Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Guest Tresor

The Killer of MetaTrader, an Ass-kicking Trading Platform

Recommended Posts

Guest Tresor

Guys, I just recently put my hands on PT Multistation: ( Link Deleted by Moderator) and was floored :)

 

The developers are from Ukraine and they definitely managed to arrive to a concept of a trading platform of my dreams (excepts for the charting which sucks).

 

The concept is simple:

(i) a trading and charting platform that supports many coding languages (EasyLanguage, MQL and C#);

(ii) a platform that you can connect to many data feeds at the same time (from what I was able to grasp from the forum the developers' team adds a new feed within a week from a request by customers - guys are pretty fast;

(iii) a platform that has a growing number of supported brokers (from stocks through forex, options to spread betting); you can place discretionary and automated trades and manage multiple accounts;

(iv) a platform that is freakishly easy customizable (all items are dockable and lockable);

(v) a platform that has Microsoft Office 2007 or 2010 easy interface and navigation;

(vi) a team of developers that is customer-oriented and does not grumble if they have to do something like e.g. add a new broker.

 

I am attaching a few screenshots so that you could get the idea of what this piece of software is capable of. I seriously think that when they improve their charting (hopefully they will reach the quality of MultiCharts), they will become the best trading platform.

 

The application is rather big - it occupies 90 MB of my storage, but this is what one should expect from a piece of software that was written for traders with multiple needs in mind.

 

If only they could improve the charting (bar alignment, trendlines, etc.)....

 

Try their free demo and tell me what you think, if you have time.

 

Regards

2010-01-17_115111.thumb.png.c80a5e3a7f52b813af7ec032947bdac3.png

2010-01-17_122501.thumb.png.6a1bc58180d921db2d18e6fdcbb9a77f.png

2010-01-17_120437.thumb.png.a8ee8d8d8d757cfdfe170d9169fe5687.png

2010-01-17_120325.thumb.png.2fd078b21e9461bdeca5e53975f2dde6.png

2010-01-17_115803.thumb.png.86a9b1d91c5f6868036f95d74ee65d2b.png

scr1_big.jpg.66944bb2a59b33276c785e470b24fb8b.jpg

Edited by Mysticforex

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor

It seems that small brokers like OEC or Transact do not know this platform but top brokers start to recognize it, e.g. Rosenthal Collins for forex: ( Link Deleted by Moderator)

Edited by Mysticforex

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I tried it, it certainly has potential but it was just a personal vibe of the thing that I did not like so I will not persist with it.

While I think it certainly has lots of potential and might revisit it down the track.:2c:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor

I especially didn't like / hated their chating and drowing tools. Horrible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tresor, thanks for starting this thread and your useful feedback about our PT multistation terminal for traders.

 

Actually, we were wondering if you could expand on your couple of negative comments about the "...horrible chatting and drawing tools." It would be great if you could tell us specifically what you did not like about them and why...

 

Thanks again :)

 

PFSoft Support

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

DugDug,

 

Thanks for your comments about our PT multistation terminal for traders.

 

I was wondering if you could explain what you mean by "...personal vibe." I mean what exactly was it that you did not like?

 

We value the opinion and input of all our users as we are constantly trying to listen to customers to improve our software, and to innovate to respond to changing market requirements.

 

Also, a BIG THANKS to TradersLab for facilitating useful discussion about or products!

 

Cheers,

 

PFSoft Support

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor
Actually, we were wondering if you could expand on your couple of negative comments about the "...horrible chatting and drawing tools." It would be great if you could tell us specifically what you did not like about them and why...

 

I would need to get a new demo and make some screeshots to explain I what meant by horrible charting and inconvenient drawing tools.

 

As far as drawing tools are concerned I didn't like the concept of placing them on the chart. I would rather prefer to have them placed on the bar, like in MT4.

 

As far as charting goes make this excercise: draw a trendline - the start of a trendline will be point A, the end will be point B, then create an extention / ray of this trendline in a way that this ray will be crossing a price bar somewhere in future.

 

Then change the resolution from 1 minute to 3 minutes to 1 hour to 4 hours, etc. What you will notice is that point C will vary GREATLY from one resolution to another resolution. E.g. when on 1 minute resolution the ray crossed the price bar at 122, on 5 minute resolution the ray may very well cross the price bar at 132, and on 30 minute resolution the ray may cross the price at 112. You do not know which trendline to trust.

 

This is a result of incorrect bar thickness and / or bar spacing on respective resolutions.

 

MT4 cannot do it properly either, neither JForex can do it properly, nor many other platforms I tried. The only charting software that is acceptable for me in this respect is MC.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor

Okay,

 

I made 3 pictures based on MT4 to explain the problem I had with your software. The catch is that the ideal product for me should adjust:

(i) thickness of bars

(ii) spacing between bars

when a trader changes resolution.

