Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Zunaa

VWAP On Forex

Recommended Posts

Below I Have Included some Screen shots of My Tradestation VWAP_syn indicator that will work on FORX or any Market that does not report Volume. Yet it can be used on Markets That do report volume as well.

 

Is anyone using VWAP to Trade Forex?

 

 

 

Regards,

zunaa

V12jpg.thumb.jpg.c28e48e6e92cda407ec8c265c169d0ac.jpg

5aa70fc5b0e43_VWAP_syn2.thumb.PNG.be526169dd093e7bf2ea2dff05201995.PNG

5aa70fc5b79a9_VWAP_Syn3.thumb.PNG.736efd207244f7a76471eebd2729d45f.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In view of the fact that vwap needs volume to work at all, how have you gone about substituting it ?

 

 

Paul

 

What you state regarding VWAP on the surface is true, after all even the name of it iplies Volume.

That said many, Volume infact is not needed to get an indicator to plot same as what a Traditional VWAP Does, Regardless if volume is or is not available. However continuing to Think that volume is needed, will keep one from finding or even thinking the possibility exists.

 

Last of all, what I mentioned above is supported by the posted screen shots and a video on VWAP_syn or synthentic Volume, so it is not confused as just an opinion.

 

The video is available here on TL under the video tab...

if you cant find it look in Forex or volume channel.

 

Rgards,

zunaa

Edited by Zunaa

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In view of the fact that vwap needs volume to work at all, how have you gone about substituting it ?

 

 

Paul

 

Guess it must use 'ticks' as a substitute. Certainly doesn't look bad but it is worth mentioning ES ticks are somewhat different to FX 'ticks'. It's probably alsow worth mentioning that the TS functions VWAP_H incorrectly calculates VWAP. You need to re weigh the whole sample when new volume 'arrives'. There is a discussion about this in the trading with market stats thread. I am no saying that this isn't useful btw :).

Edited by BlowFish

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guess it must use 'ticks' as a substitute. Certainly doesn't look bad but it is worth mentioning ES ticks are somewhat different to FX 'ticks'.

 

A logical guess... but thats not it.

I made a comparison with ES only because many traders are familiar with ES.

It will work the same with any Instrument.... Stocks, Futures of any kind, Forex, simply anything you can plot on chart.

 

Bye the way... for anyone interested.

Looking at this riddle from a programmers point of view, one will never solve it... instead, look at it from a traders point of view, offcourse it is implied that one has enough trading experience.

Edited by Zunaa

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
A logical guess... but thats not it.

I made a comparison with ES only because many traders are familiar with ES.

It will work the same with any Instrument.... Stocks, Futures of any kind, Forex, simply anything you can plot on chart.

 

I edited my original post with something else that occurred to me about TS Vwap_h. If you like I can post an ES chart tommorow with my VWAP on. Might be interesting. Averaging across 5 minutes also introduces inacuarcaies, normally fairly inconsequential but last week i did have one day where my 5 minute chart several points off my 1 tick chart (on the DAX).

 

If you are not using tick's or bid ask volume changes then you have something quite novel there :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I edited my original post with something else that occurred to me about TS Vwap_h. If you like I can post an ES chart tommorow with my VWAP on. Might be interesting. Averaging across 5 minutes also introduces inacuarcaies, normally fairly inconsequential but last week i did have one day where my 5 minute chart several points off my 1 tick chart (on the DAX). :D

 

Sure...

Re: comment on VWAP_h Function, yes I understand what your refereing to.

 

If you are not using tick's or bid ask volume changes then you have something quite novel there :D

 

------------------:):)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good job anyway! I am not trying to knock your hard work.

 

Actually if you are familiar with the error in VWAP_H you could probably fix your algorithm to mimic the actual Vwap. The thing is it is processor intensive (not over duly on 5 min bars) as every time you have a new piece of data you need to re-weigh all the previous pieces of data with the new total volume. But sounds like you knew that anyway :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Good job anyway! I am not trying to knock your hard work.

