Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

sicktrader

Most Forex Brokers Are ....

Recommended Posts

Well, I don't know the answer, which is why I'm asking. Do most/some/a few/no brokers actually manipulate the price so that you get stopped? My success has been in the currency futures, and I have opened an account for Forex to see if this arena will be better or worse. BUT, I have always been told to get a sound broker, which makes me laugh. I always pictures those poor guys in their cubiles doing anything for a buck and they think they are the cat's ass. I picked an off the wall broker for my futures and everything has been just fine for quite a few years. Anyway, if I just threw a dart at a board full of brokers, all with similar margins, how can I get fvcked? I don't know the answer. Sure, in futures when the price just goes just to my stop then moves 100 points in the other direction, I feel like I have just been bent over the kitchen table. At the same time, I know that my 10-30 contarcts shouldn't be a big deal, and it was all market driven. Please help, I am playing live with a bit of cash in the Forex now, but perhaps some of your experiences will lead me to change brokers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ha. Could be the case. I am actually hoping that they are more like my bookies in the fact that they don't cheat me, they may get my cash at the end of the week or I might get theirs, but everything is done fair and square. For any gamblers out there, here is my Saturday card: Dayton u/115' (2'), Iona+1 (2'), St.Peters o/126' (2'), cuse-1 (2'), kansas-3 (2').

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll give you my opinion of mt4 when I tried them out, which a lot of people seem to swear by.... I was getting requoted constantly, where entry within a few pips is very important for me..., my fills where no where near price quoted.... I remember thinking what a rip off...

 

Later I heard that mt4 have plug ins for delays in execution and slippage, but hey make your own mind up...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'll give you my opinion of mt4 when I tried them out, which a lot of people seem to swear by.... I was getting requoted constantly, where entry within a few pips is very important for me..., my fills where no where near price quoted.... I remember thinking what a rip off...

 

Later I heard that mt4 have plug ins for delays in execution and slippage, but hey make your own mind up...

 

You know that MT is the charting platform that many different FX brokers use and is not a broker by itself?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You know that MT is the charting platform that many different FX brokers use and is not a broker by itself?

 

 

Of course, but mt4 provides the plug ins for brokers to use as they see fit

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Of course, but mt4 provides the plug ins for brokers to use as they see fit

 

I was just asking since you said you were getting requoted and got bad fills when using MT which sound like you didn't understand the distinction between the broker you were using and MT. So your experience was really due to the broker you were using and not because the charting platform was MT.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'll repeat. Apparently MT provide virtual dealer plug ins for their platform that regulates execution by up to 5 seconds. Are you connected with MT?

 

I have no affiliation at all with MT and is not using it. MT is a tool. This is your broker that made use of the feature. Just because the one broker you have tested it with made use of the tool in a specific way, does not mean it is not a bad tool and that all brokers will do that. This is a big difference and the part you seems to have missed when you said the below and made it look like you thought that MT and your broker was one and the same thing.

 

I'll give you my opinion of mt4 when I tried them out, which a lot of people seem to swear by.... I was getting requoted constantly, where entry within a few pips is very important for me..., my fills where no where near price quoted.... I remember thinking what a rip off...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi group I am a Forex trader and as you know the platform MT4 is almost universal now.

Almost all indicators and EAs that are used in Forex are coded with mq4 language and only work on MT4s. As far as brokers go there are good ones and bad ones. They are not regulated as the stock market is. However they are much more liquid. If your good you you will make a lot of money but it takes a lot of hard work.

Happy trading

Randy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya,

 

I think in the FX land there are lots of shady brokers so it pays (literally) to put them under the microscope. I use an Oanda account as a test bed for trading just because you can set the trade size to absolutely any size you want and experience it with real data. I've had no issues with them. I use interactive brokers IDEALPRO product for my serious FX trades and have had no issue with them either. From my experience, IB offers an honest ECN product for the FX world.

 

I hope this helps ya some. GL with the bookies,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Heya

 

I think it is important to use a regulated broker, this will ensure that 1. It is not a scam and 2. Your money is safe and can be withdrawn with no problems. One good regulated broker I use is UWCFX. They are based in Cyprus, regulated by Cysec and have a very professional setup with various accounts and different types of spread to accommodate most peoples trading strategies.