 

When the algorithim in a charting platform for (i) and (ii) is incorrect this results in trendlines being untrustworthy.

 

Look at the screenshots (a picture is worth a thousand words) to get the idea of what I am talking about. However, whatever inconveniences I may have experienced while testing your demo platform, I still think you have the best business concept in the world: 1 single platform that supports many data feeds and many brokers at the same time. No other platform does it the way yours does :)

 

And it was my purpose by starting this thread to show that there are software developers who are capable to think the way a trader does, which I think is a compliment for you guys.

5aa70ff75fe45_trendline4H.thumb.png.54bd2a5c7d206d9c692fc528e9e927bd.png

5aa70ff764c68_trendline1H.thumb.png.e0d266653932faf08a87822ce8afd5c8.png

5aa70ff769a58_trendline15M.thumb.png.e3d34457d07e53336ff3c320c4bc897d.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor

I just checked 5 minute resolution of the same instrument on MT4. Unlike 15 M it plots trendline below the point indicated with the arrow. One does not know which trendline one should trust.

 

Now you guys can do the same excercise on your platform and introduce changes. If your platform can achieve a much better accuracy than Metatrader (which shoudn't be too difficult given Metatrader inaccuracy), then you will be one step closer to a success.

5aa70ff779944_trendline5M.thumb.png.66b84fbc95f21e7f956d9d60c5698c33.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I looked at the trial - and admittedly fairly briefly over a day or two. For me it was simple I just did not like the feel of it - so it is more a personal vibe than anything else... a bit like apple v PC. It looked like it had a lot of potential - functions, bells and whistles and for those who like beta testing I would say go for it. For me - I have other projects to do in my spare time at present.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Then change the resolution from 1 minute to 3 minutes to 1 hour to 4 hours, etc. What you will notice is that point C will vary GREATLY from one resolution to another resolution. E.g. when on 1 minute resolution the ray crossed the price bar at 122, on 5 minute resolution the ray may very well cross the price bar at 132, and on 30 minute resolution the ray may cross the price at 112. You do not know which trendline to trust.

 

This is a result of incorrect bar thickness and / or bar spacing on respective resolutions

 

Hi there,

 

Unless I totally misunderstand what you are saying here, the problem you describe has nothing to do with error in the charting package but is a sad fact of trendlines. By changing the interval you are adding / removing bars and that is going to change how your trendline interacts with the bars. It's no error with the charting package, it is just a fact with trendlines and IMHO, really makes trendline concepts flakey.

 

With kind regards,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have not looked at this platform (yet). Anything I would look at now would need similar data handling capabilities of NeoTicker (particularly there tick precise technology...very important).

 

Nice bonuses would be ...Easy Language support. Drawing and visualisation of Ensign (it just look so damn pretty). Ninjas chart trader.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor
By changing the interval you are adding / removing bars and that is going to change how your trendline interacts with the bars. It's no error with the charting package, it is just a fact with trendlines and IMHO, really makes trendline concepts flakey

 

Adding / removing bars on one hand should be offset / compensated with adequate decreasing / increasing bar spacing and bar thickness.

 

I tested a number of charting packages,some of them can do it with acceptable quality, yet some are disaster.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tresor,

 

After investigating your interesting (and ass-kicking!) comments, our conclusion is that the logic of how our algorithm works means that what you are describing is not a programming bug, but rather correct functioning of the system (i.e. the way it was designed) so as the be logical and useful.

 

Please see the attached screenshot with 1-minute candles. In this example the line does NOT touch any candle, but if this chart is converted to 15-min intervals then the line will touch the new single candle which will occupy the area of the red box (note in this case, of course, the 15 candles in the red box, will be converted to just one candle when changing the chart period/interval).

 

Note also that this is true for whichever of our 5 line types are used (e.g. freehand):

 

However, we will try to look how MC works, but it would be good if you could explain the logic you think it uses. We would greatly appreciate your further input if you have ideas how it would be possible to usefully change the logic here…

answer.png.43d676cd3d52f4ee55bcb1d39b6095d2.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As Midknight said, this is really a function of how trendlines function. I don't agree that it makes them flakey - it illustrates one of the reasons that price often respects the zone around a tl, rather than the exact intersection.

 

If you try to automatically change for time (by aggregating bars to create the higher timeframe connection when lengthening the timeframe) you need to consider how it will work in the shortening direction as well ... you may need to record the point of contact on short timeframes internally so that when someone lengthens and goes back it looks the same.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor
Please see the attached screenshot with 1-minute candles. In this example the line does NOT touch any candle, but if this chart is converted to 15-min intervals then the line will touch the new single candle which will occupy the area of the red box (note in this case, of course, the 15 candles in the red box, will be converted to just one candle when changing the chart period/interval).

