Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

MrPaul

A Question...

Recommended Posts

....Does the growth in the number of users taking up electronic trading systems reflect that more people are becoming increasingly knowledgeable in studying financial market behavior and are therefore accessing trading platforms to execute well-planned investment decisions? Or is the technology the advent of a sophisticated gaming medium that is excused and justified as a display place of "investment" opportunity?...

 

 

What do you think? Why?

 

 

 

excerpt from "The Psychology of Electronic Trading"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont think the number of new online accounts and the number of knowledgeable people working those new accounts go hand in hand...I do think that with so much electronic trading it is bringing a lot of bright people to the game, but more than that there's a lot of people with false hopes. I think that's the majority of it. The surge in electronic trading is bringing in a lot of fresh money into the markets for the seasoned pros to take advantage of, and then those youngin's don't have a lot left afterwards and end up quitting...just like always.

 

So....I guess I take door number 2?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I also think that new traders tend to jump in a bull market. Alot of young professionals participated during the stock market bubble but most of them are all gone now.

 

Regardless, successful trading takes time and patience. Those who survive are the ones that have gained experience and the knowledge to trade. You will always find the new and clueless traders hoping to make that quick buck and going home with nothing but a wild and reckless story. It's the same with any game you play.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think throughout the decades since the beginning of century, new technologies bring in new players along with bull and bear markets. People come in with bull markets, then blow in bear markets. Some never come back, some stayed and make a living. But one common denominator is the human behavior factor: our nature has not changed in centuries and trading requires the survivors to do the most unnatural things to succeed.

 

The famous 5%-95% ratio (if it's true) remains constant so long as human nature don't change. It's no wonder chart pattern and price action in old charts look the same as they are now. If you look at dotcom bubbles, it's not the first bubble and won't be the last. History repeats itself because ... we're humans!!!

 

So technology won't change human nature. It may make it easier for us to trade but prevent us from screwing up the trades. Even with system trading, believe it or not, human intervention is very common (yep, dang human nature must have its hand in everything).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that more and more people are simply falling victim to the new wave of marketing in the "get rich quick and easy" series. I don't think people are necessarily becoming more knowledgable about the markets, etc. (especially when even the ones that go obtain "knowledge" before entering the arena are being filled with a bunch of bs marketing garbage). I currently work in the revenue department of a large financial institution, and I have noticed alot of new attention being drawn to personal finance from large companies. For instance, the big rave right now is "check your FICO" or your "Beacon Score" from Equifax. It's just a big thing to get people to increase their debt and increase revenue for the banks, etc. I think this is very similar. The focus on trading and everything I believe is a way to generate income for hucksters peddling their snake oil, etc and brokers to increase commissions. This is all just my opinion of course, but I don't neccessarily think the quality of market knowledge is being increased per se. Back in the good old days, at least people had to do alot of legwork to really research and learn (not that I would know that from personal experience or anything) but nowadays it seems the sheer volume of knowledge and availability can increase the chances of "analysis paralysis" if anything. Sorry to ramble. I hope what I said made at least some sense. ha ha

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Reaver, you nailed it: more information can only distort the truth about the markets. So, the obstacles can only get higher, the learning curve can only increase with more and more indicators (supposedly TS itself has 2000 indicators), methods, strategies, auto systems, instruments, markets. Back to basics is the only method that works.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
People come in with bull markets, then blow in bear markets. Some never come back, some stayed and make a living.

 

...but more than that there's a lot of people with false hopes. I think that's the majority of it.

 

You will always find the new and clueless traders hoping to make that quick buck and going home with nothing but a wild and reckless story.

 

I think that more and more people are simply falling victim to the new wave of marketing in the "get rich quick and easy" series. I don't think people are necessarily becoming more knowledgable about the markets, etc.

 

These are my sentiments exactly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah it's hard at first to separate the wheat from the chaff. Not knowing anything about the markets at all makes it easy to believe that there are some secvrets, etc to making it rich. I'm glad I used my brain when I got started and realized that there is no shortcut. I'm still learning, but then again, so is everyone. This forum makes an excellent sounding board and reality check for those caught in the mix of all the bs, etc out there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's easy to get picked off by huckster marketers and scammers when you're new to the game, simply because you don't know any better. Kind of like a stranger giving a kid candy, same principle. I really think this forum serves as an excellent reality check and sounding board for those that would otherwise be surrounded by all the garbage out there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Its not bad that more people try or that more people fail.

 

Out of those potential failures will come the smaller number that succeed :)

 

The success and the failure of any trader is just because of himself - if he has chooses the right strategy he might have not lost. 99.9 % traders loose because of their own wrong strategy which Involves they emotions , greed etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think that more and more people are simply falling victim to the new wave of marketing in the "get rich quick and easy" series.

 

I agree. The other day I pulled down an old chart pattern trading book from my shelves - Curtis Arnold's PPS - trading system. At the back was a wallet in which an old diskette must once have slotted. The whole thing just seemed so incredibly dated compared to the slick online marketeers of today - how many John Carter wannabes are out there now? Hundreds.

 

Personally I wouldn't be suprised to see a new wave of marketing around algorithmic trading systems arising. Yes, I know that these have been a possibility for retail traders for a good while, but I don't think they've fully come of age yet. One of the platforms was advertising on Bloomberg the other day with a slogan of 'where robots are traders' with the promise of users being able to give simple english language instructions to build a strategy. Now why did I ever bother learning EL or Java (or B.A.S.I.C. back in 1992)!?!?

 

As well as being a very real potential way to make money, simple algorithmic trading is also a marketeer's dream for lazy traders. Having said which, so is the ego gratification of discretionary trading . . . That's enough from me, I think.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
...The surge in electronic trading is bringing in a lot of fresh money into the markets for the seasoned pros to take advantage of, and then those youngin's don't have a lot left afterwards and end up quitting...just like always...

 

Absolutely right...

 

People are trying to choose the easiest way to make money but at the end they are losing what they have...this will not change until they understand that trading is a concept that requires knowledge and experience...

 

Big sharks are sharing their profit with EA programmers (web scammers) now :rofl:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.