Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Frank

One Thing I Have Come to Appreciate More Over the Past __ Months Is:

Recommended Posts

Trading is something that requires continual learning. Phil Ivey, considered the best poker player in the world, says that every time he plays he learns something new. So this thread is just to discuss things that you have learned or come to more fully appreciate over the past __ months (you choose or just discuss in general without specific dates). In a few more months from now, hopefully I will have learned more and can share something from that.

 

One thing I have come to appreciate more over the past 12 months is this:

 

It doesn't take very many trades to make good money at trading. A MAJOR side benefit of this 'don't overtrade' mentality is that you are quite unlikely to go 'on tilt' --- ie, make mental errors due to series of losses -- if you control your trading to only the very best set-ups per day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

After last year.

 

I more fully appreciate...

 

1 - the requirement to plan a trade and stick to the plan (hence less trades and only those ones that work for me. It was not necessarily trades that cost me when I did not stick to my plan, but those trades that I entered into without a plan.)

2 - losses are just a part of the business (it does not necessarily pay to try and avoid losses, sometimes its best just to accept them as part of the plan. (minimise them -yes) - there is no need to continually look to improve things that work. If you treat losses like business costs, would you expect a business to be profitable without having any costs at all?)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I re-read Market Wizards over Christmas for the first time in years. One thing that struck me was how many of the wizzes used simple 'old fashioned' trend following systems. It made me think. There are clear 'pros' to that sort of approach though of course there are 'cons' as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Blow fish - even the ones who are not classified as true trend traders and are not systematic do much the same thing.

While maybe not a wizard he is certainly the master - Soros swings for the big moves.

Buffett - much the same.

There is something in that for all of us.;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have realized trading is not easy. I have been searching for a consistently-profitable (high reward : risk ratio) trading strategy for the past year now and I have not placed a single trade over that time period. It takes a lot of work, but I do feel that I am making progress.

 

I also realized that most trading books can probably be condensed down to about 5 pages of actual material. There's a lot of fluff.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Over the last 3 months I have learned that much of my regular pain with trading was/is from trying to achieve perfection,catching nearly the exact top or bottom on an entry and taking no heat and then exiting at virtually the exact right time to exit to maximize most virtually all of 'the move'. I've long known its an unrealistic expectation but I was on small time frames scalping and felt this type of mentality was virtually unavoidable to make both the math work and the fast paced trading of scalping working. Over those past 3 months I have been exploring a longer term approach on currencies that does not get perfect entries or exits by any stretch of the imagination and to my huge surprise it works quite well. I sometimes take quite a bit of heat for quite a bit of time under this approach. As noted by Frank in his first post, I have also noticed that I do not 'go on tilt' within this time frame like I easily do in small scalping time frames.

 

Moral for me: Everyone is imperfect. The market is made up of everyone, and therefore is also imperfect. I am imperfect. Making money from trading is imperfect. Accept imperfection.

 

With kind regards,

MK

Edited by MidKnight

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Midknight - to help strengthen your belief (as I also sometimes get those feeling to - comes from being a market maker in my early days I think)

 

George Soros - always used to remind himself that he was fallible - that he could and most likely would be wrong and would constantly remind himself, check himself and question if he was - and look at what a success he was.

 

When it comes to picking the tops and bottoms I think about it this way - if the odds of you picking the tops or bottoms are say 1 hundred to one, then wouldn't the odds of the current trend continuing be the inverse of that. Helps give me some patience.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  MidKnight said:
Over those past 3 months I have been exploring a longer term approach on currencies ...

 

I wish you all the success you deserve for your hard work, MK. If you don't feel it would "give too much away," I'd hope you would share some of your trades with us as you become more comfortable with your approach.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.