 

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi group I am a Forex trader and as you know the platform MT4 is almost universal now.

Almost all indicators and EAs that are used in Forex are coded with mq4 language and only work on MT4s. As far as brokers go there are good ones and bad ones. They are not regulated as the stock market is. However they are much more liquid. If your good you you will make a lot of money but it takes a lot of hard work.

Happy trading

Randy

 

All true however those considering spot FX should be aware that if your broker is actually a bookie (most of them) you will not have access to that liquidity as the 'broker' will be the counter party, of course if their book becomes lopsided they might choose to hedge that risk in the actual market but as a customer you will not have access to it (the market).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been testing a few FX brokers now for a while against Interactive Brokers. I've found that the ones that use MT4 (at least for Interbank fx and fxdd) have big spreads (which they are upfront about) BUT I've found Oanda (which does not use MT4 but has super crappy charting without any third party add-ons available) has spreads that are just as tight as Interactive Brokers but without the commission on EUR/USD(1pip spread) and USD/JPY(0.9pip spread) . For a few split seconds though; InteractiveBrokers spreads can get super tight ( EURUSD and USDJPY can get to 0.5pip spread)

 

I've chosen to use both Oanda and IB for trading but like to have MT up for some long term charting and indicators

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Handy list. Looks like a fair number have an institutional slant but things are clearly improving for retail guys.

 

Edit: The notes at the bottom of the list are handy for those that don't know the differences between types of 'broker'.

Edited by BlowFish

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol people that do not trade Forex place comments like that..

To you who used the word SCUM you should be old enough to know that one size does not fit all and you do not paint with such a broad brush. I make money everyday probably more than most trades here trading futures and my Broker has always been good , honest, no stop hunting etc.

It's not on the above list but should be the name Broco trading.

randy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The answer is post 2 Randy. It is not a question of one size fits all there are actually only two sizes. Most 'brokers' are not, they are in fact bookies. That's why people can not agree they are comparing chalk and cheese.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Again you do not know what your talking about and it shows. At least when I go into a forum of traders other than Forex I try to be a bit humble as I know they would know more than I since they trade it.

But you sir know nothing about the Forex market, you get on the bang wagon with the old wise tales and BS about the Forex market. And anyone that is a real Forex trader can see it a mile away. Like i said unless you can be a little open in that mind of yours you should keep those comments to yourself . They simply do no good.

 

There are many spot Forex brokers that are legit,regulated , that have excellent liquidity providers etc. Your money is safe. Now I will admit the

industry is not well regulated and if your stupid enough to go with a broker that is a bucket shop you only have yourself to blame. There are plenty of honest good ones out there. The US sucks for trading it's a horrible country these days and just because it's regulated more you think it's a better place to trade?

 

Anyhow nuff said you guys have your little stories, personally I think your just jealous of the Forex industry and pissed that you don't know how or not a good enough trader to make money at it. You do not see me or other Forex traders jumping on your trading do we?

good luck with that

randy

 

 

 

The answer is post 2 Randy. It is not a question of one size fits all there are actually only two sizes. Most 'brokers' are not, they are in fact bookies. That's why people can not agree they are comparing chalk and cheese.
Edited by randy1953

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Again you do not know what your talking about and it shows. At least when I go into a forum of traders other than Forex I try to be a bit humble as I know they would know more than I since they trade it.

But you sir know nothing about the Forex market, you get on the bang wagon with the old wise tales and BS about the Forex market. And anyone that is a real Forex trader can see it a mile away. Like i said unless you can be a little open in that mind of yours you should keep those comments to yourself . They simply do no good.

 

There are many spot Forex brokers that are legit,regulated , that have excellent liquidity providers etc. Your money is safe. Now I will admit the

industry is not well regulated and if your stupid enough to go with a broker that is a bucket shop you only have yourself to blame. There are plenty of honest good ones out there. The US sucks for trading it's a horrible country these days and just because it's regulated more you think it's a better place to trade?

