Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

sicktrader

Forex Vs Currency Futures - System Question

Recommended Posts

I have been trading currency futures profitably for some time, and now want to move to the Forex, at least I think. Got a demo the other day, but haven't set it up yet. My question is that if I have a system that works with currency futures, will it likely work the same with Forex? Has anyone experienced this situation? Thank for the help. greenbeer.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

theoretically if your system is robust enough it should work on almost any instrument.

So long as you understand and are aware the difference between the futures and spot- hence the premium - you should be fine.

Why not just get some spot data, walk your system forward and see that it picking up the same trades you have been doing in the futures.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats now a 3 year old document Cory.

 

If you use something like Interactive Brokers ECN Forex most of the arguments are void and forex can work better for you than futures especially outside of US RTH.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  sicktrader said:
I have been trading currency futures profitably for some time, and now want to move to the Forex,

 

I thought you were doubling your bankroll on the ES every few days or so. At least that is what you were claiming over at ET awhile back. Why would you ever consider going to a bucket shop if that were the case?

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  thalestrader said:
I thought you were doubling your bankroll on the ES every few days or so. At least that is what you were claiming over at ET awhile back. Why would you ever consider going to a bucket shop if that were the case?

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

 

That was some time ago, and it wasn't every few days but a few weeks on average. But then the few weeks turned to a month because there were less and less set ups, so I went to the currencies. Looking to better my win rate by about 5%, and from what I hear the forex is a smoother market, so hoping a simple switchover may accomplish the extra one win out of 20 trades. In addition, even if the switch doesn't move the win rate, I would expect more set-ups with currencies that aren't available to me now, which would do the trick as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

pros

- about 95% of volume is spot traded, why not trade the primary market?

- there are only few futures with good liquidity and tight spreads around the clock, mainly the majors

- no roll-over when trading spot

- some brokers offer WYSIWYG meaning no slippage up to certain position limits

- some brokers offer variable position sizes, micro/mini lots etc.

- free charting

 

cons

- you have to find a decent FX Broker, because in most cases he is also a market maker meaning loose regulation or try a ECN that pools liquidity from various providers

 

Bottom line: If you can find a good Broker/ECN there is no need to trade FX futures. Why? See above ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Garak, I would never go back to futures currencies. I think you will be at a great advantage for so many reasons. One of them being that you can use market orders and not get crushed on slippage.

As for charting and systems, you should have no problems. With the volume and tight spreads you can expand to real scalping if you like. It amazes me that we do not see more people running to forex. I have traded so many things, and forex is by far the best for 24 hour access, consistency of price flow (especially EUR/USD), and yes free quotes and platforms. Anyhow hope this encourages you as you push through the conversion process.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i have and will always be a currency trader. after all it is what makes the world go round.

 

futures have their place and i still trade them, but my game is now the spot. and was my game before my recent break from trading.

 

with the ability to vary leverage at the click of a mouse, it is hard to beat.

 

as for your strategy, i whole heartedly agree with DugDug. if your strategy really works, it would work even on those money robbing mutual funds.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It does seem that there are a one or two real (Direct Market Acess) brokers coming online. I have experience of MBT and IB. Does anyone have experience of others?

 

My biggest problem is lack of volume information, bid/ask ticks might be OK for some approaches but not for the statistical measures I am currently using. Guess its fine if you trade pure price.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm really amazed at the praise i'm hearing for spot. I've traded fixed and variable spread spot brokers including Gain, MBT, FXDD, and some others and switching over to the futures market was the best thing i've ever done.

 

  Quote
pros

- about 95% of volume is spot traded, why not trade the primary market?

- there are only few futures with good liquidity and tight spreads around the clock, mainly the majors

- no roll-over when trading spot

- some brokers offer WYSIWYG meaning no slippage up to certain position limits

- some brokers offer variable position sizes, micro/mini lots etc.

- free charting

 

  • - This stat is thrown around a lot but its not like your in one big liquidity pool in the spot market, most shops you are taking positions against them and not actually hitting the market, and not interacting with the actual liquidity pool per se... so whats the point? I forgot where I read it but there is some stat thrown around as well that of that 95%, like 65% of that volume is institutional and isn't accessed by the retail side to begin with. Hopefully i'm not talking completely out of my ass.
  • - By the same token there are only a few spot markets that have good enough liquidty to trade actively.
  • - I know MBT kicked me off for rollover everyday....
  • - Thats great, but then by that measure the futures market does this automatically.
  • - I do concede that variable position sizing and micro lots have futures markets beat fair and square. But IMO, if you can't cough up 2k to trade the 6B contract live maybe you should stay on sim mode a bit longer.
  • - OEC has free charting as well with easylanguage and C# support, other brokers like AMP offer Ninja to their clients at no additional charge.