 

Actually if you are familiar with the error in VWAP_H you could probably fix your algorithm to mimic the actual Vwap. The thing is it is processor intensive (not over duly on 5 min bars) as every time you have a new piece of data you need to re-weigh all the previous pieces of data with the new total volume. But sounds like you knew that anyway :D

 

Thanks for your comments. I like to fool myself into believing that after a short conversation with a Trader I can tell at what level they are operating... For example the more defensive or bravado displayed -- is indicative of a trader engulfed with performance insecurity or lower level of trading competence.

On the other hand It is always a pleasure to converse with those (you) that display the opposite—it allows for all involved to have good time.

 

As you stated it is very PC intensive to calculate VWAP properly, but well worth it if your using smaller intervals.

What actually happened was that several Forex traders that I talk to were talking about the need for a VWAP indicator. It was easy for me because it was not something I really needed. Does it not seem to be like that with almost everything in life. The less attached you are to it the easier it comes to you.

 

In any case these Forex traders I mentioned are all using 5m or higher intervals. Most are using 15m 30m 60m and higher for their trading needs. This is why I didn’t think they need it the VWAP very precise. In contrast if you’re using strategies that are dependent on low intervals i.e. Entries/Risk is dependent on low intervals then there is value in having the precise VWAP calculation. Just my view point.

 

Regards,

zunaa

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I still run a single tick chart with VWAP (just because I can I guess). I have larger bars too. Most of the time the difference is fairly negligible. There is a discussion in the thread I previously mentioned on what is 'good enough'. At the time I posted various charts comparing different algorithms. In the end with some maths help I have managed to come up with a 'continuous algorithm' that is also accurate.

 

I am interested in your FX approach. I am not sure how proprietary your method is but I'd be interested (broadly speaking) how you have achieved it. I wonder if time factors into it (a bit like MP uses time samples to build a profile). PM me if you think it is more appropriate, or ignore me if it is completely in-appropriate!

 

It might be quite interesting to emulate a more correct (than TS) VWAP and not too difficult if you have a proxy for volume. I did notice a slightly different shape to bands in my tests.

 

Not sure how closely you looked at the trading with marketstats threads, they really are pretty good. Between those and yur FX buddies maybe you might be persuaded to persue VWAP a little further.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BF,

I will check that thread out as time allows, your the 2nd person on this forum that mentioned it to me, so i better put it on my list of things to do.

 