 

Anyhow nuff said you guys have your little stories, personally I think your just jealous of the Forex industry and pissed that you don't know how or not a good enough trader to make money at it. You do not see me or other Forex traders jumping on your trading do we?

good luck with that

randy

 

I don't know whether you are being deliberately obtuse or you did not read my posts properly. You attribute things to me that I have never said. I have tried not to make any judgement calls about anything or anyone. I certainly have not used any words like 'scum'. I will re-state things as plainly as I can.

 

Point 1)

1) There are two broad types of forex 'brokers'.

a) Brokers that allow transparent trading on an ECN.

b) Bookies (or Market Makers if you prefer) that take the other side of your bet/trade.

 

Point 2)

Many people that are critical of spot FX are talking about type b) (though not all there are straight up market makers).

 

Many people that are not critical of spot FX (or are even enthusiastic) are talking about type a)

 

Point 3)

Many of the disagreements about experience (which if you look back in this thread and actually read carefully what I said I have not offered my experience) come about because the naysayers are talking about two completely different set ups.

 

The irony is if you looked at what I had actually said rather than what you think I meant you might find that we agree. If you want to discuss what I have said fine, but the ad hominem attacks obscure your argument rather than add gravitas.

 

To make it simple (again) if you are saying that there are staright brokers out there that a retail trader can make money with trading spot FX, I agree. Not only that but depending how you trade you can do absolutely fine with both types. There now you have my opinion as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't know whether you are being deliberately obtuse or you did not read my posts properly. You attribute things to me that I have never said. I have tried not to make any judgement calls about anything or anyone. I certainly have not used any words like 'scum'.

 

 

 

:did I say that?:

 

SCUM.

 

Clear enough for ya? Just my opinion, since you asked for it....

 

 

And here's why:

 

 

 

Check out the difference between my Ninja/Gain chart and my Oanda chart. These are both the 1 minute EUR/USD chart...

 

I've never seen such an extreme difference between the two.

 

This is frustrating...I can't wait to trade futures again! ;)

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=20682&d=1271769265

 

 

 

Leave it to the bucket shops to confirm my opinion... :rofl:

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your NT is screwed up not the broker. I have cross reference many many forex brokers nd at the most you could see 1 to 2 pips..

I have no idea where you guys get this stuff but I can see why you feel like you do you got wrong info simple as that

I f I check my broker with Onanda it's right on the money as it should be..I have no idea what your doing and I don't want to learn..

randy

 

 

 

:did I say that?:

 

 

 

 

And here's why:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Leave it to the bucket shops to confirm my opinion... :rofl:

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • Date: 8th April 2025.   Markets Rebound Cautiously as US-China Tariff Tensions Deepen     Global markets staged a tentative recovery on Tuesday following a wave of volatility sparked by escalating trade tensions between the United States and China. The Asia-Pacific region showed signs of stability after a chaotic start to the week—though some pockets remained under pressure. Taiwan’s Taiex dropped 4.4%, dragged lower by losses in tech heavyweight TSMC. The world’s largest chipmaker fell another 4% on Tuesday and has now slumped 13.5% since April 2, when US President Donald Trump first unveiled what he called ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs.   However, broader sentiment across the region turned more positive, with several markets rebounding sharply after Monday’s dramatic sell-offs. Japan’s Nikkei 225 surged over 6% in early trading, rebounding from an 18-month low. South Korea’s Kospi rose marginally, and Australia’s ASX 200 gained 1.9%, driven by strength in mining stocks. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng rose 1.6%, though still far from recovering from Monday’s 13.2% crash—its worst day since the 1997 Asian financial crisis. China’s Shanghai Composite added 0.9%.   In Europe, DAX and FTSE 100 are up more than 1% in opening trade. EU Commission President von der Leyen repeated yesterday that the EU had offered reciprocal zero tariffs on manufactured goods previously and continues to stand by that offer. Others are also trying again to talk to Trump to get some sort of agreement that limits the impact.   Much of the rally appeared to be driven by dip-buying, as well as hopes that the intensifying trade war could still be defused through negotiations.   China Strikes Back: ‘We Will Fight to the End’   Tensions reached a boiling point after Trump threatened to impose an additional 50% tariff on all Chinese imports unless Beijing rolled back its retaliatory measures by April 8. ‘If China does not withdraw its 34% increase above their already long-term trading abuses by tomorrow... the United States will impose additional tariffs on China of 50%,’ Trump declared on social media.   If implemented, the new tariffs would bring total US duties on Chinese goods to a staggering 124%, factoring in the existing 20%, the 34% recently announced, and the proposed 50%.   In response, China’s Ministry of Commerce issued a stern warning, stating: ‘The US threat to escalate tariffs is a mistake on top of a mistake... If the US insists on its own way, China will fight to the end.’ The ministry also called for equal and respectful dialogue, though signs of compromise on either side remain scarce.   Beijing acted quickly to contain a market fallout. State funds intervened to support equities, and the People’s Bank of China set the yuan fixing at its weakest level since September 2023 to boost export competitiveness. Additionally, five-year interest rate swaps in China fell to their lowest levels since 2020, indicating potential for further monetary easing.   Trump Talks Tough on EU Too   Trump’s hardline approach extended beyond China. Speaking at a press conference, he rejected the European Union’s offer to eliminate tariffs on cars and industrial goods, accusing the bloc of ‘being very bad to us.’ He insisted that Europe would need to source its energy from the US, claiming the US could ‘knock off $350 billion in one week.’   The EU, meanwhile, backed away from a proposed 50% retaliatory tariff on American whiskey, opting instead for 25% duties on selected US goods in response to Trump’s steel and aluminium tariffs.     Volatile Wall Street Adds to the Drama   Wall Street experienced wild swings on Monday as investors processed the rapidly evolving trade conflict. The S&P 500 briefly fell 4.7% before rebounding 3.4%, nearly erasing its losses in what could have been its biggest one-day jump in years—if it had held. The Dow Jones Industrial Average sank by as much as 1,700 points early in the day but later climbed nearly 900 points before closing 349 points lower, down 0.9%. The Nasdaq ended up 0.1%.   The brief rally was fueled by a false rumour that Trump was considering a 90-day pause on tariffs—rumours that the White House quickly labelled ‘fake news.’ The market's sharp reaction underscored how desperate investors are for any sign that tensions might ease.   Oil Markets in Focus: Goldman Sachs Revises Forecasts   Crude prices also reflected the uncertainty, with US crude briefly dipping below $60 per barrel for the first time since 2021. As of early Tuesday, Brent crude was trading at $64.72, while WTI hovered around $61.26.   Goldman Sachs, in a note dated April 7, lowered its average price forecasts for Brent and WTI through 2025 and 2026, citing mounting recession risks and the potential for higher-than-expected supply from OPEC+.       Under a base-case scenario where the US avoids a recession and tariffs are reduced significantly before the April 9 implementation date, Goldman sees Brent at $62 per barrel and WTI at $58 by December 2025. These figures fall further to $55 and $51, respectively, by the end of 2026. This outlook also assumes moderate output increases from eight OPEC+ countries, with incremental boosts of 130,000–140,000 barrels per day in June and July.   However, should the US slip into a typical recession and OPEC production aligns with the bank’s baseline assumptions, Brent could retreat to $58 by the end of this year and to $50 by December 2026.   In a more bearish scenario involving a global GDP slowdown and no change to OPEC+ output levels, Brent prices might fall to $54 by year-end and $45 by late 2026. The most extreme projection—based on a simultaneous economic downturn and a full reversal of OPEC+ production cuts—would see Brent plunge to below $40 per barrel by the end of 2026.   Goldman noted that oil prices could outperform forecasts significantly if there was a dramatic shift in tariff policy and a surprise in global demand recovery.   Cautious Optimism, But Warnings Persist   With both Washington and Beijing showing no signs of backing down, markets are likely to remain volatile in the days ahead. Investors now turn their attention to upcoming trade meetings and policy decisions, hoping for clarity in what has become one of the most unpredictable trading environments in recent years.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.