Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Snitzer

Checklists?

Recommended Posts

It was last April when I decided that now was a really good time to enter the markets. I did, and yes, I made a little money, but then, the village idiot could have made money in that run-up. But the easy money has been made, and maybe I could cash out with my modest gains, but it appears I'm hooked. In order to stay I need to reassess how I go about evaluating companies, before purchase, whilst holding and after sale. The plan is to devise a pre-purchase, or even a pre-watchlist, checklist, covering both fundamental and technical aspects of the company I've got my eyes on. I've a couple pages of ideas, some of which I'm sure will never see the light of day, but any comments/suggestions would be most welcome.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There was an interesting article in the UKs FT paper about two months ago about investors using checklists and how they are often ignored, underused and yet a very valuable tool. I read the paper copy but I am sure you could find it online.

Pilots use checklists all the time and its proven that in doing so - safety is improved. After a while even though muscle memory will take over a lot of what happens in a normal checklist, mistakes will still occur.

Charlie Munger also has a checklist of things to look out for when investing in a company - this checklist involved assessing to ensure that he was not biasing his decisions in some way

Google "charlie munger bias checklist" it should be the first one that comes up.

 

In terms of what your checklist contains - thats up to you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the interesting thread...

 

In the last two weeks I read "The Checklist Manifesto: How to Get Things Right" by Atul Gawande. My first impression was that this book is just too big; checklists are simple. Right? Gawande is on a mission to make the medical world less dangerous and he has done a fine job.

 

He divides the activities we must complete with low error into those tasks that are:

 

Simple

Complicated

Complex

 

Gawande gives great examples on how extremely complex operations lasting several days in one case were accomplished via checklists. And, that as checklists have become standard practice the statistical results leave no doubt in its success.

 

From my notes:

 

Checklists help to distinguish between 'Right Knowledge' and 'Knowledge Application'.

 

In building construction in the mid 20th century the 'Master Builder' would manage all of the general contractors and work out the details. Today, building construction is too complicated for a 'Master Builder' approach but must rely on computer checklists combined with 'feedback loops' to communicate schedule and detail changes in real time.

 

Task Saturation: is one example that pilots have known from some time. Task tempo is so fast that missing a step may be fatal.

 

Task Expertise: Some emergencies are so rare that you do not want to rely on stale training and flawed memory to execute.

 

Task Change: When tasks change it is easier to republish a checklist than to retrain and educate the entire work force. He gave several examples of how the FAA will publish a safety change at it is proprogated throughout the airlines with hours. It is not an exception, but part of the process.

 

Good checklists:

5 to 9 items

Do not try to include everything

Checklists are either 'Do Confirm' or 'Read Do'

 

I have a 'start-up' checklist I use in the morning before the market opens and I can go through it faster than trying to remember if I have everything up and running without using a checklist. My evening 'preparation' checklist of news and market levels still needs more work.

 

I have also formalized my 'Emergency Checklists' with broker phone numbers and placed the checklist and URLs on my iphone.

 

I want to focus on trades instead of the mechanics of trading.

 

Trading is a business: mistakes cost money and more importantly time. I recommend the book if you have any interest in checklists.

 

Good Trading...

Edited by ramora

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In no particular order, not thoroughly thought out, but something of what I'm thinking about. Shoot it full of holes, stomp on it, kick it around, bite chunks tear it all apart just please, add the Why.

Stock Checklist (Rough Version)

Picking a stock (company): Portfolio allocation/sector/where do we want to go today?

Diversify! Maintain a watched stable, become intimate with their performance patterns, be ready to take advantage of sudden moves. (I did that, one of my small successes: DRIV)

Maintain an indicator watch list; i.e. dollar ETFs, commodities, transports, energy, plastic packagers, etc.

Sector: Where is it? Going up? Down? Sideways? Market forces? Future direction? My current exposure/experience.

Develop stock screener chops, work with different screens, play, have fun.

Company: Market trend/is this company leading, following or stumbling about? Check competitors-always. Check institutional buying. Check industry relative strength (How?).

Technicals: Trend/patterns/support/resistance. Use my favorite indicators; BB, RSI, STO, MACD.

BUY THE F****** DIPS/SELL THE F****** PEAKS!!!!

Or buy and hold; whatever the strategy DuJour is.

Use intelligent trailing stops. Lots of noise within the trend set loose stops; a quiet trend then set them close. Let the stops work, upside targets can be exceeded with no loss of karma.

Fundamentals: Lots of stuff here; Revenue, profits, backwards, forwards, whatever. Then P/E, EPS, Dividends, Yields and Book Value. Visit Edgar, learn how to read (and stay awake while doing so) SEC filings.

Markets slow, no available cash heading towards your brokerage account? Paper trade, not as much fun but can be a learning experience.

Assess past perfomance (Of course, you maintain that Sold watch list, right?) and be prepared to relight an old flame.

Identify past mistakes (mine were too little of too many stocks, held for too short a time frame, and trying to trade whilst still deep in the grip of total ignorance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Snitzer,

 

How long are you planning on holding on to these positions? Your holding time will really effect what is on your checklist. If you are thinking a shorter term trade like a few weeks to a few months then I would focus more on technical analysis. If you are talking about taking a position for an extended amount of time then the fundamentals could come into play.

 

I have found that most traders will eventually become either fundamental traders or technical traders. For me I focus on the technicals. The buy and hold markets based off of fundamentals are gone in my opinion. Being able to play the markets on the upside and downside is crucial in todays environment. The only way to do this is to watch the price action.

 

Cuttshot

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.