 

From my experience with different platforms, no charting software can achieve 100% accuracy. This is probably impossible because if you anchor a trendline to 1M bar on 08.32 then if you change the resolution from 1M to 15M the platform will anchor the same trendline somewhere between 08.30 - 08.45. So no 100% accuracy is achievable on small set of data (like your picture).

 

Some of the platforms I tested however are more accurate on larger data set (''longer distances''), e.g. MC is such a platform that I can trust with regard to trendlines in region of 95%. But I trust MT4 only in region of 40%.

 

My suggestion to you guys would be to load AUDJPY data (the same instrument I used in my previous posts) into your platform and run comparative studies against MT4, MC, Ninja, etc. on the same example as I used.

 

If your programme is better than the above mentioned ones, you might want of course to advertise this: ''our trendlines are most trustable in the business. are better than those in Ninja and MT4'', or something similar.

 

But if your trendlines happen to be less trustable than MT4, Ninja, others, you might not want to advertise this or you might want to improve your trendlines.

 

However, we will try to look how MC works, but it would be good if you could explain the logic you think it uses.

 

Trendlines in MC tend to be the same regardless of the resolution chosen (no 100% accuracy of course). I have no idea what logic MC uses to adjust bar thickness and bar spacing as a trader changes resolution. Whatever these guys did, it works quite well (screenshots attached - whatever resolution I chose, 1M, 2M, 2H, 1D,... the trendline extention shows almost the same point).

 

If I were a developer a charting platform, I would draw multiple trendlines on 1M resolution accross a large time frame (assuming this is the correct one). Then I would switch the resolutions from 1M to 2M to 3M to .... and see if they match. If the don't match, I would correct the bar spacing on the resolution that mismatches (either decrease by 0....000001 of a minute or increase by 0.0....000001 of a minute, to arrive at a solution in which all resolutions have the same trendlines.

 

Nothing else comes to my mind.

 

We would greatly appreciate your further input if you have ideas how it would be possible to usefully change the logic here…

 

Music for my ears. You could implement sheer bar candles the ones that you have in MT4. The ones you have at the moment certainly are candy for eyes: nice rounding, nice shadows - looks like 3D, but personally I like the old fashioned ones that do not distract me from trading.

5aa70ff94c0bf_MCES1H.thumb.png.914321979acfc0f65aa276ec5d1b8862.png

5aa70ff9544a1_MCES1M.thumb.png.843d2b587133b2826b92afbbe7ac4093.png

5aa70ff95c1bb_MCES20M.thumb.png.99f0652047cb54805e15126b609d1ca3.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you again Tresor (and Kiwi) - we really appreciate your detailed explanations so that we can get to the crux of the problem here and hopefully come up with something.

 

We are sure however, that the math logic is correct:

e.g. trendline to 1M bar on 08.32 then if you change the resolution from 1M to 15M the platform will anchor the same trendline somewhere between 08.30 - 08.45. So no 100% accuracy is achievable on small set of data (like your picture).

 

So, if you are not convinced, then could you possibly send us an example of a screenshot, but using OUR CHARTS this time?

 

Also, concerning bars

...candy for eyes: nice rounding, nice shadows - looks like 3D...
, you can turn this functionality off if you want.

 

Thanks again Tresor, and we look forward to your screenshot if you could may be find time again to assist again, but please use our software for it, so we can reproduce it...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor
So, if you are not convinced, then could you possibly send us an example of a screenshot, but using OUR CHARTS this time?

 

Sure, will you give me 2nd demo trial?

 

Also, concerning bars , you can turn this functionality off if you want.

 

I didn't know this, I only played around with your software for a few hours and decided it was worth applauding in this forum :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor

I sent an e-mail. So much happening on forex, I will be able to test the platform earliest during the weekend.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor

Guys,

 

I am sorry I will not be able to test your platform. Too much work at my end. Maybe in future when I have more time.

 

At the moment I cannot devote the time that your MultiStation certainly deserves.

 

Regards, and congrats on a good product.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tresor, thanks for the note, and we'd really like to express our appreciation for all your hard work and comments.

 

We can give you a free demo if/when you do get time to do more testing, it would be great if you continue to post anything you find interesting...

 

You may also be interested in looking at our forum: ProTrader Trading Platform Official Forum

 

Cheers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello quicksilver03,

 

Such an option is available in PT multistation. You can minimize the Ribbon menu. This is possible in two ways:

 

1. Click on the small down arrow near the top left corner and then click "Minimize the ribbon".

2. In the next release it will be possible to do this by double clicking on the menu.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.