 

Now if you're trading swing on daily, 4 hour charts, etc where a couple pips slippage isn't the biggest deal go for spot. But if you are an active trader and want guaranteed 1 pip spreads on every market then I don't get how anyone can say that spot is a realistic alternative because it just isn't.

 

Take a real time quote from a fixed spread broker thats known for being pretty tight on their spreads, Oanda... RIght now the GBPUSD is at a 2.5 pip spread. I get a 1 pip spread on my futures account. So i'f i'm trading for say an taking a long at 14808 using a buy stop to enter the market... in the 6B and I get in and to my 11 pip target I make 11 pips, minus 5.45 for my commission.

 

If I take the same position in spot first off i'm going to have to put a limit order in after price makes a move up and maybe or maybe not get filled as you can't use buy/sell stops to enter. Then if i'm doing the next best thing which is entering after that initial move up is entering at the market and taking taking the spread against me and my 11 pips turns into 8.5 assuming the same move.

 

Assuming the same position sizing the futures account is up $63.30 and the spot account is up $53.12

 

And i'm sorry, I get that 1 pip spread no matter the time of day in the futures market, and don't even tell me that spreads don't widen on spot... I know on MBT all the spreads go wide after the London close and trading at night even around the Asian open the spreads were significantly larger than during US market hours.

 

As far as people saying there isn't enough liquidity? Really? I know of guys who are clearing 300 lot orders in the 6E without any issues. I doubt any of us are or ever will be pushing 10% of that size. Yes I do get slipped a tick on occasion. I had 8 trades this week so far and I have been slipped a total of 1 tick thus far. The most I was ever slipped was 2 ticks and that was due to trading right ahead of a EIA Petro report in the GCL.

 

I've done the math personally and I don't see ANY advantage to trading spot other than variable lot sizing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In my opinion currency futures is better than spot forex. I traded several years spot and eminis. After I start trading currecy futures it is very successful for me. I think newbies better start with currecy futures better than ES.

 

Happy trading

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually daedelus,

 

All the good stuff you describe with futures is also available with Interactive Brokers forex. They are not ultra high leverage and they don't do microlots, just minis but the spread on EU is half a pip (half, not one) during european/us market hours. On the others it is as good or better than futures. And there is no more pulling of orders for news with the forex than there is for c futures. Plenty of size too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  daedalus said:

This stat is thrown around a lot but its not like your in one big liquidity pool in the spot market, most shops you are taking positions against them and not actually hitting the market, and not interacting with the actual liquidity pool per se... so whats the point?

 

I mentioned the broker issue already. Besides FX futures are depending on the spot market. It makes the pace. Therefore I like to trade the primary market whether it is only 35% of that 95% or not.

 

  daedalus said:

As far as people saying there isn't enough liquidity? Really? I know of guys who are clearing 300 lot orders in the 6E without any issues.

Try this with the futures for EUR/GBP, EUR/JPY, Swissy...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  garak said:
I mentioned the broker issue already. Besides FX futures are depending on the spot market. It makes the pace. Therefore I like to trade the primary market whether it is only 35% of that 95% or not.

 

 

I'd be interested to hear who you and the other guys trading Spot use as a broker?

 

Heres the thing. There are two completely different ways of 'trading' spot.

 

1) Through an actual broker. In this case the advantages listed in this thread apply. As far as I can tell real brokers are very few and far between for retail customers. Slowly the situation seems to be changing.

 

2) Through a bookie (market maker as they like to call themselves). In this case none of the advantages in this thread apply (except flexibility in position sizing). Most of the big name 'brokers' that people refer to are actually bookies.

 

Heres another thing. Even the handful of real brokers will often deal with small orders (minis or micros) differently. In this case they usually 'make a market' themselves.

 

My suspicion is a lot of people are using number 2) whilst enthusing about the advantages of number 1). One is not trading the primary market if 'trading' with a bookie, you are taking a bet on the future market price. As the market is not centralised the guy you are taking the bet with tells you what the price is (this can be manipulated in the short term). This is a pretty clear disadvantage :).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, the argument that "FX futures are depending on the spot market" is rubbish really.

 

Sometimes futures follows spot, sometimes the reverse. And pushing futures can be an interesting way of dragging a spot position to a place you need it to be (short term).

 

Here's the thing:

- does the market behave in ways that suit your trading style?

- can you get competitive ba spreads?

- can you get order rules that are open and honest?

- any manipulation that will hurt you?

- any trickery around news that will hurt you?