I'll get back to you

Thanks

zunaa

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • Date: 8th April 2025.   Markets Rebound Cautiously as US-China Tariff Tensions Deepen     Global markets staged a tentative recovery on Tuesday following a wave of volatility sparked by escalating trade tensions between the United States and China. The Asia-Pacific region showed signs of stability after a chaotic start to the week—though some pockets remained under pressure. Taiwan’s Taiex dropped 4.4%, dragged lower by losses in tech heavyweight TSMC. The world’s largest chipmaker fell another 4% on Tuesday and has now slumped 13.5% since April 2, when US President Donald Trump first unveiled what he called ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs.   However, broader sentiment across the region turned more positive, with several markets rebounding sharply after Monday’s dramatic sell-offs. Japan’s Nikkei 225 surged over 6% in early trading, rebounding from an 18-month low. South Korea’s Kospi rose marginally, and Australia’s ASX 200 gained 1.9%, driven by strength in mining stocks. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng rose 1.6%, though still far from recovering from Monday’s 13.2% crash—its worst day since the 1997 Asian financial crisis. China’s Shanghai Composite added 0.9%.   In Europe, DAX and FTSE 100 are up more than 1% in opening trade. EU Commission President von der Leyen repeated yesterday that the EU had offered reciprocal zero tariffs on manufactured goods previously and continues to stand by that offer. Others are also trying again to talk to Trump to get some sort of agreement that limits the impact.   Much of the rally appeared to be driven by dip-buying, as well as hopes that the intensifying trade war could still be defused through negotiations.   China Strikes Back: ‘We Will Fight to the End’   Tensions reached a boiling point after Trump threatened to impose an additional 50% tariff on all Chinese imports unless Beijing rolled back its retaliatory measures by April 8. ‘If China does not withdraw its 34% increase above their already long-term trading abuses by tomorrow... the United States will impose additional tariffs on China of 50%,’ Trump declared on social media.   If implemented, the new tariffs would bring total US duties on Chinese goods to a staggering 124%, factoring in the existing 20%, the 34% recently announced, and the proposed 50%.   In response, China’s Ministry of Commerce issued a stern warning, stating: ‘The US threat to escalate tariffs is a mistake on top of a mistake... If the US insists on its own way, China will fight to the end.’ The ministry also called for equal and respectful dialogue, though signs of compromise on either side remain scarce.   Beijing acted quickly to contain a market fallout. State funds intervened to support equities, and the People’s Bank of China set the yuan fixing at its weakest level since September 2023 to boost export competitiveness. Additionally, five-year interest rate swaps in China fell to their lowest levels since 2020, indicating potential for further monetary easing.   Trump Talks Tough on EU Too   Trump’s hardline approach extended beyond China. Speaking at a press conference, he rejected the European Union’s offer to eliminate tariffs on cars and industrial goods, accusing the bloc of ‘being very bad to us.’ He insisted that Europe would need to source its energy from the US, claiming the US could ‘knock off $350 billion in one week.’   The EU, meanwhile, backed away from a proposed 50% retaliatory tariff on American whiskey, opting instead for 25% duties on selected US goods in response to Trump’s steel and aluminium tariffs.     Volatile Wall Street Adds to the Drama   Wall Street experienced wild swings on Monday as investors processed the rapidly evolving trade conflict. The S&P 500 briefly fell 4.7% before rebounding 3.4%, nearly erasing its losses in what could have been its biggest one-day jump in years—if it had held. The Dow Jones Industrial Average sank by as much as 1,700 points early in the day but later climbed nearly 900 points before closing 349 points lower, down 0.9%. The Nasdaq ended up 0.1%.   The brief rally was fueled by a false rumour that Trump was considering a 90-day pause on tariffs—rumours that the White House quickly labelled ‘fake news.’ The market's sharp reaction underscored how desperate investors are for any sign that tensions might ease.   Oil Markets in Focus: Goldman Sachs Revises Forecasts   Crude prices also reflected the uncertainty, with US crude briefly dipping below $60 per barrel for the first time since 2021. As of early Tuesday, Brent crude was trading at $64.72, while WTI hovered around $61.26.   Goldman Sachs, in a note dated April 7, lowered its average price forecasts for Brent and WTI through 2025 and 2026, citing mounting recession risks and the potential for higher-than-expected supply from OPEC+.       Under a base-case scenario where the US avoids a recession and tariffs are reduced significantly before the April 9 implementation date, Goldman sees Brent at $62 per barrel and WTI at $58 by December 2025. These figures fall further to $55 and $51, respectively, by the end of 2026. This outlook also assumes moderate output increases from eight OPEC+ countries, with incremental boosts of 130,000–140,000 barrels per day in June and July.   However, should the US slip into a typical recession and OPEC production aligns with the bank’s baseline assumptions, Brent could retreat to $58 by the end of this year and to $50 by December 2026.   In a more bearish scenario involving a global GDP slowdown and no change to OPEC+ output levels, Brent prices might fall to $54 by year-end and $45 by late 2026. The most extreme projection—based on a simultaneous economic downturn and a full reversal of OPEC+ production cuts—would see Brent plunge to below $40 per barrel by the end of 2026.   Goldman noted that oil prices could outperform forecasts significantly if there was a dramatic shift in tariff policy and a surprise in global demand recovery.   Cautious Optimism, But Warnings Persist   With both Washington and Beijing showing no signs of backing down, markets are likely to remain volatile in the days ahead. Investors now turn their attention to upcoming trade meetings and policy decisions, hoping for clarity in what has become one of the most unpredictable trading environments in recent years.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.