Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

shortbleu

Discount Stock Broker

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I am looking for a discount stock broker (to trade stocks, not CFDs or spreadbetting) with the following criteria:

 

1) The account can be opened by a UK resident.

2) The account can be funded in British pound (GBP) and only the profit/losses would be exposed to the risk of currency.

3) No inactivity or monthly fees charged (eg. Interactive Brokers charge inactivity/monthly fees and would not suit me).

4) The account can be opened with an amount as low as GBP 6,000.

5) I will do less than 6 trades per year and I am looking to pay

commission fee per side of USD 8 maximum or GBP 5 maximum (eg. Selftrade, E-Trade, Barclays stockbroker are too expensive)

 

I made some research and I found the following stock brokers: Zecco, Just2trade, but I don't know if they allow UK residents to open an account and if the account can be founded in GBP. Does anyone know if they suit such criteria?

 

Any suggestions of brokers following ALL of the above criteria are welcomed.

 

Many thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  shortbleu said:
Hi all,

 

I am looking for a discount stock broker (to trade stocks, not CFDs or spreadbetting) with the following criteria:

 

1) The account can be opened by a UK resident.

2) The account can be funded in British pound (GBP) and only the profit/losses would be exposed to the risk of currency.

3) No inactivity or monthly fees charged (eg. Interactive Brokers charge inactivity/monthly fees and would not suit me).

4) The account can be opened with an amount as low as GBP 6,000.

5) I will do less than 6 trades per year and I am looking to pay

commission fee per side of USD 8 maximum or GBP 5 maximum (eg. Selftrade, E-Trade, Barclays stockbroker are too expensive)

 

I made some research and I found the following stock brokers: Zecco, Just2trade, but I don't know if they allow UK residents to open an account and if the account can be founded in GBP. Does anyone know if they suit such criteria?

 

Any suggestions of brokers following ALL of the above criteria are welcomed.

 

Many thanks

 

Less than 6 trades per YEAR and you want to pay like you trade 6 times per DAY.

 

:confused:

 

For 6 trades per year, any online discount broker is fine. Will they meet all your requirements? Probably not.

 

So either suck it up or start your own brokerage firm that caters to your niche.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  shortbleu said:
Hi all,

 

I am looking for a discount stock broker (to trade stocks, not CFDs or spreadbetting) with the following criteria:

 

1) The account can be opened by a UK resident.

2) The account can be funded in British pound (GBP) and only the profit/losses would be exposed to the risk of currency.

3) No inactivity or monthly fees charged (eg. Interactive Brokers charge inactivity/monthly fees and would not suit me).

4) The account can be opened with an amount as low as GBP 6,000.

5) I will do less than 6 trades per year and I am looking to pay

commission fee per side of USD 8 maximum or GBP 5 maximum (eg. Selftrade, E-Trade, Barclays stockbroker are too expensive)

 

I made some research and I found the following stock brokers: Zecco, Just2trade, but I don't know if they allow UK residents to open an account and if the account can be founded in GBP. Does anyone know if they suit such criteria?

 

Any suggestions of brokers following ALL of the above criteria are welcomed.

 

Many thanks

 

If you are looking to make some real money, $10 USD commissions aren't going to kill you on 6 trades a year.

 

I have most of my personal financial business with Wells Fargo here in the USA and they give me 100 free trades per year on my trading account, my IRA trading account and my ROTH IRA trading account. That is 300 commission free trades per year and I get that every year. The price I pay is I have my mortgage, credit card, retirement accounts, checking, and savings account all with them. I do this because I like to simplify life. One bank statement and online portal that gets me to most of my finances.

 

See if the big banks where you live have similar offers for customers who do lots of business with them.

 

That's my :2c:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Dinerotrader said:
If you are looking to make some real money, $10 USD commissions aren't going to kill you on 6 trades a year.

 

And if it does, this is probably not worth doing it and one can probably get a better return by just putting the money in a savings account, or buy a CD.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3) No inactivity or monthly fees charged (eg. Interactive Brokers charge inactivity/monthly fees and would not suit me).