 

So I could trade futures or forex with ib (because the forex is ecn based) but I like the scalability of forex, the half pip spreads, same costs etc etc. The interesting thing is that we now have mini-futures in response to mini and micro forex but I'm guessing the futures boys were too arrogant for too long and have lost that chunk of the market to forex.

 

Because I trade in Asian and European hours I am well aware of the nasty slips I used to get on futures - but don't get to the same extent with ib forex. Also, the news reaction is the natural one (a short pulling of orders by most players to avoid being disadvantaged) not manipulated (like Oanda holding the news state for several minutes after the news is out (not so much manipulation as self-protection and being a bit lazy about it imo).

 

But, as Blowfish points out, IB is a broker with a bunch of banks and the customer base forming the market (you can be the bid or ask), not a bookie/bucket shop.

 

 

Edit: according to the interactive brokers website: The tight spreads and substantial liquidity are a result of combining quotation streams from 11 of the world's largest foreign exchange dealers which constitute more than two-thirds1 of the market share in the global interbank market.

 

And the banks come from the group listed in: http://www.euromoney.com/Article/2194110/FX-poll-2009-Embattled-banks-boosted-by-performance-in-booming-FX-markets.html

Edited by Kiwi

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Kiwi said:
Yes, the argument that "FX futures are depending on the spot market" is rubbish really.

 

Sometimes futures follows spot, sometimes the reverse. And pushing futures can be an interesting way of dragging a spot position to a place you need it to be (short term)

 

Well you are familiar with triangular arbitrage between FX pairs I guess. EUR/USD, EUR/GBP, GBP/USD are heavlily traded on the spot market. Now there is a decent market for 6E, there is a weak market for 6B and there is no market for RP (yeah, thats the ticker for CME's EUR/GBP future). And you are trying to tell me FX futures can lead the spot market whereas there is no inherent price action within FX futures? Now that sounds rubbish I'd say :)

I really don't care what you trade or why but it seems to me you guys are a bit home-biased. But it's still London, Tokio, Zurich far in front of any futures exchange when it comes to FX.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Kiwi said:
If you think the futures market can't be used to manipulate cash then you need to spend a little more time at it perhaps.

 

I'd rather say If you think FX futures can be used to manipulate FX cash then feel free to prove it.

 

  BlowFish said:
If I might ask, who do you use as a broker Garak?

I switched to financial futures some time ago. Had accounts with Dukascopy and Oanda.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahh Ok thanks so chalk and cheese. Dukascopy being a broker and Oanda (whilst having a decent reputation) being a bookie (so about as far removed from the primary market as you can get :)).

 

How did you find Dukascopy? Seem to get favourable reviews though a few complaints about slippage on there 1 click trading. I think people dont realise that spreads do open up sometimes when things get volatile. At least with a broker you know it's down to infrastructure rather then manipulation :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  garak said:
Well you are familiar with triangular arbitrage between FX pairs I guess. EUR/USD, EUR/GBP, GBP/USD are heavlily traded on the spot market. Now there is a decent market for 6E, there is a weak market for 6B and there is no market for RP (yeah, thats the ticker for CME's EUR/GBP future). And you are trying to tell me FX futures can lead the spot market whereas there is no inherent price action within FX futures? Now that sounds rubbish I'd say :)

I really don't care what you trade or why but it seems to me you guys are a bit home-biased. But it's still London, Tokio, Zurich far in front of any futures exchange when it comes to FX.

 

I'm not trying to personally bash anyone in here... but the 6B isn't weak by any means... in fact its the second biggest forex futures market and clears about 100k contracts a day.

 

Yes, the CME doesn't have exotic pairings that spot offers, but honestly, for the type of trading I do (targeting 10-15 pips most times) a 9 pip spread on the AUD/JPY or some whack pair isn't going to do me any good to begin with. I would argue that for most daytraders trading futures would be advantageous.

 

Swing trading I can see the advantages of having spot contracts not only for position sizing ease but if your shooting for 300 pips, the 9 pip spread isn't such a factor. I just don't think 90% of the traders out there trade like this and would actually be better served by the futures market IMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  daedalus said:

Yes, the CME doesn't have exotic pairings that spot offers, but honestly, for the type of trading I do (targeting 10-15 pips most times) a 9 pip spread on the AUD/JPY or some whack pair isn't going to do me any good to begin with. I would argue that for most daytraders trading futures would be advantageous.

 

 

Yep, that is all I go for anymore and futures have worked fine. I only open the forex demo once, then I realized why the hell should I switch if it is working. Anyway, I am off to Florida with the family later today, need to unwind from the IRS continually shoving it up my ass. Have fun while I'm gone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.