Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

maxima

Fastest Automatic Trading Software Available for Retail Users

Recommended Posts

There were many comments on "best" software and also on the best for backtesting.

 

What would be the fastest (data feed, calculations and execution altogether) software that is available for the retail traders?

 

Lets exclude latency between execution server and the user computer. Lets just take on account the natural data feed delays, speed of execution and the (least important I think) the speed of the platform itself to calculate the automated logic (mostly it is about the software being able to use compiled code or interpreted code).

 

For instance - Sierra and Ninja use compiled code. What about TS and MultiCharts? Are their languages being precompiled before use and run as a native computer code or they are being interpreted at the time of the execution?

 

What about data speed and execution speed of TS and Multicharts ? What about OEC and NeoTicker? How is Zen-Fire data and execution speeds together?

 

Which combination of data/software/execution broker can be trusted for a system which sends trades every 3 seconds (for example)?

 

I think less than 3s will require a colocation near exchange and the whole lot of other organisation and monetary efforts which I believe will make the project outside the scope of this discussion - DIY automated system?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MultiCharts indicators are compiled.

 

My understanding of TradeStation (I could be wrong) is it uses p-code.

 

 

Theoretically compiled code is slightly (ever so slightly) faster than p-code,

but practically, with today's CPU, and with the requirements of trading applications,

it doesn't matter: You won't see a noticeable difference, not even if you are doing multiple regression type of analysis.

 

 

Someone did an experiment on MultiCharts,

he nested 10 MACDs, one on top of the other,

applied it to the same symbol 10 times,

then replicated the set up in 10 charts.

 

ie. the computer has to calculate the MACD 1000 iterations every time a tick comes in.

 

Well.... it hardly budged the CPU.

 

I don't think this is just MultiCharts,

pretty well every charting software can do the same.

If not, blame it on the CPU and buy a more powerful computer.

 

 

 

p.s. one exception might be web based charting software, because they are not designed to do heavy duty work like this.

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tams, do you know any of attempts to compare data feed lags say MultiCharts vs TS vs Zen?

 

Regarding CPU I disagree. 1000 MACDs is nothing in computing time iteslf. Tell the guy to compare 10 Jurik MAs.. He'd see the difference

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Tams, do you know any of attempts to compare data feed lags say MultiCharts vs TS vs Zen?

 

Regarding CPU I disagree. 1000 MACDs is nothing in computing time iteslf. Tell the guy to compare 10 Jurik MAs.. He'd see the difference

 

 

I don't use Jurik, so I don't know the requirement...

the MACD is just an example done by someone...

Is it representational?

Probably not.

I don't think his original purpose was to make a point,

he was only doing it for experiment's sake,

without any scientific basis or benchmark for comparison.

Does it serve to illustrate a point?

it would only mean something to someone if he think it has value.

Each MACD is 2 moving averages smoothed again by a moving average...

I doubt many real life trader has to drive so much TA and requires so much iteration in one tick.

but then there's always someone doing the unusual thing... so you'd never know.

 

The point is, no matter how slow your software is,

the difference between 1,000 MACD vs 10 Jurik is not material...

it won't be slower than the latency between your eyes and your finger,

nor the latency between your computer and the broker's server.

 

 

I don't know anybody who has tested the Trader/Datafeed/Broker latency.

I doubt any retail trader has the tools, the expertize,

nor all the software/datafeed/broker combination to carry out such a test.

Probably the only people who can do such test is a magazine...

 

 

If you are bend on doing high frequency trading,

the best bet is to do it through a professional trading environment.

e.g. a prop or a fund that has the infrastructure to handle the required speed.

In a home based trading station, or a standard office building,

the Last Mile is your unavoidable weakest link.

 

 

This is only my 2c.

:-)>

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

no that was the exact point - CPU heavy computations like jurik or some signal processing filters will influent time of the system reaction even on high-end servers, MACD will not even on low-end desktop...

 

and the subsecond delays arent that difficult to measure. if you show me two feeds side-by-side i can tell the difference with 50 ms accuracy.

 

but i have found that multichart can be fed from rithmic, so i have no more questions about it... Would like to know how fast TS feed and execution though...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
btw tams, i know you are fan of MC. I cant find how MC connects to TT... is it by xtrader API or is it by TT FIX :confused: thank you

 

hahah... am I a fan ? ... LOL... I am only a user of MultiCharts.

I have used many other software... they all have strength and weakness... nothing is perfect.

 

Back to your question,

You can connect MultiCharts to TT via a supplied dll.

 

I assume it is through API,

because FIX is very expensive, and it has to be individually setup.

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
no that was the exact point - CPU heavy computations like jurik or some signal processing filters will influent time of the system reaction even on high-end servers, MACD will not even on low-end desktop...

 

and the subsecond delays arent that difficult to measure. if you show me two feeds side-by-side i can tell the difference with 50 ms accuracy.

 

but i have found that multichart can be fed from rithmic, so i have no more questions about it... Would like to know how fast TS feed and execution though...

 

 

MultiCharts cannot do sub-second analysis yet.

According to one of their forum replies, they are considering adding this feature.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Is Multichart better than Ninja Trader?

 

Tams : whick broker and datafeeder do you use witk MultiCharts?

 

Thx

 

 

MultiCharts and NinjaTrader are TWO very different programs.

 

Both have trial versions, you should download and try them out yourself.

 

 

MultiCharts uses EasyLanguage while Ninja uses C#.

 

There are lots of free EasyLanguage indicators on the web;

C# is more powerful, but also requires more skill to code.

 

Each has its own strength. You really have to find out for yourself.

 

 

p.s. I use InteractiveBrokers for broker and datafeed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
p.s. I use InteractiveBrokers for broker and datafeed.

 

Are you not facing problems for backtesting ?

Because IB has only 24 historical data.

 

You probably import data but from where ? ;)

Thks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Are you not facing problems for backtesting ?

Because IB has only 24 historical data.

 

You probably import data but from where ? ;)

Thks

 

 

IB has more than 24 hist data

 

 

besides,

I don't do much long term intraday backtest.

 

The only long term tests I do are with EOD index data, which I can get from Yahoo or Google Finance.

 

e.g.

http://finance.yahoo.com/q/hp?s=^HSI

http://finance.yahoo.com/q/hp?s=^SPX

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think its a bit silly to worry about this..it would be to assume your analysis is so precise that adding 1 second to your signal would mess up the back test to any meaningfull degree...You can test this yourself, just add a timer and +1 to your entry signal.

Unless you are trying to incorporate book data it would make far more sense to pick the platform you are most comfortable with as to get the most work done possible.

If you are trying to incorporate book data you will almost certainly need to move up a level beyond retail any, where latency of the feed and execution will become a huge issue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

True, but that is not to say that it isnt random if its going for or against you.

Of course there are strategies that latency would be of the essense, but you should be looking at FIX with a direct connection to the exchange, hosted close to the exchange your trading. It just doesn't make sense IMO to split hairs at the retail level over this at the cost of productivity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to prove my point. I have 2.5ms connection to a server which is 0.5ms away from CME and my algo on empty test run can demonstrate 40 microseconds order release. And I still think myself a retail. And the hair splitting I did helped me to achieve this.

 

Sent from my GT-P1000 using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just to prove my point. I have 2.5ms connection to a server which is 0.5ms away from CME and my algo on empty test run can demonstrate 40 microseconds order release. And I still think myself a retail. And the hair splitting I did helped me to achieve this.

 

Sent from my GT-P1000 using Tapatalk

 

Where's your algo run from though? If it's London, there's still going to be lag. Fair enough if it's right next to the CME.

Edited by TheNegotiator

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.