtually any much cheaper software. We all know what the market started in late 2003, a massive massive rally.

 

Stay away from him and his stuff. I'd be ultra surprised if that guy could trade his way out of a wet paper bag using the approach he recommends.

 

With kind regards,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't comment on Miners software (I did read some of his stuff when god was a boy, can't have been that memorable as I don't recall much about it). I have to respectfully disagree about forging your own way. There are plenty of systems, methods and approaches for sale and in the public domain that can be traded profitably. There are some right here on TL. Some gurus spread this idea ('you have to make it your own') to hide the fact that the stuff they are peddling is not particularly efficacious. The reason that people fail at trading is more likely to be that they can not consistently follow a system or method rather than it being 'faulty'.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DTosc is StochasticRSI available here.

 

where would I find that? Is it written somewhere in Trade Station "Easy Language?" I am not a programmer, so would need a lot of hand holding to get it set up properly in TS.

 

thanks for your response

Drew

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have read and enjoyed his book - and do feel that there is useful information that is tradeable. As far as the software - though it makes external retracements, internal retracements, and symmetry retracements alot easier to do in TS - do I really want to spend 2K on a program that is nicer to draw lines with? In the end - I dont see any other benefit to it. (I was never was interested in the screener - since I trade the same basket of stocks and futures - I can easily scan that basket for my set ups)

 

You can get pretty damn fast with TS in drawing the lines after a little practice.

 

Carolyn Boroden is another trader who learned Miner's methods - and trades it on a daily basis. (FibQueen is her moniker - and has also written a book somewhat similar to Miner's but with more emphasis towards day trading. I have joined her trading room in the past for a free trial and watched her trade these set ups in multiple futures market with success. She gives out some free videos daily on trading that style - so I would recommend her as a resource for free daily "examples". (fibonacciqueen.com)

 

As far as his ability to trade - I have no idea. MidKnight might be right about his lack of ability to find sunlight while stuck in a hole on a summer day. But is success in a field a prerequisite for passing on useful information? (A good question. I would argue yes if you want that person to be a mentor. I would argue no if they are merely a conduit of information that they are passing on to you in a useful way. Business/Law/Medical schools are prime examples of the latter.) I know he did win the Robbins Trading Contest in the 90's in the future market (mentioned in a Traders Audio interview Traders Interviews - View - TraderPlanet, but I have no idea who he was against/etc.) So who knows.

 

I think the best thing he has taught me is trading in two time frames - and obeying the direction of the higher time frame. In looking at my trading journal - those trades have a much higher win rate than the other trades. (as they say - the trend is your friend).

 

I agree with Blowfish - in the end it has more to do with the trader pulling the trigger than the system they are using. Good luck.

 

 

Peace

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

An alternative to DTosc could be a double smoothed stoch, the dtosc isn't going to provide you anything different IMO. I have the software but am no longer using it... Wish i could sell it off but I can't... To be fair from my understanding Carolyn B is not a trader she offers a service that plots Fib S/R and Fib extension targets using Miner's methods minus EW. But she is an analyst not a trader. EW was tough for me so i dropped it... My suggestion would be go the Wyckoff way...

 

l8r

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.