Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

charles1

Ultra T Bod

Recommended Posts

this new instrument has been trading since Jan.12th, 2010 and I am not sure how to trade it. I am trading it in my paper account and put over a million in my account in just two positions. I don't get it becausse is it that easy. Am I missing something, please someone help me understand this, because I would like to step in with my real account. Thanks TL

 

Charles1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From the perspective of a short term futures trader there is no difference from the classic 30 yr bond contract except the current liquidity is terrible. Same tick size and same contract months and hours. For longer term participants there is a difference in the deliverable for the remaining terms to maturity.

 

As far as the windfall in your paper account I have no clue but this contract is too illiquid to trade live. Coupled with its richness (large tick size) a possible disaster waiting to happen, imo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2 trades is not really statistically significant. Come back when you have done 30 (or preferably more). If you are confident in your method sure, go for it. If your approach dosen't have a positive expectancy you are actually better off putting it all on one trade and quitting win or loose. If you have a positive expectancy then little and often and let the edge work it's magic.

 

What sort of leverage are you using? What;s your risk of ruin?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you for the input and I guess for the most part I think I'm just surprised at how much capital was made on the paper account. Now for the comment on contract being illiquid. Since the first trading day the price action goes from about 124.00 to about 63.00 or so, a straight drop down and then a straight shoot up back to around 124.00 roughly.As for the leverage its 100:1 as for the ruin that would depend on the stop. But the risk is about 100 ticks on one contract. Tick size is 31.25 a tick. I've definately made more then 30 trades, just only made two trades on the ultra t bond so far. Somewhat of a newbie if not obvious just looking to see if anyone else is watching this new ultra t bond and thinking of trading it and if so wanna start a thread on it. If I open one contract and set my stop say 100 ticks and it keeps behaving the way it has one contract is worth about 153K.......?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  charles1 said:
thank you for the input and I guess for the most part I think I'm just surprised at how much capital was made on the paper account. Now for the comment on contract being illiquid. Since the first trading day the price action goes from about 124.00 to about 63.00 or so, a straight drop down and then a straight shoot up back to around 124.00 roughly.As for the leverage its 100:1 as for the ruin that would depend on the stop. But the risk is about 100 ticks on one contract. Tick size is 31.25 a tick. I've definately made more then 30 trades, just only made two trades on the ultra t bond so far. Somewhat of a newbie if not obvious just looking to see if anyone else is watching this new ultra t bond and thinking of trading it and if so wanna start a thread on it. If I open one contract and set my stop say 100 ticks and it keeps behaving the way it has one contract is worth about 153K.......?

 

So how much capital are you gonna need to trade it? I should have a very careful look at your money management. Even with 75% winners you will have runs of losses. Will you be OK with a 15k draw down? Just two losses in a row would be 6250 (with 100tick stop) which is fine if you are properly capitalised and have the cojones (OK emotional strength if you like) to step right back up to the plate. You can find out how to calculate risk of ruin for different R:R and %winners here TradersCALM - risk of ruin menu

 

Just be very careful.'Big' contracts that are thin and volatile intraday can crush you (I speak from experience) :) the damage to your confidence to execute can be greater than any financial loss.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The cojones I have, The capital I have. I just don't know enough about the instrument. TOS offers no news on it. The CME Group has 3 pubs on it I downloaded. I'm testing it on my paper account. In just 5 trades I went from $117k to $2.6Mil opening between 10-20 contracts a position. I can handle 10 contracts live but only willing to risk one (1) and/or maybe two (2). The thinness won't let me go beyond 20 contracts. Looking for someone to trade it with me? Thank you, the pub was eye opening. I appreciate your time too

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess with only a month trading it is any ones guess at the end of the day . Seems smart to try the water with minimal size. (Is it fungible with any of the other notes? I guess even if not it will be highly correlated. If it was me, that would make me feel more comfortable about it. Let us know whet you decide.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To me this is bizarre - why would anyone trade this? Why not just trade the 30year. Or for better liquidity the 10year. In my humble opinion this is just a new product designed to reduce the capital of the retail trader. In other words it is not designed for the retail trader.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.