 

As far as I am aware IB do not charge inactivity fees. They may charge data fees if you sign up for different exchanges real time data (you may not need that with 6 trades per year:)) Some are subject to waiver if you generate $30 of commissions.

 

Having said that I am not sure you can enter an order into a market that you don't have a market data subscription for. I think not so that would scupper you sadly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(Its rare I get to correct Blowfish :cool: as he is such a good source of knowledge...)

 

But you can actually enter trades into IB without a market subscription.

They will give you a few warnings saying they advise against it, but it definitely possible.

I have done it a few times with some stocks listed on the ASX in Australia and also some futures and stocks in the USA.

WARNING: I would strongly suggest you have it as a limit order, already know roughly where the prices are trading, and be very very careful, as you dont want a typo....even with a limit order.

Re: the inactivity and IB, I think it is $30pm if you dont pay a minimum brokerage ($10pm) for use of the platform....so even if you dont subscribe to an exchange. Funny thing is if this is the case its cheaper to buy and sell a few times a month, even if you break even.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  DugDug said:
Re: the inactivity and IB, I think it is $30pm if you dont pay a minimum brokerage ($10pm) for use of the platform....so even if you dont subscribe to an exchange. Funny thing is if this is the case its cheaper to buy and sell a few times a month, even if you break even.

 

Actually it is neither. They have two fees.

 

  1. $10 a month for their standard subscription bundle market data iff you don't generate $30 in commissions a month.
  2. Up to $10 a month for inactivity fee. You pay the difference between the $10 and the comissions you generated.

So, if you generate $5 commissions a month, you pay $10 data fee plus 5$ inactivity fee.

If you generate $10 commissions a month, you pay $10 data fee and $0 incativity fee.

If you generate $30 commissions a month, you don't pay anything.

 

It is all on their website. Click on Activity tab....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  DugDug said:
(Its rare I get to correct Blowfish :cool: as he is such a good source of knowledge...)

 

Hehe thank you (I think) :) I did say I wasn't sure, it was kind of an educated guess :) Anyway another thing to file away until senility sets in! It's actually a very sensible decision on IB's part when you think about it as it makes things attractive to precisely this type of investor.

 

Mind you I am not sure the minimum account requirements and the fee structure for stocks, but if I was to stick my neck out again I would guess that they would tick those boxes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  shortbleu said:
2) The account can be funded in British pound (GBP) and only the profit/losses would be exposed to the risk of currency.

 

If you are buying US listed securities, then wouldn't the entire principle be exposed to currency risk?

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"US listed securities, then wouldn't the entire principle be exposed to currency risk?"

 

This is an interesting one as a lot depends on how you get the financing /margining from the broker.

Without going into too much detail.

example; base currency GBP. Buying stocks in USD

scenario 1) you are required to fund the whole amount in USD, hence the FX exposure is to the amount required to buy the stocks.

scenario 2) the broker loans you the money on margin, hence the FX exposure is to the amount of the margin + any PL on the trade. (This is how IB basically deals with it - you then get charged interest on the borrowed amounts of the margin amount, and its the PL and this margin that is expsoed to the FX risk - not the whole amount)

scenario 3) everything gets translated back and quoted in the GBP base currency with no FX exposure. (this can be more costly depending on how many transactions etc and is generally up to the investor to hedge the exposure out if the broker does not do it automatically - however the PL as it moves will produce a FX exposure as the prices move.)

 

Every broker may do it slightly differently and it is definitely up to each investor to work it out themselves. When looking at this accounting remember to keep in mind there is a difference between the actual positions held at a broker and the cash balances.

ie; you can have cash balances in different currencies - and hence FX exposures whilst having no positions.

From what I have seen from most brokers who over cross border services, generally its only the margin and PL amounts that are exposed to FX as this is reflected in the cash balances shown in USD, EUR, AUD etc;.

 

I hope this helps and does not confuse.

 

Hi Blowfish - yes it was a complement.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.