Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

smuhr

Best Price Oscillator

Recommended Posts

all common oscillators are doomed to fail

 

unless the indicator can dynamically change its tempo to match the market's temperament.

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
never heard of it.

.....how much does it cost ?

 

Nothing for TL readers ;)

 

if type=1 then
a=8
b=5
c=3
d=3
endif
if type=2 then
a=13
b=8
c=5
d=5
endif
if type=3 then
a=21
b=13
c=8
d=8
endif
if type=4 then
a=34
b=21
c=13
d=13
endif

storsi=100*((rsi[a]-lowest[b](rsi[a]))/((highest[b](rsi[a]))-lowest[b](rsi[a])))

dtosck=average[c](storsi)
dtoscd=average[d](dtosck)

Seuilhaut=75
Seuilbas=25

RETURN dtosck AS "DTOSCK" , dtoscd AS "DTOSCD" , Seuilhaut , Seuilbas

 

I have watched Robert Miner workshop and the DTosc which is a mix between stochastic and RSI seems to be really good for multi time frame usage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
all common oscillators are doomed to fail

 

unless the indicator can dynamically change its tempo to match the market's temperament.

 

I disagree STRONGLY. :haha: The beta weighting of many stocks precludes ANY care whatsoever about what the general market is doing. Furthermore, cash infusion drives the best performers...and that is often fueled by emotions (not just fear--on the short side--but also greed--on the long side).

 

A price oscillator that is tied to market sentiment is only relevant for index-based securities and ETFs.

 

:2c:

 

EDIT:

 

Let me specify that I am an intraday trader. From that standpoint--or even from that of swing trading--the quote above is one of the most preposterous I have ever heard. Ever. I think that perspective would only be relevant at all for someone who is 100% pro-fundamental analysis and 100% against TA. I think Cramer falls into that category.

Edited by HI_THERE
Additional information.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
all common oscillators are doomed to fail

 

unless the indicator can dynamically change its tempo to match the market's temperament.

 

 

I disagree STRONGLY. :haha: The beta weighting of many stocks precludes ANY care whatsoever about what the general market is doing. Furthermore, cash infusion drives the best performers...and that is often fueled by emotions (not just fear--on the short side--but also greed--on the long side).

 

A price oscillator that is tied to market sentiment is only relevant for index-based securities and ETFs.

 

:2c:

 

 

can you post a chart example ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A chart of what? A cursory look at any of the markets--on any given day--will yield numerous stocks that outperform that market...even during this last week of extreme distribution. And guess what? A "price" oscillator would have reflected that change in "price."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

and you'd have to agree that this thread has been a premiere example of intelligent analysis.

 

or not.

 

 

 

One of the few things I really hate about Traders Laboratory is that when you add a worthless post to a worthless thread ... you can't delete the sodding thing. Happy Wednesday everyone!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
and you'd have to agree that this thread has been a premiere example of intelligent analysis.

 

or not.

 

 

 

One of the few things I really hate about Traders Laboratory is that when you add a worthless post to a worthless thread ... you can't delete the sodding thing. Happy Wednesday everyone!

 

:doh: Not sure if I understand that one. I don't think the thread itself is worthless. That demeans the original poster and he is merely trying to increase his knowledge. I, for one, understand how price oscillators are an important component for intraday trading, and I have the portfolio to prove it. :cool:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
A chart of what? A cursory look at any of the markets--on any given day--will yield numerous stocks that outperform that market...even during this last week of extreme distribution. And guess what? A "price" oscillator would have reflected that change in "price."

 

So, your oscillator tells you at the end of the day that a stock outperformed the market for that day? Sounds very helpful... :roll eyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, you misunderstand. One: no single indicator does everything. Two: The price oscillator is not for EOD analysis. However, during market hours it can definitely help you identify strong stocks, and then you look at further characteristics from there. The whole point of my original statement--as solidified--is that price oscillation of individual securities is not necessarily tied to the overall markets. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No, you misunderstand. One: no single indicator does everything. Two: The price oscillator is not for EOD analysis. However, during market hours it can definitely help you identify strong stocks, and then you look at further characteristics from there. The whole point of my original statement--as solidified--is that price oscillation of individual securities is not necessarily tied to the overall markets. ;)

 

So, all you are saying that when the market goes down, that some stocks will still go up? That's your whole point ? That is kind of obvious and common sense, isn't it? I don't think anyone expect 100% of the stocks to follow the market every day, but this is commone sense that most follow the market, since they ARE the market and this is the path of least resistance.

 

I think I understand Kiwi's post now...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Null conversation. I agree. You two have made this thread undesireable. Good luck in trading. ps. I made 20% leveraged on Netlist a few minutes ago. And the DJ is down over 100 points. A price oscillator is one of the tools in my arsenal. Hope your day is as productive.

Edited by HI_THERE
add

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dare I mention this (at the risk of entering the fray) - I have been trying to get the code that was posted for the DTOsc (have been a fan of Miner's book for some time) - and cant seem to get it to run for TS. Sent a PM to Smuhr but havent heard anything back.

 

Am not exactly ELD savvy - but am getting error messages when I try to verify the code that was posted.

 

Thanks for the response in advance. (And yes - I used oscillators at points I believe the product may turn - which yes - is actually some fibonacci levels/alt price projections/external retracements - which I know some believe is voodoo, etc. But since we all skin the market in different ways - I figure its all good!)

 

Paul

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

DT OSc

 



input: RSILength(8),
   StochLength(5),
   KLength(3),
   DLength(3);

Vars: DToscK(0), DToscD(0);

value1 = FastKCustomEasy(RSI(C, RSILength),StochLength);
DToscK =  average(value1,KLength);
DToscD = average(DToscK,DLength);

plot1(DToscK,"%K" );
plot2(DToscD,"%D" );

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DT OSc

 



input: RSILength(8),
   StochLength(5),
   KLength(3),
   DLength(3);

Vars: DToscK(0), DToscD(0);

value1 = FastKCustomEasy(RSI(C, RSILength),StochLength);
DToscK =  average(value1,KLength);
DToscD = average(DToscK,DLength);

plot1(DToscK,"%K" );
plot2(DToscD,"%D" );

Thanks, statsign. The code works great on TS charts... but it refuses to work on RadarScreen. Could fastkcustomeasy function be incompatible with RS?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks, statsign. The code works great on TS charts... but it refuses to work on RadarScreen. Could fastkcustomeasy function be incompatible with RS?

 

I don't think so. I have no need for Radar so don't have it. I do know most problems are settings for loading data. Post in the TS support forum and get an answer right away - lots of Radar savvy users there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have used several oscillators. At some points all of them fail because they are bound within 0-100 parameters, even if a trend continues vigorously. In trending markets they all will fail. But that itself is a false premis to start with. One needs to combine price oscillator with a moving average to effectively check if a trend is developing, in which case one shifts from oscillator to trend.

So the question is what is a good, if not the best, combination of oscillator and moving average. In my experience, Williams %R extremes and a simple moving agerage of twenty-one bars itself going up or down.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.